Buster Posey details new role, Giants' mindset before 2025 MLB trade deadline
Buster Posey details new role, Giants' mindset before 2025 MLB trade deadline originally appeared on NBC Sports Bay Area
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jon Gruden wins Nevada Supreme Court arbitration appeal against NFL and Roger Goodell
Jon Gruden won a skirmish Monday in his civil lawsuit against the NFL and commissioner Roger Goodell that has been plodding through a state court for four years. The Nevada Supreme Court determined in a 5-2 ruling that Gruden was not required by the NFL to participate in arbitration overseen by Goodell, who is a defendant in the lawsuit alleging that a 'malicious and orchestrated campaign' was used to destroy Gruden's coaching career by leaking offensive emails he had sent years earlier. The court said that the NFL attempt to force Gruden into arbitration was "unconscionable and does not apply to Gruden as a former employee." Gruden's resignation as coach of the Las Vegas Raiders in October 2021 made him exempt from a provision in the NFL Constitution mandating arbitration, the court ruled. "If the NFL Constitution were to bind former employees, the Commissioner could essentially pick and choose which disputes to arbitrate," the ruling stated. The decision appears to clear the way for Gruden's lawsuit to proceed. The NFL can appeal to the United States Supreme Court but so far has declined to comment. Read more: Jon Gruden emails were part of June court filing by WFT owner Dan Snyder "We're very pleased with the Nevada Supreme Court's decision, not just for Coach Gruden but for all employees facing an employer's unfair arbitration process," Gruden attorney Adam Hosmer-Henner said in a statement. "This victory further validates Coach Gruden's reputation, and it clears the way to swiftly bringing him full justice and holding the NFL accountable." Goodell and the NFL have denied leaking the emails, which were published by the Wall Street Journal and New York Times. 'In contrast to the formalities of the Washington Football Team investigation, Defendants' treatment of Gruden was a Soviet-style character assassination,' the lawsuit alleged. 'There was no warning and no process. Defendants held the emails for months until they were leaked to the national media in the middle of the Raiders' season in order to cause maximum damage to Gruden.' Gruden's email correspondence with former Washington Commanders executive Bruce Allen occurred from 2011 to 2018 when Gruden was a color analyst for ESPN's "Monday Night Football" and included racist, misogynistic and homophobic comments. The emails came to light during a league investigation into the workplace culture of the Washington team and owner Dan Snyder. Read more: Want to attend 2026 World Cup games for free? FIFA needs 65,000 volunteers "It's ridiculous the league thought they could cherry-pick emails from years ago, when I wasn't even a coach and try to end my career," Gruden said in a statement to ESPN two years ago. "At a minimum, I deserved the opportunity to respond and receive some due process." The Nevada Supreme Court agreed, reconsidering the findings of a smaller panel of the court that made a 2-1 decision more than a year ago to dismiss Gruden's lawsuit. That ruling came after a district judge in 2022 rejected the NFL's bid to dismiss the lawsuit outright or to order arbitration overseen by Goodell. Nevada Supreme Court justices Kristina Pickering and Elissa Cadish dissented from the ruling Monday, suggesting that Gruden should have been aware of language in his contract stipulating arbitration. 'As a former Super Bowl champion coach and long-time media personality signing the most lucrative NFL coaching contract in history, while being represented by one of the country's leading sports agents, Gruden was the very definition of a sophisticated party,' Pickering wrote. 'Though Gruden could not negotiate the terms of the NFL Constitution, he had the ability to negotiate the contract as a whole — such as for more pay, a longer contract, added control over team decisions, or its other terms." Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI startup Perplexity makes bold $34.5 billion bid for Google's Chrome browser
By Akash Sriram (Reuters) -Perplexity AI said it has made a $34.5 billion unsolicited all-cash offer for Alphabet's Chrome browser, a low but bold bid that would need financing well above the startup's own valuation. Run by Aravind Srinivas, Perplexity is no stranger to headline-grabbing offers - it made a similar one for TikTok US in January, offering to merge with the popular short-video app to resolve U.S. concerns about TikTok's Chinese ownership. Buying Chrome would allow the startup to tap the browser's more than three billion users for an edge in the AI search race as regulatory pressure threatens Google's grip on the industry. Google did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The company has not offered Chrome for sale and plans to appeal a U.S. court ruling last year that found it held an unlawful monopoly in online search. The Justice Department has sought a Chrome divestiture as part of the case's remedies. Perplexity did not disclose on Tuesday how it plans to fund the offer. The three-year-old company has raised around $1 billion in funding so far from investors including Nvidia and Japan's SoftBank. It was last valued at $14 billion. Multiple funds have offered to finance the deal in full, a person familiar with the matter said, without naming the funds. As a new generation of users turns to chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity for answers, web browsers are regaining prominence as vital gateways to search traffic and prized user data, making them central to Big Tech's AI ambitions. Perplexity already has an AI browser, Comet, that can perform certain tasks on a user's behalf and acquiring Chrome would give it the heft to better compete against bigger rivals such as OpenAI. The ChatGPT parent has also expressed interest in buying Chrome and is working on its own AI browser. Perplexity's bid pledges to keep the underlying browser code called Chromium open source, invest $3 billion over two years and make no changes to Chrome's default search engine, according to a term sheet seen by Reuters. The company said the offer, with no equity component, would preserve user choice and ease future competition concerns. Analysts have said Google would be unlikely to sell Chrome and would likely engage in a long legal fight to prevent that outcome, given it is crucial to the company's AI push as it rolls out features including AI-generated search summaries, known as Overviews, to help defend its search market share. A federal judge is expected to issue a ruling on remedies in the Google search antitrust case sometime this month. Perplexity's bid is also below the at least $50 billion value that rival search engine DuckDuckGo's CEO, Gabriel Weinberg, suggested Chrome may command if Google was forced to sell it. Besides OpenAI and Perplexity, Yahoo and private-equity firm Apollo Global Management have also expressed interest in Chrome.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spirit Airlines sounds the alarm on its future ability to stay in business
NEW YORK (AP) — Just months after emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Spirit Airlines is warning about its future ability to stay in business. Spirit Aviation Holdings (FLYY), the budget carrier's parent company, says it has 'substantial doubt' about its ability to continue as a going concern within the next year — which is accounting-speak for having the resources needed to sustain operations. In a quarterly report issued on Monday, Spirit pointed to 'adverse market conditions" that it's continued to face despite recent restructuring and other efforts to revamp offerings. That includes weak demand for domestic leisure travel, which Spirit said persisted in the second quarter of its fiscal year — among other challenges and 'uncertainties in its business operations' that the Florida-based company expects to continue 'for at least the remainder of 2025.' Known for its no-frills, low-cost flights on a fleet of bright yellow planes, Spirit has struggled to bounce back to profitability and boost resources to compete with rivals since the COVID-19 pandemic. Rising operation costs and mounting debt eventually led the company to seek bankruptcy protection in November. By the time of that Chapter 11 filing, the airline had lost more than $2.5 billion since the start of 2020. When Spirit emerged from bankruptcy protection in March, the company successfully restructured some of its looming debt obligations and secured new financing for future operations. Spirit has continued to make other cost-cutting efforts since — including plans to furlough about 270 pilots and downgrade some 140 captains to first officers in the coming months. Those furloughs and downgrades, both announced in July, are set to go into effect Oct. 1 and Nov. 1 to align with Spirit's 'projected flight volume for 2026,' the company noted in its quarterly report. They also follow previous furloughs and job cuts taken before the company's bankruptcy filing last year. Despite these and other cost-cutting efforts, Spirit on Monday stressed that it needs more liquidity. As a result, the company said it may also sell certain aircraft and real estate. Spirit's aircraft fleet is relatively young, which has made the airline an attractive takeover target over the years. But such buyout attempts from budget rivals like JetBlue and Frontier were unsuccessful both before and during the bankruptcy process. Spirit's shares tumbled more than 40% Tuesday morning, with the company's stock trading at just over $1.80 as of around 11 a.m. ET.
