logo
Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal

Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal

BANGKOK (AP) — Australia's defense minister dismissed concerns Thursday that a deal between the U.S., Australia and Britain to provide his country with nuclear-powered submarines could be in jeopardy, following a report that the Pentagon had ordered a review.
Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News Australia that he had known about the review of the deal 'for some time,' saying that it was a 'very natural step for the incoming administration to take.'
He noted that the UK's government also reviewed the deal, the centerpiece of a three-way alliance known as AUKUS after it was elected, and that his own government had looked at it as part of its own review of Australia's entire defense posture.
'I think an incoming government having a look at this is something that they have a perfect right to do and we welcome it and we'll work with it,' he said.
The deal, worth more than $200 billion, was signed between the three countries in 2021 under then President Joe Biden, designed to provide Australia, one of Washington's staunchest allies in the region, with greater maritime capabilities to counter China's increasingly strong navy.
The deal also involves the U.S. selling several of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia to bridge the gap as the new submarines are being jointly built.
In January, Australia made the first of six $500 million payments to the U.S. under the AUKUS deal, meant to bolster American submarine manufacturing.
Marles met with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of a defense conference in Singapore less than two weeks ago, and told reporters afterward that he had come away with 'a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding.'
'AUKUS is on track and we are meeting all the timelines that are associated with it,' he said. 'We are very optimistic.'
Hegseth's address to the defense forum made multiple mentions of cooperation with Australia but no reference to AUKUS, however, though he did later mention the deal when he was taking questions.
Hegseth did urge allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defense spending, and underscored the need for a 'strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners' as the U.S. seeks to counter China.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

WiseTech Banks Market APAC's Largest M&A Loan of The Year
WiseTech Banks Market APAC's Largest M&A Loan of The Year

Bloomberg

time15 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

WiseTech Banks Market APAC's Largest M&A Loan of The Year

Lenders to Australian software developer WiseTech Global Ltd. are syndicating a $3 billion loan backing its acquisition of US-based supply chain software platform E2open Parent Holdings Inc, according to people familiar with the matter. The loan is the largest M&A financing in the Asia Pacific region excluding Japan this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The acquisition is the first major move by founder Richard White since he assumed the role of executive chairman in February following turmoil surrounding revelations about his private life that roiled the company's stock.

No, Jennifer Griffin Is Not Leaving Fox News
No, Jennifer Griffin Is Not Leaving Fox News

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

No, Jennifer Griffin Is Not Leaving Fox News

Wondering if Jennifer Griffin is leaving Fox News? The veteran journalist has reported for the network since 1999 and currently serves as its Chief National Security Correspondent. After a brief absence during major national security coverage, online speculation grew about her status with the network. But is there any truth to the rumors? Here's what we know about Jennifer Griffin's role at Fox News and the facts behind the exit claims. Rumors about Jennifer Griffin leaving Fox News have circulated on social media, but there is no official confirmation from the network. Fox News has made no statements regarding her departure, and Griffin remains active both on air and online. Griffin continues to serve as the Chief National Security Correspondent for Fox News Channel. She has recently reported live on several key national security developments, including Pentagon updates on U.S. and Israeli military operations. On June 12, 2025, she appeared on Fox News @ Night, reporting on the Israel-Iran conflict. Despite temporary speculation after her absence during coverage of the Signal chat leak in March 2025, Mediaite later clarified that Griffin was on vacation when the story broke and returned to work the next day. Griffin also addressed the story directly on X, posting: 'The Trump administration does not deny this Signal group chat about the war planning for the Yemen strikes is real.' Griffin remains active on her verified X account (@JenGriffinFNC), where she regularly shares Pentagon updates, international defense developments, and U.S. military operations. Her page shows continued activity and professional engagement, with 234.8K followers and recent posts from this month. Fox News transcripts confirm that Griffin filed several televised reports in June 2025, including coverage of Iranian nuclear strikes, U.S. troop deployments, and Defense Department hearings. There is no indication that her role in the network has changed. The rumors suggesting her departure are false. No credible source has reported on her leaving, and her continued presence in major Fox News segments, along with her social media activity, confirms she remains in her role. The post No, Jennifer Griffin Is Not Leaving Fox News – Rumors Explained appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.

Israel-Iran conflict: If the Persian Gulf becomes a battlefield, we will all feel the consequences
Israel-Iran conflict: If the Persian Gulf becomes a battlefield, we will all feel the consequences

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Israel-Iran conflict: If the Persian Gulf becomes a battlefield, we will all feel the consequences

This is the moment people across the Middle East have feared but expected for years. The question now... what happens next? Israel has long regarded Iran's nuclear ambitions to be an existential threat, whatever the ayatollahs have said about their peaceful intentions. Israel-Iran live: Iranian leaders have talked of wiping Israel off the face of the Earth, and that threat has been taken at face value by Israelis. Benjamin Netanyahu has always said that ambition can never be combined with the means to fulfil it. He clearly thinks this is the time to act. Having started this effort to eradicate that threat, Israel can be expected to try to finish it if it can and if it is allowed to do so by the US. Equally, Iran will do what it can to stop Israel's attacks. It is a weakened regime and weak regimes cannot afford to look weaker. Its retaliation may involve attacks not just on Israeli and US assets but allies and oil installations in the Persian Gulf. Enough tankers being sunk or oil refineries going up in smoke could have an immediate impact on the global economy and that, Iranians might hope, will persuade America to call time on Israel's actions. Read more: So expect the following: Israel continues striking Iran; Iran hits back with all it can; America is forced to help defend Israel; Iran hits both Israel, the US and possibly US allies. That is the predictable bit. Wars follow the laws of unintended consequences. At any point in that escalation, unexpected events could lead to greater escalation. Brace yourself, the coming days could go in a number of directions. If the Persian Gulf becomes the battlefield, we will all feel the consequences.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store