
Time Is Not Your Friend: Asking Price Decay In Real Estate
The asking price may be set by the seller, but its decay is enforced by the market. Buyers apply ... More pressure, urgency fades, and expectations bend.
In every deal, sellers optimize for two variables: price and time.
In the real world, however, those variables are deeply entangled. Time on the market isn't free. It imposes a discount. And, like in finance, where holding an asset too long incurs costs, holding a listing introduces risk. We quantified that risk by tracking how asking prices deteriorate as listings age. The result is a measure of what we call asking price decay.
It's a concept that mirrors the financial world, where traders account for 'theta,' which is the loss of value in an option as time passes. In real estate, time on market is a similar drag on listing prices. The longer a home sits unsold, the more likely it is to be discounted, often sharply.
We analyzed the Manhattan and Brooklyn markets at biweekly intervals across 20+ years. The resulting curve shows the median discount from the original asking price as a function of time on market over the course of a typical six-month exclusive listing contract.
Asking Price Decay Over Time In Manhattan And Brooklyn
This curve plays out almost regardless of macro environment, seasonality, or demand shifts. Essentially, the market begins penalizing listings as soon as they exceed the two-to-four-week threshold. Buyers read time as weakness. The implication is that overpricing and failing to get traction early means more than just a longer time to sell; it means a lower selling price overall.
Not all markets decay at the same pace. When we split the data by market regime (hot vs. cold), the differences become clear.
In hot markets (such as 2015), the curve is flatter, and listings can sit for 30 to 45 days with minimal discounting as buyers compete at prices close to the ask and sellers retain pricing leverage longer. In weak markets (such as 2009), the curve is steeper and discounts appear quickly. Sellers who don't reprice early see any leverage they may have had evaporate. Today's market is neither hot nor cold, so the present asking price decay curve likely resembles the overall average.
Asking Price Decay In Manhattan and Brooklyn, 2009 vs. 2015
This is a familiar pattern in any market: when liquidity is strong, prices hold up. When liquidity evaporates, spreads widen, and discounts deepen.
Does property type (condo, coop, or townhouse) meaningfully affect the decay curve?
While intuitively, it might be expected to, since coops, condos, and townhouses vary widely in buyer profile, price point, and closing complexity, the data suggests a more nuanced story. For apartments, the decay curve is remarkably consistent in shape, which suggests the phenomenon is more about market liquidity. Coops and condos show flatter, more stable curves, reflecting a larger pool of buyers and a more liquid market structure. Townhouses, however, which are generally higher-priced, lower-turnover assets, experience steeper declines in pricing power over time.
For example, by day 70, Manhattan condos retain almost 97% of their original asking price, while Manhattan townhouses have already slipped to 92%. After 180 days, at the end of the listing agreement, the gap widens even more, with condos holding around 91%, while townhouses fall to 83%.
Asking Price Decay at Condos, Co-ops, and Townhouses In Manhattan and Brooklyn
Here's how to use this curve:
1. Act Fast or Reprice Fast
The window to make a full-price sale is tight. Listings that don't catch a bid in the first 30–45 days should consider a tactical price reset to avoid the long tail of discounting. The market has spoken.
2. Watch the Curve for Regime Change
A flattening decay curve suggests improving liquidity and can be seen as a bullish signal, which is good to sell into. On the other hand, a steepening curve suggests buyers are reasserting their power, which is a bearish signal for sellers as it implies a slowing market.
3. Use the Curve to Predict Market Health
Think of it as a sentiment index. Fast decay = fear and thin demand. Slow decay = conviction and competition.
The asking price may be set by the seller, but its decay is enforced by the market. Buyers apply pressure, urgency fades, and expectations bend. Thinking like a trader makes the message clear: the market doesn't pay premiums for long. Time taxes them away by applying downward pressure, week by week. Luckily, this tax is not evenly levied across all properties. The biggest time tax is evident in less liquid segments, such as Manhattan townhouses. Meanwhile, more fluid markets, such as Brooklyn condos or coops, tend to retain pricing power for longer.
In the end, asking price decay, like any tax, hits hardest where there's the least flexibility. As the Manhattan and Brooklyn markets transition into the seasonally slower summer months, understanding the impact of time on prices is paramount. For sellers, the lesson is clear: price realistically and move quickly. In real estate, time is not your friend.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hemp industry advocates respond to Texas THC ban, plea with Gov. Abbott to veto SB 3
The clock is ticking louder as the deadline is fast approaching for Texas' proposed hemp-derived THC ban bill. The bill - Senate Bill 3 — was authored by Lubbock Republican State Sen. Charles Perry to help close a loophole Lt. Governor Dan Patrick said was "exploited" to grow the THC market in Texas. However, the sweeping ban is set to impact the $8 billion hemp industry. Others are reading: Patrick, Perry defend proposed Texas THC ban after smoke shop exploit hemp loophole The bill has garnered backlash from both sides of the aisle, with hemp advocates calling on Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to veto the bill, including the Texas Hemp Coalition. "The Texas Hemp Coalition is calling on Governor Greg Abbott to veto Senate Bill 3 before his midnight deadline on June 22nd. This is a deeply flawed measure that would devastate Texas' legal hemp industry and harm farmers, entrepreneurs, and consumers across the state," reads a statement from the coalition. According to the organization, SB 3 would have the following impact on Texas: Eliminates Jobs — Over 50,000 jobs are at risk across farming, processing, retail, and manufacturing. Hurts Small Business — Hundreds of independently owned stores and operations could be forced to shut down. Contradicts Federal Law — SB 3 restricts hemp products legal under the 2018 Farm Bill. Endangers Public Safety — Driving the industry underground removes consumer protections like testing, labeling, and age restrictions. Undermines Texas Agriculture — Many Texas farmers have invested heavily in hemp as a rotational crop and income stabilizer. Benefits Other States — Neighboring states with legal hemp markets will absorb displaced Texas customers and businesses. Pushes business to the illicit market with no checks and balances which doesn't protect our consumers and citizens. The coalition's executive director, Illissa Nolan, said in a statement that the hemp industry doesn't want a free pass but rather fair rules, and "supports strong, science-based regulation including age limits, robust testing, and clear labeling." "This bill overreaches, penalizes responsible businesses, and guts a legal industry that has grown under aclear federal and state regulatory framework," said Nolan. "Governor Abbott has a history of supporting small business and rural economies. We respectfully ask him to stand with us again and protect one of the most promising sectors of Texas agriculture and entrepreneurship.' Others are reading: Lt. Gov. Patrick, Sen. Perry tout legislative victories in Lubbock stop During the 89th Texas Legislature's regular session, the bill cleared the Senate 26-5, with it being amended in the House and passing 87-54. With the Senate agreeing to the House's amendment, the bill was sent to Abbott's desk on May 27, starting the clock. The governor has until June 22 to do one of the following: Sign it — it becomes law and is effective starting Sept. 1. Veto it — with the House having the chance to overturn the veto. Not sign it — still becomes law effective starting Sept. 1. Abbott has not tipped his hand as to which of the three options he is leaning towards as the deadline approaches. Mateo Rosiles is the Government & Public Policy reporter for the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal. Got a news tip for him? Email him: mrosiles@ This article originally appeared on Lubbock Avalanche-Journal: Hemp industry advocates urge Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to veto THC ban


Forbes
35 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Criticizes Windmills In Latest Attack Against Wind Energy
President Donald Trump blasted green tax breaks and windmills in a rant about his signature budget package moving through Congress, tacking onto his longstanding criticism of the turbines even as they have become an increasingly cost-effective form of energy. US President Donald Trump waves as he boards Air Force One at Morristown Municipal Airport in ... More Morristown, New Jersey, on June 21, 2025 as he returns to the White House from his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images Trump said in a Truth Social post he 'HATED' green tax credits in the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' saying the cuts are largely a 'giant SCAM.' The bill, a massive measure currently in the Senate that will extend tax cuts passed by Trump during his first term, will remove or limit tax credits for electric vehicles and home energy efficiency if passed, as well as create gradual, year-by-year cuts to wind and solar farm tax credits. Trump said windmills 'are the most expensive and inefficient energy in the world' and are 'destroying the beauty of the environment.' The president also claimed, without evidence, windmills are '10 times more costly than any other energy,' taking issue with government subsidies linked to turbines. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts : We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here . What Has Trump Said About Windmills ? Shortly after taking office, the president said the government would not subsidize new windmill farms and added he doesn't 'want even one built' during his second term. Trump called wind turbines the 'most expensive energy' that only works 'with massive government subsidies, which we will no longer pay.' Trump could potentially impact windmill production on federal lands, but not on privately owned plots. Trump has also falsely claimed windmills kill whales, though there is no evidence supporting the claim about the mammals and offshore turbines. Not likely. The Department of Energy has said 'wind and solar projects are now more economically competitive than gas, geothermal, coal, or nuclear facilities,' though windmills in locations lacking wind could be an exception. Onshore wind turbines saw global costs of energy production fall by 68% in 2021, according to a report from the International Renewable Energy Agency, which noted onshore capacity increased four-fold from 2010 to 2021. The agency also reported onshore wind project costs fell by 13% while offshore wind projects fell by 9% in 2020. Key Background Trump once lost a legal battle in which he sought to block the construction of an offshore wind farm in view of a golf course project of his in Scotland. The president lost in court and was required to pay over $290,000 in legal fees to the Scottish government. His scrutiny of windmills is a change from his first term, when former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said he was 'very bullish on offshore wind,' adding the harnessing of the energy source was 'a big part of the Trump Administration's made in America energy strategy.' Trump's Tax Cuts Would Raise Deficit By $2.8 Trillion, New Estimate Suggests (Forbes) Trump Calls Windmills 'An Economic And Environmental Disaster' In Latest Rant Against Turbines (Forbes)
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major grocery chain to close over 60 locations by end of 2026
Kroger will be closing more than 60 stores it considers underperforming across the U.S. by the end of 2026, according to a recent announcement by the grocery chain. The news was part of Kroger's first-quarter earnings report, which was released on Friday. It states that the closures are expected to provide the company a "modest financial benefit." "In the first quarter, Kroger recognized an impairment charge of $100 million related to the planned closing of approximately 60 stores over the next 18 months. As a result of these store closures, Kroger expects a modest financial benefit," the company said in the report. Kroger said it aims to reinvest the money it saves through the closing into improving its customer experience at other stores. "Kroger is committed to reinvesting these savings back into the customer experience, and as a result, this will not impact full-year guidance," the company said. The report was also clear to mention that none of the forthcoming changes signal a need for layoffs. Employees at the affected stores will be offered roles in other stores, according to the report. The company's first-quarter earnings fell to $866 million, down from $962 million during the same quarter last year. Its total sales were also down, from $45.3 billion last year to $45.1 billion this year. Despite the first quarter losses, the company still increased its full-year earnings forecast to between 2.25 percent and 2.35 percent growth. The chain said that demand for its fresh food, store branded products, and its digital services is strong and will likely remain so throughout the year. While the company is closing stores by the end of next year, it also announced plans to open around 30 new stores by the end of this year. Kroger operates nearly 2,800 stores in the U.S. under the name Kroger as well as Ralphs, King Soopers, Fredy Meyer and Harris Teeter. The company is currently in the process of selecting a new CEO after its previous CEO, Rodney McMullen, resigned in March amid an internal ethics investigation. Sign in to access your portfolio