Trump-Zelensky meeting: Key takeaways that Indian stock market investors MUST know
Trump indicated that the US may support 'security guarantees' for Ukraine, though he ruled out NATO membership for the country — a move seen as a potential compromise to appease Russia.
European leaders, too, voiced optimism, with French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz calling it an 'important step' toward peace, while stressing that much work lies ahead.
Market watchers say this development could have a bearing on global risk sentiment. Easing tensions between Russia and Ukraine may stabilize commodity prices, particularly crude oil and wheat, both of which surged after the war began. For Indian investors, this could translate into relief on inflation, a stronger rupee, and potential momentum in equities.
Pointing towards the outcome of the Trump-Zelensky meeting, Anuj Gupta, Director at Ya Wealth, said, 'If we look at the key takeaways from the most-awaited Trump-Zelensky meeting, Donald Trump has said the US could back security guarantees for Ukraine. However, it is still not clear how to prevent further Russian aggression in the future. One thing that would keep Russia satisfied, Trump has ruled out allowing Ukraine to join NATO. He did, however, express support for security guarantees for Ukraine, which is expected to please Zelensky.'
'So, in a broader perspective, we can say that the Russia-Ukraine peace talks have moved further. Zelensky and Putin are willing to end the war, which may trigger further buying in the global markets, including the Indian stock market,' he added.
For now, investors will closely watch the next steps — including a possible Trump-brokered meeting between Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin. A breakthrough could fuel a global risk-on rally, benefiting Indian equities further.
Read Trump Zelensky Meeting LIVE updates here
Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
White House reportedly considering Budapest as location for trilateral talks with Zelenskyy and Putin
Hungarian capital Budapest could host US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for the proposed trilateral talks to end the ongoing war. Politico, citing a Trump administration official and a person close to the administration, reported that the US Secret Service is preparing for the summit in Budapest. The report added that while the Secret Service often scouts multiple locations and the ultimate venue could change, Budapest is emerging as a first choice for the White House. The choice of Budapest as the venue for the talks may, however, not be a welcome news for Zelenskyy as Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orbán, is a long-time Putin ally. On Monday, during his meeting with Trump in the White House, Zelenskyy had expressed his willingness to engage in trilateral talks involving himself, Putin and the US President to end the war that has been ongoing since February 2022. Some European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, had suggested Switzerland as a possible host nation for a meeting between the three presidents. 'It will be [hosted by] a neutral country, maybe Switzerland — I'm pushing for Geneva — or another country,' Macron told French news channel LCI, on Monday. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis, who welcomed the suggestion, said that his country was willing to host the three leaders. 'We are ready for such a meeting, and we also thank you for the trust placed in us. We have always signalled our willingness, but it naturally depends on the will of the major powers,' he told Swiss state broadcaster SRF. Putin has an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2023 for alleged unlawful deportation and transfer of children from former Ukrainian territories. On this, Cassis said under certain circumstances, Putin would be allowed to set foot in Switzerland without facing arrest. Though Trump and Zelenskyy have spoken about the trilateral meeting, there is no confirmation from the Kremlin if Putin has agreed to the same. On Tuesday, Trump warned that Putin would face a 'rough situation' if he did not cooperate in the peace process 'I hope President Putin is going to be good and if he's not, that's going to be a rough situation,' Trump said.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump 'INSULTS' EU Leaders For Lacking Urgency To End War; Macron Warns Allies About 'OGRE' Putin
/ Aug 20, 2025, 01:40AM IST U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly clashed with European leaders at the White House, accusing them of lacking urgency to end the Ukraine war. In a fiery Fox News interview, Trump revealed that while some suggested delaying talks for months, he insisted 'too many would die' if peace was postponed. Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron issued a chilling warning, describing Putin as a destabilising force and even 'an ogre at our gates.' Watch.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Breaking down the Chinese wall
As India and China commemorate 75 years of diplomatic engagement this year, strong signs of a diplomatic thaw have emerged. The meeting between Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and his Chinese counterpart, Admiral Dong Jun, on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Defence Ministers' meeting in January; resumption of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra in June; and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi's two-day visit to India this week all offer glimpses of warmth. A meeting point for two worlds Long before modern diplomacy took shape, and borders were established and redrawn, the relationship between India and China was nurtured by something more enduring: the shared pursuit of knowledge. As early as the first millennium CE, Chinese monks such as Faxian, Xuanzang, and Yijing journeyed across treacherous landscapes to reach Indian centres of learning. At the heart of this exchange stood Nalanda, where ideas flowed more freely than goods, and religious belief and secular inquiry coexisted in harmony. Nalanda was a meeting point of the two worlds, where cultural and intellectual connections flourished far beyond the concerns of modern statehood. In the quest to revive Nalanda today, there is more than nostalgia; there is hope to rebuild the kind of meaningful, respectful engagement that once defined our ties. Nalanda, both as an institution and as a philosophy, has long embodied a commitment to peace, dialogue, and intellectual diplomacy. It's enduring spirit lives on in its motto — 'Aa no bhadra kratavo yantu viśvata (let noble thoughts come to us from all directions).' This same spirit lives on in the idea of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world as one family). This way of thinking has, for centuries, held together the threads of exchange between India and China. Since the time of Xuanzang, scholars, teachers, and students from both nations have engaged in meaningful interaction, unimpeded by the boundaries that define the modern state. Today, the space for such academic and cultural exchange seems to be narrowed. Should contemporary political complexities necessarily limit the flow of ideas between two ancient civilisations? Stalling of trade, recurring military confrontations, and hundreds of academic or people-to-people connections awaiting bureaucratic clearance have created a kind of stillness, one that feels far removed from the natural flow of exchange that once defined our ties. Why must scholars on either side require permission to engage in dialogue, or students hesitate before considering an academic exchange with institutions of global standing across the border? There is immense potential for mutual learning. India can look to China's initiatives in areas such as food security, local infrastructure development, or grassroots entrepreneurship. And China's academic and policy community may find value in studying India's democratic decentralisation, open civil society engagement, or digital public goods framework. These are not points of comparison, but possible pathways of collaborative learning. In this light, one wonders: why does India's engagement with China remain so carefully limited? Why does strategic ambiguity continue to define a relationship rooted in shared intellectual history? How can we move from reactive diplomacy towards a more confident, future-facing framework that honours the depth of our civilisational ties, while meeting the complexities of the present? How do we deal with the emergence of 'the gatekeeper states,' limiting the range of possibilities? The Nalanda way Just as Nalanda once created space for dialogue and learning between civilisations, perhaps today too, we can draw from that spirit to shape how we engage with China. There will always be areas where our paths differ: on the border, in trade, or in the way we see the region around us. But Nalanda reminds us that disagreement does not have to mean disengagement. It is possible to hold firm where we must, and still stay open to conversations where they matter. This approach also calls for some reflection on how we prepare ourselves. We don't need to change our principles, but we may need to adapt how we practice them. Investing in stronger academic and policy research on China, allowing smoother academic exchanges in areas such as environment, health, and culture, and building long-term people-to-people connections are quiet but important steps. Nalanda drew its strength from more than just being a beacon of knowledge. At the heart of Nalanda's tradition were values that still feel close to us: curiosity, compassion, and the transformative power of knowledge. Scholars such as Śīlabhadra, who taught the Chinese monk Xuanzang, showed that learning could also be a form of diplomacy. Nalanda wasn't just India's; it was also a place of deep importance to generations of Chinese scholars who carried its teachings home and helped shape the intellectual and spiritual fabric of East Asia. Today, perhaps these principles matter even more. If India and China can draw from this shared legacy with genuine intention, they may find a way to engage with each other more thoughtfully. Curiosity without fear, dialogue without suspicion, and clarity without aggression could be the beginning of a steadier path built on understanding and mutual respect. We need to break down our Chinese wall to move beyond the paranoia that sustains our China policy. Rajeev Ranjan Chaturvedy, Associate Professor heading the School of International Relations and Peace Studies, and founding coordinator of the Centre for Bay of Bengal Studies; Anushka Padmanabh Antrolikar, Postgraduate scholar at Nalanda University, Rajgir
