
Options and SkyBridge Capital Mark Nine Years of Strategic Partnership, Powered by AtlasWorkplace
'Our partnership with SkyBridge Capital reflects the very best of what AtlasWorkplace was built to do; empower leading financial firms with robust, secure, and responsive IT infrastructure."
Share
The collaboration is anchored by AtlasWorkplace, Options' premier IT platform purpose-built for hedge funds, asset management, private equity, and financial services firms.
For nearly a decade, SkyBridge Capital has leveraged AtlasWorkplace to support its operations, combining secure infrastructure, cloud services, end-user support, and cybersecurity under one seamless solution. Designed to meet the pace, transparency, and compliance standards of institutional finance, AtlasWorkplace enables SkyBridge to focus on investment performance while Options delivers world-class technology operations behind the scenes.
Danny Moore, President and CEO of Options, commented: 'Our partnership with SkyBridge Capital reflects the very best of what AtlasWorkplace was built to do; empower leading financial firms with robust, secure, and responsive IT infrastructure. SkyBridge operates in one of the most demanding segments of finance. We're proud to have earned their trust over the past nine years, and we look forward to driving continued growth and innovation together.'
With a high-engagement service model at its core, AtlasWorkplace adapts to the dynamic needs of global investment firms, from day-to-day IT support to long-term scalability. For SkyBridge, this approach has enabled its business to grow and evolve in an increasingly complex technology and regulatory environment.
Today's news comes as the latest in a series of major milestones at Options, including the opening of its new city of London office at 100 Bishopsgate, the achievement of SOC compliance for 14 consecutive years and a new partnership with Paget Brown as it expands offices in Belfast.
Options Technology:
Options Technology (Options) is a financial technology company at the forefront of banking and trading infrastructure. We serve clients globally with offices in New York, London, Belfast, Cambridge, Chicago, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore, Paris, and Auckland. At Options, our services are woven into the hottest trends in global technology, including high-performance Networking, Cloud, Security, and AI (Artificial Intelligence).
www.options-it.com
About SkyBridge Capital
SkyBridge Capital is a global alternative investment firm specializing in hedge fund solutions and digital asset investments. Founded in 2005, the firm manages assets across a range of strategies with a commitment to innovation, transparency, and investor alignment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Hit Hardest by Trump's Major Social Security Change
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The Social Security Administration's more than 1,200 local field offices have been affected by the Department of Government Efficiency's cuts to federal agencies this year, which experts say will likely cause delays for Americans applying for benefits and beneficiaries looking to replace identification cards or get answers to more complex questions. A new report from the Strategic Organizing Center (SOC) that ranked states by the number of cuts in SSA field office workers found that some areas experienced far greater percentage declines than others. Since the announced cuts, 46 states have lost field office staff, with more than 30 percent of field offices losing at least 10 percent of their staff. Why It Matters Social Security's local field offices serve more than 119,000 visitors daily, according to the SOC. In February of this year, the Trump administration announced it would be cutting 12 percent of the SSA's workforce, culminating in roughly 7,000 job losses, by the end of fiscal year 2025. What To Know The top five most impacted states from March 2024 to March 2025 were Wyoming (17 percent cut in field office workers), Montana (14 percent), West Virginia (11 percent), Hawaii (11 percent) and New Mexico (10 percent). "What's surprising is the correlation between population density and the states with double-digit declines in SSA field office workers," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. "Sure, you could argue that fewer workers simply would lead to a more significant reduction in staffing given the smaller numbers, but when you look closer, many of these states also have an older population—median ages north of 39—places like New Mexico, Wyoming, and Montana. That means the very people who depend most on these services are in the areas losing the most staff." Field office cuts were particularly alarming if they occurred in rural states or areas with a large amount of rural land, the SOC said. Because residents there are less likely to have computer access or reliable internet, Wyoming and Montana residents could face substantially longer drives to get to their local office and would likely require more in-person services. Meanwhile, some of the top five states also have higher rates of disability, including West Virginia, which has the highest disability rate in the country, with New Mexico and Montana in the top 10. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C. A Social Security Administration office in Washington, D.C. SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Many of these states have fewer people spread out over larger areas. Add in the SSA's push toward technology and automation, and headcounts in certain offices are going to drop as they modernize. For rural areas, the impact will be immediate. People who once had an office in town might now have to travel to the nearest major city or even the state capital just to get basic answers." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "It's important to note in some states, the number of employees for the administration in the field are already low, and cutting them further could delay support to some beneficiaries. Government efficiency is obviously important, but as a larger size of the population enters retirement and qualifies for benefits, there will be more demand for services Social Security provides." What Happens Next As of March 2025, the SSA employed 20,593 field office workers, a 5 percent decrease of field office staff from March 2024, when the agency employed 21,627 employees. "For the disabled, that's a huge barrier," Thompson said. "These communities already have limited access. This just makes it worse, forcing people to make real-life decisions about whether they can even afford the time, cost, and effort to get the help they need."


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
AI Teammates Are Changing The SOC Without Replacing People
The conversation about AI in security operations centers has long been framed around automation replacing humans. But many security leaders see a different path—one where AI works alongside analysts as a 'teammate,' taking on repetitive, low-value tasks so humans can focus on higher-value work. I had an opportunity recently to speak with Brian Murphy, founder and CEO of ReliaQuest, and James Lowry, director of information security for Signature Aviation, to get some expert perspective on the issue. From Burnout to Breathing Room When Lowry joined Signature Aviation three years ago, his team was doing everything—detection, response, architecture, and engineering—with no automation to help shoulder the load. He described how the company has leveraged technology to automate tier one SOC tasks and noted that about 80% of all alerts are now handled by automated response plays. 'The more you digest to get that common operational picture, the faster it's going to be and the lighter the load is going to be on my team to allow them to get back to what they really want to do anyway, right? They want to architect. They want to engineer. They want to be interfacing with the business, helping solve problems.' Murphy views agentic AI as an 'exponential multiplier' that lets security teams redirect their time to more strategic work. 'It's not taking over for that security analyst or replacing that… it's freeing up some of their time,' he explained. By removing duplicates, false positives, and other distractions, Murphy believes AI 'weaponizes' analyst knowledge for faster, more consistent execution. That philosophy underpins ReliaQuest's recent launch of GreyMatter Agentic Teammates, billed as the industry's first autonomous, role-based AI agents for security operations. Built to represent specific SOC functions—such as Threat Intelligence Researchers, Detection Engineers, and Threat Hunters—these AI teammates work together and with human analysts to anticipate threats, model risk, and strengthen long-term resilience. According to ReliaQuest, GreyMatter's native agentic AI already performs investigations 75% faster than traditional methods with over 99% accuracy on malicious activity. The new role-based teammates are designed to extend those capabilities, giving SOC teams around-the-clock, burnout-proof coverage while allowing human experts to focus on predictive and business-aligned security work. Why Context Matters Both leaders pointed to the importance of AI adapting to an organization's environment. Lowry offered an example: his CEO often visits multiple states in a day, which would normally set off 'impossible travel' alerts. 'It knows that's our CEO. It knows that this is common for him, and so it allows us not to hear that noise in the background,' he said. But if the travel was from a location far outside normal business operations, such as Thailand, it would still trigger a review. Murphy described the same principle in broader terms. For him, AI teammates should operate within the context of each organization's unique architecture, tools, and policies. Trust, Transparency, and Human Oversight AI is not flawless. 'AI models do hallucinate from time to time. It's just what they do,' Lowry acknowledged. Early deployments provided recommendations rather than taking direct action, allowing his team to validate and tune the system over time. Spot checks remain in place, especially for high-value assets. Murphy emphasized transparency as a safeguard: 'Show your work… here's the plan, here are the steps that I took, here's the data… here's the conclusion I came to.' That visibility not only makes it easier to audit decisions but also helps train the AI to improve over time without losing organizational context. The Skills Question Some worry that handing tier-one tasks to AI could leave future analysts without the foundational skills needed for higher-level work. And by 'some,' I mean me. It has occurred to me lately that we are saying that people should validate results from AI and not accept it as gospel, but that assumes you have the institutional knowledge to know what the answer should be and the skills and experience to second-guess the AI. Murphy likens AI teammates to an executive's support staff: 'I can't do my job without the right teammates around me. And then my question becomes, well, what work should they not be doing? Like, when do we get time to think as humans?' Lowry sees the concern but believes organizations will draw boundaries: 'At some point we'll draw a line in the sand and say, 'How much are we going to allow AI to take over?'' For him, AI should handle routine, repeatable work so people can focus on developing deeper skills. Matching the Adversary's Speed Adversaries are already using AI to increase their speed and scale. 'When the adversaries are using it, you have two options, use it in defense or get beat,' Murphy said. Practical Advice for CISOs Lowry recommends a gradual approach when adopting AI in the SOC. Rather than deploying it across the most sensitive systems immediately, organizations should start with lower-risk use cases to observe how the AI behaves and refine its performance. He also stresses the importance of training AI models on an organization's own data and keeping them within secure, internal environments to reduce risk. Murphy's advice centers on ensuring that automation serves the operational goals of the security team rather than fitting a vendor's platform strategy. He emphasizes flexibility—keeping data where it already resides, applying automation where it delivers clear value, and avoiding unnecessary costs or dependencies. Augmentation, Not Replacement Both leaders agree that the role of AI in the SOC is to enhance human capabilities, not replace them. AI teammates can help organizations operate at the speed and scale of modern cyber threats, while freeing human analysts from repetitive tasks that cause fatigue and slow response times. The aim is to strengthen security operations by combining the efficiency of automation with the judgment and adaptability of experienced professionals.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Why Unusual Options Candidate Root (ROOT) Stock is Screaming for a Sentiment Reversal
Unusual options activity can be a hit-or-miss affair, particularly because the derivatives market is rather opaque. Given that puts and calls can be incorporated as debit or credit-based strategies, merely witnessing aberrant trades may not be enough to ascertain forward predictability. Further, because contracts can be incorporated into multi-leg strategies, the underlying implications are rarely intuitive. Still, there are occasionally intriguing ideas that pop up. In my opinion, insurance specialist Root Inc (ROOT) is worth a closer look, especially if you're a risk-tolerant speculator. More News from Barchart Microsoft's Impressive Free Cash Flow - MSFT Stock Could Be Worth 28% More Options Traders Price in Volatile Nvidia Earnings Reaction After U.S. Government Deal on AI Chips Option Volatility And Earnings Report For Aug 11 - 15 Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! On Friday, ROOT stock represented one of the highlights of Barchart's Unusual Stock Options Volume screener. Covering 500 of the most aberrant transactions relative to historical norms, this screener can potentially clue retail investors into big moves that could eventually occur in the open market. While correlation doesn't always equal causation, it's nevertheless a helpful place to jumpstart additional research. Heading into the weekend, total options volume for ROOT stock hit 6,061 contracts. Though this figure doesn't inherently sound particularly robust, it represented a 183.62% jump from the trailing one-month average. Further, call volume stood at 4,410 contracts while put volume was 1,651 contracts, yielding a ratio of 0.37. On paper, this ratio signifies bullish intent. However, it's better to spot-check options flow, which focuses exclusively on big block transactions likely placed by institutional investors. Here, we find that following Friday's close, net trade sentiment landed at $31,100 above parity, thus slightly favoring the bulls. Importantly, the biggest transactions by dollar volume were for calls, strongly hinting that these are debit-based strategies. Under such a framework, the trader pays a premium for the right to speculate on the underlying security. Therefore, a debit-based transaction must meet the minimum threshold of profitability to be considered successful. Because these were bought calls, the rational assumption is that the smart money believes ROOT stock will head higher. Going Beyond the Narratives into the Statistical Case for ROOT Stock While studying aberrations in the derivatives arena can be useful, one of the challenges is that there are plenty of informational gaps that you would have to fill with presumptions. Further, the relationship between unusual options and how the markets — both the open market and the derivatives sector — respond is not always clear or intuitive. Therefore, rather than trying to understand how compelling ROOT stock options are relative to their informational profile — such as implied volatility — it's arguably better to consider its statistical pathways and possibilities. This approach requires a new framework called discrete-event analysis. Instead of analyzing price, it's much more appropriate to consider behavioral states, which by nature are discrete events. The reason is that analysts often use discrete language to describe stocks, such as a 'good price' to buy. However, there's no objective standard for what a good price is because price is a continuous scalar signal. In contrast, one of the few objective truths in the equities sector is as follows: at the end of the day, the market is either a net buyer or a net seller. Here's how we can apply this simple but profound concept to our research. In the last 10 weeks, the market voted to buy ROOT stock two times and sell eight times. During this period, the security incurred a negative trajectory. For brevity, we can label this sequence as 2-8-D. Since its public market debut in October 2020, the 2-8-D sequence has materialized 12 times on a rolling basis. By classifying the price action of ROOT stock in this manner, we can better determine how the market responds to the sequence. In addition, we can stack the signal against other behavioral states to formulate a decision-tree logic: L10 Category Sample Size Up Probability Baseline Probability Median Return if Up 2-8-D 12 91.67% 42.57% 7.19% 3-7-D 46 43.48% 42.57% 8.61% 4-6-D 43 46.51% 42.57% 6.85% 4-6-U 14 50.00% 42.57% 5.68% 5-5-D 28 25.00% 42.57% 19.18% 5-5-U 26 50.00% 42.57% 4.60% 6-4-U 26 46.15% 42.57% 14.21% 7-3-U 14 50.00% 42.57% 13.53% From the table above, we can see that the baseline probability or the chance that a long position in ROOT stock will rise on any given week is only 42.57%, a decidedly negative bias. This is effectively our null hypothesis, the probabilistic performance expectation assuming no mispricing. However, our alternative hypothesis is that, because of the 2-8-D sequence, the odds of upside success in the following week are 91.67%. Further, under the positive pathway, the expected median performance is 7.19%. With ROOT stock closing at $88.26 on Friday, it's possible that it could be on course to hit around $94.61, perhaps even a bit more if the market gods decide to be nice. A Daring Proposition for the Aggressive Trader Given the market intelligence above, the most aggressive (but still rational) bet would arguably be the 90/95 bull call spread expiring Aug. 15. While the payout is incredibly enticing at over 194% and though a pathway to the short strike price exists, it's wildly risky — too many elements would have to fall in place perfectly. A much more reasonable (but still risky) trade would be the 90/95 bull spread for next month's expiration date of Sep. 19. This trade features a lower payout of 127%. However, the extra five weeks could be well worth it for those who want the relative peace of mind. Of course, a lot rides on the viability of the 2-8-D sequence. Running a one-tailed binomial test reveals a p-value of 0.0006, which means that there's a 0.06% chance that the implications of the signal could materialize randomly as opposed to intentionally. This figure more than meets the threshold of statistical significance, though the methodology is naturally optimistic due to the rolling 10-week intervals. Still, in terms of intentionality versus randomness, ROOT stock represents the most empirically intriguing idea I've come across. To be clear, this doesn't guarantee upside success. However, if you're the speculative type, you'll want to keep close tabs on this insurance specialist. On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data