logo
‘Worse than worst-case scenario': Trump's tariffs send markets reeling

‘Worse than worst-case scenario': Trump's tariffs send markets reeling

Al Jazeera03-04-2025

After weeks of anticipation, global investors finally have sight of United States President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs.
If the reaction of the stock market is any guide, the 'liberation day' tariffs unveiled on Wednesday exceeded their worst fears.
From the US to Asia to Europe, markets tumbled as investors absorbed the implications of the sharpest turn towards protectionism by the world's largest economy since the 1930s.
Futures tied to the US's benchmark S&P 500 and tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 – which can be traded outside usual market hours – dropped more than 3 percent and 3.5 percent respectively, setting the stage for heavy losses when Wall Street reopens on Thursday.
Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 dropped as much as 4.5 percent, while South Korea's KOSPI and Hong Kong's Hang Seng each fell more than 2 percent.
In Vietnam, the benchmark VN-Index suffered one of the worst days in its history, plunging more than 6 percent.
'The hike in tariffs was more aggressive than expected,' Lynn Song, chief economist for greater China at Dutch bank ING, told Al Jazeera.
'Many were expecting a range of 10-20 percent tariffs. This sort of aggressive move will probably risk some retaliation from the bigger players, though smaller countries could choose to try and negotiate for a lower rate.'
Daniel Ives, an analyst with Los Angeles-based wealth management firm Wedbush Securities, went as far as to describe Trump's plans as 'worse than the worst-case scenario'.
While Trump announced a baseline 10 percent tariff for all imports to the US, he confirmed that much higher duties would be imposed on dozens of other countries.
The steeper rates apply to both major US trading partners and smaller economies – and allies and rivals – alike.
China, the US's third-largest trading partner accounting for more than $430bn worth of US imports annually, is facing a 34 percent tariff.
When added to Trump's previous tariffs on Chinese goods, the latest tariff lifts the overall rate to 54 percent.
'In our view, the scale and speed of the new Trump administration's additional tariffs and other measures against China are much worse than markets had expected, though these events unfolding are consistent with our more cautious views,' Ting Lu, chief China economist at Nomura, said in a note.
The European Union is set to be hit with a 20 percent tariff, while Japan and South Korea are facing duties of 24 percent and 26 percent, respectively.
Some of the steepest rates have been applied to developing economies that potentially have the most to lose from serious disruptions to trade, including Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Laos, which are facing tariffs of 44-49 percent.
Trump's list included exemptions for a limited number of goods, including semiconductors, oil and pharmaceutical products.
'These tariff figures are worse than expected – certainly viewed from Asia, where everyone got hit. An export-dependent region is going to really struggle with sudden, huge price increases,' Deborah Elms, the head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, told Al Jazeera.
'This will result in a loss of jobs in markets that are already poor and often fragile.'
China and the EU, the world's two largest economies, have already promised to retaliate with their own trade measures, though many smaller trade-reliant economies are seen as hesitant to respond in any way that might exacerbate trade tensions further.
After weeks of market volatility due to uncertainty over Trump's plans, a key question is whether the tariffs could be eased in negotiations between Washington and its trade partners.
'The tariff announcement doesn't eliminate uncertainty, but it hopefully puts a boundary around how bad the economic consequences will be,' Brian Jacobsen, chief economist at Annex Wealth Management, told Al Jazeera.
'Including non-tariff barriers in the calculation has pushed the tariff higher than it otherwise would be. That's also the part that is hardest to quantify, so perhaps it leaves a large door open to negotiations. Framing these tariffs as reciprocal will hopefully reduce the likelihood of retaliation.'
Gary Ng, a senior economist with the investment bank Natixis in Hong Kong, said that while he expects US trade partners to work towards a compromise, it is likely that at least some of the measures will become permanent.
'Regardless of what the deal is, it is highly likely that the US will keep part of the tariffs for everyone,' Ng told Al Jazeera.
While the severity of Trump's tariffs seemed to take many investors by surprise, there is room for stocks to fall much further still – depending on the administration's next moves.
JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs have put the likelihood of Trump's protectionist policies tipping the US economy into a recession this year at 40 percent and 35 percent, respectively.
Veljko Fotak, an associate professor of finance at the University at Buffalo, said the market does not see Trump's latest announcement as the final word on tariffs.
'If that were the case, markets would be falling a lot more dramatically, as this kind of tariff regime would effectively guarantee a recession. The long-run tariff policy remains uncertain – how will other countries react? Will the US escalate? Will it pull back?' Fotak told Al Jazeera.
'Markets did react forcefully, but we will see further downward corrections if these tariffs persist – and more dramatic movements if the trade war escalates.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best
Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best

Al Jazeera

time24 minutes ago

  • Al Jazeera

Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best

It's official: United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest person, Elon Musk, have broken up. At the end of last month, Musk departed from his post as the head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he oversaw the mass firing of federal employees and dismantling of various government agencies – all the while benefitting from his own companies' lucrative contracts with the government. Anyway, US 'democracy' has never met a conflict of interest it didn't like. Musk's service at the White House initially appeared to end on an amicable note as Trump praised him for the 'colossal change' he had achieved 'in the old ways of doing business in Washington'. The former head of DOGE in turn thanked the president for the opportunity. But soon after his departure, Musk publicly criticised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', a tax and spending bill that Trump is currently obsessed with passing, slamming it as a 'disgusting abomination'. There ensued predictably dramatic social media exchanges between the two right-wing billionaires with Trump pronouncing Musk 'so depressed and so heartbroken' after leaving the White House and offering the additional coherent analysis: ' It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Musk has repeatedly taken credit for Trump's 2024 election victory on account of the gobs of money he donated to the president's campaign and those of other Republican candidates. Now that the relationship is over, Trump has wasted no time in warning Musk that he'll face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to fund Democratic campaigns in the future. But some Democratic ears, at least, have perked up at the possibility of getting the planet's richest person back on their side – which he abandoned in favour of Trump after having extended support to Democratic former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The political switcheroo was hardly extreme. At the end of the day, ideology matters little when you're just in the business of buying power. California Congressman Ro Khanna, for example, recently opined that Democrats should 'be in a dialogue' with Musk in light of their shared opposition to Trump's big beautiful bill. As per Khanna's view, 'we should ultimately be trying to convince [Musk] that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with.' He went on to list a few of these alleged values: 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Never mind that Musk's main 'value' is a commitment to controlling as much of the earth – not to mention the whole solar system – as he possibly can for the benefit of himself and himself alone. Beyond his mass firing activities while head of DOGE, a brief review of Musk's entrepreneurial track record reveals a total lack of the 'values' that Democrats purport to espouse. Over recent years, reports have abounded of sexual harassment and acute racism at Musk's Tesla car factories. In October 2021, a federal jury in San Francisco ordered Tesla to pay $137m to a Black former employee who claimed he was told to 'go back to Africa' among other abuses suffered at his workplace. Along with violating federal labour laws, Musk as chief executive of Tesla threatened workers over the prospect of unionisation. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, he violated local regulations to keep his factories up and running, underscoring a general contempt for human life that, again, should not be a 'value' that anyone aspires to. To be sure, not all Democrats are on board with the proposal to woo Musk back into the Democratic camp – but he may be getting a growing cheering squad. In addition to Khanna's advocacy on his behalf, New York Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres seems prepared to give Musk his vote as well: 'I'm a believer in redemption, and he is telling the truth about the [big beautiful] legislation.' Anthony Scaramucci, Trump's former White House director of communications, has, meanwhile, suggested that Democrats could 'bring Elon Musk back into the fold as a prodigal son' by foregoing more left-wing policies – as if there's anything truly left-wing about the Democratic Party in the first place. Newsweek's write-up of Scaramucci's comments observed that 'It would be a coup for Democrats if they could court the influence of the world's richest man once more.' It would not, obviously, be a coup for democracy, which is supposed to be rule by the people and not by money. And yet a longstanding bipartisan commitment to plutocracy means the US has never been in danger of true democracy. Instead, billions upon billions of dollars are spent to sustain an electoral charade and ensure that capital remains concentrated in the hands of the few – while Americans continue to literally die of poverty. Now it remains to be seen whether the Trump-Musk breakup will drive Democrats into Musk's arms. But either way, the country's plutocratic values remain rock solid – and that is nothing less than a 'disgusting abomination'. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

AESC pauses $1.6 bn SC battery plant amid ‘uncertainty'
AESC pauses $1.6 bn SC battery plant amid ‘uncertainty'

Qatar Tribune

time15 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

AESC pauses $1.6 bn SC battery plant amid ‘uncertainty'

Agencies A Japanese company has halted construction on a $1.6 billion factory in South Carolina to help make batteries for electric BMWs, citing 'policy and market uncertainty.' While AESC didn't specify what those problems are, South Carolina's Republican governor said the company is dealing with the potential loss of federal tax breaks for electric vehicle buyers and incentives for EV businesses as well as tariff uncertainties from President Donald Trump's administration. 'What we're doing is urging caution — let things play out because all of the these changes are taking place,' Gov. Henry McMaster said. AESC announced the suspension in construction of its plant in Florence on Thursday, 'Due to policy and market uncertainty, we are pausing construction at our South Carolina facility at this time,' the company's statement said. AESC promised to restart construction, although it didn't say when, and vowed to meet its commitment to hire 1,600 workers and invest $1.6 billion. The company said it has already invested $1 billion in the Florence plant. The battery maker based in Japan also has facilities in China, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Germany. In the U.S., AESC has a plant in Tennessee and is building one in Kentucky. The statement didn't mention any changes with other plants. The South Carolina plant is supposed to sell battery cells to BMW, which is building its own battery assembly site near its giant auto plant in Greer. BMW said the construction pause by AESC doesn't change its plans to open its plant in 2026. AESC has already rolled back its South Carolina plans. They announced a second factory on the Florence site, but then said earlier this year that their first plant should be able to handle BMW's demand. That prompted South Carolina officials to withdraw $111 million in help they planned to provide. The company is still getting $135 million in grants from the South Carolina Department of Commerce and $121 million in bonds and the agency said a construction pause won't prompt them to claw back that offer. South Carolina is investing heavily in electric vehicles. Volkswagen-owned Scout Motors plans to invest more than $4 billion and hire 10,000 people for a plant to build its new electric SUVs scheduled to open in 2027. The state has for decades made big bets on foreign manufacturers like BMW, Michelin and Samsung that have paid off with an economic boom this century, but there is uneasiness that Trump's flirtation with high tariffs might stagger or even ruin those important partnerships.

Asia caught between US-China power plays ahead of tariff deadlines
Asia caught between US-China power plays ahead of tariff deadlines

Qatar Tribune

time15 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Asia caught between US-China power plays ahead of tariff deadlines

Agencies Caught in the undertow of swirling power plays between China and the United States, Asia has become like a piece of driftwood battered by the pounding of opposing tides. With key tariff deadlines approaching in July, and in light of lingering trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies, many countries in the region are facing a delicate, pragmatic choice: bow to Washington's growing pressure to crack down on supply chains and enforcement – or preserve the economic ambiguity that underpins their deep ties with Beijing? Asian countries have entwined their supply chains, technology, markets and investment with Beijing – accounting for one-third of China's total trade volume, or US$1.89 trillion last year. Meanwhile, some of them may need security assurances from the US amid the growing Chinese influence in the region, analysts said. China remains the top trading partner for 18 countries across the region and has been the largest trading partner of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) for 15 consecutive years. Meanwhile, economic asymmetry and military advantage have often translated into Beijing's leverage in market power while, for many in the region, Washington represents security, diversification and strategic rebalancing, with its military presence, investment and advanced technology, analysts said. That leaves many Asian economies walking a tightrope – benefiting from China's vast market while remaining wary of the risks of over-dependence. For much of Asia, maintaining ties with both while caught in between has become a survival strategy. As ongoing negotiations between the administration of US President Donald Trump and Asia unfold behind closed doors and prospects remain cloudy, 'it's too early to talk about 'camps' in Asia, as Asia can't afford to do without either China or the US', said Vivek Kelkar, an independent analyst based in India. Some regional leaders, such as Malaysia's Anwar Ibrahim, have been verbally supportive of China because their geography and economy do not allow them to be anything else, but they may also be aware that, without the US, they are vulnerable to Chinese domination across both economics and politics, Kelkar said. Both China and the US have shown a willingness to exercise power by weaponising supply chains and trade, Kelkar added, but there was no sign yet that Asia would cave in quite the way Trump envisages. 'Asia is trying to manage a careful balance while messaging Washington that Asia has alternatives,' he said. For instance, Malaysia's chief negotiator, Mastura Ahmad Mustafa, told domestic news outlet The Star that although her country's tariff talks with the US were in progress, those negotiations were only one part of Malaysia's broader strategy to cushion the potential impact on exporters. In a report published on Thursday, she said that it was hard to know whether the two sides could reach a deal before a 90-day pause on tariffs is lifted in July, and that the Malaysian government had 'begun rolling out contingency measures' such as market diversification and economic reforms. In April, Trump imposed a 10 per cent universal tariff on all imports effective April 5, in an effort to address America's trade deficits. His administration also announced higher 'reciprocal' tariffs on goods from select countries from April 9 – including 25 per cent for South Korea, 24 per cent for Japan, 36 per cent for Thailand, 46 per cent for Vietnam, and 49 per cent for Cambodia. However, a grace period was granted later that month for all countries except China, delaying the implementation of these higher tariffs until July 9 and giving governments time to negotiate possible exemptions or adjustments with Washington.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store