Minister opposes IMF demand of more taxes on agri sector
KARACHI: Sindh Minister for Agriculture Muhammad Baksh Mahar has expressed serious concerns over the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) demand to impose an 18% General Sales Tax (GST) and increase Federal Excise Duty (FED) on fertilisers, sprays, and agricultural machinery.
Mahar said, 'The IMF's demand is extremely unfair and anti-farmer, which will prove disastrous for the country's agricultural sector and farmers. The IMF must refrain from proposing additional taxes on the agriculture sector.'
He emphasised that farmers across the country, including Sindh, are already suffering due to climate change, water scarcity, and low crop prices.
The provincial minister warned that the new taxes would lead to an enormous increase in agricultural production costs, ultimately jeopardising food security.
He stated that this would trigger a new wave of inflation in the country. He strongly urged the federal government to persuade the IMF and make it aware of the importance of the agriculture sector.
He made it clear, 'The IMF's demand is causing severe unrest among farmers, and we vehemently oppose any such proposal.' He said that providing facilities to agriculture is the need of the hour instead of imposing additional burdens on it.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
17 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
External financing in FY2025-26
One of the key indicators in the federal budget is the projected level of external financing to partly finance the budget deficit. The expectation in 2024-25 was that there would be total external financing inflow of approximately US$10.3 billion into the federal government account, excluding rollovers. Net of repayment the financing was expected to be US$2.3 billion. The Ministry of Economic Affairs has recently reported on the gross inflows up to the end of April 2025. They have aggregated to US$5.7 billion, equivalent to only 55 percent of the annual target. They should have reached 83 percent of the annual target by the end of April. The biggest shortfall is in commercial loans. The target is US$3.8 billion, whereas the actual loans received aggregate to less than US$0.8 billion. Given the enhanced risk perceptions of lending to Pakistan, it is not surprising that private creditors have reduced their exposure to Pakistan. The surprising outcome is the significant shortfall also in inflows from multilateral development agencies. The Asian Development Bank is, more or less, on target and has disbursed 76 percent of its annual commitment by April. However, the big shortfall is in the inflows from the World Bank. Only 51 percent of the annual target has been met up to April. The IMF Staff Report of the 17th of May, following the first review of the IMF Programme, contains estimates of the likely inflow of external financing by the end of 2024-25. These IMF estimates include the requirements of inflows to the private sector in Pakistan. The good news is that the expectation is of a gross inflow of US$18.9 billion, including rollovers, which will be $2.5 billion above the requirements of amortization of debt. The expectation is that the foreign exchange reserves of the SBP will rise by $4.5 billion by the end of 2024-25. US$2 billion will be the inflow from the IMF, which has already taken place. Consequently, the projection is that by end of June 2025, the level of foreign exchange reserves will reach US$14 billion. This will provide import cover of 2.8 months and put Pakistan in a somewhat more secure position. There is need, however, to appreciate that total external inflows, of both foreign direct investment and loan financing, will be significantly smaller in 2024-25. Inclusive of inflows into the private sector, the IMF estimate of the actual external financing of Pakistan is US$20.9 billion. This is 23 percent less than the total inflow of US$26.3 billion in 2023-24. We turn now to the outlook for 2025-26. The first part of the external financing requirement is the size of the current account surplus or deficit in the balance of payments. The IMF Staff report has projected a small deficit of US$1.5 billion. Exports are expected to show a growth rate of 5.4 percent, while imports are projected to increase by 3.4 percent. The turmoil in the global trade after the US announcement of higher tariffs is likely to adversely impact on the volume of global trade. Further, the shortfall in major crop outputs like cotton and wheat will raise the volume of agricultural imports. Also, if a target GDP growth rate of 3.6 percent is to be achieved then this will imply larger imports of inputs and capital goods. The IMF has been cautious about the level of remittances, which are likely to increase by 20 percent in 2024-25, and are the main reason for a near zero current account deficit. The expectation is that they will fall marginally in 2025-26. Also, only 3 percent growth is anticipated in interest payments and repatriation of profits. The latter may be significantly higher due to increase in risk perceptions about investment in Pakistan. Overall, there is the risk that there may be a larger deficit in the current account in 2025-26, which could approach US$4 billion, equivalent to almost 1 percent of the GDP. The balance of payments projections of the IMF for 2025-26 are based on a double-digit depreciation of the rupee. The projection of the level of amortization of external debt, both public and private, is of a significant increase of almost 18 percent. It is expected to rise from US$14.7 billion in 2024-25 to US$17.3 billion in 2025-26. Fortunately, repayment to the IMF will be less by almost $1 billion. Turning to the available financing, the IMF has been cautious about the projection of foreign direct investment in 2025-26. The expectation is that it will remain at the same level as in 2024-25 of US$2.1 billion. However, the tense security situation may lead to some postponement of investments in South Asia. Further, the IMF is also not expecting significant increase in the disbursement of loans in 2025-26. They are projected at $17 billion as compared to US$16.7 billion in 2024-25. Overall, the lack of optimism in the IMF projections is clearly indicated by the expectation that the available financing will be virtually the same as the total external financing requirement of US$19.3 billion. This is in contrast to the expected surplus of US$2.5 billion from sources other than the IMF in 2024-25. The assumption in the projections is that the IMF Programme will continue throughout 2025-26. Two reviews during the year will be successfully completed and Pakistan will meet the quantitative performance criteria and implement the agreed agenda of reforms. Uninterrupted continuation of the IMF Programme in 2025-26 will lead to a loan disbursement of $2 billion from the IMF. In addition, there will be some inflows from the resilience facility, which has not yet been included in the IMF projections. Overall, Pakistan's reserves are projected to increase by $2 billion. In addition, there could be other prospective financing of US$1.4 billion. Overall, the above IMF projections indicate a relatively high level of risk and uncertainty in the level of external financing in 2025-26. The requirement may be higher because of a larger current account deficit and the need for purchase of armaments. Foreign direct investment may be adversely affected by the security situation. On top of all this, Pakistan will have to continue performing well within the framework of the IMF Programme. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
17 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
PARTLY FACETIOUS: We don't have royalty in this country
'There are reports that Prince Harry explored the option of taking his mother's last name.' 'Ooops.' 'What?' 'Well if he is a Spencer then what would happen to the title of Prince?' 'Hmmm I guess that can remain, see he is Prince Harry not Prince of Windsor.' 'So what's the point?' 'Well the Duke and Duchess of Sussex may be replaced by Harry…what's the title of his maternal Uncle?' 'He is the ninth Earl of Spenser, referred to as Viscount Althorp.' 'Hmmm see I always told you, it's all in a name. And no one understands that better than our politicians.' 'We don't have royalty in this country – no kings, no queens, no princes or princesses or…' 'Agreed.' 'That's not like you.' 'Hey I ain't challenging you so why did you…' 'No I meant it's not like you to agree with me so quickly.' 'Well, let's put it this way there have been a few name changes, last name changes, in the second generation of one political party and the third generation of another.' 'That is perfectly understandable my friend. The family name sells and need I remind you that we vote tribally or for a family which means even if the family name is different the uneducated constituents may not understand who to vote for and…' 'I recall in the February 2024 elections…' 'Hey how old are you?' 'How is that relevant?' 'It's the old who dwell on the past my friend.' 'But some lessons can be learned….' 'Nope we are on the road towards success on all fronts and seriously there is no one in our past history who had actually embarked on this road, rhetorically they all did but not….' 'Gotcha. Mum is the word.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
31 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
FPCCI opposes new taxes in budget
KARACHI: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) Vice President Muhammad Aman Paracha has voiced strong opposition to reports of new taxes being imposed on existing taxpayers in the upcoming federal budget for the fiscal year 2025-26. The organization has urged the government to refrain from introducing new taxes on imports, exports, and other sectors in order to promote national trade, industrial growth, and to encourage new investments. The FPCCI warned that if the government imposes additional taxes under pressure from the IMF, the FPCCI will actively oppose such measures. FPCCI Vice President Muhammad Aman Paracha emphasized the need to separate tax policy from tax administration to avoid conflicts of interest. He further suggested that the budget-making process should not be treated merely as a routine financial exercise but should be transformed into a strategic economic tool. Aman Paracha stressed the importance of expanding the tax net to include all untaxed and under-taxed sectors, noting that imposing additional taxes on those who are already compliant would have adverse effects. He highlighted that business activity is already sluggish and the business community is struggling to stay afloat. Imposing further tax burdens on existing taxpayers could lead to decreased revenue collection as it would open more avenues for tax evasion. He also expressed concerns over amendments introduced through Ordinance IV of 2025, particularly Sections 138(3A), 140(6A), and 175C, stating that these amendments grant excessive powers to tax authorities and violate Articles 4, 18, and 77 of the Constitution. He warned that such changes would significantly erode investor confidence. Paracha proposed the development of a harmonized structure for General Sales Tax (GST), featuring a unified compliance portal. He recommended gradually reducing the GST rate to 12% to lower business costs for the formal sector and stimulates economic growth. He also called for comprehensive reforms in Pakistan Customs, identifying outdated laws, tariff segmentation, under-invoicing, and weak enforcement as major challenges. He underscored the need for economic policy to strike a balance between revenue requirements and industrial development, especially through measures that boost Pakistan's export potential and attract investors. Finally, Muhammad Amaan Paracha appealed to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to immediately release the long-pending Rs23 billion subsidies related to additional electricity consumption and ensure that funds for this are allocated in the upcoming 2025-26 federal budget. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
