SBA and EPA Announce New Guidance To Ease Diesel Exhaust Mandates for Small Businesses
DES MOINES, Aug. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Today, U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Administrator Kelly Loeffler joined U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin in Des Moines, Iowa to announce new action to protect American farmers, truckers, and diesel equipment operators from sudden speed and power losses caused by diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) mandates. EPA's new guidance urges engine and equipment manufacturers to revise DEF system software to reduce loss of power and increase time for operators to secure DEF. This will reduce burdensome red tape for small businesses and deliver major cost savings.
SBA estimates that this single regulatory action will have an outsized impact on America's family farms – saving them $727 million per year and relieving them of costly downtime, equipment repairs, and DEF-related maintenance. With 1.8 million family farms operating nearly 90% of all U.S. farmland, the benefits of this rule are expected to extend across rural America.
'The Trump Administration is fighting for farmers and truckers, as evidenced by the EPA's new DEF guidance which is a big win for the millions of small businesses who rely on diesel engines – and who have been crushed by years of costly Green New Scam regulations,' said SBA Administrator Loeffler. 'This change will save family farms an estimated $727 million per year and offers vital financial and operational certainty. I'm proud to work alongside EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin to reduce red tape for our nation's producers and deliver real relief for hardworking Americans.'
'We have heard loud and clear from small businesses across the United States that the current DEF system is unacceptable. It is unacceptable that farmers, truckers, construction workers, and many other small businesses continually experience failures of diesel-powered equipment when they need it most—costing millions of dollars in lost productivity,' said EPA Administrator Zeldin. 'Today, we are responding to those concerns by calling on manufacturers to take action to update their software and eliminate the unnecessary sudden loss of power and frustrating shutdowns that too many Americans have experienced.'
To read more about EPA's new guidance on DEF, visit: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/iowa-state-fair-epa-administrator-zeldin-announces-diesel-exhaust-fluid-def-fix.
# # #
About the U.S. Small Business Administration
The U.S. Small Business Administration helps power the American dream of entrepreneurship. As the leading voice for small businesses within the federal government, the SBA empowers job creators with the resources and support they need to start, grow, and expand their businesses or recover from a declared disaster. It delivers services through an extensive network of SBA field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations. To learn more, visit www.sba.gov.
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
5 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Unlike at Columbia, Trump's attack on UCLA is aimed at taxpayer money
President Trump's demand for a whopping $1-billion payment from UCLA sent shock waves through the UC system. For those of us on the inside, the announcement elicited a range of responses. Some faculty and staff reacted with horror, others voiced increasing fear about the ongoing assault on academic freedom, and some merely muttered in sad resignation to the new reality. I laughed. The president has decided to poke the bear — and the Bears and the Bruins, too. Whether Trump knows it or not, targeting the University of California is very different from going after private Ivy League institutions with deep historical ties to political power. Pressuring UC to pay a large sum has another dimension entirely: It's going after state tax dollars paid by the people of California. This should matter to folks on the left and the right, to those who venerate higher education and those who vote in favor of states' rights against federal overreach. Californians across the political spectrum should repurpose one of Trump's own slogans: 'Stop the steal.' Unlike Columbia and Brown, which have paid off the Trump administration, UC is a public institution. That means, as new UC President James Milliken said, 'we are stewards of taxpayer resources.' UC must answer to the people, not just to boards of trustees or senior administrators. Indeed, as a professor at UC Santa Barbara, I consider myself to be employed by my fellow Californians. My job is to contribute to the fundamental mission laid out in the state's 'Master Plan': to create new knowledge and educate the people of California. I take my responsibility even more seriously because I am also a product of UC; I earned my PhD at Berkeley and remain a proud Golden Bear. I am fully aware of what a positive effect a UC education can have on students and Californians everywhere. A $1-billion payment to the federal government would have huge consequences — not only on the people's university but also on the general welfare of our state, the world's fourth-largest economy. UC is the second-largest employer in the state. We generate $82 billion in economic activity every year. More than 84% of our students come from California, and their degrees are proven to increase their lifetime earning potential. UC health centers treat millions of people every year, providing essential medical care. According to one striking study, 'The economic output generated by UC-related spending is $4.4 billion larger than the economic output of the entire state of Wyoming and $16.1 billion larger than that of Vermont.' We accomplish that in large part with the people's money. For every dollar the state invests in us, we generate $21 of economic activity for the state. All of that activity generates $12 billion in tax revenue. We're a great engine of growth. You'd think a self-proclaimed genius and 'self-made' business tycoon would know a good deal when he sees one. To be sure, the supposed bases for demanding the extraordinary payment — antisemitism and civil rights abuses — are very serious. College students should expect to confront new ideas they may disagree with, but no one should be targeted for their beliefs. Full stop. But there are more effective remedies for addressing any failures, as have already been pursued at UCLA. For Trump, though, the accusations are the pretext for punishing institutions that he doesn't like and, as the Associated Press reports, rebuking political opponents such as Gov. Gavin Newsom. They are not reflective of a genuine concern for student rights. Many of us have already sounded the alarm about the increasing financial challenges the UC system faces. Even last year, we had reached a critical breaking point — and that was before losing federal grant money. But we haven't given up and neither should the people. We all must fight back against this attempted seizure of taxpayer funds. It's not enough to leave the task to political leaders; the people themselves must send the message. Californians can continue to resist federal incursions by making it clear to the UC Board of Regents, elected representatives and everyone else that Californians will not tolerate a federal pressure campaign to take our state's resources. There are many reasons to be alarmed by Trump's broader attack on higher education. But this time, Trump has crossed the public-private boundary and set his sights on state taxpayers' money. Because we fund it, UC and everything it produces belongs to us. That means we all — no matter where we fall on the political spectrum — must stop the steal. Giuliana Perrone, an associate professor of history at UC Santa Barbara, is the author of 'Nothing More than Freedom: The Failure of Abolition in American Law.'
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
White House Launches Smithsonian Review To 'Ensure Alignment'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The White House has announced a review of some Smithsonian Institution museums to "ensure alignment" with President Donald Trump's goals. Newsweek has contacted the Smithsonian for comment via email outside regular working hours. Why It Matters In March, Trump signed an executive order, titled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," to eliminate what his administration described as "improper ideology" across all branches of the Smithsonian—including its museums, research centers, educational initiatives and the National Zoo. The move sparked backlash online and from museum volunteers. In July, the Smithsonian National Museum of American History removed references to Trump's two impeachments from its exhibit on presidential impeachments, prompting a debate about historical accuracy and political influence on public institutions. A Smithsonian Institution sign on the National Air and Space Museum on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on March 28. A Smithsonian Institution sign on the National Air and Space Museum on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on March To Know A letter dated August 12 and addressed to Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch said the White House would be leading "a comprehensive internal review of selected Smithsonian museums and exhibitions." According to the letter, the review is timed to coincide with next year's celebrations of the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence being signed. The letter described the review as a "constructive and collaborative effort," adding that it would focus on key areas such as public-facing content, the curatorial process, exhibition planning, collection use and narrative standards. The letter also said the initial review would focus on the following museums: National Museum of American History, National Museum of Natural History, National Museum of African American History and Culture, National Museum of the American Indian, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian American Art Museum, National Portrait Gallery, and Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. These are not the only museums being reviewed. The letter said additional museums would be reviewed in "Phase II." While the Smithsonian is independent of the government, it receives funding from Congress. As with Trump's March executive order, the review has received backlash online. Some social media users have raised concerns about the level of government intervention with the museums. What People Are Saying The White House's letter to the Smithsonian said: "This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." President Donald Trump wrote in his March executive order: "Museums in our Nation's capital should be places where individuals go to learn—not to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history. To advance this policy, we will restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness." Karly Kingsley, a media personality, wrote on X in a post viewed more than 200,000 times: "We're suspending the jobs report so you don't see how bad the numbers are, auditing the Smithsonian to match Trump's politics, fighting over gerrymandering the map, and deploying the military into cities. This isn't governance anymore. It's authoritarianism in plain sight." Journalist Dan Friedman wrote on X in a post viewed more than 40,000 times: "The White House pressuring the Smithsonian to 'eliminate political influence' from its presentation of history is some freaky Orwellian s***." What Happens Next The letter includes a 30-, 75- and 120-day implementation timeline. By the 120-day mark, "museums should begin implementing content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions across placards, wall didactics, digital displays, and other public-facing materials."
USA Today
35 minutes ago
- USA Today
Too many empty churches, not enough homes. Is it a match made in heaven?
When Cristiana Perez and Nick Porter began house-hunting in New York State in 2021, they were open-minded about their prospects. Perez has a background in historic preservation, and both expected to be able to work from home. 'But at every turn we were just getting priced out,' explained Perez, the director of social media for CIRCA Old Houses, the media company affiliated with Cheap Old Houses, which is a popular newsletter and HGTV show, among other things. Finally, they had an epiphany. 'Well, if we're taking the 'handcuffs off' geographically speaking, if I'm going to live in the middle of nowhere, I want it to be my dream house,' Perez said. 'And I'd always dreamed of living in a non-traditional something, whether it used to be a schoolhouse or a general store or a fire station or a church. So I was like, if we're gonna really go for it, I'm all in.' Four years later, the couple are the proud owners of 'Welsh Hall,' a former church that dates back to the 1790s and which had been vacant for a few decades. It's been a 'learning curve,' Perez told USA TODAY, and an expensive one – but the beauty of the building and its historical significance have been worth it. As church attendance declines and the housing market gets tighter, Perez and Porter's path may seem increasingly promising. There are plenty of vacant houses of worship around the country, but there's also a lot to consider before taking the leap (of faith). A 'tipping point' for vacant churches As recently as 1999, 70% of Americans responding to a Gallup poll said they belonged to a church, synagogue, or mosque. But by 2020, that number had fallen to just 47%. One estimate suggests that as many as 100,000 houses of worship could be closed over the next several years. Stephen Ferrandi is the founder and broker of PraiseBuildings, a Maryland-based religious building brokerage. '20 years ago when we first started, I said there's going to be a tipping point and you're going to see a lot of churches hit the market, but I didn't know what it was going to be,' Ferrandi said in an interview. 'Turns out it was COVID.' The majority of the houses of worship PraiseBuildings brokers are sold by one congregation to another, primarily newer immigrant groups. Ferrandi describes what may be a long path before congregations get to that point: 'It's just not sustainable," he said. "Honestly, they probably should have closed 30 years ago when they first started having the problems. The problem that everybody ran into was nobody wanted to make the decision to close the church.' Despite the opportunity these vacant churches represent, there are plenty of potential pitfalls, as anyone familiar with fixer-uppers may expect. 'All the pieces have to come together,' said Bill Skubik, founder of Michigan-based Religious Real Estate. Can churches and other religious buildings be residences? Most older churches for sale have one extremely wide-open space and exceptionally tall ceilings. In many cases, houses of worship have few bathrooms – and perhaps none of them full – and either a small, rudimentary kitchen, or a giant commercial-scale one. There can be some charm in that: Glen Jackson, who owns two churches in the metropolitan Pittsburgh area, likens the blank slate of a historic church to the industrial loft buildings made into cool residences a few decades ago. And as Elizabeth Finkelstein, co-founder of CIRCA Old Houses, puts it, 'you will have the coolest house in town.' Still, many of them may require drastic overhauls to make them feel more like homes, and many will need expensive updates to plumbing, heating and electrical work, and perhaps a new roof. Financing a church renovation No matter the specific circumstances, buying a church that needs to be renovated to serve as a home will likely require nontraditional financing, according to people who spoke to USA TODAY. Perez and Porter got a traditional mortgage for the purchase of the church, and are taking out construction loans for renovations as they go. Churches can often be bought for far less than houses: Jackson is currently selling one of his for only $60,000. So other owners have paid cash for the building, as it can be challenging to take out small mortgages, and then borrowed funds for the rehab work. In many cases, church buildings may have a separate building on the grounds, such as a minister's home, which can be occupied while the construction work is ongoing, and may also be rented for income later on, once the main building is habitable. Notably, sources caution that it may take work to get appraisals and homeowners insurance because of the lack of comparable properties. Skubik offers another consideration: if the church is in an area of lower property values, you may want to consider how much work you put into the renovations so the completed property doesn't have a drastically higher value that's completely out of place in its neighborhood. Finally, if you're counting on financial assistance from the community or a nonprofit or the government, make sure you have it nailed down – a lesson Glen Jackson, who believed local government officials had the same goals he did, learned the hard way. Buying a home with spirit In some suburban or rural areas, churches may sit on land that's surrounded by cemeteries. Consider how you'll feel if people come to visit, but more importantly make sure you have a plan for construction projects or infrastructure that has to enter the building through that land. On a more positive note, you may find that your neighbors and others in the community can share stories about the history of your home. It may even be an anchor of the community. "You kind of become a local hero because you've preserved an anchor of the town," Finkelstein said. "A building like that, really (is) kind of the centerpiece of the community.' Embrace the challenge of converting a church Perhaps the best advice comes from Perez, who says anyone buying a 'non-traditional building' for a home should embrace its essence. 'I get it that changes need to happen to make it livable,' she said. 'But the way that we're making our mark is as minimal as possible, so that hopefully it will forever be the thing that attracted us to it in the first place. So I would encourage people, if they're going to look for a church, be prepared to keep it churchy.'
