Meta's $8B Data Scandal Trial Ends Early with Settlement
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
Meta's $5B FTC Fine Sparked Backlash
Shareholders also targeted Meta's board for approving a $5 billion fine levied by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), a deal they claimed shielded Zuckerberg from personal liability. The plaintiffs argued that the board failed to prevent Meta from violating a 2012 FTC order that restricted its data-sharing practices.
These claims followed revelations that Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm linked to Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, had improperly accessed data from millions of Facebook users. The scandal led directly to the record-setting FTC fine.
An Abrupt End to the Trial
The settlement abruptly ended the trial on its second day, meaning Meta executives and board members will no longer have to testify about their handling of the breach. On the first day, an expert witness for the plaintiffs pointed to 'gaps and weaknesses' in Facebook's privacy policies, but did not confirm whether META violated the 2012 FTC agreement.
Details of the settlement remain undisclosed. The trial was overseen by Judge Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery, who praised both sides for reaching an agreement.
Is Meta a Buy, Hold, or Sell?
Turning to Wall Street, META stock has a Strong Buy consensus rating based on 41 Buys and four Holds assigned in the last three months. The average Meta share price target is $741.31, which implies an upside of 5.29% from current levels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Clear Fork Solar Deal Fuels Meta and Enbridge
Meta (NASDAQ:META) lands a $900 million boost for its Clear Fork solar project in Texas thanks to Enbridge's investment. Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) will fund 600 MW of solar capacity, cementing a long?term deal for Meta to buy 100 % of the green power for its data centers. The project, slated to go live by 2027 near San Antonio, reflects a broader tech pivot toward renewable energy to power AI and cloud operations. Enbridge says Clear Fork will add accretive cash flow and earnings once online. META stock has climbed 21 % this year, while ENB shares are up 9 % on the back of growing clean?energy investments. Clear Fork demonstrates the growing demand for renewable power across North America from blue?chip companies involved in technology and data center operations, Enbridge said in a release. Meta joins Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) in signing long?term power purchase agreements as AI workloads surge and sustainability targets tighten. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Engadget
2 hours ago
- Engadget
Meta has ended its bonus program on Threads
It's still trying to lure new users, but it's done paying anyone to post. Meta is no longer paying creators to post on Threads. The company quietly ended the Threads bonus program, which offered some creators thousands of dollars a month in bonuses, earlier this year, Engadget has confirmed. The company hasn't officially commented on why it stopped the payments, but an Instagram support page that once listed details about the creator incentives no longer references Threads at all. In posts on Threads, creators who were once part of the program have said they stopped receiving payments around the end of April. That's roughly one year after Meta first started paying creators for popular posts. Though Meta never publicly shared a lot of details about how the program worked, creators who previously spoke with Engadget reported that they were able to earn monthly bonuses ranging from $500 to $5,000 in exchange for hitting specific metrics around post counts and views. It's not clear what Meta's strategy for creators on Threads is going forward. The company is still trying to lure more brands and notable faces to the platform, and has tested features to help people find popular creators they previously followed on X. Meta has also added creator-friendly tools, like the ability to add more links to profiles and more detailed analytics for the app. ADVERTISEMENT Advertisement But Meta has yet to clearly explain what it can offer creators in return. The platform is hardly driving any traffic to outside websites. It's also much harder to build a following on Threads, since the platform defaults to an algorithmic timeline consisting mainly of recommended content. This means that it's easier for a post from an unknown account to go viral, but viral posts rarely lead to an influx of new followers. Meta may simply be calculating that Threads already has enough momentum without paying people for viral content. At the same time, Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly said he believes the app can be Meta's next billion-user platform. It's difficult to see how that happens without the buy-in of creators. Have a tip for Karissa? You can reach her by email, on X, Bluesky, Threads, or send a message to @karissabe.51 to chat confidentially on Signal.
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Democrats are desperately trying to revive the click-to-cancel rule
is a senior policy reporter at The Verge, covering the intersection of Silicon Valley and Capitol Hill. She spent 5 years covering tech policy at CNBC, writing about antitrust, privacy, and content moderation reform. Democratic lawmakers are taking multiple routes to try to revive the Federal Trade Commission's 'click-to-cancel' rule after an appeals court blocked it on procedural grounds right before it was set to take effect. Democrats already introduced legislation earlier this month to codify the rule, which would require subscription services to let customers cancel as easily as they signed up, through congressional vote. But now a group of lawmakers are also pressuring Republican FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson to reinstate it. Seven Democrats led by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) appealed to the chair in a letter shared exclusively with The Verge, urging him to revise the rule so that it can take effect. 'Putting this commonsense consumer protection in place is vital to foster competition, innovation, and fairness,' wrote the lawmakers, including Sens. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), who are also behind the click-to-cancel legislation. The click-to-cancel or negative option rule would have barred companies from throwing up roadblocks to ending gym memberships, streaming video subscriptions, and other services — eliminating extra steps of talking to a live agent, for example, to cancel a subscription purchased with a click of a button. But a federal appeals court ruled this month that the rule had to be thrown out because the FTC, under former Democratic Chair Lina Khan, had deprived companies and trade groups that petitioned against the rule a fair chance to talk the agency out of it. It's not yet clear whether either path toward restoring it will be fruitful, given that passing bills in a deeply divided legislature is a tall task, and Ferguson alongside Republican Commissioner Melissa Holyoak voted against the rule the first time around. But Democrats' insistence on reviving it shows they believe it to be a politically winning consumer protection issue, a position some Republicans might also come around to. The letter's Democratic signatories argue comments submitted on click-to-cancel show overwhelming support for the measure. 'A review of more than 16,000 comments from the public made clear what should be obvious: Businesses should not be allowed to trap consumers in costly subscriptions by making it difficult to unsubscribe—costing consumers valuable time and money while stifling competition,' the lawmakers wrote. 'We urge the FTC to cure any perceived procedural defect and reissue the rule as quickly as possible to ensure consumers are protected from predatory subscription traps.' 'Businesses should not be allowed to trap consumers in costly subscriptions by making it difficult to unsubscribe' There's some reason for hope that the FTC could get the rule back on track, even if it might look different than last time around. In her dissenting statement on the original rule, Holyoak wrote that she might have voted differently '[h]ad political leadership at the Commission taken more time to engage with other Commissioners to refine and improve the Rule.' But that path forward still looks murky, especially in light of President Donald Trump's upheaval of the FTC, an issue that's still working its way through the courts. Trump broke Supreme Court precedent to fire the two Democratic commissioners at the agency earlier this year, removing what could be key votes for the click-to-cancel rule. Last week, Democratic Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, who voted for the rule the first time, returned to work at the FTC after a federal judge ruled that Trump's attempt to fire her was unlawful. Smiling outside the FTC building on the day of her ephemeral return, Slaughter wrote on X that her first priority would be 'calling a vote on restoring the Click to Cancel Rule.' But her return was short-lived, after an appeals court this week granted an emergency stay keeping her from agency work while the case plays out. (Trump also attempted to fire Democratic Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya, who later resigned his position to take another role while the case played out in court. A federal judge dismissed his claims without prejudice). While pushing for Ferguson to reinstate the rule at the FTC, Klobuchar is also supporting Van Hollen's Consumer Online Payment Transparency and Integrity (Consumer OPT-IN) Act and Gallego's Click to Cancel Consumer Protection Act, which were introduced after the appeals court blocked the FTC rule. But Klobuchar and other Democrats aren't looking at it as an either-or proposition. 'The FTC should always be looking out for consumers and they did the right thing when they issued this rule,' Klobuchar said in a statement. 'Consumers deserve protection from subscription traps and it is time for the FTC to reinstate the rule to do just that.'
