logo
Trump's tariff war hits US F-35 hard: Spain cancels deal, India declines and Switzerland wavers

Trump's tariff war hits US F-35 hard: Spain cancels deal, India declines and Switzerland wavers

First Posta day ago
Trump's trade war impacts US defence exports, with Spain and Switzerland reconsidering F-35 purchases. Spain opts for European alternatives, while Swiss political resistance grows due to tariffs. Read here read more
A Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jet performs during the International Aerospace Exhibition ILA on the opening day at Schoenefeld Airport in Berlin, Germany June 5, 2024. REUTERS
The escalating trade war unleashed by US President Donald Trump is beginning to reverberate through Washington's own defence exports, with America's flagship fighter jet programme, the Lockheed Martin F-35 taking a direct hit.
In Europe, Spain has formally shelved plans to buy the US-made stealth fighters, confirming it will now focus on European alternatives, the Eurofighter Typhoon and the Future Combat Air System (FCAS). A defence ministry spokesperson in Madrid said the government had ruled out the F-35 in favour of platforms backed by Airbus, BAE Systems, Leonardo, Dassault Aviation and Indra Sistemas.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The move follows Trump's sharp criticism of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez for refusing to raise long-term defence spending to 5% of GDP, despite plans to meet NATO's 2% target by 2025. Washington had also threatened Madrid with additional tariffs on Spanish goods. With €6.25 billion initially budgeted for new jets and €10.5 billion in extra defence spending earmarked for European industries, the US aircraft had no political or fiscal space left.
Switzerland, meanwhile, is experiencing growing political resistance to its planned purchase of 36 F-35s after Trump imposed punitive 39% tariffs on Swiss exports — the steepest rate among developed nations. The surcharge, which affects luxury watches and Nespresso capsules, has sparked calls in parliament to cancel the order or hold a fresh referendum.
Green lawmaker Balthasar Glättli said, 'A country which throws rocks at us in trade shouldn't get a present,' while Social Democrat co-president Cédric Wermuth urged voters to stop the procurement. Even Liberal allies of Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter have questioned the deal, citing higher-than-expected costs and the 'American tariff shock.'
The setback in Bern comes at a time when Lockheed Martin is already under pressure, with the Pentagon cutting its own F-35 purchases for 2026 and shifting funds to rival programmes. The 36 jets earmarked for Switzerland would have represented nearly a third of the company's total deliveries in 2024.
India, too, has kept its distance from the F-35 programme. New Delhi has not pursued the American fighter, focusing instead on its indigenous Tejas programme and other procurement options amid friction over Trump's steep tariffs on Indian exports and policy disagreements.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With key US allies turning to European-made aircraft or reconsidering existing deals, Trump's tariff strategy intended to pressure trading partners is increasingly undermining one of America's most lucrative defence exports. For Lockheed Martin, the turbulence in Washington's trade relationships is now a direct threat to its order books.
Wit inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who is Stephan Miran? Did you know Trump's interim Fed pick is the ‘mind' behind his tariffs?
Who is Stephan Miran? Did you know Trump's interim Fed pick is the ‘mind' behind his tariffs?

Mint

time26 minutes ago

  • Mint

Who is Stephan Miran? Did you know Trump's interim Fed pick is the ‘mind' behind his tariffs?

United States President Donald Trump has appointed Dr Stephen Miran as the temporary appointee to the Federal Reserve Board until January 31, 2026, filling the seat left vacant by the surprise resignation of Governor Adriana Kugler. In a statement posted on Truth Social, Trump said: 'It is my great honor to announce that I have chosen Dr. Stephen Miran. He has been with me from the beginning of my Second Term, and his expertise in the World of Economics is unparalleled. He will do an outstanding job.' Miran, 42, is currently serving the US government as the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors. He is often credited as the 'mind' behind Trump's economic policies including the tariffs. He has been a prominent figure in conservative economic policy, shaping key financial strategies under Trump since the beginning of the president's second term. Previously, he served in the Treasury Department under Secretary Steven Mnuchin, where he was assigned the position to design the Paycheck Protection Program during the 2020 COVID-19 crisis. Other than serving the U.S. government, Miran has worked as a senior strategist at Hudson Bay Capital Management and senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. He is known for his strong economic views, such as publicly criticizing the Federal Reserve's pandemic-era stimulus policies. He has also authored 'Mar-A-Lago Accord,' a controversial proposal that suggests dollar devaluation as a way to address the U.S. current account deficit. His economic stance aligns closely with Trump's viewpoints, as he is a strong advocate for not just reciprocal tariffs but also pro-crypto initiatives. Miran earned his bachelor's degree in Economics, Philosophy, and Mathematics from the prestigious Boston University in 2005, and went on to complete a PhD in Economics at Harvard University in 2010. Miran was the son of Dan and Jane Miran who served as civil servants at theSocial Security Administration.

Trump attack on Intel's CEO could compound factory struggles
Trump attack on Intel's CEO could compound factory struggles

Economic Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Trump attack on Intel's CEO could compound factory struggles

NYT News Service FILE -- Utility infrastructure under construction in Johnstown, Ohio, to support a planned Intel chip manufacturing plant, Jan. 3, 2025. Intel's challenges in Ohio highlight both the risks that federal and state officials took in financially backing Intel, and the struggles the Trump administration will face in trying to shift more semiconductor production from Asia to the U.S. (Brian Kaiser/The New York Times) At the end of July, Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said Intel's chief executive was "very, very optimistic" about the company's plans to build multibillion-dollar semiconductor factories in his state. Last week, President Donald Trump attacked the tech executive, and a Republican senator called for an investigation into delays surrounding Intel's massive construction project outside Columbus. Trump demanded Thursday that Lip-Bu Tan, Intel's new CEO, resign over his past ties to Chinese companies, adding to the woes of a company that DeWine and other senior figures in Ohio's Republican Party had said would help create a manufacturing boom and turn the state into a "Silicon Heartland." To help build its Ohio factories, Intel received commitments worth roughly $1.5 billion in federal funding in recent years, as well as a $2 billion incentive package from the state. The project has been badly delayed, and the chipmaker said this year that the factories would not be operational until at least 2030. The company's challenges in Ohio highlight the risks that federal and state officials took when they financially backed Intel, a once-powerful force in chip manufacturing, an industry now dominated by the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Intel's situation is also indicative of the struggles the Trump administration will face as it tries -- through the pressure of tariffs and threats from the White House -- to shift the bulk of semiconductor production to the United States from Asia. When the Biden administration offered financial incentives through the CHIPS Act, Intel was one of the few American companies that it made sense to back. But whether by stick or carrot, forcing this transition could prove extraordinarily difficult, as the delays around the Ohio project demonstrate. "It's pretty obvious that Intel has failed to meet the commitments it made to the people of Ohio," Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, wrote on social media Thursday. "Now we find out its new CEO is deeply conflicted with ties to the CCP," he said, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. "The CEO must immediately resign, the project completed, and a fraud investigation should be initiated by Ohio," Moreno added. Semiconductor factories are extremely expensive and complicated to build. Intel has struggled to find enough customers to stay afloat as it poured money into construction. After posting an $18.8 billion loss in 2024 in its foundry division, the company ousted its CEO in December, cut 15,000 jobs and appeared to be exploring other strategies, including the possible sale of its manufacturing business to TSMC. Asked for comment, a spokesperson for Intel referred to its most recent earnings report from July, in which the company said it was committed to completing the project in Ohio but had slowed construction to match customer demand. Dan Tierney, press secretary for DeWine, said Friday that the governor remained optimistic about the project. "We expect chips to be made in that facility," Tierney said. He added that the company had already invested $7 billion in the construction project in Ohio, more than three times the amount of the state's incentive package, which involves some tax credits that have yet to be paid out. The incentive package is tied to job creation by the end of 2028, so the earliest that the state would attempt to claw back any money is 2029, Tierney said. As for the allegations against Tan, he said, DeWine is concerned about any allegation of involvement with the Chinese Communist Party that is detrimental to the national interest but is not rushing to judgment. "We don't have all the facts, and we will need to see what facts come out," Tierney said. The stakes are high for Intel and Ohio. Semiconductor chips, which are used in everything from cellphones to fighter jets, have recently become a particular focus for Trump, as they were for former President Joe Biden. Both presidents viewed domestic production as critical to national security, especially as more than 90% of the world's most advanced chips were produced in Taiwan, an island claimed by China. In 2022, under Biden, Congress passed a bill with bipartisan support that aimed to remedy that vulnerability by pouring billions of dollars into subsidies for semiconductor companies to build facilities in the United States. Intel, the only American-owned maker of advanced logic chips, was awarded up to $7.9 billion to build factories in the United States. (Only about $2 billion of that has been disbursed.) Trump has criticized the subsidy approach, arguing that tariffs are a more effective tool to bring manufacturing back to the United States. He threatened last week to impose a 100% duty on many imported chips. Tan, who took over Intel in March, has been hailed as a savior of the struggling American chipmaker. He is a longtime Silicon Valley investor who focused on semiconductor startups, even during eras when venture capital money seemed to be pouring into software and apps. On July 28, a company that Tan once ran pleaded guilty to transferring technology that was under U.S. export controls to Chinese entities. Though the plea agreement with the Justice Department did not name Tan, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., wrote to the chair of Intel's board of directors Tuesday, raising questions about what Tan may have known about the illicit activity. In a statement Thursday, Tan, an American citizen who was born in Malaysia, said that "misinformation" was circulating about his past roles and that he fully shared "the president's commitment to advancing U.S. national and economic security." "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. He added that he was engaging with the administration "to address the matters that have been raised and ensure they have the facts." The questions surrounding Tan could create yet another hurdle in the attempt to bring the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors to Ohio. Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, was among the lawmakers who supported public funding for the Intel semiconductor factory. He posted a message on social media saying the company had promised to "respond promptly" to Cotton's letter. "The facts have not changed: We need an American company to make American chips on American soil," Husted wrote. "Producing the world's most advanced high-tech chips in the U.S. is not just economic policy -- it's a national security imperative. Every day we are not doing that, we are putting our country at risk." Husted did not respond to a request for comment. State Sen. Bill DeMora, a Democrat representing Columbus, said Ohio Republicans were using Trump's attack on Tan to distract from the fact that they sank public money into a project that has stalled. DeMora, who has long called the project a boondoggle, said in an interview Friday that Ohio Republicans "did all this hoopla and pageantry" to hype the Intel project. "Now they want the Intel president to step down because he has ties to China," he said. "That's their excuse." He said construction had continued with a fraction of the workers the company had promised to hire. He predicted that the site would never become a semiconductor factory. "Intel is never going to make a chip there," he said. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. BlackRock returns, this time with Ambani. Will it be lucky second time? The airport lounge war has begun — and DreamFolks is losing End of an era: The Maggi Man who rebuilt Nestlé India bows out India's last cement IPO did not work. Can JSW Cement break that curse? Is Shadowfax closing in on its closest rival? Stock Radar: APL Apollo Tubes stock fails to hold momentum after hitting highs in June; what should traders do? Buy, Sell or Hold: Avendus trims target on Titan Company; Motila Oswal maintains buy on Jindal Stainless These large- and mid-cap stocks may give more than 25% return in 1 year, according to analysts

"5 Pak Jets, 1 ELINT Or AEW&C" India Scores "Longest Surface-To-Air Kill" With S-400 In Op Sindoor
"5 Pak Jets, 1 ELINT Or AEW&C" India Scores "Longest Surface-To-Air Kill" With S-400 In Op Sindoor

News18

time28 minutes ago

  • News18

"5 Pak Jets, 1 ELINT Or AEW&C" India Scores "Longest Surface-To-Air Kill" With S-400 In Op Sindoor

In May 2025, during Operation Sindoor, the Indian Air Force shot down six Pakistani aircraft using the S-400 missile system, achieving a record 314 km surface-to-air kill. IAF Chief Amar Preet Singh called the S-400 a "game changer," highlighting India's advanced military capabilities and strategic autonomy.00:00 INTRODUCTION03:03 'POLITICAL WILL, CLEAR DIRECTIONS AND NO RESTRICTIONS'04:50 OPPOSITION CITES 'TRUMP PRESSURE' n18oc_crux

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store