Sharaa's Pullout From Syria Druze Heartland Exposes Shaky Leadership
Since seizing office in December after ousting longtime autocrat Bashar al-Assad, Sharaa has worked to recast himself from jihadist to statesman, even earning praise from US President Donald Trump as a "tough guy".
But in the early hours of Thursday, he was forced to announce the withdrawal of troops from the Druze-majority city of Sweida, framing it as an effort to avoid confrontation with Israel and prevent further destabilisation in a country still reeling from 14 years of war.
AFP looks at what drove Syria's interim president to this withdrawal -- and whether his leadership is now fatally undermined.
In his Thursday speech, Sharaa praised the "effective intervention of American, Arab and Turkish mediation, which saved the region from an unknown fate".
That followed Israeli air strikes targeting the Syrian military headquarters and the vicinity of the presidential palace in Damascus.
It also came amid diplomatic pressure from the United States.
Gamal Mansur, a comparative politics researcher specialising in Syrian and Israeli studies at the University of Toronto, said he believed "the withdrawal was imposed on the authorities due to the imbalance of power caused by Israel's presence".
Syria "was forced to retreat because its position in Sweida was not that strong and it was unable to retain the land in Sweida without a high price that would force a second Israeli intervention", he said.
Sharaa admitted on Thursday that his options to avoid "open war" with Israel were limited.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the ceasefire in Syria was "obtained by force" and "not by demands, not by pleas".
A senior Western diplomat, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the topic, told AFP that Sharaa "is very aware of the situation that he is in and he is realistic".
"He knows Syria is at a weak point and that the best option is to reach a deal with the Israelis."
Heiko Wimmen, project director for Iraq, Syria and Lebanon at International Crisis Group, said Sharaa's pullback showed he was "making a further step towards accepting that Israel basically projects power onto the doorstep of Damascus".
Since leading the overthrow of Assad, Sharaa has repeatedly said his country does not seek conflicts with its neighbours.
Damascus has acknowledged holding indirect talks to reduce tensions with Israel, which has occupied Syria's Golan Heights since 1967.
The Israeli army deployed troops into the UN-patrolled zone on the Golan after the fall of Assad and launched hundreds of bombing raids.
Mansur believes the Sweida events "will place Israel in a better position and with stronger negotiating terms".
The Western diplomat said that while full normalisation was unlikely, Israel could still reach a favourable security agreement with Syria.
Sharaa and his government have been pushing for unified control of the country from Damascus, with the various armed factions, often tied to ethnic or religious identities, merged into the state's armed forces.
That goal was undermined by the events in Sweida, which remains outside Damascus's direct control, and major sectarian clashes like the coastal massacres in March, during which more than 1,700 mostly Alawite civilians were killed.
Sharaa's ability to control armed factions loyal to him, which include extremist groups and foreign jihadists, was heavily questioned following those incidents.
Washington had previously demanded that "foreign terrorists" leave Syria.
These developments reveal "the weakness of Sharaa's authority", Mansur said, adding the Syrian leader needed to consolidate his authority and secure control over the state's security apparatus.
Additionally, the Kurds in northeastern Syria are still demanding a decentralised system despite repeated rejections by Damascus.
Bedran Ciya Kurd, a senior official in the autonomous administration, said on Thursday that Damascus should "review" its attitude towards minorities.
Syria's Kurds may be in a stronger position after the Sweida clashes, according to Wimmen, who said there was now a "big question mark" over the idea of full integration with Damascus.
The Kurds now have "many reasons to be very careful about any form of integration", he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
27 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Palantir, The AI Giant That Preaches US Dominance
Palantir, an American data analysis and artificial intelligence company, has emerged as Silicon Valley's latest tech darling -- one that makes no secret of its macho, America-first ethos now ascendant in Trump-era tech culture. The company's reach spans the global economy, with banks, hospitals, the US government, and the Israeli military among its ever-expanding client roster. "We want and need this country to be the strongest, most important country in the world," Alex Karp, Palantir's CEO, recently declared at a client conference in Palo Alto, California, where AFP was the only media outlet present. In armed conflicts -- most notably in Ukraine -- Palantir's tools help evaluate potential targets in real-time, using multiple sources, including biometric data and intercepted phone calls. "I'm super proud of... what we do to protect our soldiers... (using our AI) to kill our enemies and scare them, because they know they will be killed," the graying, curly-haired billionaire continued, wearing a tight white T-shirt. Washington has been filling Palantir's coffers. In the first quarter, the company received $373 million from the US government -- a 45 percent jump from the previous year -- and it's not all miltary spending. This spring, federal immigration authorities (ICE) awarded the company a $30 million contract to develop a new platform for tracking deportations and visa overstays. The company then secured an investment of nearly $800 million from the US military, adding to the $480 million contract signed in May 2024 for its AI platform supporting the Pentagon's "Project Maven" target identification program. This marked Palantir's first billion-dollar contract, elevating it alongside government contracting stalwarts like Microsoft and Amazon's AWS. However, financial results "are not and will never be the ultimate measure of the value, broadly defined, of our business," Karp wrote in his letter to shareholders in early May, where he tossed in quotes from Saint Augustine, the Bible and Richard Nixon. "We have grander and more idiosyncratic aims." Palantir was founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel -- Silicon Valley's preeminent conservative -- Karp, and others with CIA backing. The company takes its name from the magical seeing stones in Tolkien's "Lord of the Rings." "Young people would say we're like pure drugs -- very expensive, highly sought after... that make you stronger and better," Karp boasted on stage. Palantir's expanding footprint at the highest levels of government has raised eyebrows. Several members of the Trump administration's "DOGE" cost-cutting commission, originally headed by Elon Musk, came from the company. Recent reports from The New York Times, Wired, and CNN have detailed secret government projects to create, with Palantir's help, a central database combining data from different federal agencies. This development has created "a lot of concerns about how that information might be used," warned Elizabeth Laird from the Center for Democracy & Technology. Palantir maintains it isn't building "surveillance technology" or a "central database on Americans." Unlike most traditional Silicon Valley companies that have kept military projects discreet, Palantir now embraces its defense work openly. Sasha Spivak, director of strategy, said that when she joined Palantir ten years ago, the company kept its sense of purpose behind closed doors. "Today we're not ashamed, we're not afraid, and we're deeply proud of what we do and our clients," said Spivak. Some employee groups are pushing back. In early May, 13 former Palantir employees published a letter accusing tech giants of helping to "normalize authoritarianism under the cover of a 'revolution' led by oligarchs." They argue that by supporting the Trump administration and DOGE, Palantir has betrayed its stated values of ethics, transparency, and defending democracy. "When I joined the company... there were many smart, motivated people -- that's pretty rare," said one of the letter's signatories, who wishes to remain anonymous, for fear of reprisal. After months of seeking management explanations about Palantir's collaboration with Israel and ICE, several of these employees resigned. "They said, 'We're a company that's very responsive to employees,' but people asking about Israel were quickly shut down and told, 'That's what we do -- if you don't like it, you can leave,'" the former staffer recalled. Jeremy David, co-director of the Health division, plays down the controversies. "My daily life is more about nurses and doctors who often hate us at first and are very grateful at the end," he told AFP at the conference. On stage, Joe Bonanno, head of data analysis at Citibank, celebrated how one operation that previously required "nine days and sometimes 50 people" now "takes just a few minutes for one person." "Like I said, and like Alex said, I came to dominate, crush and annihilate. So if you're JPMorgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, sorry," he concluded with a broad smile. Some potential clients quietly admit they don't appreciate the war-like rhetoric, but they see no alternative to Palantir's capabilities.
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Israeli NGOs say Israel is committing genocide in Gaza – DW – 07/28/2025
Two prominent NGOs said Palestinians had been "stripped of their humanity and rights," accusing Israel of actively destroying Gaza's healthcare infrastructure. Israel's government said the accusations were "baseless." Two Israeli human rights organizations accused the government of Israel of committing genocide against Palestiniansin Gaza. The groups represented the first major voices within Israeli society to level the strongest possible accusation against the state. Rights group B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel released their reports at a press conference in Jerusalem, saying Israel was carrying out "coordinated, deliberate action to destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza strip." While claiming to target only Islamist extremist group Hamas, the Israeli government carried out a policy of "mass killing" through direct attacks and by creating catastrophic living conditions in Gaza that drove the death toll higher, the NGOs said. The report also found that Israeli forces caused "serious bodily or mental harm to the entire population of the Strip" and carried out "large-scale destruction of infrastructure" along with "destruction of the social fabric, including Palestinian schools and cultural sites." "The people of Gaza have been displaced, bombed and starved, left completely stripped of their humanity and rights." said Yuli Novak, B'Tselem's executive director. Physicians for Human Rights Israel focused on damage to Gaza's healthcare system, saying: "Israel's actions have destroyed Gaza's healthcare infrastructure in a manner that is both calculated and systematic." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video An Israeli government spokesperson called the allegation made by the human rights groups "baseless." Since the early days of the Gaza war, Israel has repeatedly denied accusations of genocide—including in a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called "outrageous." The 1948 Genocide Convention, adopted globally after the Nazi genocide of Jews during World War II, defines genocide as intentional acts meant to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. When Amnesty International last December accused Israel of committing genocidal acts, Israel's foreign ministry slammed the global rights group as a "deplorable and fanatical organization."
Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Russia Using American Trucks to Launch Deadly Kamikaze Drone Strikes on Ukraine Cities: Report
Russia is reportedly equipping American-made trucks to launch deadly kamikaze drone strikes on Ukrainian cities, according to a new report. A modified Ram 1500 pickup truck could be seen in a July 20 video by Zvezda, a state TV channel controlled by the country's defense ministry, firing kamikaze drones, according to the Kyiv Independent . Four more trucks with the same feature were later seen in the video showing off the Tatarstan region drone factory, although a source told the outlet that launching drones from pickup trucks was not common. Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Stellantis, who owns Ram Trucks, paused all exports to Russia after sanctions were implemented on the country. However, between February 2022 and September 2024, 130 Michigan-made Ram 1500 trucks ended up in the country. The majority of these exports are believed to have come about through a tactic called "transshipment," which is when a company direct sales through a country that is not participating in the sanctions. Several companies based in the United Arab Emirates, who was not involved in the sanctions on Russia, allegedly rerouted sales of the American trucks through the country to sell to private Russian companies. From there, the trucks could be sold anywhere in Russia. While companies could be able to continue sales in sanction-restricted countries with a special license, Alex Bashinsky, a co-founder at the Global Sanctions Training Institute and member of the International Working Group on Russian Sanctions, told the outlet that they are "hard to obtain." No companies reached out to by Kyiv Independent explicitly stated they had the required license. An intel report from earlier this month revealed that Russia's kamikaze drones are set to multiply in number to use in its war against Ukraine, with the number Shahed-136s, the most common explosive-carrying drone used by Russia, reportedly up exponentially. On Thursday, at least 33 people were injured in an attack on Kharkiv, Ukraine, which officials from the Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor's Office said may have involved a new weapon developed by Russia, UMPB-5 bombs, though this remains unconfirmed. Originally published on Latin Times
