logo
D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Capitalizes on Annealing Advantage to Extend Bullish Outlook

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Capitalizes on Annealing Advantage to Extend Bullish Outlook

Shares of quantum computing pioneer D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) have surged more than 124% year-to-date, fueled by the commercial debut of its Advantage2 annealing quantum computer, strong first-quarter earnings, and a successful $400 million capital raise through a stock offering.
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
I'm optimistically Bullish about quantum computing, and D-Wave in particular, as the company provides distinctive exposure to what could be a transformative leap in technology. That said, the stock currently trades at a premium and carries considerable risk.
QBTS Makes Progress as Competition Heats Up
As the world's first commercial quantum computer manufacturer, D-Wave has demonstrated quantum computational supremacy in solving real-world problems, thereby distinguishing its practical applications from purely theoretical approaches in quantum computing.
The company spent over two decades developing both 'annealing' and 'gate-model' systems that leverage quantum mechanics to try and solve problems in fundamentally different ways than traditional computers. D-Wave's annealing quantum technology is gaining commercial traction, with companies reporting productivity improvements from implementation.
Recent successes include a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with South Korea's Yonsei University and Incheon Metropolitan City, positioning D-Wave within South Korea's national quantum initiatives. The company has also completed a recent transaction with Julich. These have strengthened D-Wave's revenue trajectory, show support for its Quantum Computing as a Service (QCaaS) business model, and help further establish the company's presence in key global markets.
While D-Wave benefits from its first-mover advantage and commercial focus, the company faces intensifying competition as tech giants, with massive research budgets and established technology ecosystems, like IBM (IBM), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Microsoft (MSFT), race to make quantum computing a reality.
D-Wave's Financial Performance Shows Promise
Looking back to May, D-Wave published its first-quarter 2025 results, which exceeded expectations, with revenue of $15 million—a 500% increase from the same period last year—reflecting the company's first sale of its flagship Advantage system to a major research institution.
The company's gross profit margin of 92% was impressive and suggests D-Wave has made significant progress toward building a genuinely scalable business model with strong pricing power.
While the company beat earnings expectations with a loss of just $0.02 per share, versus the anticipated $0.05 loss, it's still burning through cash to fund growth, reflecting the reality that quantum computing remains primarily a research and development play.
However, the company also recently took steps to shore up its balance sheet. After completing a $400 million equity raise in July, D-Wave now holds approximately $815 million in cash. This war chest provides crucial breathing room to invest in research, expand operations, and weather the inevitable ups and downs of an emerging market.
An Expensive Ticket to This Volatile Ride
D-Wave's valuation has reached all-time highs. The company trades at over 176x its trailing revenue and more than 23x its book value. To put that in perspective, its peers in the Information Technology sector trade at an average Price/Sales ratio of 3.26x and a Price/Book ratio of 3.64x. D-Wave's valuation implies investors believe the company will achieve massive scale soon.
This creates a challenging situation for investors. Any disappointment in growth, competitive setbacks, or delays in the adoption of quantum technology could trigger a sharp decline in its share price. The recent 10%+ drop following reports of increased competition from IBM and Google demonstrates the stock's sensitivity to headline news.
Furthermore, while most experts agree that quantum computing will eventually reach mainstream adoption, 'eventually' could mean anywhere from five years to twenty. The company will need to maintain its technological edge and continue growing revenue during what could be a long development/adoption period.
Is QBTS a Good Stock to Buy?
Wall Street analysts, as covered by TipRanks, currently rate QBTS as a Strong Buy based on the recent recommendations of seven analysts. Currently, QBTS' average stock price target of $17.33 is below the current market price, indicating that analysts expect QBTS stock to decline by ~6% over the next 12 months.
More specifically, Cantor Fitzgerald recently initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a $20 price target, while Benchmark Co. analyst David Williams reiterated a Buy rating with a $20 price target. Both firms recognize quantum computing as an emerging technology with substantial economic potential, despite being in early developmental stages.
QBTS Must Face Risks to Achieve Quantum Dominance
Quantum computing holds the potential to transform how we solve complex problems, and D-Wave is uniquely positioned to benefit from this shift.
Its dual-technology approach provides flexibility that competitors lack, while its commercial focus has translated into actual revenue growth rather than just research papers. The recent cash infusion eliminates near-term financial risk and provides resources to accelerate development.
However, the current stock price already incorporates significant optimism about D-Wave's future success. The extreme valuation multiples leave little room for disappointment, while intensifying competition creates ongoing execution risk.
As an investor willing to accept potential substantial volatility in exchange for exposure to quantum computing, I believe a small position in QBTS merits strong consideration.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030
Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030

Key Points Quantum Computing has emerged alongside other popular quantum stocks such as IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum over the last year. While the company's approach to building quantum applications is interesting, past ambitions in other markets and an inconsistent financial profile should make investors pause before blindly buying the hype narrative. Although Quantum Computing has interesting potential, the amount of unknowns surrounding the company's future are hard to ignore. 10 stocks we like better than Quantum Computing › One of the more curious companies that has piqued investor intrigue in the quantum computing market is a business called (wait for it!) Quantum Computing (NASDAQ: QUBT). With a name like that, I wonder how it landed on so many radars. Sarcasm aside, Quantum Computing (the business) deserves a look -- and not just because of its 2,400% share price gains over the last year. To me, the company's technological promises and its actual business just don't align. Let's explore how Quantum Computing is attempting to disrupt the artificial intelligence (AI) realm and then dig into whether or not the company has what it takes to fulfill its lofty ambitions. Is Quantum Computing the next multibagger AI stock? Read on to find out. Quantum Computing might look like an exciting company on the surface, but... Quantum-based applications have the potential to transform the computing industry thanks to their fundamentally differentiated architectures. In simple terms, classical computing is based on binary code, written through a series of bits expressed as 1 or 0. Quantum computing uses qubits, which means they can exist as both 1 and 0 at the same time -- a process known as superposition. This allows for more complex information processing compared to today's classical computers. There are multiple ways that companies are developing qubits. IonQ relies on a process called trapped-ion, which essentially uses lasers to trap atoms and use them as the foundation of a qubit. Meanwhile, other competitors such as Rigetti Computing and D-Wave Quantum use superconducting circuits and quantum annealing techniques to make qubits. Quantum Computing, on the other hand, is using light (photons) as opposed to Rigetti and D-Wave's electricity-based foundation or IonQ's trapped atom technology. In theory, photonic qubits may be more energy efficient and easier to scale than other approaches that are heavily reliant on sophisticated cooling systems. ... there are quite a few red flags to point out Before buying into the idea that Quantum Computing is on the verge of a technological breakthrough, consider the following: Quantum Computing was once known as Innovative Beverage Group Holdings (IBGH). Why did the company pivot from beverages to qubits? Well, consider that IBGH went out of business, and the leftover management team decided to acquire a small company called QPhoton and completely shift its focus to quantum computing. Over the last year, Quantum Computing has generated $385,000 in sales. While the idea of photonic qubits is interesting, Quantum Computing is far from building a competitive moat over its rivals. The company's nominal revenue base and unproven roadmap hint at possible liquidity crunches down the road. For now, Quantum Computing appears to be relying on issuing stock as a means to raise cash and fund the operation. Despite these red flags, Quantum Computing has seen its market value climb from $55 million to $2.4 billion in just one year. The company's valuation is far higher than what investors witnessed during prior stock market bubbles during the internet boom and the COVID-19 stock market euphoria. Where will Quantum Computing stock be in five years? Given the ideas explored above, it's clear that Quantum Computing has virtually nothing to show for its supposed innovative photonic processes. The lack of strategic partners and product-market fit has me thinking that Quantum Computing offers more along the lines of vaporware than anything groundbreaking at this time. With ongoing research and development (R&D) and capital expenditures (capex) required to explore quantum technology, Quantum Computing is likely going to continue tapping the capital markets for liquidity unless some transformative deals begin to take shape -- which I suspect is highly unlikely. In my eyes, Quantum Computing stock is benefiting for one reason above all else. The company's name isn't just associated with one of AI's hottest new themes -- it's literally the name of the actual trend. To me, this is a case study revolving around the idea of investors blindly chasing narratives over sound fundamentals. I think that Quantum Computing is headed toward insolvency and could wind up bankrupt by 2030 (if not sooner). Alternatively, regulators could begin to scrutinize the company more heavily, and Quantum Computing could end up as a delisted stock. Regardless of how things shake out, I think Quantum Computing's equity value will diminish significantly in the coming years. For this reason, I think the company will have little-to-no value by the end of the decade. Should you buy stock in Quantum Computing right now? Before you buy stock in Quantum Computing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Quantum Computing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Adam Spatacco has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030 was originally published by The Motley Fool

D-Wave Stock Skyrocketed 1,732%: Here's What Canaccord Expects Next
D-Wave Stock Skyrocketed 1,732%: Here's What Canaccord Expects Next

Business Insider

time6 hours ago

  • Business Insider

D-Wave Stock Skyrocketed 1,732%: Here's What Canaccord Expects Next

D-Wave (NYSE:QBTS) stock is attracting attention as quantum computing gains traction for its potential to revolutionize processing power and tackle problems beyond the reach of classical computers. While gate-based quantum systems remain mostly experimental, D-Wave's specialty – quantum annealing – has already been applied to real-world commercial challenges for years. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. That real-world applicability is a key reason why Canaccord analyst Kingsley Crane sees D-Wave as uniquely positioned in the quantum space. 'D-Wave is not only the clear market leader in quantum annealing but has lead innovation in the space since its inception,' the analyst opined. Backing that conviction, Crane outlines three main reasons he considers D-Wave a 'compelling investment.' First, although the broader quantum field is buzzing with long-term potential, Crane points out that gate-based quantum models – often seen as the endgame – still face a murky path to commercialization. Estimates on readiness vary widely, from a few years to well over a decade. In contrast, D-Wave is already delivering value through its quantum annealing systems, with many clients using hybrid solutions today. 'In the meantime,' says Crane, 'D-Wave is solving problems for customers (in many cases using a hybrid approach) and is getting paid to do so. All the while, D-Wave is also actively researching and developing in the gate model space which embeds a gate model 'call option' into the stock.' Second, D-Wave's diversified business model adds another layer of appeal. Its Leap platform – a quantum computing-as-a-service (QCaaS) offering – is the core driver of recurring revenue, providing enterprises with real-time quantum access. At the same time, D-Wave has started to gain traction selling physical systems, notably racking up $18 million in bookings in Q4 of 2024. 'As the recurring QCaaS revenue base continues to ramp, system sales present a powerful auxiliary revenue stream,' Crane noted, while also acknowledging the potential volatility it introduces. The third pillar of Crane's thesis centers on leadership. D-Wave is led by a highly experienced core team with deep technical knowledge and a strong track record of innovation. In Crane's history of analyzing transformative software companies, those with category-defining leadership often represent 'generational investment opportunities.' D-Wave is a 'special case,' where it is not only the pioneer of quantum annealing, but has also maintained its leadership in R&D within this niche for decades. CEO Alan Baratz, who joined in 2017, and Chief Development Officer Trevor Lanting, who has been with the company since 2008, bring extensive scientific and technological expertise to the table. With revenue beginning to accelerate, Crane believes this team will 'continue to build on its advantage as revenue now begins to inflect.' Of course, with investor excitement running high, valuations have followed suit. QBTS shares have skyrocketed 1,732% over the past year, and at over 100 times projected 2026 sales, the stock now falls squarely into 'long-term concept' territory. Even so, Crane initiated coverage on QBTS with a Buy rating and a $20 price target – a 6% above Friday's closing price – while suggesting a bull case scenario could push shares as high as $45. (To watch Crane's track record, click here) To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.

MCP Connects, SDP Delivers: The Missing Half of AI Memory is Here
MCP Connects, SDP Delivers: The Missing Half of AI Memory is Here

USA Today

time7 hours ago

  • USA Today

MCP Connects, SDP Delivers: The Missing Half of AI Memory is Here

Prescott, Arizona / Syndication Cloud / July 22, 2025 / David Bynon Key Takeaways Model Context Protocol (MCP) creates AI connections to external tools but doesn't define structured memory content Semantic Digest Protocol (SDP) provides trust-scored, fragment-level memory objects for reliable AI operations Multi-agent systems typically fail due to missing shared, verifiable context rather than communication issues MCP and SDP together form a complete memory architecture that stops hallucinations and contextual drift MedicareWire will implement SDP in 2025 as the first major deployment of AI-readable, trust-verified memory in a regulated domain AI's Memory Crisis: Why Today's Systems Can't Remember What Matters Today's AI systems face a critical problem: they process vast information but struggle with reliable memory. This isn't merely a technical issue — it's what causes hallucinations, inconsistency, and unreliability in advanced AI deployments. This problem becomes obvious in multi-agent systems. When specialized AI agents work together, they don't typically fail from poor communication. They fail because they lack shared, scoped, and verifiable context. Without standardized memory architecture, agents lose alignment, reference inconsistent information, and produce unreliable results. David Bynon, founder at MedicareWire, identified this issue early on. In regulated areas like Medicare, incorrect information can seriously impact consumers making healthcare decisions. The solution needs two protocols working together to create a complete memory system for AI. The first protocol, Model Context Protocol (MCP), addresses the connection problem. But it's just half of what's needed for truly reliable AI memory. Understanding Model Context Protocol (MCP) IBM recently recognized the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as core infrastructure for AI systems, describing it as 'USB-C for AI' — a universal connector standard allowing AI models to connect with external tools, data sources, and memory systems. This recognition confirmed what many AI engineers already understood: standardized connections between AI models and external resources build reliable systems at scale. IBM's Recognition: The 'USB-C for AI' Breakthrough The USB-C comparison makes sense. Before USB standardization, connecting devices to computers required numerous proprietary ports and cables. Before MCP, every AI tool integration needed custom code, fragile connections, and ongoing maintenance. IBM's official support of MCP acknowledged that AI's future requires standardized interfaces. Just as USB-C connects any compatible device to any compatible port, MCP creates a standard protocol for AI systems to interact with external tools and data sources. What MCP Solves: The Transport Problem MCP handles the transport problem in AI systems. It standardizes how an AI agent: Negotiates with external systems about needed information Creates secure, reliable connections to tools and data sources Exchanges information in predictable, consistent formats Maintains state across interactions with various resources This standardization allows developers to build tools once for use with any MCP-compliant AI system. Custom integrations for each new model or tool become unnecessary — just consistent connectivity across platforms. The Critical Gap: Missing Content Definition Despite its value, MCP has a major limitation: it defines how AI systems connect, but not what the content should look like. This resembles standardizing a USB port without defining the data format flowing through it. This creates a significant gap in AI memory architecture. While MCP handles connections, it doesn't address: How to structure memory for machine understanding How to encode and verify trust and provenance How to scope and contextualize content How information fragments should relate to each other This explains why AI systems with excellent tool integration still struggle with reliable memory — they have connections but lack content structure for trustworthy recall. Semantic Digest Protocol: The Memory Layer MCP Needs This is where the Semantic Digest Protocol (SDP) fits — built to work with MCP while solving what it leaves unaddressed: defining what memory should actually look like. Trust-Scored Fragment-Level Memory Architecture SDP organizes memory at the fragment level, instead of treating entire documents as single information units. Each fragment — a fact, definition, statistic, or constraint — exists as an independent memory object with its own metadata. These memory objects contain: The actual information content A trust score based on source credibility Complete provenance data showing information origin Scope parameters showing where and when the information applies Contextual relationships to other memory fragments This detailed approach fixes a basic problem: AI systems must know not just what a fact is, but how much to trust it, where it came from, when it applies, and how it connects to other information. Using the 'USB-C for AI' analogy, SDP is a universal, USB-C thumb drive for the Model Context Protocol. It provides data, across multiple surfaces, in a format MCP recognizes and understands Machine-Ingestible Templates in Multiple Formats SDP creates a complete trust payload system with templates in multiple formats: JSON-LD for structured data interchange TTL (Turtle) for RDF graph representations Markdown for lightweight documentation HTML templates for web publication Invented by David Bynon as a solution for MedicareWire, the format flexibility makes SDP work immediately with existing systems while adding the necessary trust layer. For regulated sectors like healthcare, where MedicareWire operates, this trust layer changes AI interactions from educated guesses to verified responses. The Complete AI Memory Loop: MCP + SDP in Action When MCP and SDP work together, they form a complete memory architecture for AI systems. Here's the workflow: From User Query to Trust-Verified Response The process starts with a user query. Example: 'What's the Maximum Out-of-Pocket limit for this Medicare Advantage plan in Los Angeles?' The AI model uses MCP to negotiate context with external resources. It identifies what specific plan information it needs and establishes connections to retrieve that data. The external resource sends back an SDP-formatted response with the requested information. This includes the MOOP value, geographic scope (Los Angeles County), temporal validity (2025), and provenance (directly from CMS data), all with appropriate trust scores. With trust-verified information, the model answers accurately: 'The 2025 Maximum Out-of-Pocket limit for this plan in Los Angeles County is $4,200, according to CMS data.' No hallucination. No vague references. No outdated information. Just verified, scoped, trust-scored memory through standardized connections. Eliminating Hallucinations Through Verified Memory This method addresses what causes hallucinations in AI systems. Rather than relying on statistical patterns from training, the AI retrieves specific, verified information with full context about reliability and applicability. When information changes, there's no need to retrain the model. The external memory layer updates, and the AI immediately accesses new information—complete with trust scoring and provenance tracking. Real-World Implementation: MedicareWire 2025 This isn't theoretical — SDP launches on in August 2025, marking the first major implementation of AI-readable, trust-scored memory in a regulated domain. 1. First Large-Scale Deployment in a Regulated Domain The healthcare industry, especially Medicare, offers an ideal testing ground for trust-verified AI memory. Incorrect information has serious consequences, regulations are complex, and consumers need reliable guidance through a confusing system. MedicareWire's implementation will give AI systems unprecedented accuracy when accessing Medicare plan information. Instead of using potentially outdated training data, AI systems can query MedicareWire's SDP-enabled content for current, verified information about Medicare plans, benefits, and regulations. 2. Solving Healthcare's Critical Information Accuracy Problem Consumers using AI assistants for Medicare options will get consistent, accurate information regardless of which system they use. The SDP implementation ensures any AI agent can retrieve precise details about: Plan coverage specifications Geographic availability Cost structures and limitations Enrollment periods and deadlines Regulatory requirements and exceptions All come with proper attribution, scope, and trust scoring. 3. Creating the Foundation for Multi-Agent Trust Infrastructure Beyond immediate benefits for Medicare consumers, this implementation creates a blueprint for trust infrastructure in other regulated fields. Multi-agent systems will have shared, verifiable context — eliminating drift and hallucination problems that affect complex AI deployments. The combination of MCP's standardized connections and SDP's trust-verified memory builds the foundation for reliable AI systems that can safely operate in highly regulated environments. From Connection to Memory: The Future of Reliable AI Is Here David Bynon, founder of Trust Publishing and architect of SDP, states: 'We didn't just create a format. We created the trust language AI systems can finally understand — and remember.' As AI shapes important decisions in healthcare, finance, legal, and other critical fields, reliable, verifiable memory becomes essential. The MCP+SDP combination shifts from probabilistic guessing to trust-verified information retrieval — defining the next generation of AI applications. SDP will be available as an open protocol for non-directory systems, supporting broad adoption and continued development across the AI ecosystem. As the first major implementation, MedicareWire's deployment marks the beginning of a new phase in trustworthy artificial intelligence. MedicareWire is leading development of trustworthy AI memory systems that help consumers access accurate healthcare information when they need it most. David Bynon 101 W Goodwin St # 2487 Prescott Arizona 86303 United States

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store