Is Bitcoin The Only Investable Crypto Asset?
In 2013, right after bitcoin's price crashed nearly 24% in a single day, a bleary forum user called GameKyuubi missed a keystroke and immortalized a philosophy: 'I AM HODLING.' He meant to type 'HOLDING," meaning that he was not going to sell his bitcoin regardless of the crash. (The entire hilarious post is worth a read.)
The typo became part of bitcoin lore. The word 'HODL' now means to hold bitcoin for the long term and to avoid selling no matter what. Over a dozen years and multiple 80% draw-downs later, HODLing has proven to be a sound strategy. Stubborn HODLers were rewarded with orders-of-magnitude gains that beat out every other investment, period.
That success has tempted newcomers to stretch the doctrine across the entire token universe. After all, if holding bitcoin worked brilliantly, why not buy a basket of the next big things and sit tight? The answer is that HODLing works with a deflationary, scarce, highly liquid asset like bitcoin – and seems not to work with anything else.
Saving In Bitcoin For The Long Term
In order for anything to serve as money, it must have a mix of monetary properties; it must be scarce, durable, portable, fungible, divisible, and recognizable. Bitcoin possesses many of these. Its terminal supply is hard-limited to 21 million, its ledger is updated every ten minutes with no central authority, each unit subdivides into one-hundred-million 'sats,' and anyone with an open-source client can validate its authenticity. Crucially, no third party is required to 'make you whole' when you take possession.
So called 'altcoins' (other cryptocurrency tokens) fail this test. Their monetary policy is mutable, their security budgets depend on perpetual inflation or venture funding, their ledgers often settle on a parent chain they don't control, and redemption ultimately hinges on trusted teams. Stripped of the marketing gloss, they are closer to penny-stock warrants than to bearer cash.
The Data Doesn't Lie: Cryptocurrency Has Failed
A recent study of more than sixteen-thousand tokens launched since 2015 finds that fewer than 4% ever recover after their price falls 75% from peak. Since the first quarter of 2024 the pattern has intensified. Almost 86% of tokens debuting at valuations north of half a billion dollars have already collapsed at least 75%, and more than half have bled 90% or more.
In this type of market, where a tiny number of illiquid tokens rocket up in price while most fail, attempts at 'diversification' are more like buying lots of lottery tickets and hoping one will win. The CoinDesk 20, a fund designed to spread risk across 'blue-chip' digital assets, has performed worse than bitcoin by itself. It would appear that investors who thought they were buying a portfolio of independent upside discovered they were actually underwriting a single risk factor: demand for speculative narrative and crypto hype.
How To Mine Fiat Currency
Market share offers another perspective. Bitcoin accounted for roughly 40% of aggregate token capitalization as the calendar turned to 2023. Today, in midsummer of 2025, it controls more than 55%, even after waves of ETF inflows made it easier than ever to purchase exposure to rivals. Capital is not sentimental – it migrates toward the asset with the deepest order book, the most immutable rules and the lowest probability of terminal failure – and capital is choosing bitcoin.
Recognizing that split clarifies why only one investment model has been consistently profitable in the crypto ecosystem and has even bested traditional investments. Convert fiat into bitcoin, self-custody it to avoid the counterparty risk of exchanges, and wait for reality to close the gap between infinite-printing government paper and a fixed-supply digital bearer asset. Some HODLers call this 'mining fiat.' Time is the leverage.
The moral of the market
HODLing is not a universal verb. It is a strategy tuned for money, and today only bitcoin satisfies the definition. Everything else demands constant diligence, deep knowledge of markets, active risk management, and a willingness to sell when the story changes.
Bitcoin rewards conviction because its governing variables are transparent and irreversible. Altcoins reward extraction because their rules are negotiable and their economics subsidize insiders. Mixing the two under a single investment philosophy is like storing heirloom gold and lottery tickets in the same vault and pretending they constitute a 'portfolio.'
For investors who want long-term wealth rather than a seat at the roulette table, the playbook is unchanged since GameKyuubi smashed the keyboard: buy bitcoin, hold the keys, ignore the noise. Everything else is entertainment, and the house always takes a cut.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tech, Banks Lead Record U.S. Buyback Wave
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and other heavyweights are driving a record buyback wave, with U.S. repurchases on track to top $1.1 trillion this year, The Wall Street Journal reported. Companies have announced $983.6 billion YTD, the strongest start since Birinyi Associates' data began in 1982. July alone hit $165.6 billion, topping the prior July record of $87.7 billion set in 2006. The biggest buyers include Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), JPMorgan (NYSE:JPM), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), alongside Apple. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with AMD. The mood is upbeat. Things are better than everyone makes them seem, said Birinyi president Jeffrey Yale Rubin, adding that many firms are flush with cash. Trade uncertainty has nudged boards toward buybacks when capex plans slow, and companies kept buying even when markets were softer. S&P 500 (SP500) repurchases reached $293.5 billion in Q1 2025, a quarterly record. Larger buybacks can lift EPS, support shares on pullbacks and concentrate returns in megacaps, while sparking debate about investment versus capital buyback engine is humming, and investors will watch 2H authorizations and Q3 execution for confirmation. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not many people in Wisconsin have flood insurance. Here's what to know about how it works.
As residents across the Milwaukee area assess the scope of damage from the weekend deluge, just 1,186 households have federal flood insurance policies in place. As emergency crews continue responding to hundreds of calls, it isn't clear yet what the toll of the financial damage will be for this 1,000-year flooding event. But Sarah Smith, director of public affairs for the Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance, said even 1 inch of water can cause up to $25,000 in damage. Over the next 30 years, Wisconsin households in the low- to moderate-flood-risk zones will experience five times more flooding than fire-related events, Smith said, yet the state has one of the lowest numbers of flood insurance policies per capita in the country. As of July 31, the state Office of the Commissioner of Insurance counted 10,541 federal flood insurance policies across the Wisconsin's more than 2.7 million households. The state did not provide data on how many households use private insurance, but said the majority of residents with flood insurance are using federal. That's a problem considering Wisconsin building codes don't include any kind of flood plain regulations that would stipulate how to elevate a building, or where not to build based on floodplains, said Sarah Rafajko, the state's National Flood Insurance Program coordinator. People sometimes mistakenly assume they can't get flood insurance because they don't live in a flood zone or because they rent their home or apartment. "It's available to anybody, whether they're in the floodplain or not," Rafajko said. "And it can make a really big difference." What is flood insurance? Flood insurance covers financial losses of structures and belongings directly caused by flooding. Consumers have two primary options for flood insurance — the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) or private insurance. NFIP is managed by FEMA and bases rates on where a property is located on the flood zone map. Homeowners can use an online NFIP tool to search their ZIP code and find out their area's risk. Smith noted that FEMA's maps and risk models derive from historic floodplain data, not future projections that would include the impact of climate change. Homeowners with a federally backed mortgage are required by their lender to have flood insurance if they're located in a high-risk zone. Private insurance generate premiums based on a property's unique flood risk rather than on zone regulations. Why is flood insurance a separate cost from homeowners insurance? Flood events are too uniquely catastrophic to be included in most homeowners insurance plans. It wasn't until Congress established NFIP in 1968 to oversee floodplain management regulations that flood insurance became available. Communities that chose to receive federal insurance were required to adopt minimum standards for flood management. More: Does home and rent insurance cover flood damage? What to know after Milwaukee floods Can I get flood insurance if I rent? Just as homeowners insurance doesn't cover floods, neither does the majority of renters insurance. Even if a landlord has flood insurance for the building, their insurance won't cover a renter's belongings. Through NFIP, renters can purchase contents-only flood insurance plans that cover up to $100,000 in belongings. How much does flood insurance cost? It depends on where you are and whether you chose NFIP or private insurance. NFIP price ranges from $600 to $1,200 per year, typically. If you live in a floodplain, however, it can be in the $4,000-per-year range. If you opt for private insurance, it also varies based on the private assessment done on your property. Unlike NFIP, private companies can opt to drop someone from their plan for any reason, and can also refuse to take residents on if they live in a floodplain, Rafajka said. Residents who don't know whether to go the route of NFIP or private can reach out to local insurance agents in Wisconsin. Most sell both kinds of insurance and can quote both, Rafajka said. Otherwise, homeowners and renters can get a quote directly from to find out what their flood insurance options are. What does it typically cover? Under NFIP, the maximum building coverage provided is $250,000 and the maximum belonging coverage is $100,000, Rafajka said. These residents are also granted $30,000 in compliance coverage, which enables residents to rebuild in ways that comply with flood codes. A big upside of private insurance, Rafajka said, is it can provide replacement costs. That's going to be more beneficial for people who own properties worth considerably more than the maximum building cap of $250,000 provided by NFIP. Why would Wisconsin residents need flood insurance? There's a saying among those who work in natural resources: "Wherever it rains, it can flood." That's part of why Rafajka emphasized the importance of investing in flood insurance. Rafajka recommends recording yourself doing a walk-through of your apartment or home as video evidence of your belongings. Visuals like this will come in handy later — to which Rafajka, who lives in a floodplain, can attest. It's a saying that tracks for Smith, from the state Office of the Commissioner of Insurance, who said 40% of all flood claims in Wisconsin occurred in low- to moderate-risk areas. Flood insurance has a standard 30-day waiting period, Smith said, an important consideration for homeowners and renters to think about ahead of flood season, which begins in the months of March and April in Wisconsin. The Office of the Commissioner of Insurance has more information about flood insurance on its webpage and in a FAQ Sheet. Natalie Eilbert covers mental health issues for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. She welcomes story tips and feedback. You can reach her at neilbert@ or view her X (Twitter) profile at @natalie_eilbert. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Flood insurance rare in Wisconsin. What to know about how it works.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump weighs taking steps to decriminalize marijuana
President Donald Trump on Monday said his administration is considering rescheduling marijuana on the federal level, a move that would amount to a big step toward decriminalization of weed nationwide. Acknowledging potential divisions over the step, Trump said he will likely decide in coming weeks whether to reduce the official assessment of the danger of marijuana. 'It's a very complicated subject,' he said at a White House press conference, pushing back against the suggestion that reclassification could seem weak on crime. 'I've heard great things having to do with medical and bad things having to do with just about everything else.' Trump effectively confirmed a Wall Street Journal report from Friday that said the White House might reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I to a Schedule III drug, meaning it would be considered to have some medical uses and be much less likely to cause dependence than it was before. Schedule I drugs includes heroin and cocaine, while Schedule III includes steroids and Tylenol with codeine. Reclassification would allow marijuana companies to fall under different tax regulations and encourage investment in the $80 billion legal weed market, among other benefits. Cannabis company stocks soared Monday, with several stocks and funds that track the pot business shooting up by 10% or more. The move to decriminalize would amount to a promise kept by Trump who said during the presidential campaign that he would move to 'end needless arrests and incarcerations of adults for small amounts of marijuana for personal use.' The president also voted for a 2024 state referendum that would have legalized marijuana in Florida. The measure won 56% support but failed to clear the 60% mark needed for adoption. Public opinion has shifted over the years to dramatically favor mostly legalizing marijuana as many states have moved to permit the use of weed for both medical and recreational purposes. But some conservatives, including within Trump's loyal MAGA base, argue that weed fuels other criminal behavior and is a gateway to use of other harder drugs. _____
