
Is Palantir a Top AI Stock to Buy in June?
Palantir (NASDAQ: PLTR) has rapidly become one of the most popular artificial intelligence (AI) stocks in the market. It's up by more than 600% since the start of 2024 and has gained more than 60% so far in 2025 alone. Few stocks will ever match that sort of jaw-dropping performance, but now, many investors are wondering if it's too late to buy Palantir.
I think there's one guiding metric that will inform investors whether it is or not, and the answer may surprise you.
Palantir's AI growth is impressive
Palantir provides its clients with an AI-powered data analytics software suite. While the ins and outs of what Palantir does are quite complicated, its platform can simply be described as data in, insights out.
This basic concept isn't easy in practice, but it has earned Palantir a broad and growing customer base. Palantir's got its start assisting various governments around the world -- and such clients are still its most important customers. It has since then expanded into commercial markets and has seen success in that arena, particularly in the U.S.
In Q1, Palantir's fastest growing segment was U.S. commercial, which saw revenue rise by 71% to $255 million. Its U.S. government accounts also saw significant growth, with revenue increasing by 45% to $373 million.
One area where Palantir is lagging is global sales. This may not necessarily be Palantir's fault, as AI hasn't been as widely adopted as quickly by businesses worldwide (if you exclude China). Its total commercial sales were up 33% to $397 million in Q1, while total government sales increased by 45% to $487 million.
Overall, it's still a rapidly growing business, and if its domestic revenues continue growing at the same pace they have been, Palantir will be just fine.
Palantir's profitability has also improved recently, with its profit margin reaching a record high of 24% in Q1.
PLTR Profit Margin (Quarterly) data by YCharts.
To top it off, in conjunction with its Q1 report, Palantir's management team gave guidance for a strong Q2 -- it expects revenue to rise by 38% year over year. However, Palantir's management has a history of guiding low and then overdelivering, so investors shouldn't be too concerned that Q2's forecast growth rate is slower than Q1's 39%.
All of these metrics point to Palantir as still being a successful investment, but there's one problem: the price tag.
Palantir's stock is far too expensive
As mentioned above, Palantir's stock is up by more than 600% since 2024 began, yet its revenue has only risen by 40% and net income is up 172%. In short, the market is willing to pay more for Palantir's stock than it did in 2024. This occurred by a mechanism known as multiple expansion.
Palantir's stock now trades at jaw-dropping valuations.
PLTR PS Ratio data by YCharts.
Few stocks reach and sustain levels of 212 times forward earnings and nearly 100 times sales. Palantir's execution from here will have to be flawless and outperform expectations, or else the stock will get whacked.
To illustrate how expensive Palantir's stock is, let's take a five-year outlook and assume that Palantir's profit margin improves to 30%, its growth rate stays at 40%, and its share count stays flat. Those are incredibly bullish projections, but we're giving Palantir the benefit of the doubt.
Should those three things occur, in five years, Palantir will produce $16.8 billion in revenue and $5 billion in profits. That would be incredible growth, but if the stock simply stayed flat from now until then, it would be trading for 58 times earnings at that point, which is still quite expensive.
There are so many better options out there for investors than Palantir. The company is growing like few others, but the price you'd have to pay for the stock today already has at least five years of incredible growth baked in. As a result, I think many other stocks will outperform Palantir over the next five years.
Should you invest $1,000 in Palantir Technologies right now?
Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $638,985!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $853,108!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is978% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
The Real Value of Photorealistic Rendering vs. AI-Generated Images
The Difference Between Realistic Rendering and AI-Generated Images It is commonly stated that a picture is worth a thousand words. In design and real estate, a photorealistic depiction is far more important than showing only blueprints or 2D drawings. The goal of photorealistic rendering—whether it's Interior Rendering, Exterior Rendering, or even Aerial Rendering—is to accurately portray a design concept that will eventually be built. It is a visual representation of an unbuilt project, demonstrating how it would appear in real life. In contrast, AI-generated graphics frequently resemble visually appealing photographs with little relevance to the underlying design concept. Many AI businesses promote these visually appealing graphics, yet they fail to capture the architectural goal. Instead, they create pictures that, while enticing, are frequently unrelated to actual real estate ventures. This disparity highlights the gap between the concept of photorealistic rendering and the often-misleading results of AI-generated Value of Photorealistic Rendering in Design Projects A high-quality photorealistic depiction serves more than just aesthetic purposes. It conveys the designer's vision by precisely depicting the finishes, materials, and spatial relationships of a planned environment. For architects and real estate developers, this is critical since it provides a realistic glimpse of the finished result. Unlike AI-generated graphics, which may change design components arbitrarily, photorealistic renderings—including those produced by expert studios like RENDEREXPO —adhere to the desired concept, assuring consistency from design to execution. The true benefit of photorealistic rendering lies in the finish line or "last mile" of design. This last step of visual representation must accurately reflect the designer's concept, including the proposed environment's textures, colors, and lighting conditions. While AI might introduce unnecessary changes or embellishments, professional renderings prioritize accuracy and context, ensuring a reliable preview of the final product. Why AI Fails to Deliver Real-World Accuracy Despite the amazing graphics that AI may create, they sometimes fail to translate into practical applications in design and real estate. AI-generated visualizations sometimes lack the contextual foundation required for real-world application. Finishes, for example, may appear too polished or materials portrayed incorrectly, resulting in visually appealing but impractical architectural solutions. The difficulty with AI-generated photos is their lack of specificity. Designers and architects want professional-grade renderings—such as high-quality Interior Rendering or realistic Exterior Rendering —that carefully adhere to the planned materials and structural aspects. AI's proclivity to include visually appealing but unrelated characteristics might drastically distort the intended message, resulting in confusion rather than clarity. Photorealistic Rendering as a Tool for Real Estate Success Photorealistic renderings are effective marketing tools for real estate agents and clients alike. These illustrations build trust and confidence among stakeholders by correctly showing the project as it will appear once completed. AI-generated visuals, on the other hand, can deceive potential investors and clients, resulting in a loss of reputation. The cost of using AI for architectural renderings does not outweigh the benefits, especially when the purpose is to demonstrate realistic, buildable ideas. While AI may have a place in academic or conceptual work, such as efforts by architectural students investigating theoretical worlds, it falls short of the precision required for professional design visualization. Companies like RENDEREXPO specialize in delivering detail-rich renderings—be it for Aerial Rendering to showcase large-scale developments or nuanced Interior Rendering for luxury spaces—that truly reflect what will be built. The Future of AI in Design Visualization While AI technology is fast advancing, it is still a long way from achieving the subtle precision of traditional photorealistic rendering. Realistically, AI-generated photos may take several years to achieve the same degree of detail and contextual correctness. Until then, using AI purely for design visualization is impracticable. Professionals in architecture and design should continue to use photorealistic rendering as their primary visualization tool. As technology progresses, incorporating AI into this process may potentially improve speed and inventiveness, but for the time being, photorealistic rendering—delivered by specialized studios like RENDEREXPO—remains the gold standard for properly depicting unbuilt environments. Conclusion: Choosing the Right Visualization Approach The decision between photorealistic rendering vs AI-generated Images comes down to accuracy vs aesthetics. In architectural and real estate ventures, realism is most important. Until AI can perfectly reproduce the careful integration of materials, finishes, and spatial relationships, photorealistic rendering—whether through Interior Rendering, Exterior Rendering, or large-scale Aerial Rendering—will remain the favored way for experts. It's more than just making a visually appealing image; it's also about communicating a design that accurately reflects what will be created. Media Contact Company Name: RENDEREXPO Contact Person: Louai Alsaman Email: Send Email Phone: (202) 455-4032 Country: United States Website:


CTV News
37 minutes ago
- CTV News
Steel tariffs of 50% could spark ‘economic depression,' Sault mayor warns
The announcement that the U.S. is imposing a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum exports could spell disaster for Sault Ste. Marie, Mayor Matthew Shoemaker said Monday. The announcement that the U.S. is imposing a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum exports could spell disaster for Sault Ste. Marie, Mayor Matthew Shoemaker said Monday. American President Donald Trump made the sudden decision Friday, doubling the 25 per cent tariff he imposed earlier this year. President Donald Trump speaks at U.S. Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant, Friday, May 30, 2025, in West Mifflin, Pa. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) President Donald Trump speaks at U.S. Steel Corporation's Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant, Friday, May 30, 2025, in West Mifflin, Pa. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) Shoemaker said they were working to deal with that smaller tariff when Trump escalated his trade war. 'My first reaction was definitely shock,' the mayor said. 'At 50 per cent, it's a completely different recipe. It's not that the problem is twice as big. It's that the problem is 10 times as big.' Shoemaker said he's pushing the federal government to come up with an 'immediate action plan' to support workers at Algoma Steel, the community's largest employer. 'The steel plant ships, I think, 55 to 60 per cent of its materials to the U.S.,' he said. Customer base would 'evaporate' 'That customer base is going to evaporate if they have to pay 50 per cent more for their steel ... Without direct support from the government for the workers and for the industry, there's the risk of creating a severe economic depression in our community.' Trump made the announcement May 30 at a U.S. Steel facility in West Mifflin, Penn. To an applauding crowd of U.S. Steel employees, Trump said he would jack up the tariff to protect America's steelworkers. 'We are going to be imposing a 25 per cent increase,' Trump said. 'We're going to bring it from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America, which will even further secure the steel industry in the United States. Nobody's going to get around that.' He said the move would come into effect Wednesday of this week. Sault MP Terry Sheehan said Trump's move is almost 'beyond belief.' 'Well, 25 per cent is unacceptable to begin with,' Sheehan said. 'It's illegal. It's unjust – 50 per cent beyond belief. It's beyond preposterous.' Quick action needed A statement from Algoma Steel said quick action is vital. 'The Algoma Team remains in close consultation with our customers and the government regarding the challenges this presents to our business,' the statement said. 'Algoma is advocating for swift government action to support Algoma and the Canadian Steel Industry during this volatile time.' The speed of the new tariff means Canada has to respond quickly, Shoemaker said. 'We don't have the luxury of that amount of time,' he said. 'We need an action plan within the next 7-10 days.' Specifically, Algoma Steel needs assurances that the Department of Defence will be buying from Canadian producers, and that new infrastructure projects will use domestic steel. 'Whether that's contracts, or whether that supports for workers or whether that's, you know, direct injections of capital into their facility,' Shoemaker said. 'Those numbers need to be worked out by the steel plants themselves. Really, I want to make sure that the federal government and the provincial government, that they understand that there is no time to waste here. That this is pressing and that without it, the Sault is going to be left withering on the vine.' Later Monday, United Steelworkers said it welcomed news that the federal government would require Canadian steel and aluminum in national infrastructure and defence projects. 'Canada has the tools to defend and grow good jobs — it just takes the will to use them,' said the union, which represents 225,000 people in Canada, including at Algoma Steel. 'Today's news could mark a turning point — and we hope it's just the beginning.' Shoemaker and Sheehan said workers should know that everything is on the table when it comes to protecting the industry. 'We're going to continue to have their backs and I'll work night and day on this issue,' Sheehan said. 'I have meetings lined up this week here in Ottawa on the very subject. And we're going to continue to fight tooth and nail for the workers that make northern Ontario so great.' He said Prime Minister Mark Carney is in Saskatchewan to 'tear down provincial trade barriers' and to fast-track projects that use Canadian steel and aluminum.


Globe and Mail
43 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Corporate America is well prepared for the coming storm
Headwinds from tariffs, bond yields and 'stagflation' are gathering force, but corporate America could not be in better shape to face the economic storm that may be building. Data released last week showed that U.S. pre-tax corporate profits fell US$118.1-billion, or 2.9 per cent, in the first quarter, the fastest pace since 2020, suggesting companies are feeling the pinch from tariffs even before they've properly started to bite. After-tax profits fell 3.6%. But any sense of alarm should be mitigated by the fact that profits surged US$205-billion, or 5.4 per cent, the three months before. The decline in the January-March period was simply normalization on the back of a bumper quarter. And on a year-on-year basis, profits were up more than 5 per cent. True, the next few quarters could get messy. If growth slows or inflation starts to rise, corporate margins could get squeezed, consumers may curb spending and companies could find themselves with limited pricing power. But zoom out, and the bigger picture suggests corporate America has rarely been stronger. Depending on how you slice and dice the figures, corporate profits as a share of national output or income are still extraordinarily high. In some cases, they're close to the highest on record. Consider pre-tax profits with inventory valuation and capital consumption adjustments. These fell slightly to 13.0 per cent of GDP in the first quarter of this year, on a seasonally-adjusted annual basis, but that was from a record 13.5 per cent in the September-December period. After-tax profits dipped to 12 per cent of GDP from 12.2 per cent in the final quarter of last year. Again, that was a small decline, and it leaves after-tax profits still near the all-time peak of 12.8 per cent of GDP recorded in the second quarter of 2021. The average over the past 75 years is less than 7.5 per cent of GDP. To paraphrase former British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan, corporate America has never had it so good. Which is just as well, because headwinds are gathering. One can debate how much any of the number of brewing risks will land on the real economy, but companies could certainly feel some pain if they end up facing the collective punch of tariffs, weakening consumer demand, diminishing pricing power and higher-for-longer interest rates. 'An increasingly fragmented environment means diverging trends across economies. It's an environment ... that will constrain profits at home and around the world,' says Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon. Tariffs and protectionism will put the squeeze on global supply chains and overall trade. It will be interesting to observe how the divergence between domestically-generated profits and earnings accrued from the rest of the world (RoW) plays out in this environment. Domestic profits account for the majority of total income, of course, but that share has exploded recently. Or looked at the other way, the share of profits from abroad has plunged. If Trump's trade war succeeds in prompting U.S. companies to bring more production back home, the 'RoW' footprint may shrink further. In the fourth quarter of 2019, just before the pandemic, domestically-generated profits were around 75 per cent of the US$2.13-trillion total, on a seasonally-adjusted annual basis, and 'RoW' profits accounted for a quarter. In the first three months of this year, domestic profits accounted for 87.5 per cent of the total, and the share of profits from abroad had halved to 12.5 per cent. Corporate profitability is being tested. The aggregate second quarter earnings growth forecast for S&P 500 companies stands at 5.5 per cent, according to LSEG I/B/E/S, down from 10.2 per cent two months ago. The 2025 calendar year earnings growth forecast has shrunk to 8.3 per cent today from 14.0 per cent at the start of the year. The challenges are mounting, but corporate America can face them from a position of strength. Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.