Domestic abuse specialists placed in 999 control rooms after women's murders
The first domestic violence specialists have been placed in 999 control rooms in memory of a woman who was murdered by her ex-husband despite ringing police on the night she died.
Raneem's Law has been launched in five pilot areas - West Midlands, Northumbria, Northamptonshire, Bedfordshire and Humberside.
The legislation - promised in Labour's manifesto - is named after 22-year-old Raneem Oudeh and her mother Khaola Saleem, 49, who were murdered by Ms Oudeh's ex-husband in August 2018.
Ms Oudeh had called 999 more than a dozen times in the months leading up to her death, including to report threats to kill her, but police did not log the reports correctly, did not follow up and did not assess them correctly.
On the night she was killed, she rang 999 four times but the police did not respond in time.
The new domestic abuse specialists will ensure that calls for help are properly assessed, managed and responded to, the government said.
Their duties will include advising on risk assessments, making referrals to specialist services and identifying missed opportunities to safeguard victims.
The first phase will inform plans for a national rollout across 43 police forces in England and Wales and will be underpinned by £2.2m funding over the next financial year.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: "Every 30 seconds, someone calls the police about domestic abuse - over 100 people every hour seeking urgent help.
"That's why we are determined to overhaul the police emergency response to domestic abuse, making sure that victims get the specialist support and protection they need. That must be Raneem and Khaola's legacy."
1:05
On the night she died, Ms Oudeh was told to go to her mother's house and officers would visit her the next day. She was on the phone to West Midlands Police when she was stabbed by Janbaz Tarin, her estranged husband, one of the many calls she had made about him that night.
Ms Oudeh had broken up with her husband in the weeks before the attack after discovering he had three children and a secret wife who was pregnant with a fourth child in Afghanistan.
Tarin admitted the murders and was jailed for life with a minimum of 32 years in December 2018.
An inquest found the police force "materially contributed" to their deaths. Five officers were disciplined over the failures.
Nour Norris, Ms Oudeh's aunt and Mrs Saleem's sister who has been campaigning to improve outcomes for domestic abuse victims, said today's announcement would help save lives.
"Raneem called for help, and today, the system finally answered," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Starmer accused of ‘passing the buck' as council tax likely to rise
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has distanced himself from expected large increases in local taxation, shifting responsibility to councils. Councils can increase council tax by up to 5 per cent following last week's spending review, with the police also granted powers to raise extra funds through a similar precept. The Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned of the biggest rise in council tax for two decades as a result of the spending review. Sir Keir said that council tax rises are for councils to decide, noting the spending review allows the Labour government to show what difference it makes after a year of stabilising the economy. The Local Government Association and Lib Dems criticised the move, saying 'passing the buck to local government and asking hard-pressed households to shoulder the burden of mounting council tax bills is deeply unfair'.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Is this the worst Labour MP in parliament?
The publication of Louise Casey's report into rape gangs was a sobering affair. But not, apparently, for Shaun Davies, Labour MP for Telford since July 2024. He previously served as the Shropshire town's council leader from 2016 to 2024. More than 1,000 children in Telford were sexually exploited over decades, according to the Independent Inquiry for Child Sexual Abuse in 2022. Davies decided that yesterday was the perfect time to stand up in the House of Commons and criticise the Conservative government for not themselves investigating grooming gangs. He told the House that: 'We did a local-based review because the then Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, and the then local government Minister, Rishi Sunak, refused to provide a statutory inquiry into Telford.' Yet, as council leader, Davies signed a letter to Rudd in September 2016, asking her not to investigate Telford. The crucial paragraph of the two page-letter is the following: 'Given the recent findings of Ofsted and the fact that the Government's own independent inquiry, chaired by Alexis Jay, is already committed to looking at what happened here in Telford, we do not feel at this time that a further inquiry is necessary.' As Kemi Badenoch wrote on X after yesterday's debate: This Labour MP will be exposed soon enough. He sat in the chamber trembling, made this outrageous statement and ran off. He was of course the council leader in Telford who actively requested no national investigation and has the cheek to smear Amber Rudd and Rishi Sunak. You can read the full incriminating letter here. Over to you Davies…
Rhyl Journal
2 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
MPs to debate and vote on decriminalising abortion
The issue looks likely to be debated and voted on on Tuesday, as part of amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. The latest attempt follows repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th-century law – the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act – after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. MPs had previously been due to debate similar amendments removing the threat of prosecution against women who act in relation to their own pregnancy at any stage, but these did not take place as Parliament was dissolved last summer for the general election. Earlier this month, a debate at Westminster Hall heard calls from pro-change campaigners that women must no longer be 'dragged from hospital bed to police cell' over abortion. But opponents of decriminalisation warned against such a 'radical step'. Ahead of debate in the Commons, Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi said her amendment would result in 'removing the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. Ms Antoniazzi said the cases of women investigated by police had motivated her to advocate for a change in the law. She said: 'Police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortion in the last five years including women who've suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This is just wrong. It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest.' She said her amendment will not change time limits for abortion or the regulation of services but it 'decriminalises women accused of ending their own pregnancies', taking them out of the criminal justice system 'so they can get the help and support they need'. Her amendment is supported by abortion providers including MSI Reproductive Choices and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (Bpas) as well as the the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). A separate amendment has also been put forward by Labour MP Stella Creasy and goes further by not only decriminalising abortion, but also seeks to 'lock in' the right of someone to have one and protect those who help them. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) urged MPs to vote against both amendments, saying they would bring about 'the biggest expansion of abortion since 1967'. Alithea Williams, the organisation's public policy manager, said: 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers. 'Both amendments would allow abortion up to birth, for any reason. NC20 (Ms Creasy's amendment) is only more horrifying because it removes any way of bringing men who end the life of a baby by attacking a pregnant woman to justice.' Ms Creasy rejected Spuc's claim, and urged MPs not to be 'misled'. She highlighted coercive control legislation, which would remain in place if her amendment was voted through, and which she said explicitly identifies forcing someone to have an abortion as a crime punishable by five years in jail. Abortion in England and Wales remains a criminal offence but is legal with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. The issue has come to the fore in recent times with prominent cases such as those of Nicola Packer and Carla Foster. Ms Packer was cleared by a jury last month after taking prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home. She told jurors during her trial, which came after more than four years of police investigation, that she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks. The case of Carla Foster, jailed in 2023 for illegally obtaining abortion tablets to end her pregnancy when she was between 32 and 34 weeks pregnant, eventually saw her sentence reduced by the Court of Appeal and suspended, with senior judges saying that sending women to prison for abortion-related offences is 'unlikely' to be a 'just outcome'. A separate amendment, tabled by Conservative MP Caroline Johnson proposes mandatory in-person consultations for women seeking an abortion before being prescribed at-home medication to terminate a pregnancy. The changes being debated this week would not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands north of the border. On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines. During a Westminster Hall debate earlier this month, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon. She said: 'If the will of Parliament is that the law in England and Wales should change, then the Government would not stand in the way of such change but would seek to ensure that the law is workable and enforced in the way that Parliament intended.'
