Keir Starmer Has Conditions for Israel
On Tuesday Mr. Starmer said the U.K. will join France in recognizing a State of Palestine at the United Nations in September, but with a twist. He'll do it 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a cease-fire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Israel Security Cabinet Approves Plan to Seize Gaza City
Israel's security cabinet has approved Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's plans to take full control of Gaza City in a final push to topple Hamas and end 22 months of fighting. The country's top decision-making forum on Friday approved the plan which would also see Israel Defense Forces provide humanitarian aid to Palestinian civilians outside combat zones, according to a statement from Netanyahu's office.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Netanyahu says Israel to control not govern Gaza
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday Israel plans to take full control of Gaza but does not intend to govern it, as he convened his security cabinet to discuss updated plans 22 months into the war. The cabinet meeting comes as Netanyahu faces mounting pressure at home and abroad for a truce deal to pull Gaza's more than two million people back from the brink of famine and to spare hostages held by Palestinian militants. With tensions rising, Netanyahu took to the airwaves telling US network Fox News the government intends to seize complete control of the Gaza Strip, where the military has been fighting Hamas since the Palestinian group's October 7, 2023 attack. Asked if Israel will take control of "all of Gaza", Netanyahu said: "We intend to." He was expected to seek the cabinet's approval for an expanded offensive, which could see ground troops operate in densely populated areas where hostages are believed to be held, Israeli media reported. Netanyahu told Fox News "we don't want to keep" the Gaza Strip, which Israel occupied in 1967 but withdrew troops and settlers in 2005. "We want to have a security perimeter. We don't want to govern it," Netanyahu said. "We want to hand it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us and giving Gazans a good life. That's not possible with Hamas." The reported plans to expand the war have sparked growing concern in Israel about what it means for the remaining hostages. As the cabinet meeting kicked off, hundreds rallied near the prime minister's office in Jerusalem, calling for a deal to free the hostages. "The only way to bring the hostages home is to halt the war and end the suffering of the hostages and all those living through this terrible conflict," said protester Sharon Kangasa-Cohen. - 'More destruction' - Hamas in a statement said that "Netanyahu's plans to escalate the aggression confirm beyond any doubt his desire to get rid of the captives and sacrifice them in pursuit of his personal interests and extremist ideological agenda." Earlier Thursday, relatives of hostages set sail from the port of Ashkelon seeking to approach the Gaza Strip where their loved ones have endured 22 months of captivity. Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead. Ahead of Thursday's meeting, rumours have been rife in the Israeli press about disagreements between the cabinet and Israel's military chief Eyal Zamir, who is said to oppose plans to fully reoccupy Gaza. On Wednesday, Defence Minister Israel Katz had weighed in on social media saying the military must ultimately respect any policies adopted by the government. In a statement released by the military Thursday, Zamir underscored his independence, vowing to "continue to express our position without fear". "We are dealing with matters of life and death... and we do so while looking directly into the eyes of our soldiers and citizens," Zamir said. In Gaza, meanwhile, fears grew over what an expansion of Israeli operations would entail. "Ground operations mean more destruction and death," said Ahmad Salem, 45. - 'Unrealistic costs' - International concern has been growing over the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, where a UN-backed assessment warned that famine was unfolding. The World Health Organization said at least 99 people have died from malnutrition in the Gaza Strip this year, with the figure likely an underestimate. Displaced Gazan Mahmoud Wafi said that the prices of available food remained high and erratic. "We hope that food will be made available again in normal quantities and at reasonable prices, because we can no longer afford these extremely high and unrealistic costs," the 38-year-old told AFP. In late July, Israel partially eased restrictions on aid entering Gaza, but the United Nations says the amount allowed into the territory remains insufficient. Amjad Al-Shawa, head of the Palestinian NGO Network in the Gaza Strip, told AFP that lengthy inspection procedures at entry points meant few trucks could come in. "What is currently entering the Gaza Strip are very limited numbers of trucks -- between 70 to 80 per day -- carrying only specific types of goods," he said. The United Nations estimates that Gaza needs at least 600 trucks of aid per day to meet its residents' basic needs. Amid the shortages, bloodshed continued with Gaza's civil defence agency saying Israeli attacks across the territory on Thursday killed at least 35 people. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,258 Palestinians, according to Hamas-run Gaza's health ministry. The 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. bur-ds/ami
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Questions loom over potential Trump-Putin summit
Trump has grown increasingly frustrated with Putin in recent months as Russia pounds Ukraine despite U.S. calls for a pause in the fighting. The administration on Wednesday announced tariffs on India over its purchases of Russian oil, and additional sanctions on Russia are expected Friday. Much is still unknown about the meeting, including when, where — and even whether — it will happen. Both the White House and the Kremlin have indicated the meeting will take place soon, potentially as early as next week. But officials did not offer details on where it would take place, how long it would last or who would be involved. Trump told European leaders on a call on Wednesday that his idea was to meet with Putin and then have a trilateral meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. It was unclear if all parties would agree to such a setup, or who else might attend. Trump told reporters Thursday that Zelensky's attendance was not a prerequisite for him to meet with Putin. Possible venues could include Turkey, which has served as a mediator for U.S.-Russian prisoner swaps. The United Arab Emirates has also mediated between Russia and Ukraine for prisoner swaps. Qatar is a mediator the U.S. has relied on heavily in negotiating between Israel and Hamas and between warring parties in Africa. One key piece of any potential summit is Ukraine's role. Trump indicated to European leaders that his idea would be to meet with Putin, then host a meeting with Putin and Zelensky. The Kremlin had earlier dismissed the possibility of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky unless negotiators had reached the final stages of a deal to end the war. Zelensky has not publicly commented on a potential meeting with Putin, and such a meeting would be the first time the two leaders have come face-to-face since the war began in 2022. But he has been adamant that there should be no decisions about Ukraine without Ukrainian input. Such a high-stakes meeting could yield a historic diplomatic win for Trump if he stops the war — but it also carries risks for all parties involved. Trump has repeatedly demurred on whether Putin is stringing him along, and an in-person meeting could buy the Russian leader more time without producing concrete results toward a ceasefire in Ukraine. White House officials have indicated they are going into the potential meeting with eyes open about Putin's lack of commitments thus far.
