Ramaphosa defends new regulations for global companies looking to do business in SA
He said regulations introduced by the Communications Minister, Solly Malatsi, on 'equity equivalence', as opposed to transferring shares to local owners, were permitted by law.
Ramaphosa was answering questions in the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) on Wednesday, where he was quizzed about transformation and Elon Musk's company Starlink, which has been critical of the country's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) laws.
The first citizen was questioned by the Democratic Alliance (DA)'s Nicolaas Pienaar on whether he would commit to supporting investments like Starlink, which is yet to be granted a licence in the country.
'Will the President commit to supporting investments of this nature without requiring businesses to hand over 30% of their companies?'
Ramaphosa said the new regulations on equity equivalence, which is investment without share ownership, should be welcomed, as the government tries to find new ways to trigger investment without doing away with transformation.
'If you're not able to have joint ownership, we want equity equivalence. That will help to address the injustices of the past.'
He said several companies invested in the country had welcomed this and were actively participating in transforming the economy and had committed to investing more money.
ALSO READ: ICASA again probing Musk's Starlink for allegedly operating illegally in SA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Post-mining strategy seen as key to economic revival
Expert calls for post-mining strategy as global investment interest in South Africa's mining sector continues to fall. It is time for South Africa to develop a post-mining economic activities strategy, as the sector's international investment attractiveness is declining. This is the view of mining expert David van Wyk, who was reacting to the latest annual survey of mining companies from the authoritative Canadian Fraser Institute, stating that out of 82 investable mining jurisdictions, the country is rated at 68. The attractiveness index is a combination of perceptions of mineral potential, where the region's geology encourages exploration investment and perceptions of mining policy. Expert calls for post-mining strategy The report stated that investors were concerned about the country's political stability, socioeconomic agreements and its geological database. Be that as it may, Van Wyk believes that the country's mining policies did not cause the decline. ALSO READ: How SA's old coal mines can offer hope for dying towns He said the focus should be on developing the post-mining economic activities that would grow the economy. 'We need to repurpose and reengineer the mines for post-mining economic activities,' he said. 'Minerals are not renewable; mining is therefore not sustainable. We should be looking at planning towards diversification and the evolution of a post-mining economy.' Mining not sustainable Van Wyk said some of the biggest mining firms had registered huge profits because mining was not sustainable. He said the country's mining police was not the main thing driving potential investors away. ALSO READ: Court denies plea to pardon state capture accused 'As large-scale mining goes into decline because minerals are not renewable and mining is not sustainable, the country will have to make an orderly and just transition into small and medium-scale mining, including artisanal mining,' he said. However, DA spokesperson on mineral and petroleum resources James Lorimer shared the same view as the study and said the current mining policy was not creating a favourable condition for the investors. Lorimer said despite the mining investors' negative perception, Mineral and Petroleum Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe continues with his plans to introduce an amendment Bill that is unpopular with mining companies. Current policy not creating favourable investors 'He is also spending a great deal of time talking about his critical mineral's strategy, which is wordy but largely meaningless,' said Lorimer. 'The DA will be submitting public comments on the draft mineral resource amendment to fight back against over-regulation, excessive ministerial power and disastrous B-BBEE [broad-based black economic empowerment] regulation. ALSO READ: Hundreds to lose jobs in KZN as Motsepe-linked Assmang shuts down plant 'The annual survey shows how investment into South African mining is hampered by ANC mining policy. Mining is in a recession, which looks to be getting worse. That means the loss of jobs and declining revenues for the cash-strapped fiscus. Mining tax payments halved last year.' Lorimer said South Africa needed investment-friendly mining legislation and regulation that would involve a wholesale rewriting of mining law and the abolishment of the effect of B-BBEE on the sector, to facilitate investment in the sector. Need for international investors National Association of Artisanal Miners spokesperson Zethu Hlatshwayo said as there was a need for international investors, it was also essential to give local mining companies a chance to venture into the industry. Hlatshwayo said small-scale miners could play a vital role in growing the country's economy.
eNCA
10 hours ago
- eNCA
We need to make water investment a priority
CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa hopes the water summit taking place in Cape Town will mobilise global leaders to lend a hand in improving Africa's water security. The three-day summit which sees the African Union promote the Continental Africa Water Investment Programme.
Daily Maverick
13 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
What role, if any, is South Africa playing in Ukraine peace efforts?
President Cyril Ramaphosa has been in direct telephonic contact with all the main players, but it is unclear just how significant a role South Africa can, or will play. Before the big Ukraine war peace summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday, 15 August 2025, President Cyril Ramaphosa had phone calls last week with the three key players, Putin, Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky – who is, inexplicably, not invited to the Alaska meeting. Were Ramaphosa's calls an indication that he and South Africa have a role to play in trying to end Russia's brutal war on Ukraine, now in its 42nd month? Or was this merely some sort of diplomatic name-dropping? It's clear from the statement by his office that Ramaphosa and Trump mainly discussed tariffs and other aspects of the fraught South Africa-US relationship. Whether they also talked about Trump's peace efforts in Ukraine is unclear. But peace was, of course, the main focus of Ramaphosa's calls with Putin on Thursday, 7 August and Zelensky on 8 August. The Kremlin statement said Putin had shared with Ramaphosa the main results of his conversation the day before in Moscow with Trump's special envoy on the peace process, Steven Witkoff. Putin also complimented the African Peace Initiative, the delegation of Africans which Ramaphosa led in June 2023, meeting Zelensky in Kyiv and Putin in St Petersburg. Ramaphosa's office later said Putin had asked to brief the President on the peace process and had 'expressed his recognition and appreciation for South Africa's involvement in advancing a peace process between Russia and Ukraine'. Call with Zelensky, cryptic statements A day later, Zelensky posted on X that his call with Ramaphosa had been 'a friendly and candid conversation about how to achieve real peace and stop the killings'. He said Ramaphosa had shared details of his conversation with 'the Russian side' (Putin) and was adamant that 'the path to peace must begin with a ceasefire'. Ramaphosa's office said Zelensky 'expressed his appreciation for South Africa's continued support in finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict'. These statements were rather cryptic. Zelensky and Putin are poles apart on how to end this vicious war, yet both expressed appreciation for Ramaphosa's contributions to peace efforts. So what did Ramaphosa say, what advice, if any, did he give? No one who really knows seems to be saying. Jalel Harchaoui, a political scientist at the Royal United Services Institute, said he believed 'Ramaphosa couldn't possibly have said anything of relevance' in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin. And Ramaphosa's conversations with Zelensky and Putin were probably 'just standard fare', underlining his general narrative that he wants a ceasefire. 'And that does not mean over-concern about Ukraine's territorial integrity or the status of the occupied territories,' said Samuel Ramani, lecturer in politics and international relations at Oxford University (and author of the book, Russia in Africa). 'Moreover, South Africa wants to be seen as supportive of a key Trump initiative to help it deal with the US 30% import tariffs. So I think this is largely routine from him. I wouldn't read too much into it,' he said. Peace talks in SA? One source suggested, however, that a future round of the peace talks starting in Alaska could be held in South Africa. Was this discussed in the phone calls? Dzvinka Kachur, co-founder of the Ukrainian Association in South Africa, noted that Ramaphosa had in the past spoken about the importance of Ukraine's territorial integrity, and so she hoped that he underscored this in his call with Putin. It should also be noted that Zelensky made about 30 calls to international leaders last week to underscore his point that no Ukraine peace negotiations were possible without Ukraine in the room, and that a ceasefire should be unconditional, rather than conditioned on territorial concessions, as the US had initially suggested. And it is understood that Putin also initiated the call to Ramaphosa. Nevertheless Ramaphosa's phone conversations – and there have been others, as well as Zelensky's visit to Pretoria in April and Ramaphosa's in-person meeting with Putin at the BRICS+ summit in Kazan in October 2024 – do prompt the wider question of whether Ramaphosa and South Africa are playing any kind of real role in the Ukraine peace process, and if so what is the contribution, and what should it be? Kachur noted that South Africa was playing a concrete role in the attempts to return some of the about 20,000 Ukrainian children abducted by Russia after its invasion of Ukraine and deported to Russia. When Zelensky met Ramaphosa in Pretoria, he gave him a list of 400 abducted children who South Africa promised to try to return – but with no success and no visible progress so far. African Peace Initiative But Kachur believes there is much South Africa and Ramaphosa could still do for Africa and otherwise. The 2023 African Peace Initiative remained important, not only because of those direct impacts which Ramani mentioned – such as African food insecurity caused by Russia's blockade of Ukraine's grain exports. It also remained important because the Ukraine war also had wider, deeper and longer impacts on principles important to Africa, such as restitution for war damages, accountability for aggression, reframing borders, and the future of the UN system. She also noted that Russia's questionable presence in the Central African Republic, Mali and Niger through the Wagner private security company and its successor, the Africa Corps, had direct negative outcomes for the human rights, safety and security of the continent. 'The illegal, undocumented export of raw materials from these countries also provides Russia with the funding to continue the aggression. This is not bringing any benefits to the continent, but creates more trauma, undocumented weapons and suffering.' And she believes that given its history and role as a champion of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, South Africa could and should be doing more to ensure nuclear safety – which has been jeopardised by Russia's military capture of Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Perhaps Ramaphosa was conveying messages in his phone calls with Zelensky and Putin, said Steven Gruzd, head of the Africa-Russia project at the South African Institute of International Affairs in Johannesburg. 'But I don't think South Africa is playing any major role in peacemaking between Ukraine and Russia. 'I don't see much room and evidence of us being a major peacemaker. 'The African Peace Initiative didn't really go very far. And there was not much follow-up. I don't think the money or the infrastructure has been put behind it to really make it a serious effort.' Gruzd added though that South Africa had also 'taken measures to appear less one-sided (i.e. pro-Russian) in this conflict, the biggest being Zelensky's visit to SA in April'. He thought that South Africa could play a bigger role in the Ukraine peace effort but that would require US support, which could in turn improve its poor relations with Washington. And he noted that South Africa has attended most of Zelensky's international peace formula meetings (which began in 2023) and is working on two points of the formula – returning kidnapped Ukrainian children and exchanging prisoners of war. Denys Reva, researcher at the Institute for Security Studies in Pretoria, said those meetings still continued at a lower level (mainly, it seems, on the return of the abducted children). And although the African Peace Initiative did not seem to still exist as a formal grouping, South Africa had been engaging in different peace processes, promoting the values of the African peace plan, including advancing African interests and values. For example, at the UN in New York in September 2024, South Africa joined the 'Friends for Peace' group backing the China-Brazil peace plan (which Zelensky strongly opposes because he believes it serves Moscow's interests mainly because it does not demand the withdrawal of Russian forces from Ukraine, as his plan does). Read more: War in Ukraine 'Realistically, no single initiative has yet succeeded in bringing peace,' Reva says. 'Pretoria seems to have shifted its emphasis towards humanitarian concerns, rather than positioning itself as a primary broker of a peace settlement.' He added that 'SA's readiness to mediate the return of the children is an important humanitarian contribution amid stalled negotiations elsewhere. I think Pretoria has been fairly consistent in this regard, and I think that both Kyiv and Moscow probably welcome South African efforts.' And he said both Kyiv and Moscow also see South Africa as crucial in improving their relations with Africa. Ramani said: 'I'm not hearing too much about South Africa being an influential interlocutor.' He added that other countries of the Global South were playing a greater peace role, citing the United Arab Emirates, which he said had hoped to host Friday's summit between Trump and Putin. However, he also added that South Africa was probably doing its best to ensure that the voice of Africa was heard in the Ukraine peace process, and that this was important because the war had significant implications for food security, supply chains and many other things that impacted Africa's socioeconomic development so profoundly. DM
