Opendoor Technologies Achieves First Adjusted EBITDA Profitability
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Opendoor Technologies ( (OPEN)) just unveiled an announcement.
On August 5, 2025, Opendoor Technologies reported its financial results for the second quarter of 2025, highlighting a revenue of $1.6 billion and achieving its first quarter of Adjusted EBITDA profitability since 2022. Despite challenging housing market conditions, the company sold 4,299 homes and improved its net loss position to $29 million. Opendoor is expanding its agent-led distribution platform to offer more solutions to homeowners, aiming to capture capital-light revenue streams and enhance its operational model.
The most recent analyst rating on (OPEN) stock is a Hold with a $2.00 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Opendoor Technologies stock, see the OPEN Stock Forecast page.
Spark's Take on OPEN Stock
According to Spark, TipRanks' AI Analyst, OPEN is a Neutral.
Opendoor Technologies faces significant financial hurdles, impacting its overall score. While technical indicators are strong, suggesting short-term bullish momentum, fundamental valuation and financial performance remain concerning. Strategic initiatives and regained Nasdaq compliance provide some optimism but are tempered by market uncertainties and liquidity issues.
To see Spark's full report on OPEN stock, click here.
Opendoor Technologies Inc. is a leading e-commerce platform specializing in residential real estate transactions. Since its inception in 2014, the company has been providing a simple and certain way for people across the U.S. to buy and sell homes. Opendoor operates nationwide, focusing on innovation and problem-solving to lead the future of real estate.
Average Trading Volume: 177,573,847
Technical Sentiment Signal: Buy
Current Market Cap: $1.53B
See more data about OPEN stock on TipRanks' Stock Analysis page.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
10 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Buy The Trade Desk Stock After Its 40% Crash Post-Earnings? Wall Street Says This Will Happen Next.
Key Points The Trade Desk stock plummeted nearly 40% following its second-quarter financial report as investors reacted to slowing revenue growth and tariff uncertainty. The Trade Desk's independent business model has helped the company forge important partnerships across the connected TV and retail advertising landscape. Wall Street expects adjusted earnings to increase at 14% annually through 2026, which makes the current valuation of 31 times adjusted earnings look tolerable. 10 stocks we like better than The Trade Desk › The Trade Desk (NASDAQ: TTD) had its worst day as a public company on Friday, Aug. 8. Shares dropped nearly 40% as investors processed second-quarter financial results, the departure of CFO Alex Kayyal, and a cautious outlook due to tariff uncertainty. Most Wall Street analysts think the market overreacted. The Trade Desk still has a median target price of $80 per share, which implies 48% upside from its current share price of $54. However, forecasts range from $45 per share at the low end (implying 17% downside) to $135 per share at the high end (implying 150% upside). Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Here's what investors should know before buying the post-earnings dip. The Trade Desk's independence differentiates it from Amazon, Google, and Meta Platforms The Trade Desk operates the leading independent demand-side platform (DSP), a type of adtech software that helps media buyers plan, measure, and optimize advertising campaigns across digital channels. Its platform leans on artificial intelligence to help clients manage budgets, customize bids, and dynamically target consumers. The Trade Desk's independence -- meaning it does not own media content that might bias ad spending on its platform -- distinguishes it from larger competitors, such as Alphabet 's Google, Meta Platforms, and Amazon. Those companies have a clear incentive to steer media buyers toward their own ad inventory on websites like Google Search and Instagram, which creates a conflict of interest. In other words, The Trade Desk is more transparent. The company's independence has allowed it to form a number of critical partnerships. It sources ad inventory from streaming platforms Netflix, Roku, Walt Disney, and Spotify. It sources data from retailers Albertsons, Target, and Walmart. That creates opportunities brands cannot find on other platforms, such that The Trade Desk has become a leader in connected TV (CTV) advertising and a formidable player in retail advertising. Importantly, the company has consistently taken market share in digital advertising, and CEO Jeff Green believes that trend will continue for the foreseeable future. That sets The Trade Desk up for solid growth in years to come. Adtech spending is projected to increase at 14% annually through 2030, according to Grand View Research. The Trade Desk reported slowing growth in the second quarter and gave weak guidance that unsettled investors Despite the sharp decline in the stock, The Trade Desk actually reported reasonably good second-quarter financial results that beat estimates on the top and bottom lines. Revenue rose 19% to $694 million, and non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) net income jumped 5% to $0.41 per diluted share. "With our leadership in CTV as well as other areas such as retail media, digital audio, identity, measurement, and data, we are winning more business," said CEO Jeff Green. Nevertheless, investors were clearly concerned about slowing growth, particularly because larger competitors delivered stronger results. Meta Platforms and Amazon said advertising revenue increased 21% and 23%, respectively, in the second quarter. The Trade Desk has historically outpaced its largest rivals, so the latest report raises questions about its ability to do so in the future. That is particularly true because the company provided weak guidance for the third quarter. Management says revenue will increase by 14% to $717 million, and adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) will increase 8% to $277 million. But newly appointed CFO Laura Schenkein said actual results could be worse if tariff uncertainty leads to a less favorable economic environment. That gloomy outlook caused the stock to plunge nearly 40% following the report. Bank of America analyst Jessica Ehrlich downgraded the stock to hold and slashed her target price to $55 per share (down from $130 per share). She still thinks The Trade Desk's revenue will increase at a double-digit pace in the future, but no longer believes a premium valuation is justified because the company is losing momentum. MoffettNathanson also downgraded the stock to sell for similar reasons, slashing its target price to $45 per share. What Wall Street expects from The Trade Desk in the coming quarters The Trade Desk's second-quarter report raised questions about its ability to grow revenue faster than 20% annually, and Wall Street analysts are clearly divided on the issue. The company reorganized its sales team earlier this year after missing its own guidance in the fourth quarter for the first time in 33 quarters. Growth could reaccelerate as those changes improve workflows, especially once tariff uncertainty dissipates. Regardless, Wall Street currently estimates The Trade Desk's adjusted earnings will increase by 14% annually through 2026. That forecast makes the current valuation of 31 times adjusted earnings look tolerable, and it leaves room for upside if the company manages a material reacceleration in sales growth in the future. To that end, patient investors should consider buying the stock on the post-earnings dip. Should you invest $1,000 in The Trade Desk right now? Before you buy stock in The Trade Desk, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and The Trade Desk wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Trevor Jennewine has positions in Amazon, Roku, and The Trade Desk. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Netflix, Roku, Spotify Technology, Target, The Trade Desk, Walmart, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
CTV News
40 minutes ago
- CTV News
AI in health care: Hype and red flags to watch for
Some easy-to-understand advice for using A.I, tools safely and knowing when it's time to pick up the phone and call your doctor. With tens of millions of downloads, generative AI apps like ChatGPT are increasingly being used to seek out medical advice. A recent study by researchers at the University of Waterloo found that only a fraction of ChatGPT's responses to open-ended medical questions were considered correct or clear. Experts say large language models (LLMs) should be used with caution. Dr. Vera Kohut, national medical director at Serefin Health, spoke to CTV Morning Live on Thursday to discuss what's helpful, what's hype, and what red flags to look out for. 'It's here to stay and we've just got to understand that it needs to become more fulsome in its accuracy,' she said. Kohut says LLMs are designed to mimic conversations. 'When you understand that AI is really a machine that has been fed information by a human and it has learned from those human interactions, what happens is that it is not personal,' she said. 'It does not know anything about you, your personal history, your family history, your genetics. It doesn't know anything about the geography that you live in, your gender, your race, so as a result, it's giving you blanket information; it's not giving you personal information.' Generative AI tools have no capacity to assess risk or get into the nuances of your personal health situation, Kohut added. 'Therefore, it's likely to give you generalized information. It may be inaccurate,' she said. Red flags to watch for when using AI Kohut says if you should be skeptical whenever a chatbot gives you a diagnosis. 'If it suddenly gives you one diagnosis, or it starts giving you these vague diagnoses, or it says more research is needed, be careful,' she said. 'If it suddenly does not recognize, and it may not, the importance of what you are saying and therefore does not guide you, in a situation where your symptoms are increasing, to go and get further help, or frankly, doesn't talk about you doing that, beware. And if, in situations where you're talking to it and it suddenly starts giving you information about supplements or strange therapeutic interventions, beware.' The Ontario Medical Association recently raised concerns about a growing trend of self-diagnosis using online tools and said that while it's not always necessarily a problem, it can be risky and should be part of a broader conversation with a medical professional. Can AI be helpful? Kohut says there are ways AI tools can help. 'It allows you, for example, to track your symptoms. It allows you to take a look at what you're going through and ask AI what that might mean. It allows you to take medical information and make it more palatable,' she said. She said you can also use it to track medical appointments and medications. Kohut said, however, that it is important to consider privacy whenever you use AI tools. Earlier this year, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned that there is no legal confidentiality when feeding personal information into ChatGPT. 'We need to be more aware of the need for privacy in the information that is being given,' she said.
Globe and Mail
40 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Letters to the editor, Aug. 10: ‘Canada should now take all concessions off the table … it is time to be tough against a tyrant'
Re 'Poilievre says Carney has failed with Trump, urges narrow countertariffs' (Aug. 8): I worry that Canada might capitulate to bullying from Washington like so many other countries have done. From my perspective, Canada should now take all concessions off the table, including elimination of the digital services tax. Canada should also impose tariffs on non-USMCA-compliant vehicles and other goods from the United States. Hit back on any other items that can generate revenue to compensate our people from the impact of tariffs, including energy and oil and gas. Perhaps Canada and Britain can reach a deal on steel. Both countries export to the U.S; if what each country makes complements the loss of U.S. trade, it could be win-win. It is time to be tough against a tyrant. Bullies are encouraged by acquiescence. Fawning is disgusting and encourages him. Janet Henley St. John's Re 'Carney announces $1.2-billion in lumber industry supports' (Report on Business, Aug. 6): Get around U.S. softwood tariffs by going metric. Years ago, we went metric for weights and measurements at great expense, for little payback. There would certainly be costs involved, but if we went metric on softwood manufacturing, then the world would be our market and not just the United States. We would lose the U.S. market, but then, as Donald Trump said, they 'don't need anything Canada has.' Frank Best Collingwood, Ont. Re 'Trump's firing of economic data collector raises alarm' (Aug. 4): Examples from Greece, China, and Argentina of the disastrous results of political interference in non-political institutions are helpful. But we don't have to look far to see similar examples much closer to home. Not long ago, the Harper government didn't seem to like the policy implications of demographic information, so the long-form census was cancelled; for similar reasons, scientific input into public discourse was silenced. And there are more current provincial examples of attacks on public institutions and processes. Institutional interference that serves only political purposes is always corrosive. It is well and good to be reminded of this by observing the international experience. However, that does not obviate the need to be aware of the same phenomena, past and present, occurring right here. Kent Sargeant Calgary Re 'How Norway cracked the electric-vehicle code' (Aug. 1): Here's one way to shift to more electric vehicles. Fully charged EV batteries should be modular and available for exchange at gas stations. It should take less than one minute when all EVs are designed for quick battery replacement. The removed batteries should then be sent to large central facilities that refurbish and recharge them, then send them back to services stations. Motorists don't own the batteries; the cost could be added to monthly electricity bills. This method would require little new infrastructure and no need for motorists to replace expensive long-term batteries. 'Refuelling' times would be faster than filling a tank with gasoline. Frank Foulkes Professor emeritus, department of chemical engineering and applied chemistry, University of Toronto Re 'What's in a number?' (Letters, Aug. 2): Several correspondents have argued strongly for lowering the voting age to 16. That, by lowering the voting age, democracy is strengthened. That, in particular, it is our youth who will have to live with the downstream results of today's political decisions. And, at present, the future has no vote. So why stop at 16? Since those under 16 have even more riding on the future, their votes should be cast by their mothers, acting on their behalves. I guarantee child poverty and related issues would be cleared up within a couple of election cycles. Just look at what the senior vote did for my demographic. Here is an opportunity for Canada to show the world we take the future of our youngsters very seriously. Allan Portis Toronto Re 'A long ballot satire within satire' (July 30): So the Longest Ballot Committee believes that election laws would be better made by a citizens' assembly. Why stop there? Given the issues with electoral politics on every file, why not turn Parliament itself into a citizens' assembly – that is, appoint members by random lottery? (The modern term for this is sortition.) If they want real democracy, regardless of leaning left or right, return democracy to its roots: This is how officials were appointed in ancient Athens, where elections were deprecated by Aristotle as a recipe for oligarchy. People on juries act seriously. It can work in Parliament, too. Mark Tilley Middlesex County, Ont. Re 'Vancouver mourns the loss of its iconic Kitsilano Beach log' (Aug. 2): While I understand the city's concern for safety, the removal of the beloved giant driftwood from Kitsilano Beach without thought for the community has truly left us saddened. For generations, this magnificent piece served as a play area for children, a sunset gathering spot for friends and families and no less a peaceful place for meditation for many of us. It wasn't just a piece of wood, it was a keeper of memories and a symbol of community connection. It's not too late to commemorate this driftwood's profound impact. I urge Vancouver officials to work with residents to create a meaningful legacy, be it through an art installation, a memorial plaque, poetry embedded nearby or ultimately a safe, remodelled structure that pays tribute to the original. Beryl Woodrow Vancouver Re 'Cleaning after my mother's death taught me about what can't be replaced' (First Person, Aug. 1): I, too, despaired at the task of cleaning out my mother's home after she died almost two years ago. My mom was also an organized 'keeper.' When I would gently chastise her for the multiple accumulated notepads, or stacks of balls of wool we'd come across while valiantly searching for some other crucial item, she'd smile and say, 'I will use them one day!' I'm now ashamed that this occasionally annoyed me. (I did, surreptitiously, do away with my childhood Encyclopedia Britannica set. I'm sure she noticed, but didn't say a word.) The smallest things made my heart skip a beat when I came across them after her death: her favourite lipstick tucked in the back of a drawer, a delicate and frayed silk scarf not worn for years, a copy of a note to a dear friend. I carry one of her many handwritten shopping lists-bookmarks in my wallet. Andrea Cooper Murphy Toronto Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@
