logo
Trump's World Liberty crypto tokens are set to become tradable

Trump's World Liberty crypto tokens are set to become tradable

Crypto Insight17-07-2025
Tokenholders of US President Donald Trump-backed crypto project World Liberty Financial (WLFI) have voted to make them tradable, opening the door for the Trump-linked token to increase in value.
The proposal submitted by the WLFI team on July 9 closed on Wednesday, with an 'overwhelming' 99.94% in favor of the unlock. It will make the platform's governance token tradable through peer-to-peer transactions and secondary markets.
'Following the vote to make the token tradable, WLFI's governance framework will enable more tokenholders to participate directly in protocol decisions,' the WLFI team said in the proposal.
'This includes voting on emissions, ecosystem incentives, and future treasury actions. This proposal is the first step in handing greater influence to the community.' Token unlock will come in stages, launch plan coming soon
Not all the governance tokens will be unlocked at once, according to the WLFI team, and a full launch plan is coming soon, according to WLFI's post on X on Wednesday.
The WLFI team outlined in the original proposal that as part of the initial unlock, only 'a portion' of the tokens sold to early supporters will be eligible to be traded.
'The remainder of the tokens will be subject to a second vote by the community to determine the unlock and release schedule,' the team said.
Founders, team, and adviser tokens will also not be unlocked. They will be subject to a longer schedule: timing and any eligibility requirements are yet to be determined.
World Liberty sold WLFI tokens in two tranches. One opened in October 2024 and sold 20 billion for $0.015 each, netting the company about $300 million.
The second opened in January and charged $0.05 per token, which saw another five billion tokens sold, generating $250 million in sales. Transition from closed to open
The token unlock is part of a broader plan to transition from being a closed network to 'open participation,' the WLFI team said.
Making the tokens tradable will also likely open the door to speculation and price discovery.
Once the tokens become tradable, the team said it will continue ecosystem expansion and align long-term token incentives with protocol adoption.
Blockchain intelligence platform TRM Labs has been tapped to provide transaction monitoring. Trump family reducing WLFI stake
WLFI launched on Sept. 16, 2024 and was endorsed by Donald Trump and his sons — Eric, Donald Jr. and Barron Trump.
The president reported a $57 million profit from WLFI in a June financial disclosure with the US Office of Government Ethics; however, the Trump family has also reportedly reduced its stake in the platform since December 2024, holding 40% of the company as of June.
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/trump-backed-wlfi-token-trading-approved-token-unlock
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Time for international organisations to adapt and change
Time for international organisations to adapt and change

Al Etihad

timean hour ago

  • Al Etihad

Time for international organisations to adapt and change

29 July 2025 01:16 By: OBAID FAISAL ALKAABIThe international organisations and their role in today's world have become a subject of debate, not only in the Global South but also in the western corridors of power. Over the past decade, some western countries have taken the lead in criticising international organisations and blocs with some even opting to withdraw from them, claiming that these bodies no longer serve their interests or align with their policies, with the United States at the forefront during the first and second administrations of President Donald the most recent US decisions in this regard was its withdrawal from UNESCO; it has already left the World Health Organization, the Paris Climate Agreement, and the Human Rights Council. Trump's return to the White House has renewed this trend, as his administration once again reviews America's membership in various United Nations-affiliated bodies. Official justifications for these decisions often centre around claims of bias, lack of independence, poor crisis management, and failure to achieve US interests. The United States contributes significantly more funding to these organisations than many other, more populous countries. The change has gone to the point that a Republican senator introduced a bill in the Senate urging the US to quit the United moves significantly weakened the activity of some organisations and perhaps paralysed others, whether due to funding cuts or by banning their operations in certain from official reasons, Trump is not convinced by the post-World War II global order, which was established by the US and led to the creation of international political and economic institutions, chief among them the United Nations and its agencies. While the multiple US withdrawals from international organisations and treaties may diminish its global role to some extent, Washington views this as a principled rejection of multilateral mechanisms, even as international law is largely dependent on such Trump, the United States adopts a transactional attitude towards global engagement. As such, membership in international organisations is evaluated through a cost-benefit lens, especially in terms of economic cutting costs may be one factor, the more decisive motive remains the 'America First' policy. Accordingly, Washington places little value on organisations that do not align with its inward-focused policies and its preference for domestic over international before Trump came to power, there was another example from the western part of the world. In 2016, the United Kingdom chose to leave the European Union for reasons connected to immigration, economics, and sovereignty. This marked a return of protectionist measures to the global economic scene, culminating in today's widespread tariff hikes, although many believed such practices had been dismantled in the post-World War II transformations take time, there seems to be a shift toward alternative mechanisms that may marginalise international organisations, especially if this western vision is not merely a passing phase tied to certain political figures. Yet, we must also acknowledge the shortcomings of international organisations in the face of global conflicts. Some international organisations' handling of wars and crises has often exposed institutional bias, either embedded within their structures or forced upon them by dominant global powers seeking to legitimise their geopolitical end of World War II ushered in a new era of global governance, where sovereign equality among nations would be enshrined through the United Nations. But it seems that the current US administration wants to reshape the world in a way that advances its own interests and reinforces its dominance and values. It seeks to rewrite the rules on global issues like trade, cyberspace, and emerging technologies. Meanwhile, many countries in the Global South remain disillusioned by the current global system that has yet to fulfill their aspirations. They now call for a multi-polar world order that respects sovereignty and ensures economic and social these diverging global visions, international organisations find themselves at a critical juncture: Will they remain entrenched in the current world order, or will they evolve to become foundational institutions in the coming era as well? The columnist is a staffer at the think-tank firm TRENDS Research & Advisory

Thailand and Cambodia begin truce talks as fighting drags on
Thailand and Cambodia begin truce talks as fighting drags on

Sharjah 24

time2 hours ago

  • Sharjah 24

Thailand and Cambodia begin truce talks as fighting drags on

More than 200,000 people have fled as the two sides fired artillery, rockets and guns in a battle over the long-disputed area, which is home to a smattering of ancient temples. The flare-up is the deadliest since violence raged from 2008-2011 over the territory, which is claimed by both sides because of a vague demarcation made by Cambodia's French colonial administrators in 1907. Hours ahead of the talks, an AFP journalist in the Cambodian city of Samraong -- 17 kilometres (10 miles) from the fraught frontier -- reported hearing a steady drumbeat of up to 10 blasts a minute. US President Donald Trump -- who both nations are courting for trade deals to avert the threat of eye-watering tariffs -- intervened over the weekend, and said both sides had agreed to "quickly work out" a truce. Thai acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet began their talks in the administrative capital Putrajaya around 3:15pm (0715 GMT). They met at the residence of Malaysian leader Anwar Ibrahim, serving chair of the ASEAN bloc of which Thailand and Cambodia are both members, who earlier told media he would focus on an "immediate ceasefire". Washington's top diplomat Marco Rubio said State Department officials were on the ground in Malaysia to assist the "peace efforts" while Cambodia said a delegation from its close ally China would also attend. But ahead of the summit, Thailand and Cambodia traded fresh fire and barbed accusations. Cambodia's defence ministry spokeswoman Maly Socheata said it was "the fifth day that Thailand has invaded Cambodia's territory with heavy weapons and with the deployment of a lot of troops". As he departed Bangkok airport, Phumtham told reporters he did not believe Cambodia was "acting in good faith" and called on the country "to demonstrate genuine intent" in the meeting. In Thailand's Surin city -- 30 kilometres from the border and a hub of evacuees fleeing the fighting -- 58-year-old Lamduan Chuenjit shared her leader's scepticism. "I hope the negotiation goes well today and ends with a ceasefire," the cleaner told AFP while sweeping a shopfront. "But I do wonder how trustworthy Cambodia is." Both sides point the finger On the eve of the talks, Thailand's military said Cambodian snipers were camped in one of the contested temples, and accused Phnom Penh of surging troops along the border and hammering Thai territory with rockets. It said there was fighting at seven areas in the rural region, marked by a ridge of hills surrounded by wild jungle and fields where locals farm rubber and rice. "The situation remains highly tense, and it is anticipated that Cambodia may be preparing for a major military operation prior to entering negotiations," the Thai military statement read. Thai King Maha Vajiralongkorn marked his 73rd birthday on Monday, but a notice in the country's Royal Gazette said his public celebrations scheduled for Bangkok's Grand Palace have been cancelled amid the strife. Trump has threatened both countries with high levies in his global tariff blitz unless they agree to independent trade deals -- but said he would "look forward" to signing them once "peace is at hand". Each side has already agreed to a truce in principle, while accusing the other of undermining peace efforts and trading allegations about the use of cluster bombs and targeting of hospitals. Thailand says eight of its soldiers and 14 civilians have been killed, while Cambodia has confirmed eight civilian and five military deaths. The Thai military said it had returned the bodies of 12 Cambodian soldiers killed in combat. More than 138,000 people have fled Thailand's border regions, while around 80,000 have been driven from their homes in Cambodia. With the skirmish enflaming nationalist sentiments, Thailand warned its citizens to "refrain from any kind of violence, whether in speech or action" against Cambodian migrants living in the country.

US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'
US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US calls Saudi and French-led conference on two-state solution a 'publicity stunt'

The United States on Monday lashed out at a United Nations conference promoting a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict that was hosted by its close allies France and Saudi Arabia. The US State Department labelled the three-day event "unproductive and ill-timed", as well as a "publicity stunt" that would make finding peace harder. The diplomatic push is a "reward for terrorism", the statement said. The US deployed even harsher words against French President Emmanuel Macron, calling his decision to recognise a Palestinian state last week 'counterproductive', saying its Nato ally's decision 'undercuts our diplomatic efforts'. France is hoping that the UK will follow its lead. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters More than 200 British members of parliament voiced support for the idea on Friday, but Prime Minister Keir Starmer has resisted. Middle East Eye has revealed that the US pressured both the UK and France against recognising Palestine earlier this year. The conference kicked off on Monday in New York City, with participants reaffirming that there is "no alternative" to the conflict besides a two-state solution. France and Saudi Arabia's leadership of the event underscores how the US's unchecked support for Israel's war on Gaza is putting its diplomacy at odds with key partners. "Only a political, two-state solution will help respond to the legitimate aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security. There is no alternative," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said at the start of the three-day meeting. UN secretary general Antonio Guterres said at the meeting that "the two-state solution is farther than ever before", decrying Israel's "creeping annexation" of the occupied West Bank and "the wholesale destruction of Gaza". The meeting comes as Gaza descends into famine as a result of Israel's siege of the enclave. Hundreds of starving Palestinians have been killed trying to obtain food from the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation that is backed by the US and Israel. Deaths from famine and malnutrition have soared in recent days. US asked Saudi Arabia to send missile interceptors to Israel during Iran conflict. Riyadh refused Read More » US President Donald Trump was asked about the famine on Monday and did not dispute it. 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump said. 'I see it, you can't fake that.' 'Those children look very hungry,' he said. 'We have to get the kids fed.' But Trump has continued to fault Hamas for the crisis, claiming the group is stealing aid despite a US government assessment contradicting that accusation. More than two dozen of the US's allies - including countries traditionally close to Israel - have accused it of 'drip feeding' aid into Gaza. The Trump administration has clashed with Israel on several issues - including striking an independent ceasefire with the Houthis in Yemen and condemning Israeli strikes on Syria - but has given it full backing for Israel to wage war on Gaza. Last week, Trump announced that the US was pulling out of ceasefire talks. He blamed Hamas for the impasse, a move analysts say was in keeping with more than two years of US messaging to provide cover to Israel for acts of genocide in Gaza, according to two major Israeli human rights groups and scores of western organisations. "It's widely understood that there are no real strategic objectives to fulfill militarily unless the ultimate goal is displacement," Michael Hanna, a Middle East expert at the International Crisis Group, told MEE previously. "In the meantime, it appears the US is willing to stand by as famine deepens throughout Gaza." Even as the US criticised the UN summit, its top participants tried to entice Trump back to talks. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan al-Saud said Trump could be a "catalyst" to ending the war in Gaza and jump-starting the two-state solution. Trump has regularly said he wants to strike a normalisation deal with Saudi Arabia and Israel, building on the 2020 Abraham Accords, which he considers a signature foreign policy achievement. Riyadh says to achieve that goal, Israel would need to take irreversible steps towards the creation of a Palestinian state, with a ceasefire in Gaza the first precondition. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said publicly that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Beyond facilitating conditions for the recognition of a Palestinian state, the three days of meeting will focus on three other issues, including the reform of the Palestinian Authority, disarmament of Hamas and normalisation of relations with Israel by Arab states as part of a two-state solution.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store