Buy now, pay later is taking over the world. Good
Such purchases are often the subject of derision. Paying for lunch in instalments is, to some, consumerism at its most ludicrous. Others see something darker: lending that skirts the edge of mainstream finance, preying on precarious borrowers.
Neither mockery nor anxiety have dented the industry's growth, however. Worldpay, a payments firm, suggests that BNPL accounted for $342bn in spending around the world last year, up from just over $2bn a decade earlier. Older financial firms, such as JPMorgan Chase and PayPal, have entered the market, just as BNPL companies are taking on tasks that were previously left to banks. The opportunity for BNPL in business-to-business loans—a fragmented, old-school market—may be even larger than that for consumers. And a new market is emerging for portfolios of BNPL debt, which are securitised and bought up, often by asset managers.
Chart
The idea of a loan at the point of sale is an old one. In 1856 Isaac Singer and Edward Clark, an entrepreneurial duo, began selling sewing machines in instalments, with great success. The modern industry operates in a similar manner. When a customer buys a product for $100, they can pay in stages. The BNPL lender—perhaps Klarna, a Swedish company, or Affirm, a large American provider—pays the merchant upfront, in exchange for a cut of, say, $3. This works for retailers, since it boosts sales. Customers with access to loans spend at least 20% more relative to those without access, even as the sticker price stays the same. The customer pays back the sum over time, often six weeks, in four instalments and with zero interest.
Despite the industry's recent success, there is reason to think it is still in the foothills. Fewer than 2% of Bank of America customers born before 1965 have an outstanding BNPL payment, compared with 10% of the bank's Millennial and Generation Z clients. As younger cohorts come to account for more consumer spending, the market should grow. In countries where BNPL has been around longer, it contributes to more sales: over one in five of those made online in Sweden, against less than one in sixteen in America. Local and regional firms are popping up to offer the service: Addi in Colombia, Atome in Singapore, Tamara in Saudi Arabia.
As the industry grows, the borders between BNPL and mainstream finance are blurring. Klarna, an early mover, has been a bank in Europe since 2017. Sebastian Siemiatkowski, the company's co-founder and boss, says he wants it to become a digital financial assistant enabled by artificial intelligence. Affirm launched a debit card two years ago, and has seen uptake soar of late: the firm now reports almost 2m cardholders. Customers can use the cards in shops, either to pay in full or in instalments, bringing a financing method synonymous with e-commerce into the real world. In the past two years, both the BNPL giants have been integrated into Apple's and Google's digital wallets.
Established financial firms are moving in the opposite direction. PayPal began offering BNPL services in 2020, capitalising on its strong relationships with merchants. Last year the payments giant processed $33bn in BNPL spending; an amount it says is growing at about 20% a year. Several banks now allow customers to split larger payments into smaller chunks after purchases. And Klarna's recent deals with payments firms such as Adyen, JPMorgan Payments and Stripe mean that its services are now provided to millions of merchants.
Several fast-growing startups hope to disrupt trade credit, a vast market in which suppliers lend money to firms that buy their products. American companies alone report about $4.9trn in trade payables, money owed to other firms for supplies purchased on credit. The market is about four times the size of the $1.2trn in balances on American credit cards. It is also antiquated and ripe for innovation. Suppliers doing the lending are forced to manually assess whether each of their clients are creditworthy, with little information to go on, and chase buyers for payments.
Matthias Knecht, co-founder of Billie, a firm specialising in business-to-business BNPL loans, suggests that such lending is roughly 15 years behind the consumer market. Richard Thornton, co-founder of Hokodo, another startup, believes that the potential impact on business spending is greater than with consumers owing to the limited alternatives available to young firms. He says that when small companies gain access to BNPL lending baskets grow by around 40% on average.
For BNPL providers, expanding their lending operations as fast as possible means keeping a light balance-sheet. The idea of burrito-securitised bonds may be the subject of mockery, but the relatively opaque market for BNPL portfolios is booming. Asset managers and private investment firms that are snapping up the debt believe they have found an appetising asset class in which underlying assets mature quickly. In October, Elliott Advisors, a British affiliate of a mammoth hedge fund, purchased Klarna's $39bn British loan portfolio. In 2023 KKR, a private-markets giant, agreed to buy as much as $44bn in BNPL debt from PayPal in 2023. Affirm has issued around $12bn in asset-backed securities. One BNPL insider calls the market 'a feeding frenzy', where there is not enough debt to satisfy demand.
Some difficult questions linger over the industry, which has ballooned over the past decade—a period without a prolonged downturn. Chief among them is whether it is facilitating risky borrowing by consumers living beyond their means.
Customers undoubtedly have lower incomes than those using credit cards. And there have been worrying snippets of news. Klarna's consumer-credit losses rose by 17% year-on-year in the first quarter of this year. Research by the Federal Reserve suggests that the proportion of BNPL users who have made a late payment has climbed from 15% in 2021 to 24% in 2024.
All the same, default rates remain markedly lower than other forms of consumer credit. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a regulator, notes that default rates for BNPL loans were about 2% between 2019 and 2022, compared with 10% for credit-card debt held by similar borrowers. Although Klarna's credit losses have grown in the past year, so have its balances. The company's overall default rate is lower than the industry norm.
Could a growing pile of distressed consumer debt be hidden from view, beyond the sight of banks and policymakers? Some lenders worry about loan-stacking (borrowing from multiple sources at once). Such doubling up can cause a downwards spiral, with consumers taking on more and more loans in order to pay off earlier ones. Yet other research by the CFPB offers reassurance. It finds that measures of financial distress—such as revolving debt on credit cards or extra charges on credit-card loans—do not rise after BNPL use. Nor are BNPL users more likely to borrow from other sources in the 18 months after agreeing to pay for something in instalments.
In June, FICO, America's main provider of consumer-credit scores, announced it would begin providing scores based on borrowers' BNPL histories. Julie May, an executive at FICO, notes a surprising finding from its year-long study with data from Affirm: for the most frequent borrowers, credit scores were improved or unchanged when BNPL loans are included. Research in Scandinavia finds similarly positive results. Christine Laudenbach of Goethe University Frankfurt and co-authors recently looked at 1m loan applications to an unnamed Nordic bank that makes use of BNPL data. Clients with a history of BNPL use, as well as a strong repayment history, were able to borrow at an average interest rate of 1.4 percentage points below the level suggested by their credit ratings.
The final verdict on BNPL will come only in a severe downturn. But although its users are young, and many are new to borrowing, there are reasons for optimism. As the new form of finance becomes increasingly mainstream, it looks safer and more useful than its critics argue. Buy that burrito, and don't let anyone judge you.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
South Korean President Lee to meet Trump in Washington on August 25
South Korea's new President Lee Jae Myung will travel to Washington later this month to meet with US President Donald Trump, Lee's office said Tuesday, for talks on trade and defence cooperation in the face of nuclear-armed North Korea and other threats. Their August 25 summit will follow a July trade deal in which Washington agreed to cut its reciprocal tariff on South Korea to 15 per cent from the initially proposed 25 per cent and to apply the same reduced rate to South Korean cars, the country's top export to the United States. South Korea also agreed to purchase $ 100 billion in US energy and invest $ 350 billion in the country, and the leaders could use their meeting to discuss expanding cooperation in key industries such as semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, Lee's spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said. The meeting also comes amid concerns in Seoul that the Trump administration could shake up the decades-old alliance by demanding higher payments for the US troop presence in South Korea and possibly move to reduce it as Washington shifts more focus on China. Lee and Trump will discuss strengthening the allies' defence posture against growing North Korean threats, and also developing the partnership into a future-oriented, comprehensive strategic alliance to address the changing international security and economic environment, according to Kang, who didn't elaborate on the specific issues to be addressed. Dating back to his first term, Trump has regularly called for South Korea to pay more for the 28,500 American troops stationed on its soil. Recent comments by key Trump administration officials, including Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, have also suggested a desire to restructure the alliance, which some experts say could potentially affect the size and role of US forces in South Korea. Under this approach, South Korea would take a greater role in countering North Korean threats while US forces focus more on China, possibly leaving Seoul to face reduced benefits but increased costs and risks, experts say.

The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trump opens door to sales of version of Nvidia's next-gen AI chips in China
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday suggested he might allow Nvidia to sell a scaled-down version of its next-generation advanced GPU chip in China, despite deep-seated fears in Washington that China could harness U.S. artificial intelligence capabilities to supercharge its military. The move could open the door to China securing more advanced computing power from the U.S. even as the two countries battled for technology supremacy, critics said. "Jensen (Huang, Nvidia CEO) also has the new chip, the Blackwell. A somewhat enhanced-in-a-negative-way Blackwell. In other words, take 30% to 50% off of it," Trump told reporters in an apparent reference to slashing the chip's computing power. "I think he's coming to see me again about that, but that will be an unenhanced version of the big one," he added. Earlier, the Trump administration confirmed an unprecedented deal with Nvidia and AMD to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from sales of some advanced chips in China. The move sent shivers across Washington, where China hawks of both parties have long sought to keep Beijing generations behind U.S. AI technology. 'Even with scaled-down versions of flagship Nvidia (chips), China could spend and buy enough of them to build world-leading, frontier-scale AI supercomputers," said Saif Khan, former director of Technology and National Security at the White House National Security Council under former President Joe Biden, who heavily restricted U.S. AI chip exports abroad. "This could directly lead to China leapfrogging America in AI capabilities.' Reuters in May reported that Nvidia was preparing a new chip for China that was a variant of its most recent state-of-the-art AI Blackwell chips at a significantly lower cost. Nvidia has not disclosed the existence of the chip, or its capabilities compared with its U.S. offerings. But the flagship U.S. version of the Blackwell chip, which Nvidia unveiled in March, is up to 30 times faster than its predecessor. Trump on Monday defended the agreement calling for Nvidia and AMD to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from China sales, after his administration green-lighted exports to China of less advanced AI chips known as the H20 last month. The Trump administration halted sales of Nvidia's H20 chips to China in April, but the company said last month it had won clearance to resume shipments and hoped to start deliveries soon. "The H20 is obsolete," Trump said on Monday, arguing China already had it. "So I said, 'Listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country.'" The deal is extremely rare for the United States and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making, after pressuring executives to invest in American manufacturing and demanding the resignation of Intel's new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, over his ties to Chinese companies. The U.S. Commerce Department has started issuing licenses for the sale of H20 chips to China, a U.S. official said on Friday. Washington does not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips compromises national security, a second U.S. official told Reuters on Sunday. The second official did not know when or how the agreement with the chip companies would be implemented but said the administration would be in compliance with the law. When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15% of revenue to the U.S., a company spokesperson said: "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide," the spokesperson added. A spokesperson for AMD said the U.S. approved its applications to export some AI processors to China, but did not directly address the revenue-sharing agreement and said the company's business adheres to all U.S. export controls. China's foreign ministry said the country has repeatedly stated its position on U.S. chip exports. The ministry has previously accused Washington of using technology and trade measures to "maliciously contain and suppress China."


The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung to meet Donald Trump on August 25 in Washington
South Korea's new President Lee Jae Myung will travel to Washington later this month to meet with U.S. President Donald Trump, Lee's office said on Tuesday (August 12, 2025), for talks on trade and defence cooperation in the face of nuclear-armed North Korea and other threats. Their August 25 summit will follow a July trade deal in which Washington agreed to cut its reciprocal tariff on South Korea to 15% from the initially proposed 25% and to apply the same reduced rate to South Korean cars, the country's top export to the United States. South Korea also agreed to purchase $100 billion in U.S. energy and invest $350 billion in the country, and the leaders could use their meeting to discuss expanding cooperation in key industries such as semiconductors, batteries and shipbuilding, Lee's spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said. The meeting also comes amid concerns in Seoul that the Trump administration could shake up the decades-old alliance by demanding higher payments for the US troop presence in South Korea and possibly move to reduce it as Washington shifts more focus on China. Mr. Lee and Mr. Trump will discuss strengthening the allies' defence posture against growing North Korean threats, and also developing the partnership into a 'future-oriented, comprehensive strategic alliance' to address the changing international security and economic environment, according to Kang, who didn't elaborate on the specific issues to be addressed. Dating back to his first term, Mr. Trump has regularly called for South Korea to pay more for the 28,500 American troops stationed on its soil. Recent comments by key Trump administration officials, including Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby, have also suggested a desire to restructure the alliance, which some experts say could potentially affect the size and role of U.S. forces in South Korea. Under this approach, South Korea would take a greater role in countering North Korean threats while U.S. forces focus more on China, possibly leaving Seoul to face reduced benefits but increased costs and risks, experts say.