BBC makes huge change to news programmes as they announce new partnership
The BBC is reuniting with the Met Office for its weather broadcasts.
The broadcaster cut ties with United Kingdom's national weather and climate service in 2017 and turned to Dutch MeteoGroup, which was the acquired by the US weather services company DTN, for their meteorological output, But now, a new deal has been put in place which will allow them to join forces with the Met Office once again, and the result will reports across news programmes such as BBC Breakfast.
Declaring that the weather is the the UK's favourite conversation, BBC director general Tim Davie said: "The BBC's world-renowned journalism will be working together with the Met Office's weather and climate intelligence to turn science into stories and help everyone in the UK to make informed decisions about the weather." The BBC confirmed that no jobs have been created or cut amid the new deal. However, it comes just days after a staple presenter let slip her plans to quit the BBC.
The BBC boss also spoke of the rise of misinformation as he insisted: "There has never been more need for trusted and impartial information to help people understand today's weather."
Penny Endersby, CEO of the Met Office said of the new deal: "As the UK's national weather service, we are excited to be back working closely with the BBC again. Together we can reach even more people with essential weather information, helping them to plan their days, stay safe when it matters and keep well-informed in our changing climate", adding that they have a desire to "help more people stay safe, thrive and understand the wonder of weather."
However, is expected that the BBC's current deal with DTN will remain in place for the foreseeable future, and the new partnership will kick in at some point "later this year."
Broadcaster Scott Bryan was one of the first to comment on the news, and he took to X to say: "The BBC have reunited with the Met Office for its weather forecasts. The BBC ditched Met Office in 2015 and had partnered with Meteogroup (with Met Office for weather warnings.) It now appears the partnership is back."
In a second tweet, he insisted that the new deal is "big news for all the people who keep saying that the weather is always wrong."
The BBC first lost the contract with the Met Office a decade ago, and in an online blog, the Project Director for BBC Weather procurement, Nigel Charters, confirmed some jobs would go.
Charters insisted at the time that 'the weather may be changeable in the UK, but BBC Weather will continue to provide the best possible weather information service across television, radio and digital based on timely and accurate forecast information.'
Charters said: "Some things won't change though. We know how fond people are of our weather presenters. We have taken steps so the vast majority of our well known and much loved presenters will continue to front BBC Weather.
"We'll still work closely with the Met Office on severe weather warnings; the national agencies for flood warnings and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency on shipping forecasts and coastal information."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Boxxer fights to air for free on BBC as Sky Sports deal comes to an end
Boxing will soon return to free-to-air television in Britain, with the BBC having signed a broadcast deal with Boxxer, following the end of the promotion's contract with Sky Sports. Boxxer, led by founder and CEO Ben Shalom, signed a four-year deal with Sky in 2021, the conclusion of which has now arrived without the pay-per-view broadcaster opting to extend the partnership. The Independent understood that a deal with the BBC would ensue, and the free-to-air broadcaster was announced as Boxxer's new home on Friday (8 August). A press release said that boxing will get a spot on 'Saturday night primetime television' with the BBC, while the broadcaster's iPlayer app will also stream certain fights. 'Full details of the first fight, undercard and BBC Sport presenting team will be announced in the coming weeks,' read the press release. 'Selected undercard fights, features and behind-the-scenes content will also be available across BBC iPlayer.' The BBC also vowed that the deal will 'open boxing up to all audiences, making the sport more accessible than ever'. In 1938, the BBC in fact aired the first televised boxing match in the UK: Eric Boon vs Arthur Danahar. The broadcaster has sporadically shown professional boxing in the decades since, but its deal with Boxxer marks its first consistent output of the sport in many years. Viewers will be accustomed to the BBC airing amateur boxing, however, which it does at each edition of the Olympic Games.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
BBC signs boxing broadcast deal with Boxxer
The BBC has signed a broadcast deal with Boxxer which will mean world-class professional boxing returns to prime-time television and BBC the next 12 months, the BBC will air fights from selected events on BBC Two or Three as well as on iPlayer and the BBC Sport currently houses some of the biggest talents in UK boxing including Olympic and world champion Lauren Price."Bringing professional boxing back to primetime BBC television, free-to-air, and to our extensive digital platforms is an exciting moment for us and hopefully for boxing fans," said Alex Kay-Jelski, director of BBC first event is expected to happen by the end of the year, with dates and headliners to be announced in the coming led by promoter Ben Shalom, staged an all-women's card headlined by Price and Natasha Jonas in March as well as promoting Amir Khan v Kell Brook, Liam Smith v Chris Eubank Jr, Claressa Shields v Savannah Marshall and Fabio Wardley v Frazer Clarke in recent years."Partnering with the BBC to deliver big-time British boxing on Saturday night TV is a historic moment," Shalom said."We're proud to bring the most entertaining British fighters to the biggest possible audience."This huge platform will give our fights the exposure they deserve and helps us take the sport to huge new audiences."
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves ‘vastly underestimated' scale of private school parents' VAT rebellion
Rachel Reeves 'massively underestimated' the scale of parents paying private school fees upfront to avoid VAT, internal Treasury forecasts suggest. Experts who reviewed documents obtained by The Telegraph said that Whitehall was not expecting the hundreds of millions of pounds of school fees that were paid in advance last year, ahead of the tax raid coming into force on Jan 1 2025. A total of £515m flooded into the advance fee schemes of the top 50 independent schools alone, allowing parents to avoid paying the 20 per cent levy imposed by ministers. This money is used to pay school costs one or more years before they fall due. Internal Treasury forecasts obtained by The Telegraph suggest this vastly eclipsed government predictions. Ms Reeves, the Chancellor, announced last year that all fee prepayments from July 29 would be subject to VAT, as the Government tried to clamp down on the potential tax loophole. Treasury calculations shared with ministers last summer show they expected to raise £90m in VAT from fees in advance schemes made beyond that date. This would equate to tax on around £450m in upfront school fees after July 29 last year, since VAT is charged at 20 per cent. The documents obtained by The Telegraph reveal that the Government also considered trying to capture fee prepayments made from May 22 2024 – the date Rishi Sunak called a general election – but ultimately rejected this option. The internal Treasury advice said it expected doing so would raise an additional £30m in VAT, bringing the total forecast for money raised by charging the 20 per cent levy on fee prepayments to £120m. This would equate to parents handing over around £600m in fee prepayments across all 2,600 private schools in the UK. However, private schools' annual accounts suggest the total is likely to be significantly higher. Eton College alone received as much as £52.7m in upfront fees from parents ahead of the July 29 deadline. This would have handed the Treasury an extra £10.5m in VAT if the tax were applied to Eton's prepaid fees alone. Treasury officials said in the documents: 'As demonstrated by the small differences in the costings, not legislating back to an earlier date in time does not mean that we expect to lose significant amounts of revenue.' They added that it would be 'difficult to justify' trying to retrospectively tax fee prepayments 'given the legislation would be giving effect to the policy before the details… were known'. Tom Clougherty, executive director at the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: 'It does appear that the Government massively underestimated the behavioural effect of introducing VAT on private school fees. 'Prepayment has clearly been far more significant than the Treasury anticipated when preparing the policy, but I suspect that is just one part of a wider picture. More children have been withdrawn from the independent sector, and more schools have closed, too.' Mairéad Warren de Búrca, managing director at Alvarez and Marsal Tax, said: 'I think they've just done what a lot of people have done, which is underestimate how much cash is available and also the lengths to which parents would go to to fund private education in the most cost-effective way possible.' The internal Government communications obtained by The Telegraph do not include forecasts about the potential use of prepayment schemes prior to May 2024. They instead show the Treasury drew up its own internal forecasts for expected revenue gain from both VAT and prepayment schemes, and that these were later analysed by the Office for Budget Responsibility. The documents reveal Treasury officials defended targeting parents who paid fees upfront, saying: 'It is unfair that those who are financially able to pre-pay should benefit over those who cannot.' A Whitehall source said the Government had always predicted a huge rise in the use of fees in advance schemes by the richest parents trying to avoid VAT, and that ministers were confident they could recoup most of the money. HMRC has said it will now 'carefully scrutinise' prepayments amid concerns that some schools may have abused the financial mechanisms to avoid VAT. The Government is expected to target schools that set up fees in advance schemes in a hurry ahead of the VAT start date, or those that used them more like 'deposits'. For prepayments to be treated as genuine, they must contractually apply to a specific service at a specific price – rather than a vague lump sum to be sorted out at a future date. It is expected to spark lengthy legal battles between both HMRC and private schools, and potentially between parents and private schools over who is liable for unpaid VAT. Tax experts said it could lead to parents suddenly being told they are on the hook for tens of thousands of pounds in tax several years down the line. A government spokesman said: 'The Office for Budget Responsibility has already factored in the increased use of pre-payment schemes in its revenue forecasts. 'Removing tax breaks for private schools is expected to raise £1.8bn a year by 2029-30. 'This funding will help us recruit 6,500 new teachers and improve standards in state schools, which educate 94 per cent of children.'
