logo
Debate over Latin Mass heats up after apparent leak of Vatican documents that undermine Pope Francis

Debate over Latin Mass heats up after apparent leak of Vatican documents that undermine Pope Francis

Independent2 days ago
The debate in the Catholic Church over the celebration of the old Latin Mass is heating up just as Pope Leo XIV's pontificate is getting under way, with the apparent leak of Vatican documents that undermine the stated reason of his predecessor Pope Francis for restricting access to the ancient liturgy.
The documents suggest that the majority of Catholic bishops who responded to a 2020 Vatican survey about the Latin Mass had expressed general satisfaction with it, and warned that restricting it would 'do more harm than good.'
The texts from the Vatican's doctrine office were posted online Tuesday by a Vatican reporter who has followed the Latin Mass dispute, Diane Montagna. The Vatican spokesman and prefect of the doctrine office didn't immediately respond when asked Wednesday to confirm their authenticity, or comment.
If confirmed, the documents could add pressure on Leo to try to pacify the liturgical divisions that spread, especially in the United States, during Francis' 12-year papacy. Since the start of his pontificate, Leo has said his aim is unity and reconciliation in the church, and many conservatives and traditionalists have pointed to the Latin Mass dispute as an area that requires urgent resolution.
In one of his most controversial acts, Francis in 2021 reversed Pope Benedict XVI's signature liturgical legacy and restricted access for ordinary Catholics to the old Latin Mass. The ancient liturgy was celebrated around the world before the modernizing reforms of the 1960s Second Vatican Council, which allowed Mass to be celebrated in the vernacular, with the priest facing the pews.
Francis said he was cracking down on the spread of the old liturgy because Benedict's decision in 2007 to relax restrictions had become a source of division in the church. Francis said at the time he was responding to 'the wishes expressed' by bishops around the world who had responded to the Vatican survey, as well as the Vatican doctrine office's own opinion.
'The responses reveal a situation that preoccupies and saddens me, and persuades me of the need to intervene,' Francis wrote at the time. Benedict's relaxation had been "exploited to widen the gaps, reinforce the divergences, and encourage disagreements that injure the church, block her path, and expose her to the peril of division,' he said.
The documents posted online, however, paint a different picture. They suggest the majority of bishops who responded to the Vatican survey had a generally favorable view of Benedict's reform and warned that suppressing or weakening it would lead traditionalist Catholics to leave the church and join schismatic groups. They warned any changes 'would seriously damage the life of the church, as it would recreate the tensions that the document had helped to resolve.'
The documents include a five-page 'overall assessment' of the survey findings, written by the Vatican's doctrine office, as well as a seven-page compilation of quotes from individual bishops or bishops' conferences.
The documents contain some negative and neutral opinions, and say some bishops considered Benedict's reform 'inappropriate, disturbing,' dangerous and worthy of suppression. But the Vatican's own assessment said the majority of bishops who responded expressed satisfaction. It cited the rise in religious vocations in traditionalist communities and said young Catholics in particular were drawn to the 'sacredness, seriousness and solemnity of the liturgy.'
It's not clear what other evidence, anecdotes or documentation informed Francis' decision to reverse Benedict. But from the very start, Francis was frequently critical of traditionalist Catholics, whom he accused of being navel-gazing retrogrades out of touch with the evangelizing mission of the church in the 21st century.
The new documents have comforted traditionalists who felt attacked and abandoned by Francis.
'The new revelations confirms that Pope Francis restricted the Traditional Mass at the request of only a minority of bishops, and against the advice of the dicastery in charge of the subject,' said Joseph Shaw, of the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales. 'The majority view of the bishops, that restricting the TLM would cause more harm than good, has sadly been proved correct.'
In an email, he said Leo should address the issue 'urgently.'
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans celebrate as Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes in House
Republicans celebrate as Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes in House

The Independent

time44 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Republicans celebrate as Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes in House

Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" was passed by the House of Representatives on Thursday, 3 July 2025, with a vote of 218 in favour to 214 against. The legislation features sweeping cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance programmes. It also extends the 2017 tax cuts and includes funding for 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and 3,000 Border Patrol agents. Mr Trump has set a loose deadline of 4 July to sign the bill into law. Watch the video in full above

For retailers, US-Vietnam trade deal leaves questions
For retailers, US-Vietnam trade deal leaves questions

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

For retailers, US-Vietnam trade deal leaves questions

LONDON, July 3 (Reuters) - A trade deal announced by the U.S. and Vietnam creates new question marks for sportswear and clothing retailers like Nike and Adidas that source shoes and clothes from factories in the Southeast Asian country, industry experts said on Thursday. The U.S. will impose a 20% tariff on many imports from Vietnam, while "transshipping" from third countries through Vietnam will face a 40% levy, President Donald Trump said on Wednesday. Garment and shoe factories in Vietnam rely heavily on yarns, polyester fabrics, and trims like buttons and zippers imported from neighbouring China. It was not immediately clear whether such products assembled in Vietnam from Chinese inputs would be vulnerable to the transshipment tariff. Typically, transshipment would designate a product mostly made in China, shipped to Vietnam and then relabelled and exported as made in Vietnam. U.S. customs already watches for that practice, but the Trump administration has hardened its stance on it, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying that "a huge amount" of trade from Vietnam is transshipment from China, in a CNBC interview Thursday. Many questions remain over the trade agreement, said Sheng Lu, professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware. "Strictly speaking, transshipment is illegal, whereas using foreign components in compliance with rules of origin requirements is common practice," said Lu. "Confusing these two distinct practices will only create greater uncertainty and risk further supply chain disruption." Vietnam has been a top destination for retailers and brands looking to reduce their reliance on factories in China, but has also become a target of Trump's aggressive trade policy. Vietnam is a key producer of sports shoes for Nike, accounting for 50% of Nike branded shoes overall in the company's fiscal year 2024, and is also Adidas' biggest supplier country, producing 27% of the German brand's products. A Nike spokesperson said the company is still looking into the details of the deal. Adidas declined to comment. "With this new change and with the potential for this transshipment tariff, I think it's going to cause a lot of importers to really question, is Vietnam really a good other option?" said Lila Landis, a customs compliance consultant based in Fort Worth, Texas. While details are still not confirmed, the 40% tariff could possibly be stacked atop the correct China duty for any given product, making it highly punitive, Landis added. Overall, the U.S. imported 274 million pairs of shoes from Vietnam last year, according to industry group Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America (FDRA), which on Wednesday called the tariffs unnecessary and said they would hit American consumers. "There's disappointment in the 20% on the Vietnam side," said Joe Jurken, managing director at supply chain management company The ABC Group. The announced tariff on Vietnam narrows the gap with China, which the U.S. has hit with a 55% tariff, and may even tempt some brands to stick with China, Jurken said, instead of switching suppliers which is lengthy and costly. "There's a lack of capacity in Vietnam because there's not enough factories, and there's an overabundance of capacity in China... so the Chinese factories, in our opinion, will benefit from this over the short term," Jurken said. Still, the 20% tariff rate is better than the 25-30% rate the market feared, according to analysts at Raymond James. And the deal announcement goes some way to end uncertainty, and could encourage some retailers that were considering Vietnam to go ahead and place orders, said Jim Kennemer, managing director at Cosmo Sourcing. "It's going to be nearly impossible to get a 100% not-China supply chain," he said.

EPA takes brutal action after employees sign 'declaration of dissent' against Trump policies
EPA takes brutal action after employees sign 'declaration of dissent' against Trump policies

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

EPA takes brutal action after employees sign 'declaration of dissent' against Trump policies

Lee Zeldin's EPA placed 139 employees on administrative leave pending an investigation into what the agency calls an attempt to illegally sabotage Donald Trump 's agenda. In a 'declaration of dissent' published Monday, the employees wrote via an organization formed called 'Stand Up 4 Science' that the agency is no longer living up to its mission to protect human health and the environment. The letter represented rare public criticism from agency employees who knew they could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. In a statement to the agency declared that the rebel employees were attempting to undermine Trump's mandate. 'The Environmental Protection Agency has a zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging, and undercutting the administration's agenda as voted for by the great people of this country last November,' a spokesperson said. Zeldin also spoke out, telling The Daily Caller: 'Unfortunately, a small number of employees signed onto a public letter, written as agency employees, using their official work title, that was riddled with misinformation regarding agency business.' Employees were notified that they had been placed in a 'temporary, non-duty, paid status' for the next two weeks, pending an 'administrative investigation,' according to a copy an email sent out. 'It is important that you understand that this is not a disciplinary action,' the email read. In a statement released Thursday night, Stand Up 4 Science said the employees were unclear about where they stood, as Zeldin never directly responded to their letter. 'Though we are still gathering information on this situation, we condemn these actions. These are dedicated civil servants whose career goal is to keep Americans safe,' Colette Delawalla, the head of the of the activist organization said. More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move in June, when nearly 100 employees signed a declaration that assailed Trump administration 'policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe.' An additional 250 of their colleagues endorsed the declaration without using their names. But no one at NIH has been placed on administrative leave for signing the declaration and there has been no known retribution against them, Jenna Norton, a lead organizer of the statement, told AP on Thursday. Norton oversees health disparity research at the agency´s National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, in his confirmation hearings, had pledged openness to views that might conflict with his own, saying dissent is the 'essence of science.' A former Congressman, Zeldin has attempted to serve the efforts of both the Trump administration and the Department of Government Efficiency to cut waste, fraud and abuse at the EPA. In February, Zeldin identified where $20 billion of climate-related funds purposefully wasted by the Biden administration landed. He It all came to light in a recent 'disturbing' video showing a Biden EPA political appointee. The employee bragged abut how the administration was 'tossing gold bars off the Titanic' and rushing to get 'billions of your tax dollars out the door before Inauguration Day,' Zeldin said in a video. 'The gold bars were tax dollars, and tossing them off the Titanic meant the Biden administration knew they were wasting it.' Zeldin said his team discovered where exactly the billions were intentionally placed by the outgoing Biden officials after they bragged about handing the money over to nonprofits to make it harder for Republicans to recover the funds. Critics of Zeldin say he has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA´s research and development office as part of his push to slash its budget and gut its study of climate change and environmental justice. And he´s seeking to roll back pollution rules that an AP examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. The EPA responded to the employees' letter earlier this week by saying policy decisions 'are a result of a process where Administrator Zeldin is briefed on the latest research and science by EPA´s career professionals, and the vast majority who are consummate professionals who take pride in the work this agency does day in and day out.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store