logo
House Republicans tiptoe toward tariff criticism

House Republicans tiptoe toward tariff criticism

Yahoo20-07-2025
President Donald Trump's determination to barrel ahead with tariffs is forcing a growing number of Republican lawmakers to make an uncomfortable choice: defend the president's agenda or influential industries back home.
So far, they are trying to thread the needle by expressing concerns to administration officials couched in praise for the president — but not yet supporting legislation to rein in his trade authority. The gentle, behind-the-scenes pushback, primarily in the form of group letters, is a sign of the squeeze Trump's trade agenda is putting on some Republicans, who face pressure from powerful, export-reliant industries like aerospace and agriculture, but also fear crossing a president known for nursing grudges.
In recent weeks, dozens of House Republicans have signed onto letters to Trump's top trade advisers encouraging them to take a restrained approach to future tariffs — in particular, the industry-specific tariffs the Commerce Department is weighing on sectors ranging from semiconductors to pharmaceuticals to drones. Trump has hinted that some of those duties will be rolled out soon, telling reporters on Tuesday that tariffs on pharmaceuticals could be coming 'at the end of the month,' starting at a low rate but gradually rising to a 'very high tariff.'
That effort is being driven in part by industry groups representing a broad range of critical sectors that depend on trade and exports, that have concluded that direct appeals to the administration carry less weight than channeling their lobbying through Congress.
The lawmakers' letters are always laudatory. 'We write to commend this Administration's commitment to restore a robust American manufacturing sector,' read a June 17 letter from two dozen House Republicans — many representing swing districts — that was shared with POLITICO.
But the underlying request is clear: rein in the tariffs.
The June letter, which was led by Rep. Ron Estes, went on to urge U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to honor a longstanding zero-tariff agreement on civil aircraft between the U.S. and other countries — and, implicitly, drop the administration's plan to raise tariffs on imports of aerospace products. Lawmakers also underscored the industry's trade surplus and 'its high-wage domestic manufacturing workforce' — a subtle counterpoint to Trump's argument that tariffs are necessary to rebalance global trade and return manufacturing to the U.S.
Estes' Wichita-based district is home to several aerospace companies, including the headquarters for Spirit Aerosystems, a commercial airline manufacturer. Kansas companies export about $2.3 billion in aerospace products annually, according to the Kansas Department of Commerce, which is 20 percent of the Midwestern state's total exports.
'One of the unique things in the aerospace industry is that since 1979 there's been a zero-zero tariff policy that's out there,' Estes said in an interview. 'And that kind of ties in with the president's objective of 'how do we have growth in America,' because without having some of the constraints around tariffs, America has been very successful in terms of developing and supplying the world.'
Estes and a number of his GOP colleagues on the House Ways and Means Committee also signed onto a recent letter urging Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to narrow the focus of any future U.S. duties on pharmaceuticals to Chinese-made products, reminding Lutnick that trade disruptions to drugs 'jeopardize the health and lives of Americans that rely on treatment.'
'I feel strongly that we need a targeted approach,' Nicole Malliotakis, the New York Republican who led the letter, said in a recent interview. 'We can't 'make it in America' if we don't have certain parts and components and materials, and so, the first piece of this is to make sure the things we actually need to make in America are available and don't have the tariffs.'
Malliotakis' Staten Island-based district is home to a network of independent pharmacies that have long complained about rising drug costs and shrinking profit margins — problems they say would be exacerbated by broad-based tariffs on imported medicines.
One of the lobbyists who pitched the letter to Malliotakis and her colleagues said it was the product of outreach from 'local pharmacists, the mom-and-pop shops,' who helped nudge the right-leaning lawmakers into 'understanding the outsized impact of hikes on pharmaceutical tariffs.' The lobbyist was granted anonymity to discuss the details of those private conversations.
It's just one example of the quiet but intense effort by business groups to rein in the Trump administration's most potentially damaging duties — particularly those Trump is considering applying on a national security basis. Under existing trade law known as Section 232, the Commerce Department must investigate whether foreign imports of a certain product represents a security threat before the president can take that action. Lutnick is currently overseeing nine investigations of key industries — everything from lumber to copper to semiconductors to drones.
A White House official defended the administration's plans to target critical sectors with higher tariffs, arguing there are "very clear national security, national and economic security prerogatives at play."
"We all remember back in 2021, 2022 ... we had shortages of critical drugs and medical equipment during Covid," as well as "car shortages because of semiconductor shortages."
The administration is approaching the tariffs in "a much more thoughtful way than I think we're being ... given credit for," the official continued. "They're all also hypotheticals, because, again, we have to finish these 232 reports. We haven't unveiled any of these."
Industry groups, however, are pulling out all the stops to pressure the administration not to follow through on the most extreme tariff proposals, from filing comments on the investigations, to walking lawmakers through factories that may have to make cuts due to the tariffs, to attempting to secure as many meetings as possible with officials they know have Trump's ear.
One pro-trade lobbyist, who pitched a March letter to GOP lawmakers calling for greater agricultural market access, said industry groups are 'focusing their efforts on the members of Congress that they know that have phone call access to the Trump administration.'
An official in the U.S. Trade Representative's office confirmed it has been fielding comments from members of Congress and the business community about tariffs' potential impact.
'USTR has been engaged with Congress, stakeholders, and business leaders at an unprecedented pace and will continue to do so,' said the official, who was granted anonymity to speak about meetings that are not open to the public.
A spokesperson for the Commerce Department did not immediately respond to POLITICO's request for comment.
At the same time, business groups and their allies in Congress are being careful not to appear like they are criticizing Trump or opposing a key plank of his administration.
'There's room in this administration for those differences of opinion about the best way to architect an equal America First trade strategy,' said one right-leaning corporate lobbyist involved with the effort, who recently met with administration officials. 'And if certain approaches are fine-tuned or refined, there's a way to truly protect key segments of manufacturing.'
Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) and 11 other Senate Republicans joined with 44 House colleagues to send a letter to Trump's top trade officials thanking them for their work on trade deals, while pushing the administration to continue to expand U.S. agricultural markets.
'They're rooting for the president,' Daines said of his constituents. 'They just want to see [trade deals] done sooner versus later. And the administration is seeing that, I know they've got a full court press on this, going as fast as they can.'
Senate Republicans have been forced to vote on Democrat-led resolutions aimed at blocking Trump from pursuing some of his tariffs — and all but a few toed the party line. House Republicans, however, have maneuvered to avoid a similar vote. That has allowed members to maintain that they are firmly in favor of Trump's agenda.
'It is categorically wrong to say we oppose Trump on trade,' said one of the staffers for a Republican lawmaker, granted anonymity to speak candidly.
To put it another way, 'It's not our job to publicly shame Trump on his approach to trade,' said a staffer for a different Republican lawmaker. 'It's about Trump understanding the benefits of a more measured approach.'
'We admit there's still work to do,' the staffer added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Alligator Alcatraz' immigrant detainees are held without charges and barred from legal access, lawyers say
'Alligator Alcatraz' immigrant detainees are held without charges and barred from legal access, lawyers say

NBC News

timea few seconds ago

  • NBC News

'Alligator Alcatraz' immigrant detainees are held without charges and barred from legal access, lawyers say

"This is an emergency situation," Eunice Cho, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, said during the hearing in federal court in Miami. "Officers at 'Alligator Alcatraz' are going around trying to force people to sign deportation orders without the ability to speak to counsel." But Nicholas Meros, an attorney representing Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, said the situation had evolved since the civil rights groups' lawsuit was filed July 16. Video-conference rooms had been set up so detainees can talk to attorneys, and in-person meetings between detainees and attorneys had started. "There have been a number of facts that have changed," Meros said during Monday's hearing U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz, an appointee of President Donald Trump, didn't make an immediate ruling. He asked the civil rights attorneys to refile their complaint to consolidate their pleadings as a request for a preliminary injunction, and he set a briefing schedule that will end with an in-person court hearing on Aug. 18. The judge warned that his role was to provide relief to any proven constitutional violations and said that "attempts to transform the court into the warden of 'Alligator Alcatraz' is not going to happen here." The judge also allowed the civil rights groups to argue for the release of any agreements between the federal and state governments showing who has authority over the detention center, a murky issue since it opened a month ago. "And that's part of the problem — who is doing what in this facility?" Ruiz said. The lawsuit is the second one challenging "Alligator Alcatraz." Environmental groups last month sued federal and state officials asking that the project built on an airstrip in the heart of the Florida Everglades be halted because the process didn't follow state and federal environmental laws. Attorneys for the state of Florida have argued in both cases that the federal court's southern district in Florida was the wrong venue since the airstrip is located in neighboring Collier County, which is a part of the middle district, even though the property is owned by Miami-Dade County. A hearing over whether the southern district venue is proper in the environmental case is set for Wednesday. Critics have condemned the facility as a cruel and inhumane threat to detainees, while DeSantis and other Republican state officials have defended it as part of the state's aggressive push to support President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has praised Florida for coming forward with the idea, as the department looks to significantly expand its immigration detention capacity.

Trump is getting the world economy he wants -- but the risk to growth could spoil his victory lap
Trump is getting the world economy he wants -- but the risk to growth could spoil his victory lap

Associated Press

timea few seconds ago

  • Associated Press

Trump is getting the world economy he wants -- but the risk to growth could spoil his victory lap

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is getting his way with the world economy. Trading partners from the European Union to Japan to Vietnam appear to be acceding to the president's demands to accept higher costs — in the form of high tariffs — for the privilege of selling their wares to the United States. For Trump, the agreements driven by a mix of threats and cajoling, are a fulfillment of a decades-long belief in protectionism and a massive gamble that it will pay off politically and economically with American consumers. On Sunday, the United States and the 27-member state European Union announced that they had reached a trade framework agreement: The EU agreed to accept 15% U.S. tariffs on most its goods, easing fears of a catastrophic trans-Atlantic trade war. There were also commitments by the EU to buy $750 billion in U.S. energy products and make $600 billion in new investments through 2028, according to the White House. 'We just signed a very big trade deal, the biggest of them all,' Trump said Monday. But there's no guarantee that Trump's radical overhaul of U.S. trade policy will deliver the happy ending he's promised. The framework agreement was exceedingly spare on details. Most trade deals require months and even years of painstaking negotiation that rise and fall on granular details. High-stakes negotiations break Trump's way Financial markets, at first panicked by the president's protectionist agenda, seem to have acquiesced to a world in which U.S. import taxes — tariffs — are at the highest rates they've been in roughly 90 years. Several billion in new revenues from his levies on foreign goods are pouring into the U.S. Treasury and could somewhat offset the massive tax cuts he signed into law on July 4. Outside economists say that high tariffs are still likely to raise prices for American consumers, dampen the Federal Reserve's ability to lower interest rates and make the U.S. economy less efficient over time. Democrats say the middle class and poor will ultimately pay for the tariffs. 'It's pretty striking that it's seen as a sigh of relief moment,' said Daniel Hornung, a former Biden White House economic official who now holds fellowships at Housing Finance Policy Center and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 'But if the new baseline across all trading partners is 15%, that is a meaningful drag on growth that increases recession risks, while simultaneously making it harder for the Fed to cut.' The EU agreement came just four days after Japan also agreed to 15% U.S. tariffs and to invest in the United States. Earlier, the United States reached deals that raised tariffs on imports from Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom considerably from where they'd been before Trump returned to the White House. More one-sided trade deals are likely as countries try to beat a Friday deadline after which Trump will impose even higher tariffs on countries that refuse to make concessions. Trump's long-held theory now faces reality The U.S. president has long claimed that America erred by not taking advantage of its clout as the world's biggest economy and erecting a wall of tariffs, in effect making other countries ante up for access to America's massive consumer market. To his closest aides, Trump's use of tariffs has validated their trust in his skills as a negotiator and their belief that the economists who warned of downturns and inflation were wrong. Stocks rose slightly on Monday morning on tariffs that once seemed unthinkably risky. 'Where are the 'experts' now?' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on X. But the story is not over. For one thing, many of the details of Trump's trade deals remain somewhat hazy and have not been captured in writing. The U.S. and Japan, for instance, have offered differing descriptions of Japan's agreement to invest $550 billion in the United States. 'The trade deals do seem to count as a qualified win for Trump, with other countries giving the U.S. favorable trade terms while accepting U.S. tariffs,' said Eswar Prasad, a Cornell University economist. 'However, certain terms of the deals, such as other countries' investments in the U.S., seem more promising in the abstract than they might prove in reality over time.'' Trump is also facing a court challenge from states and businesses arguing that the president overstepped his authority by declaring national emergencies to justify the tariffs on most of the world's economies. In May, a federal court struck down those tariffs. And an appeals court, which agreed to let the government continue collecting the tariffs for now, will hear oral arguments in the case Thursday. And he's yet to reach an accord with China — which has deftly used the threat of retaliatory tariffs and withholding exports of rare earth minerals that are desperately needed for electric vehicles, computer chips and wind turbines to avoid caving in to Trump's demands. The U.S. and China are talking this week in Stockholm, Sweden. Economists remain skeptical of the impacts for US consumers There is also skepticism that tariffs will produce the economic boom claimed by Trump. Analysts at Morgan Stanley said 'the most likely outcome is slow growth and firm inflation,' but not a recession. After all, the 15% tariffs on the EU and Japan are a slight increase from the 10% rate that Trump began charging in April during a negotiation period. While autos made in the EU and Japan will no longer face the 25% tariffs Trump had imposed, they will still face a 15% tax that has yet to appear in prices at U.S. dealerships. The administration has said the lack of auto price increases suggests that foreign producers are absorbing the costs, but it might ultimately just reflect the buildup of auto inventories to front-run the import taxes. 'Dealers built stocks ahead of tariff implementation, damping the immediate impact on retail prices. That cushion is starting to wear thin,' Morgan Stanley said in a separate note. 'Our Japan auto analyst notes that as pre-tariff inventory clears, replacement vehicles will likely carry higher price tags.' Economist Mary Lovely of the Peterson Institute for International Economics warned of a 'slow-burn efficiency loss'' as U.S. companies scramble to adjust to Trump's new world. For decades, American companies have mostly paid the same tariffs – and often none at all – on imported machinery and raw materials from all over the world. Now, as a result of Trump's trade deals, tariffs vary by country. 'U.S. firms have to change their designs and get inputs from different places based on these variable tariff rates,'' she said. 'It's an incredible administrative burden. There's all these things that are acting as longer-term drags on economy, but their effect will show up only slowly.'' Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said that the United States' effective tariff rate has risen to 17.5% from around 2.5% at the start of the year. 'I wouldn't take a victory lap,'' Zandi said. 'The economic damage caused by the higher tariffs will mount in the coming months.''

Adam Schefter offers troubling update on Terry McLaurin and Commanders
Adam Schefter offers troubling update on Terry McLaurin and Commanders

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Adam Schefter offers troubling update on Terry McLaurin and Commanders

ESPN NFL insider Adam Schefter was a guest on the Pat McAfee Show on Monday and shared some information about Terry McLaurin and the Washington Commanders, as well as the reasons why the two sides remain far apart in contract talks. Schefter said McLaurin wants more money than fellow class of 2019 draftee, DK Metcalf, who signed a new deal with the Pittsburgh Steelers this offseason at an average annual value of $33 million. While the two are from the same draft class, Metcalf is over two years younger. "It's been vast," Schefter said when asked what the separation was between the two sides. "It's up to the two sides to figure out a way to bridge their differences. But I would say that DK Metcalf was the same draft class as Terry McLaurin, he got about $33 million per year, and I wouldn't think that Terry is going to take less than that, and I think he wants considerably more than that. Now, what it comes in at, we'll wind up seeing. Washington, they're not there right now. They love and value Terry McLaurin but they love and value him at a different price. So, these two sides right now seem apart on a deal. They don't seem close today. I don't know how they're going to get that resolved and figured out, but these things usually find a way of working themselves out over time, but as of today, I don't get the sense that anything's close." Some assumed that when McLaurin showed up at camp, the two sides were progressing toward a deal. There is no NFL reporter more plugged-in than Schefter, and he says they remain far apart. If McLaurin is asking for more than Metcalf, "considerably more," perhaps, this may go into the season. While we don't know what Washington is offering, Jeremy Fowler of ESPN said last week it was around $27 million. That's a lot of ground to make up. Numbers-wise, McLaurin has a strong case to be paid more. However, most NFL GMs look at the ages of the player over the life of a long-term contract. That's hurting McLaurin here. He's not in the same class as Justin Jefferson, who is averaging $35 million per year. McLaurin's agent has been on the sideline with him over the last two days at Commanders' training camp. This article originally appeared on Commanders Wire: Adam Schefter offers troubling update on Terry McLaurin, Commanders

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store