logo
Disaster happened in 'world's most controlled airspace'

Disaster happened in 'world's most controlled airspace'

Saudi Gazette31-01-2025

WASHINGTON — The aviation world is struggling to understand how a deadly mid-air collision between a passenger plane and military helicopter was able to happen in what one expert described as "the most controlled bit of airspace in the world".A US Army Black Hawk helicopter with a crew of three collided with an American Airlines jet carrying 64 people seconds before the passenger aircraft was due to land at Washington National airport.Both aircraft were sent careering into the icy Potomac River on Wednesday night.The exact cause of the crash remains unknown.Officials will release a preliminary report within 30 days, according to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) - which is leading the investigation.Crews were able to recover flight data recorders - known as the black boxes - from the wreckage on Thursday, according to the BBC's US news partner CBS. The devices can help investigators pinpoint what led up to a crash.Airspace over the District of Columbia is heavily restricted to protect both national security and the buildings that house core aspects of US government.Commercial planes are prevented from flying over the Pentagon, the White House and other historic landmarks.Yet the area sees a lot of air traffic, Aviation attorney Jim Brachle, who has handled numerous litigation matters related to jets and Reagan airport, told the BBC.There is commercial traffic but also private aviation and helicopters that fly around the city, often carrying high-ranking officials and politicians between sensitive locations."You got these really narrow pathways in and out and you've got a lot of congestion and extra airplanes, so you're putting a lot of aircraft in a really confined space," he said.Jeff Guzzetti, a former aircraft accident investigator for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the NTSB, told BBC Newshour that it seems the helicopter was in communication with the control tower before the accident. The air traffic controller pointed out the American Airlines flight to the helicopter, he said."The helicopter pilot indicated he had the airplane in sight and was going to visually separate from it – and then the accident happened shortly thereafter - so there's going to be a lot of questions about exactly what did the helicopter pilot see?" Guzzetti said.Todd Inman, part of the five-member NTSB board, said that DC is also a "unique environment" because of helicopters and specific zones they're allowed to fly."If you look at DC, you see a lot of helicopters going down into this area so there's a very well-defined system in that regard," he said.Inman could not provide any specifics on altitude of the helicopter before it collided with the American Airlines flight.Brachle, who has handled numerous litigation matters related to jets and Reagan airport, told the BBC the question that remains is how two aircraft ended up in the same airspace."What's really unique about Reagan is right there on the river. There's also a helicopter route that crosses right through that final approach and that's at or below 200 feet," he said.Brachle said the routes for both helicopters and the approach for aircraft intersect."You're putting potentially two different aircraft in a really small space with hardly any separation," he said. "If you get one that's maybe a little too low, one that's a little too high, you end up being in the same spot."Aviation consultant Philip Butterworth-Hayes said the incident occurred at the "nexus of different aviation systems", including civilian and military systems, as well as procedures specific to the airport."You are at the border of three or four aviation systems here - and it's at those borders where most accidents tend to happen," he added.But UK-based aviation expert John Strickland said the amount of commercial air traffic in the area cannot fully explain why the deadly collision was able to happen.As well as Washington National close to the city centre, he notes, there is the international gateway, Washington Dulles, and also Baltimore Airport a little further away."There has to be management of traffic flows to keep separation. It's much like we have in London where you have to manage traffic flows between Heathrow, Stansted, Gatwick and London City."So DC is not different in that sense to London or New York... it's not totally unusual."Butterworth-Hayes continued: "This is the most controlled bit of airspace in the world. You have both US government and civilian systems - Ronald Reagan airport is even owned by the government, it's one of the very, very few like that."This really is the most secure - and should be the safest - airspace in the world, given the number of security and civilian safety organisations working in that area."The last fatal crash on a comparable scale involving a commercial plane in the US was in February 2009. Officials and experts alike have stressed that this type of incident is incredibly rare due to tight safety restrictions on all types of flights.Footage obtained from an air traffic control source by CBS News, the BBC's US news partner, showed the two aircraft which appear to have been involved in the crash clearly visible on radar systems accessible to controllers.Audio sourced by BBC News appears to confirm the helicopter was in contact with air traffic control on the ground at the airport.The helicopter was asked if it had the passenger plane "in sight" and to "pass behind" it. In the audio that follows, controllers appear to realise there has been a collision and can be heard directing other planes in the air to neighbouring airports.Butterworth-Hayes said an in-air collision like this requires a number of things going wrong.He said that in order to fly in civilian airspace, the military helicopter would have needed to be fitted with a transponder alerting surrounding aircraft to its position.That means both aircraft should have been able to see each other, he says, plus there would have been instructions from air traffic control and an aircraft protection safety device that operate separately from each other."On this occasion, you have these two different systems and both should have been able to keep these aircraft separate."The Black Hawk helicopter was part of B Company, 12th Aviation Battalion. It left Fort Belvoir, a military base in Virginia, and was taking part in a training exercise.US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth has said the helicopter's crew were "fairly experienced" and taking part in an annual night flight training session.Speaking to CNN, Cedric Leighton - a retired US Air Force colonel - said it was normal for that type of military aircraft to be training at night in the area, particularly to make sure pilots are proficient with using instruments needed to fly in the dark.He said one of the unit's duties is to transport high-ranking personnel around the capital - though none were on board at the time of the crash as it was a training flight.The unit's pilots are expected to be proficient at flying in DC's busy airspace and "train in order to avoid incidents like this", he added.Butterworth-Hayes said only experienced pilots would be able to train in such a busy section of airspace.
"Whether it's training for new systems or equipment, we need to know what systems the pilot had turned on in the helicopter and whether they had all the safety systems on board, or whether they were trying a new procedure or new route." — BBC

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Muslim Nations Should Build Palestinian State on Their Lands: US Envoy to Israel
Muslim Nations Should Build Palestinian State on Their Lands: US Envoy to Israel

Leaders

time3 days ago

  • Leaders

Muslim Nations Should Build Palestinian State on Their Lands: US Envoy to Israel

The US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has said that 'Muslim countries' should build a Palestinian state on their territory, according to BBC. 'Muslim countries have 644 times the amount of land that are controlled by Israel. So maybe, if there is such a desire for the Palestinian state, there would be someone who would say, we'd like to host it,' Huckabee said in a videotaped interview with the BBC. During the interview, he harshly criticized US allies, including the UK and Australia, for imposing sanctions on two far-right Israeli ministers over 'repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities' in the occupied West Bank. On June 1, Huckabee attacked France's call for recognizing the Palestinian state, stating that if it adopted such an outcome, it could 'carve out a piece of the French Riviera' and create one, according to Al-Arabiya. The ambassador described the initiative at the UN as 'incredibly inappropriate when Israel is in the midst of a war.' The Israeli statement came after Macron's call for European countries to toughen up their stance on Israel if the humanitarian situation in Gaza did not improve. 'If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them — carve out a piece of the French Riviera and create a Palestinian state. They are welcome to do that, but they are not welcome to impose that kind of pressure on a sovereign nation,' Huckabee said. In May, Israel also accused French President Emmanuel Macron of undertaking a 'crusade against the Jewish state.' Related Topics: Western Allies Impose Sanctions on Israeli Ministers Over West Bank Violence Israel Plans to Build Jewish Israeli State in West Bank Macron Accuses Israel of Committing 'Shameful and Disgraceful' Actions in Gaza Short link : Post Views: 2

US sees no immediate reason to ground Boeing 787 after Air India crash
US sees no immediate reason to ground Boeing 787 after Air India crash

Arab News

time3 days ago

  • Arab News

US sees no immediate reason to ground Boeing 787 after Air India crash

WASHINGTON: US officials said on Thursday they have not seen any immediate safety data that would require halting Boeing 787 flights after a fatal Air India accident killed over 240 people. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Acting Federal Aviation Administration head Chris Rocheleau made the comments at a news conference and said they had seen videos of the crash in India. Duffy said he had spoken to National Transportation Safety Board Chair Jennifer Homendy. An NTSB and FAA team, with support from Boeing and engine manufacturer GE Aerospace, was going to India, Duffy said. 'They have to get on the ground and take a look. But again right now it'd be way too premature,' Duffy said. 'People are looking at videos and trying to assess what happened, which is never a strong, smart way to make decisions on what took place.' Duffy said the FAA was reviewing information with Boeing and GE as part of the investigation into the crash. Duffy also emphasized the US government 'will not hesitate to implement any safety recommendations that may arise. We will follow the facts and put safety first.' Rocheleau said, 'As we proceed down this road with the investigation itself, if there's any information that becomes available to us regarding any risk, we will mitigate those risks.' Duffy said the FAA is 'prepared to send additional resources to get the data we need to ensure the safety of the flying public.'

US reviewing Aukus submarine pact as part of 'America First' agenda
US reviewing Aukus submarine pact as part of 'America First' agenda

Saudi Gazette

time4 days ago

  • Saudi Gazette

US reviewing Aukus submarine pact as part of 'America First' agenda

WASHINGTON — The US has launched a review of its multi-billion dollar submarine deal with the UK and Australia, saying the security pact must fit its "America First" agenda. Under the trilateral pact, believed to be aimed at countering China, Australia is to get its first nuclear-powered subs from the US, before the allies create a new fleet by sharing cutting-edge tech. Both Australia and the UK - which did its own review last year - have played down news of the US probe, saying it is natural for a new administration to reassess. The move comes as both Australia and the UK face pressure from the White House to lift military spending, demands heeded by Downing Street but largely resisted by Canberra. The Aukus agreement - worth £176bn ($239bn; A$368bn) - was signed in 2021, when all three countries involved had different leaders. A US defense official told the BBC the pact was being reviewed "as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda". "As [US Defence] Secretary [Pete] Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our servicemembers [and] that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defense," the defense official said. The US has been pushing allies to start spending at least 3% of GDP on defense as soon as possible. The UK has agreed to spend 2.5% of GDP on its defense by 2028, and 3% by the next parliament, while Australia has also said it will lift funding, but not to the 3.5% that the US wants. The review will be headed up by Elbridge Colby, who has previously been critical of Aukus, in a speech last year questioning why the US would give away "this crown jewel asset when we most need it". Defense Minister Richard Marles, speaking to local Australian media on Thursday morning local time, said he was optimistic the deal would continue. "I'm very confident this is going to happen," he told ABC Radio Melbourne. "You just need to look at the map to understand that Australia absolutely needs to have a long-range submarine capability." Some in Australia have been lobbying for the country to develop a more self-reliant defense strategy, but Marles said it was important to "stick to a plan" - a reference to the previous government's controversial cancellation of a submarine deal with France in favor of Aukus. An Australian government spokesperson told the BBC it was "natural" that the new administration would "examine" the agreement, adding the UK had also recently finished a review of the security pact between the long-standing allies. There is "clear and consistent" support for the deal across the "full political spectrum" in the US, they said, adding Australia looked forward to "continuing our close cooperation with the Trump Administration on this historic project". A UK defense spokesperson told the BBC it was "understandable" for a new administration to look at the deal, "just as the UK did last year". Aukus is a "landmark security and defense partnership with two of our closest allies", the spokesperson said, and "one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades, supporting peace and security in the Indo-Pacific and Euro-Atlantic". Jennifer Kavanagh, from American thinktank Defense Priorities, told the BBC that the US was "absolutely right to take another look at this deal" as its submarine capacities were already stretched. "The US cannot meet its own demand for these nuclear-powered submarines," she said. The other concern the US might have is whether Australia would use the submarines they buy in the way the US wants them to, she said, particularly if conflict erupts over Taiwan. Dr Kavanagh said the review might see the security pact shift its focus away from providing submarines to sharing other long-range weapons technology. However, if the US were to pull out of the deal, China would "celebrate" as they have long criticized the deal, Dr Kavanagh added. For Australia, the deal represents a major upgrade to its military capabilities. The country becomes just the second after the UK to receive Washington's elite nuclear propulsion technology. Such submarines will be able to operate further and faster than the country's existing diesel-engine fleet and Australia would also be able to carry out long-range strikes against enemies for the first time. It is a big deal for the US to share what is often called the "crown jewels" of its defence technology. But arming Australia has historically been viewed by Washington and Downing Street as essential to preserving peace in a region they themselves aren't a part of. From 2027, the pact will allow both the US and UK to base a small number of nuclear submarines in Perth, Western Australia. Canberra will also buy three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US at a yet-to-be-determined date in the early 2030s - with options to purchase two more. After that, the plan is to design and build an entirely new nuclear-powered submarine model for the UK and Australian navies. This attack craft will be built in Britain and Australia to a British design, but use technology from all three countries. The security alliance has repeatedly drawn criticism from China, with the foreign ministry in Beijing saying it risked creating an arms race. — BBC

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store