Trump, Xi turn up the heat in a battle for the future
The administration's objective is to make America's AI sector and its technologies the global standards for AI, exporting the technologies to its allies.
'We want the entire world to be running on American artificial intelligence stack. That is our cloud, our chips, our algorithms, all of that needs to be exported and packaged to the world so that we become the ecosystem of choice globally,' the White House science and technology director, Michael Kratsios, told Bloomberg.
China's approach, or at least the approach it publicly stated last week at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, is very different.
China's premier, Li Qiang, said AI innovation was being hampered by bottlenecks, like access to semiconductors, that could lead to AI becoming an 'exclusive game for a few countries and companies.'
Loading
'Currently, overall global AI governance is still fragmented. Countries have great differences, particularly in terms of areas such as regulatory concepts and institutional rules.
'We should strengthen coordination to form a global AI governance framework that has broad consensus, as soon as possible,' he said.
China has proposed creating a new international organisation to develop AI, arguing that AI has risks that require nations to collaborate.
Denied access by the US to the most advanced semiconductors, China has adopted an 'open source' approach to AI, with its leading AI companies – companies like DeepSeek and Alibaba – making their large language models available to developers within and outside China as a strategy for fast-tracking a low-cost approach to developing AI and differentiating itself from Trump's America First approach.
Beijing wants China, not the US, to influence international standards for AI and its AI companies to win a bigger proportion of the global AI market. It is placing a particular emphasis on the development of AI within the 'Global South' group of loosely aligned countries that it has been working to bring within its sphere of influence.
In the US, the race is on between the mega tech companies to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI), or human-level artificial intelligence. In China, Xi Jinping appears more focused on AI applications, or usages with practical applications for industries.
The two countries are therefore pursuing somewhat different AI goals, which might reflect the success of America's export controls in denying China access to the most advanced chips and chip-making equipment required to pursue AGI. It might also be that China doesn't believe AGI will be attainable within a reasonable timeframe.
In Europe, as you'd expect, the focus has been on heavily regulating AI, prohibiting some AI practices that manipulate behaviours or are exploitative: imposing rules on the use of AI in critical infrastructure, employment and other sectors regarded as high-risk and legislating in areas like the transparency of the data used for the models, the protection of copyright and the management of risks.
The competition between the US and China in particular, and the differing nature of their strategies might accelerate the development and deployment of AI, but it could also inflate the risks.
In Australia, where there aren't yet any AI-specific regulations, the prevailing sentiment appears to be for 'light touch' regulation, with safeguards.
Trump has effectively abandoned the safeguards the Biden regime tried to erect around the development of AI, essentially adopting the laissez-faire approach that most of the big US technology companies (which contributed heavily to his presidential campaign) have been lobbying for.
Having jettisoned Biden's guardrails, he's told the technology advisers in the administration that they have six months to come up with a new set of AI policies that support his plan to fast-track AI projects, boost US technology exports and expunge the 'woke' out from AI.
He has said he will use every rule at his disposal to facilitate the building of AI infrastructure like data centres and chip-manufacturing plants and the energy infrastructure they require and use the US export-Import Bank and Development Finance Corp to help spread US AI technologies to other countries.
The US will do 'whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence,' he said.
Given that those developing AI systems have themselves warned that it poses risks, not just to individuals but humankind, Trump's deregulatory approach is itself risky.
Moreover, the competition between the US and China in particular, and the differing nature of their strategies might accelerate the development and deployment of AI, but it could also inflate the risks.
Loading
That could particularly be the case if one of the superpowers were to establish a clear lead in AI technologies and the other feared having to deal with the entrenched technological and geopolitical dominance of the winner of the race to become the global standard for AI.
Given how world-changing and disruptive AI might be, and the pace at which AI developments are occurring, the stakes in this contest for AI leadership – not just for the US and China – are extremely high.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
5 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Woolworths, Coles, Aldi and Macca's to keep American beef off the menu
The nation's largest supermarkets, Woolworths, Coles and Aldi will not stock US beef on their shelves even after the government lifted bans on the import of such products last week. The grocery giants are not alone, with iconic American fast food chain McDonald's – the food retailer that uses the most beef nationally – and Mexican fast food chain Guzman Y Gomez also opting out of using US beef in its burgers and burritos locally.
The Advertiser
7 hours ago
- The Advertiser
US tariff mercy 'vindicates' Australian trade diplomacy
Donald Trump has resisted pressure to increase tariffs on Australian goods in a "vindication" of the federal government's diplomatic efforts, the trade minister says. While many new tariffs unveiled by the US president increase levies on products from America's trading partners, most Australian exports have been spared but will continue to incur a 10 per cent baseline tariff. Some in America had pushed Mr Trump to lift tariffs on Australian goods, but Trade Minister Don Farrell said the president resisted the calls. "There had been some pressure in the American system for an increase, but President Trump had decided to maintain that 10 per cent," he told reporters in Adelaide on Friday. "This is a vindication for the Albanese government and particularly the prime minister, in the cool and calm way that we have conducted diplomacy with the United States. "This decision by the United States government is a very positive one for our relationship." There had been speculation that Australian goods would be hit with a higher levy, given Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far failed to secure a face-to-face meeting with the president and after Mr Trump on Tuesday said he was planning a new tariff "for the world" in the 15-20 per cent range. But it's unclear if the government will be successful. No US trading partner has managed to totally dodge the tariffs, and the 10 per cent rate is the lowest most can hope for. "I'm hopeful that this is the end of the matter now, and that the American government maintains that 10 per cent, and that our producers, our winemakers, can get back to a normal relationship with the United States where we don't have to worry about changes in tariff rates," Senator Farrell said. The Trump administration has released details of country-specific tariff rates for dozens of nations, hours before the passing of its self-imposed August 1 deadline. New Zealand goods will be subject to a greater 15 per cent tariff, as will exports from Fiji and Papua New Guinea. More punitive rates have been imposed on products from several major US trading partners including Canada and India, with the new tariffs due to come into effect on August 7. In a statement, the White House said tariffs were increased on countries that failed to engage in negotiations with the US or take adequate steps to "align sufficiently on economic and national security matters". The Albanese government recently wound back biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports, although ministers insist the move was a coincidence and not in response to the tariffs. The US has complained to Australia about non-tariff trade barriers including longstanding restrictions on beef following a prior outbreak of mad cow disease, and the federal government's decision to lift restrictions on US beef imports was hailed as a victory by Mr Trump. The US president has struck trade agreements with major partners such as Japan and the European Union after threatening them with punitive tariffs. Australia has yet to sign a formal trade deal with the US following the introduction of the tariffs. Donald Trump has resisted pressure to increase tariffs on Australian goods in a "vindication" of the federal government's diplomatic efforts, the trade minister says. While many new tariffs unveiled by the US president increase levies on products from America's trading partners, most Australian exports have been spared but will continue to incur a 10 per cent baseline tariff. Some in America had pushed Mr Trump to lift tariffs on Australian goods, but Trade Minister Don Farrell said the president resisted the calls. "There had been some pressure in the American system for an increase, but President Trump had decided to maintain that 10 per cent," he told reporters in Adelaide on Friday. "This is a vindication for the Albanese government and particularly the prime minister, in the cool and calm way that we have conducted diplomacy with the United States. "This decision by the United States government is a very positive one for our relationship." There had been speculation that Australian goods would be hit with a higher levy, given Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far failed to secure a face-to-face meeting with the president and after Mr Trump on Tuesday said he was planning a new tariff "for the world" in the 15-20 per cent range. But it's unclear if the government will be successful. No US trading partner has managed to totally dodge the tariffs, and the 10 per cent rate is the lowest most can hope for. "I'm hopeful that this is the end of the matter now, and that the American government maintains that 10 per cent, and that our producers, our winemakers, can get back to a normal relationship with the United States where we don't have to worry about changes in tariff rates," Senator Farrell said. The Trump administration has released details of country-specific tariff rates for dozens of nations, hours before the passing of its self-imposed August 1 deadline. New Zealand goods will be subject to a greater 15 per cent tariff, as will exports from Fiji and Papua New Guinea. More punitive rates have been imposed on products from several major US trading partners including Canada and India, with the new tariffs due to come into effect on August 7. In a statement, the White House said tariffs were increased on countries that failed to engage in negotiations with the US or take adequate steps to "align sufficiently on economic and national security matters". The Albanese government recently wound back biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports, although ministers insist the move was a coincidence and not in response to the tariffs. The US has complained to Australia about non-tariff trade barriers including longstanding restrictions on beef following a prior outbreak of mad cow disease, and the federal government's decision to lift restrictions on US beef imports was hailed as a victory by Mr Trump. The US president has struck trade agreements with major partners such as Japan and the European Union after threatening them with punitive tariffs. Australia has yet to sign a formal trade deal with the US following the introduction of the tariffs. Donald Trump has resisted pressure to increase tariffs on Australian goods in a "vindication" of the federal government's diplomatic efforts, the trade minister says. While many new tariffs unveiled by the US president increase levies on products from America's trading partners, most Australian exports have been spared but will continue to incur a 10 per cent baseline tariff. Some in America had pushed Mr Trump to lift tariffs on Australian goods, but Trade Minister Don Farrell said the president resisted the calls. "There had been some pressure in the American system for an increase, but President Trump had decided to maintain that 10 per cent," he told reporters in Adelaide on Friday. "This is a vindication for the Albanese government and particularly the prime minister, in the cool and calm way that we have conducted diplomacy with the United States. "This decision by the United States government is a very positive one for our relationship." There had been speculation that Australian goods would be hit with a higher levy, given Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far failed to secure a face-to-face meeting with the president and after Mr Trump on Tuesday said he was planning a new tariff "for the world" in the 15-20 per cent range. But it's unclear if the government will be successful. No US trading partner has managed to totally dodge the tariffs, and the 10 per cent rate is the lowest most can hope for. "I'm hopeful that this is the end of the matter now, and that the American government maintains that 10 per cent, and that our producers, our winemakers, can get back to a normal relationship with the United States where we don't have to worry about changes in tariff rates," Senator Farrell said. The Trump administration has released details of country-specific tariff rates for dozens of nations, hours before the passing of its self-imposed August 1 deadline. New Zealand goods will be subject to a greater 15 per cent tariff, as will exports from Fiji and Papua New Guinea. More punitive rates have been imposed on products from several major US trading partners including Canada and India, with the new tariffs due to come into effect on August 7. In a statement, the White House said tariffs were increased on countries that failed to engage in negotiations with the US or take adequate steps to "align sufficiently on economic and national security matters". The Albanese government recently wound back biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports, although ministers insist the move was a coincidence and not in response to the tariffs. The US has complained to Australia about non-tariff trade barriers including longstanding restrictions on beef following a prior outbreak of mad cow disease, and the federal government's decision to lift restrictions on US beef imports was hailed as a victory by Mr Trump. The US president has struck trade agreements with major partners such as Japan and the European Union after threatening them with punitive tariffs. Australia has yet to sign a formal trade deal with the US following the introduction of the tariffs. Donald Trump has resisted pressure to increase tariffs on Australian goods in a "vindication" of the federal government's diplomatic efforts, the trade minister says. While many new tariffs unveiled by the US president increase levies on products from America's trading partners, most Australian exports have been spared but will continue to incur a 10 per cent baseline tariff. Some in America had pushed Mr Trump to lift tariffs on Australian goods, but Trade Minister Don Farrell said the president resisted the calls. "There had been some pressure in the American system for an increase, but President Trump had decided to maintain that 10 per cent," he told reporters in Adelaide on Friday. "This is a vindication for the Albanese government and particularly the prime minister, in the cool and calm way that we have conducted diplomacy with the United States. "This decision by the United States government is a very positive one for our relationship." There had been speculation that Australian goods would be hit with a higher levy, given Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has so far failed to secure a face-to-face meeting with the president and after Mr Trump on Tuesday said he was planning a new tariff "for the world" in the 15-20 per cent range. But it's unclear if the government will be successful. No US trading partner has managed to totally dodge the tariffs, and the 10 per cent rate is the lowest most can hope for. "I'm hopeful that this is the end of the matter now, and that the American government maintains that 10 per cent, and that our producers, our winemakers, can get back to a normal relationship with the United States where we don't have to worry about changes in tariff rates," Senator Farrell said. The Trump administration has released details of country-specific tariff rates for dozens of nations, hours before the passing of its self-imposed August 1 deadline. New Zealand goods will be subject to a greater 15 per cent tariff, as will exports from Fiji and Papua New Guinea. More punitive rates have been imposed on products from several major US trading partners including Canada and India, with the new tariffs due to come into effect on August 7. In a statement, the White House said tariffs were increased on countries that failed to engage in negotiations with the US or take adequate steps to "align sufficiently on economic and national security matters". The Albanese government recently wound back biosecurity restrictions on US beef imports, although ministers insist the move was a coincidence and not in response to the tariffs. The US has complained to Australia about non-tariff trade barriers including longstanding restrictions on beef following a prior outbreak of mad cow disease, and the federal government's decision to lift restrictions on US beef imports was hailed as a victory by Mr Trump. The US president has struck trade agreements with major partners such as Japan and the European Union after threatening them with punitive tariffs. Australia has yet to sign a formal trade deal with the US following the introduction of the tariffs.
The Advertiser
7 hours ago
- The Advertiser
US museum removes Trump's name from impeachment exhibit
The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History has removed explicit reference to US President Donald Trump from an exhibit about impeachment. The museum in Washington DC made the change as part of a review that it agreed to undertake following White House pressure to remove an art museum director, the Washington Post, which first reported the removal on Thursday, cited a source as saying. A spokesperson in a statement said "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments". Trump signed an executive order in March calling for "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology" to be removed from the Smithsonian - the vast museum and research institution that is a premier exhibition space for US history and culture. The order raised concern of political interference at the institution as well as fear that his administration is undoing decades of social progress and undermining the acknowledgment of critical phases of American history. "In September 2021, the museum installed a temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump. It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025," the spokesperson said in an email. The Washington Post reported the exhibit now notes that "only three presidents have seriously faced removal." The temporary label - which read "Case under redesign (history happens)" - also offered information about the impeachments of former presidents Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998, as well as Richard Nixon, who would have faced impeachment had he not resigned in 1974, the newspaper reported, citing a photograph of the label. The spokesperson said that after a content review, the Smithsonian decided to restore the exhibit to how it looked in 2008. The Smithsonian receives most of its budget from the US Congress but is independent of the government in decision-making. In June, Kim Sajet stepped down as director of the National Portrait Gallery, which is part of the Smithsonian, after criticism from Trump. In Trump's first term in office from 2017 to 2021, he became the first president to be impeached twice - the first time over a request that Ukraine investigate former President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, and the second over the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters. The three presidents impeached - or charged with misconduct - by the House of Representatives were acquitted by the Senate. The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History has removed explicit reference to US President Donald Trump from an exhibit about impeachment. The museum in Washington DC made the change as part of a review that it agreed to undertake following White House pressure to remove an art museum director, the Washington Post, which first reported the removal on Thursday, cited a source as saying. A spokesperson in a statement said "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments". Trump signed an executive order in March calling for "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology" to be removed from the Smithsonian - the vast museum and research institution that is a premier exhibition space for US history and culture. The order raised concern of political interference at the institution as well as fear that his administration is undoing decades of social progress and undermining the acknowledgment of critical phases of American history. "In September 2021, the museum installed a temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump. It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025," the spokesperson said in an email. The Washington Post reported the exhibit now notes that "only three presidents have seriously faced removal." The temporary label - which read "Case under redesign (history happens)" - also offered information about the impeachments of former presidents Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998, as well as Richard Nixon, who would have faced impeachment had he not resigned in 1974, the newspaper reported, citing a photograph of the label. The spokesperson said that after a content review, the Smithsonian decided to restore the exhibit to how it looked in 2008. The Smithsonian receives most of its budget from the US Congress but is independent of the government in decision-making. In June, Kim Sajet stepped down as director of the National Portrait Gallery, which is part of the Smithsonian, after criticism from Trump. In Trump's first term in office from 2017 to 2021, he became the first president to be impeached twice - the first time over a request that Ukraine investigate former President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, and the second over the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters. The three presidents impeached - or charged with misconduct - by the House of Representatives were acquitted by the Senate. The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History has removed explicit reference to US President Donald Trump from an exhibit about impeachment. The museum in Washington DC made the change as part of a review that it agreed to undertake following White House pressure to remove an art museum director, the Washington Post, which first reported the removal on Thursday, cited a source as saying. A spokesperson in a statement said "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments". Trump signed an executive order in March calling for "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology" to be removed from the Smithsonian - the vast museum and research institution that is a premier exhibition space for US history and culture. The order raised concern of political interference at the institution as well as fear that his administration is undoing decades of social progress and undermining the acknowledgment of critical phases of American history. "In September 2021, the museum installed a temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump. It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025," the spokesperson said in an email. The Washington Post reported the exhibit now notes that "only three presidents have seriously faced removal." The temporary label - which read "Case under redesign (history happens)" - also offered information about the impeachments of former presidents Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998, as well as Richard Nixon, who would have faced impeachment had he not resigned in 1974, the newspaper reported, citing a photograph of the label. The spokesperson said that after a content review, the Smithsonian decided to restore the exhibit to how it looked in 2008. The Smithsonian receives most of its budget from the US Congress but is independent of the government in decision-making. In June, Kim Sajet stepped down as director of the National Portrait Gallery, which is part of the Smithsonian, after criticism from Trump. In Trump's first term in office from 2017 to 2021, he became the first president to be impeached twice - the first time over a request that Ukraine investigate former President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, and the second over the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters. The three presidents impeached - or charged with misconduct - by the House of Representatives were acquitted by the Senate. The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History has removed explicit reference to US President Donald Trump from an exhibit about impeachment. The museum in Washington DC made the change as part of a review that it agreed to undertake following White House pressure to remove an art museum director, the Washington Post, which first reported the removal on Thursday, cited a source as saying. A spokesperson in a statement said "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments". Trump signed an executive order in March calling for "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology" to be removed from the Smithsonian - the vast museum and research institution that is a premier exhibition space for US history and culture. The order raised concern of political interference at the institution as well as fear that his administration is undoing decades of social progress and undermining the acknowledgment of critical phases of American history. "In September 2021, the museum installed a temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump. It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025," the spokesperson said in an email. The Washington Post reported the exhibit now notes that "only three presidents have seriously faced removal." The temporary label - which read "Case under redesign (history happens)" - also offered information about the impeachments of former presidents Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998, as well as Richard Nixon, who would have faced impeachment had he not resigned in 1974, the newspaper reported, citing a photograph of the label. The spokesperson said that after a content review, the Smithsonian decided to restore the exhibit to how it looked in 2008. The Smithsonian receives most of its budget from the US Congress but is independent of the government in decision-making. In June, Kim Sajet stepped down as director of the National Portrait Gallery, which is part of the Smithsonian, after criticism from Trump. In Trump's first term in office from 2017 to 2021, he became the first president to be impeached twice - the first time over a request that Ukraine investigate former President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, and the second over the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by Trump supporters. The three presidents impeached - or charged with misconduct - by the House of Representatives were acquitted by the Senate.
