'Commissions Without Consequences': Experts cite TRC, Zondo, Marikana as missed opportunities
Image: IOL
South Africa's history is marked by numerous commissions of inquiry that have focused on investigating corruption, human rights abuses, and systemic failures. While some have made significant contributions to understanding these issues, others have struggled to deliver justice, raising concerns about their effectiveness, costs, and long-term impact.
Recently, allegations involving Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, Deputy Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, and officials linked to a criminal syndicate have once again thrust the spotlight on the role and effectiveness of these bodies following President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcement that a commission of inquiry would be established to investigate the allegations.
While commissions have played a crucial role in exposing wrongdoing, critics argue their impact often falls short of delivering tangible justice.
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), chaired by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and established in 1995, was instrumental in addressing apartheid atrocities, fostering national healing through truth-telling, and encouraging dialogue among victims and perpetrators.
However, many critics and some political parties argue that the commission failed in its primary goals of reconciliation and prosecution.
Decades later, the Zondo Commission, set up in 2018 to investigate allegations of state capture involving former President Jacob Zuma and the Gupta family, uncovered widespread corruption at the highest levels of government.
Its findings have led to numerous referrals for prosecution and prompted policy reforms. Yet, despite the hefty price tag - nearly R1 billion, many critics argue that it has yet to produce the expected results.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Other notable inquiries include the Seriti Commission, which investigated the 2012 arms deal but was widely criticised for failing to hold anyone accountable; and the Marikana Commission, which examined the police killing of 34 striking miners in 2012 but resulted in few prosecutions and lingering dissatisfaction among victims' families.
Experts argue that many commissions have successfully exposed systemic abuses and informed public debate. However, translating these revelations into action remains a persistent challenge.
Critics argue that commissions can serve as political tools rather than genuine agents of reform, citing political interference, limited resources, and the slow pace of follow-up actions as factors diminishing their ability to effect meaningful change.
Independent political analyst Professor Sipho Seepe expressed skepticism about the actual utility of some commissions.
'There is nothing wrong with commissions of inquiry in unraveling societal challenges. The challenge arises when recommendations of commissions are ignored.
'South Africans have had the misfortune of having to contend with two of the worst commissions recently, the Nugent and Zondo Commissions. These commissions were politically tainted from the outset.'
Seepe argued that their chair weaponised them to target specific individuals instead of providing insights into the country's challenges.
'They became arsenals of the so-called 'New Dawn' to target individuals associated with a certain faction within the ANC. Both these commissions have done no great disservice in South Africa's body politic to the extent that many South Africans have lost faith in commissions as mechanisms to address societal challenges.'
In his academic article 'Integrity & Accountability Commissions of Inquiry: A South African Perspective,' Lauren Kohn proposed a permanent commission that seeks truth and enforces solutions.
'South Africans cannot again sleep through state capture. Abuses of public power must be brought to light and dealt with swiftly and effectively. Establishing a permanent commission would greatly enhance public trust and confidence in government, and indeed that of the 'state' more broadly. It exists to advance the public interest and perhaps even, as many authors suggest, 'the well-being of its members'.'
Kohn felt that the presidency's adoption of this recommendation would also help to keep the spirit of truth and reconciliation alive.
'The benefits of commissions of inquiry have been examined above. One of their costs is that the public expenditure that goes into their operation does not yield real dividends when it matters most; namely, after their terms end, when reports tend to gather dust and recommendations get shelved.'
Professor Dirk Kotze from the University of South Africa echoes this view, stating the importance of timely and well-resourced investigations.
'A commission of inquiry is a fundamental and practical mechanism to investigate. If it is done within the day, then it can be beneficial and prosperous. The challenge is often that the implementation of recommendations is delayed or inadequate, which diminishes their impact.
'The reason many commissions, like those on the PIC, fail to bring about tangible change is not due to their principle but political interference and resource constraints. It's often seen as an easy or cheap option, but without proper follow-through, its effectiveness is limited.'
List of Commissions since 1995 include the Nel Commission (2001), Ngoepe Commission (2001), Inquiry into human rights violations in farming communities (2001), Jali Commission (2001), Ngobeni Commission of Inquiry (2001), Myburgh Commission (2002), Donen, Commission (2002), and Hefer Commission (2003).
Khampepe Commission (2005), Ginwala Enquiry (2007), Seriti Commission (Arms Procurement) (2011), Khayelitsha Commission of Inquiry (2012), Marikana Commission (2012), Cassim Inquiry (2015) Fees Commission (Higher Education and Nugent Commission (Tax Administration and SARS Governance) (2018), PIC Commission (Public Investment Corporation) (2018), and Mokgoro Commission (Fitness of NPA officials) (2018).
thabo.makwakwa@inl.co.za
IOL Politics

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Zandile Mafe's second psychiatric evaluation for Parliament fire set for September
The Directorate of Priority Crime says it will follow up on the new information or leads should there be information that gets to their attention in connection with the gutting of Parliament. Zandila Mafe, pictured, continues to be a state patient at Valkenberg Psychiatric Hospital. Image: Chevon Booysen The man accused of starting the fire that gutted Parliament, Zandile Christmas Mafe, is scheduled to receive a second periodical assessment in September. This is according to the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations (DPCI) when it briefed the Joint Standing Committee on Financial Management of Parliament on Friday on the status of its investigation. Brigadier Mushavhaduvha Ramovha said Mafe continued to be a state patient at Valkenberg Psychiatric Hospital, where he receives treatment. Mafe was admitted to the hospital in February 2024 for a psychiatric evaluation after the Western Cape High Court declared he was unfit to stand trial in December 2023. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Ramovha said the first evaluation on Mafe was conducted in September 2024, following his admission in February 2024. He also said his diagnosis at this stage included severe Schizophrenia with early remission. 'Mr Mafe is scheduled to receive the second periodical assessment in September 2025 again. The Director of Public Prosecutions advised that Mr Mafe's progress be monitored to establish whether he will be able and willing to cooperate with the investigation when he is well enough to do so,' Ramovha said. Mafe was arrested by the police on January 2, 2022, and charged with housebreaking, theft, and arson following the fire incident while busy climbing through a window from inside the Old Assembly. He allegedly confessed to starting the fire to the investigating officer and demanded that President Cyril Ramaphosa resign, assassin Janusz Waluz be released, and a R1,500 grant be paid to unemployed people. After the case was referred to the DPCI for investigation, the National Director of Public Prosecutions had authorised the prosecution of Mafe under the Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act. During the meeting, MPs wanted to know the status of the investigation and whether it had been widened. DA MP Frederik Jacobus Badenhorst wanted to know why the case was referred to the DPCI, considering it dealt with serious cases of corruption, organised crime, and commercial crimes, among others. ANC MP Bheki Radebe said the issue of focusing only on Mafe was misdirected. 'When Parliament was burnt down, it was during the period when the Zondo Commission was to present its report and when there were riots in 2021,' Radebe said. He also said there was no way he was acting alone in light of the demands Mafe made. 'We know very well even people used to commit these heinous crimes can be pumped with drugs so that by the time they appear in court, they appear as if they are deranged,' he said, before asking if the investigation had been widened beyond Mafe. DPCI's acting head, Lieutenant-General Siphesihle Nkosi, explained that the case was referred to the DPCI because it was a national priority offence, which included a crime against the state 'If there is an attack or commission of a crime related to Parliament, it is a matter classified as a national priority offence,' he said. Nkosi confirmed that their investigation had focused on Mafe but that they obtained several statements and interviewed several individuals suspected of the fire incident. He indicated that they obtained 56 affidavits, including from their forensic digital forensic investigation team that worked on Mafe's phone. 'Contact numbers of individuals found in the gadget were approached and interviewed to get an understanding of how they are linked to Mr Mafe.' In its report to the committee, the DPCI stated that the Director of Public Prosecutions had requested that further statements be obtained from two potential witnesses who allegedly had telephonic communication with Mafe before the fire incident. 'The required statements were obtained and presented to the Director of Public Prosecutions on 3 February 2025 for consideration; however, they did not present any new leads for further investigation.' Nkosi said that in the event they establish new leads or obtain new information to be actioned, they will follow the leads. 'The investigation is conducted in collaboration with all critical stakeholders. The information made available to us will be shared with Crime Intelligence to ask them to enhance that information in ensuring we leave no stone unturned in this matter. As of now, the matter is waiting for the report that will come whether the individual is fit to stand trial,' Nkosi added. He clarified that the current information at their disposal did not add any other individual, but emphasised that the search for the truth never ends. 'Should there be information that gets to our attention, we obviously will follow that,' Nkosi said.


eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
Quiet Crisis: South Africans Don't Know South Africa
South Africas history is complicated and contentious, with the recorded section of it spanning centuries. It's a journey that's often misunderstood but crucial to our understanding of modern South Africa. Efforts have been made to better understand and process that history, like the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. However, many feel these efforts have fallen short in helping South Africa process its past. Let's get in to it.

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Tiffany Meek's lawyer claims there's no public outcry opposing her bail
The lawyer for Tiffany Meek claimed there was no outcry for her to remain behind bars. Image: Kamogelo Moichela/IOL The defence counsel for Tiffany Meek claimed there was no 'public outcry' opposing her bail on Friday. He submitted this during his cross-examination of the investigating officer in the Roodepoort Magistrate's Court as his client's claim hearing continues. Lawyer Noven Naidoo brought up the fact that the police sergeant previously told the court it would be in Meek's best interest to stay behind bars. The court heard the public outcry from not only residents from Fleurhof, but South Africans at large, needed to be taken into consideration when making a judgment. The 31-year-old, Tiffany Meek, the mother of the 11-year-old Jayden-Lee Meek, in the Roodepoort Magistrate Court for her bail hearing Image: Kamogelo Moichela/IOL Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The police sergeant said South Africans are angered at Meek, who was initially at the forefront for justice for her son, 11-year-old Jayden-Lee Meek, yet she is now sitting in the dock for murder. Earlier this week, the court asked the investigating officer to provide the memorandum handed over to SAPS that he previously mentioned. Protest actions by residents at the Florida police station resulted in community activists calling for a police station in Fleurhof, more visible policing, and prioritising the murder of Jayden-Lee, days earlier. Naido pointed out that the memorandum was not one opposing the release of his client, as it was handed over on May 17, while his client was arrested on July 11. The police officer did not dispute this but stated there was a handwritten petition, as well as a digital petition by the public. 'People were crying for justice for the child's murder,' the police sergeant said. The magistrate confirmed the online petition (to which she had a copy) had over 2,500 signatures, but asked for access to the handwritten petition. IOL sourced the online petition and found it was started on July 14, the day Meek made her first court appearance. By midday, the petition had 5,914 signatures and counting. However, Naidoo claimed this petition was started on Tuesday, July 22, after the court's request and that there were barely people outside the court in support of this. 'The community activist, Ms [Natalie] Solomons, was standing outside of court, urging people to sign the petition. She offered people free transport. People only started coming to court when asked for this. There was only public outcry when the court asked for it,' Naidoo said. Jayden-Lee Meek, 11, was returning home from school when he disappeared from inside his apartment complex. Image: Supplied But the investigating officer corrected him: 'The court only asked for it after I indicated there was a public outcry.' He said while he does not know the exact date, he knows the petition opposing bail was started once the public became aware of the identity of the individual arrested for Jayden-Lee's murder. 'If the State were to find another suspect, and the State is forced to withdraw charges against my client. Those same community members and activists will be standing by the accused and her family. So you see this about social media…,' Naidoo submitted. He further bashed the SAPS for not doing a proper job in the investigation. 'Community activists played a more active role in getting answers or going to flats to assist the family members. There are a sequence of events that followed Jayden's death that SAPS failed to investigate. Police refused to do their job,' he submitted. He also stated the same community activist, who was petitioning outside, Solomons claimed that a pillow with blood, and a substance that seemed like semen was seen at another flat that community members allegedly searched. This 'evidence' was even shared on Solomon's social media, on which she has over 100,000 followers. IOL