
"5 Jets Were Shot Down": Trump Makes Another Op Sindoor Claim
US President Donald Trump on Friday claimed that "five jets were shot down" in the recent conflict between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack. His remarks, made at a private dinner with Republican lawmakers at the White House, did not specify which country's aircraft were downed.
"In fact, planes were being shot out of the air. Five, five, four or five, but I think five jets were shot down actually," Trump said, referring to the brief but intense military exchange between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
The claim, while lacking in detail, brought back focus on Operation Sindoor, India's retaliatory military operation launched in early May following the deadly terror attack on April 22 in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. The attack killed 26 people, including tourists, prompting air and missile strikes that escalated over a four-day period.
#WATCH | Washington, D.C.: US President Donald Trump says, "We stopped a lot of wars. And these were serious, India and Pakistan, that was going on. Planes were being shot out of there. I think five jets were shot down, actually. These are two serious nuclear countries, and they… pic.twitter.com/MCFhW406cT
— ANI (@ANI) July 18, 2025
Pakistan has consistently claimed that its air force downed Indian jets during the engagement, including three French-built Rafale fighters, and that it had captured Indian pilots. Islamabad has not provided any evidence to substantiate these claims.
India, in contrast, has largely refrained from detailing its losses. However, in the weeks following the ceasefire, Indian Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan acknowledged that the Indian Air Force (IAF) did lose aircraft but dismissed the Pakistani narrative of six Indian jets being destroyed.
"What is important is that, not the jet being down, but why they were being down," General Chauhan told Bloomberg TV at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore in May. "Numbers are not important."
General Chauhan then went on to describe India's ability to quickly adapt tactics, learning from early errors, and launching successful subsequent waves of long-range precision strikes deep inside Pakistani territory.
"We were able to do precision strikes on heavily air-defended airfields of Pakistan deep 300 kilometres inside, with the precision of a metre," he said.
India has consistently said that no Rafale fighters were lost, and denied any Indian pilots were captured or detained.
On June 15, Eric Trappier, Chairman and CEO of Dassault Aviation, the French manufacturer of the Rafale, called Pakistan's claims "factually incorrect."
"What Pakistan is claiming about downing three Rafales is simply not true," Mr Trappier said in an interview with French magazine Challenges. "What we already know is that what the Pakistanis are saying about destroying three Rafale planes is inaccurate. When the complete details are known, the reality may surprise many."
Trump reiterated that the ceasefire, announced on May 10, was the result of US diplomatic intervention, although India has consistently pushed back on that narrative.
"We stopped a lot of wars. And these were serious, India and Pakistan, that was going on. These are two serious nuclear countries, and they were hitting each other. You know, it seems like a new form of warfare. You saw it recently when you looked at what we did in Iran, where we knocked out their nuclear capability, totally knocked out that... But India and Pakistan were going at it, and they were back and forth, and it was getting bigger and bigger, and we got it solved through trade. We said, you guys want to make a trade deal. We're not making a trade deal if you're going to be throwing around weapons, and maybe nuclear weapons, both very powerful nuclear states," the US President claimed.
India has disputed Trump's version of events. Its official position is that New Delhi and Islamabad resolved the crisis bilaterally and that no foreign mediator played a decisive role. Indian officials have also rejected the idea that the US threatened to suspend trade talks to secure peace.
Operation Sindoor began on the night of May 7 with coordinated strikes by the Air Force, Army and Navy. Over the next 72 hours, India conducted a series of attacks on what it called "terrorist infrastructure and military assets" across Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
Air Marshal A.K. Bharti said on May 11 that all Indian pilots had returned safely.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump releases FBI files on Martin Luther King Jr despite family's opposition
The Trump administration has declassified and released over 240,000 pages of FBI surveillance files on Martin Luther King Jr, drawing strong opposition from his family and civil rights leaders who warn the records must be handled with care and historical context read more The Trump administration has made public over 240,000 pages of FBI surveillance records on Martin Luther King Jr., despite opposition from his family and the civil rights group he once led. The files, kept under seal since 1977, were handed over to the National Archives decades ago but only now released in digital form. King's children, Martin Luther King III and Bernice King, called the release deeply personal, reminding the public that their father's assassination remains a source of ongoing grief. They urged people to read the files with 'empathy, restraint, and historical context.' The family, who reviewed the documents ahead of the public release, also reiterated their long-standing belief that James Earl Ray, the man convicted for the assassination, wasn't solely responsible—if responsible at all. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bernice was just 5 when her father was killed in 1968; Martin III was 10. The release, described as 'unprecedented' by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's office, follows a 2017 executive order by President Donald Trump to declassify documents related to the assassinations of MLK, John F. Kennedy, and Robert F. Kennedy. While some hail it as a move toward transparency, others see it as a political distraction amid controversy surrounding Trump's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Alveda King, MLK's niece and a vocal conservative, thanked Trump for the disclosure. However, many civil rights leaders, including Rev. Al Sharpton, criticized the move, calling it a diversion tactic rather than a pursuit of justice. The Southern Christian Leadership Conference also opposed the release, citing the FBI's history of illegal surveillance and smear campaigns against King and other civil rights activists. Under J. Edgar Hoover's leadership, the FBI wiretapped King's phones, bugged hotel rooms, and used informants to undermine his work. King's children condemned those tactics, saying their father was the target of a 'relentless and disturbing' campaign to destroy both his reputation and the broader Civil Rights Movement. They said they support historical transparency but warned against using the files to distort King's legacy or spread misinformation. In his later years, King expanded his focus from civil rights to economic justice and opposition to the Vietnam War, drawing criticism from political leaders and suspicion from the FBI, which viewed him as a threat to the status quo. He was assassinated in Memphis in 1968 while supporting striking sanitation workers—a reflection of his deepening commitment to social and economic equality. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump will 'crush economy' of India, China, Brazil with tariffs over Russian oil import: US Senator
US Senator Lindsey Graham has warned that Trump is planning tough economic action against countries still importing oil from Russia, naming India, China, and Brazil as top targets. read more Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enter a hall for a family photo before a plenary session of the BRICS 2024 Summit in Kazan, Russia, October 23, 2024. File Image/Reuters US Senator Lindsey Graham has said that President Donald Trump is preparing to slap hefty tariffs on nations continuing to buy Russian oil, with India, China, and Brazil in the crosshairs. Speaking to Fox News, Graham stated that Trump intends to impose a 100 per cent tariff on oil-related imports from these countries in a bid to choke off revenue to Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'Trump is going to impose tariffs on people that buy Russian oil – China, India, and Brazil,' Graham said, pointing out that these three nations are responsible for nearly 80 per cent of Russia's crude exports, which he claims are funding Moscow's war effort in Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Graham, the move is part of Trump's broader strategy to hold countries accountable for indirectly supporting Russia's war machine. 'President Trump's going to put a 100 per cent tariff on all those countries, punishing them for helping Putin,' he said. Graham said, 'You have played President Trump at your own peril. You made a major league mistake, and your economy is going to continue to be crushed. We're flowing weapons to Ukraine, so Ukraine will have the weapons to fight Putin back.' Senator Lindsey Graham accused Vladimir Putin of attempting to rebuild the Soviet empire by forcefully seizing neighboring nations. 'Putin is trying to reclaim countries that are not his,' Graham said, adding that the Russian leader has shown blatant disregard for international agreements. He pointed to Ukraine's decision in the mid-1990s to surrender over 1,700 nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances, including a commitment from Russia to respect its sovereignty. 'Putin shattered that promise,' Graham noted, calling it a betrayal of the post-Cold War order.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Big blow to Donald Trump's Republican party as Florida Judge rules Miami election can't be delayed by a year
Miami election was supposed to be held this fall but city authority has taken steps to postpone it to next year. However, a Florida court judge has intervened into the matter. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs Miami city commissioners violated the Florida Constitution when they voted last month to postpone this fall's election to November 2026, a state judge ruled Monday, saying that such a change required voter approval. The judge, Valerie R. Manno Schurr of Florida's 11th Judicial Circuit, ruled in favor of Emilio T. González, a candidate for mayor. He sued in late June after the City Commission voted 3-2 to delay the election, a move it said was meant to save money and improve turnout. Critics noted that it would give elected city officials an extra year in office. The postponement had led to public outcry from candidates who had already filed to run, and from some voters who said the process had been Francis X. Suarez and one city commissioner, Joe Carollo, are supposed to leave office at the end of this year because of term limits. Carollo voted against postponing the election; Suarez signed the approved ordinance into three commissioners who voted to postpone the Miami election said at a meeting in June that doing so would align with the midterms, lowering the election costs and probably leading to higher turnout. Before their vote, James Uthmeier, Florida's Republican attorney general, opined that changing the election date without voter approval would be unlawful. Governor Ron DeSantis commissioners and the mayor cannot lawfully change the date of a municipal election by ordinance, the judge wrote. Postponing the election from an odd-numbered year to an even-numbered one amounted to amending the city's charter, which would require approval from the electorate, she judge cited the Miami-Dade County charter, which governs cities in the county, including Miami, under the Florida Constitution. Lawyers for the city had argued that the ordinance changed the city's code, not its charter. The judge dismissed that argument, saying what mattered was the decision's substantive effect."Our Constitution deals with the substance of matters, not mere semantics," she wrote. "The city's contention that its ordinance did not 'amend' its City Charter is nothing more than semantic sleight of hand."Manno Schurr dismissed the city's emergency request to toss out González's lawsuit and granted his request for summary judgment. The city immediately said it would fight the ruling.A1. Governor of Florida is Ron DeSantis.A2. Miami election was supposed to be held this fall but city authority has taken steps to postpone it to next year.