
Battle of Dividend Stocks: Microsoft vs. Meta Platforms
Microsoft boasts a 20-year streak of consecutive annual dividend increases.
Meta's dividend is new and unproven, but it's backed by strong free cash flow and rapid business growth, giving it meaningful long-term upside.
Both are good dividend stocks, but one is the clear winner.
10 stocks we like better than Microsoft ›
Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has long been a go‑to for income among tech stocks, while Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) only began paying dividends last year. But Microsoft's long and impressive dividend track record doesn't automatically make it the better dividend stock when comparing the two.
On the surface, software giant Microsoft's dividend yield of about 0.6% comfortably exceeds social media specialist Meta's yield of roughly 0.3%. But beneath this headline dividend metric, the comparison isn't so straightforward. Ultimately, though, one of the two stocks does come out ahead when comparing them as dividend stocks. So, which is it?
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More »
Microsoft: a reliable dividend growth stock
Highlighting Microsoft's track record of dividend growth, its quarterly payout of $0.83 per share, or $3.32 annually, represents a 10% boost over its dividend last year. Furthermore, the dividend marks the company's 20th consecutive year of increases.
Despite Microsoft's modest dividend yield of just 0.6%, the company's payout is backed by one of the most durable business models in tech. In addition, the dividend is easy for the company to pay out. It taps into only 24% of the company's annual earnings and a third of its annual free cash flow.
Looking ahead, Microsoft should be able to not only sustain but also grow this payout. Recent business performance shows a healthy, fast-growing company. In fiscal 2025, which ended June 30, Microsoft generated $281.7 billion in revenue, up 15% year over year. Operating income rose 17% to $128.5 billion. On the heels of such strong performance, the software company returned over $37 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks.
Meta: early days with upside potential
Meta Platforms' dividend is still new to Wall Street. Introduced last year, the company, which is the parent of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and Threads, has already increased the payout once. In February, the company said it would boost its dividend by 5% to 52 and a half cents per share, translating to $2.10 annually.
Although the company's dividend yield of 0.3% and recent dividend increase are small, investors shouldn't count Meta out as a dividend stock. After all, its dividend consumes only about 7% of earnings and roughly 10% of free cash flow -- extremely conservative metrics. Further, the company's recent business momentum is extraordinary. Meta's second-quarter revenue soared 22% year over year, and its earnings per share jumped 38%. This business strength was helped by 6% year-over-year growth in daily active users across its family of social media apps, an 11% year-over-year increase in ad impressions, and a 9% jump in price per ad.
As with Microsoft, Meta is returning cash in more ways than one. Indeed, this explains why it has been so modest with its dividend; management favors share repurchases by a wide margin. In its most recent quarter, management repurchased nearly $10 billion worth of its stock while paying out just $1.33 billion in dividends.
All that said, Meta's entire business model is comparatively new and potentially riskier. The company's reality labs segment continues to burn cash as Meta invests heavily in artificial intelligence (AI). Highlighting how Meta's business is showing signs of potentially becoming more capital-intensive over time, the company's capital expenditures this year are expected to be between $66 and $72 billion. This means capital expenditures will rise about 77% year over year.
Of course, there's massive upside potential to the dividend, and the company's share repurchase program, if Meta's aggressive investments today help the company keep growing rapidly for years to come.
There's a clear winner
So, which tech giant is the better dividend stock? Microsoft is arguably the clear winner today. But that could change in the future.
Making the case for Microsoft, its yield is higher, its dividend is more established, and a long track record of consistent growth and strong free cash flow generation supports the payout. Investors can count on Microsoft to keep raising its dividend year after year, even as it continues to invest heavily in AI and cloud computing.
Meta, on the other hand, is still a newcomer. Its dividend may grow substantially over time, but there's no proven history yet. And while management's capital allocation has been increasingly shareholder-friendly, the company's rapidly rising capital expenditures and still-nascent dividend policy make it a riskier choice for income-focused investors. Sure, the stock trades at a more conservative valuation of 28 times earnings, compared with Microsoft at about 39 times earnings. But this lower valuation makes sense given Meta's dependence on advertising, a much more volatile and unpredictable source of revenue than Microsoft's diversified business.
Long term, Meta could very well become the better dividend stock of the two. But the safer bet today is Microsoft. For investors seeking dividend dependability with upside, the software giant is the more compelling choice.
Should you invest $1,000 in Microsoft right now?
Before you buy stock in Microsoft, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Microsoft wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $635,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,099,758!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,046% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025
Daniel Sparks and his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
11 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Pembina Pipeline Reports Q2 2025 Results and Strategic Expansions
Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. An update from Pembina Pipeline ( (TSE:PPL)) is now available. Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported its second quarter 2025 financial results, highlighting earnings of $417 million and an adjusted EBITDA of $1,013 million. The company has updated its 2025 adjusted EBITDA guidance and announced several strategic initiatives, including enhanced propane exports, acquisitions in gas infrastructure, and pipeline expansions. These developments are aimed at improving market access, reducing costs, and meeting growing transportation demands. Pembina's capital investment program for 2025 has been revised to $1.3 billion, reflecting its commitment to expanding infrastructure and securing long-term agreements. The most recent analyst rating on (TSE:PPL) stock is a Buy with a C$56.00 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Pembina Pipeline stock, see the TSE:PPL Stock Forecast page. Spark's Take on TSE:PPL Stock According to Spark, TipRanks' AI Analyst, TSE:PPL is a Outperform. Pembina Pipeline's overall score reflects strong financial performance and positive corporate events. While technical analysis shows mixed signals, the company's valuation is attractive, and the earnings call indicates confidence in future growth despite some challenges. To see Spark's full report on TSE:PPL stock, click here. More about Pembina Pipeline Pembina Pipeline Corporation is a leading energy infrastructure company in North America, primarily engaged in the transportation and storage of hydrocarbons. The company focuses on providing integrated solutions for the oil and gas industry, with a significant presence in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Average Trading Volume: 3,588,461 Technical Sentiment Signal: Buy Current Market Cap: C$29.86B For detailed information about PPL stock, go to TipRanks' Stock Analysis page. Disclaimer & Disclosure Report an Issue


Globe and Mail
11 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Don't be fooled by the ‘yield on cost' fallacy
Why would you not calculate your model dividend portfolio's yield based on its book cost instead of its current market value? I'll calculate the yield both ways in today's column. Then I'll explain why I prefer one method over the other. Let's use my model Yield Hog Dividend Growth Portfolio as an example. This is an opportune time to do so, because the portfolio just reached a key milestone: Thanks to a 6-per-cent dividend hike from Capital Power Corp. (CPX) on July 30, the portfolio's annual income has now officially doubled since inception. When I launched the portfolio with $100,000 of virtual money on Oct. 1, 2017, it was throwing off $4,094 of income annually based on dividend rates at the time. Owing to scores of dividend increases and regular reinvestments of cash over the years, it's now generating $8,199 of income – an increase of 100 per cent. These dividend ETF picks diversify your portfolio while saving on currency-conversion costs Down on dividend investing? Here's why you shouldn't be Now, to your question about yield: The traditional way to calculate the yield of a portfolio or individual stock is to divide the projected annual income by the current market value. Dividing the model portfolio's annualized income of $8,199 by its market value of $192,896 (as of July 31) produces a yield of about 4.3 per cent. In other words, for every dollar of capital in the portfolio today, about 4.3 cents of income is being generated annually, based on current dividend rates. This is what is known as the 'indicated yield,' and it is by far the most common way to calculate yield. But some investors prefer to measure yield in a different way. They calculate the 'yield on cost' by dividing current annualized income by the original cost of the stock or portfolio, not by the current market value. Using this method, the yield on cost of the model portfolio is $8,199 divided by the original value of $100,000, or about 8.2 per cent. The main benefit of using yield on cost is that it illustrates the growth of income over time. Indeed, despite the tariff-related volatility that has swept financial markets this year, dividend increases have continued to roll in from utilities, power producers, banks, real estate investment trusts and other companies in the portfolio. This is one reason I invest in dividend growth stocks: They bring some stability and predictability to an uncertain world. But here's the problem: Some investors don't always interpret yield on cost properly. They make the mistake of comparing the yield on cost with the current yields available in the marketplace. This is an apples-to-oranges comparison that can lead investors astray. Let's look at a stock in my personal portfolio to see why. Back in 2010, I bought shares of the utility, Fortis Inc. (FTS). At the time, the stock was trading at $27.58 a share and paying $1.12 of dividends annually, for a yield of about 4.1 per cent. Fortis (which I also hold in the model portfolio) has raised its dividend every year since then and is currently paying $2.46 annually. My yield on cost is therefore about 8.9 per cent (calculated as $2.46 of current income divided by my original purchase price of $27.58). Some fans of using yield on cost might argue that I could never find a dividend yield that high in the marketplace, especially from a company as solid as Fortis. I've even seen investors use a high yield on cost to justify hanging on to a stock they might otherwise want to sell. But am I actually earning 8.9 per cent on my investment in Fortis? No, absolutely not, because – this is the key part – my investment is no longer worth $27.58 a share. That price is 15 years out of date. Thanks to steady appreciation in Fortis's stock price over the years, my investment is now worth about $70 a share, as of Friday morning. So, if I currently have about $70 of capital tied up in each Fortis share, and each share is generating $2.46 of dividends, the yield of my Fortis shares is actually 3.5 per cent, not 8.9 per cent. The higher yield is misleading because it is derived by applying a current dividend rate to an old share price, which makes it useless for comparing Fortis's yield with the yields of other dividend stocks. Let's look at a more extreme example to drive the point home. Imagine you purchased a rental apartment building 50 years ago for $100,000. At the time, the building was generating rental income of $10,000, for a yield of 10 per cent. Now, let's assume the apartment building's market value and its total rental income have both increased tenfold, to $1-million and $100,000, respectively. Would you calculate the apartment's yield by dividing the current rental income of $100,000 by the wildly out-of-date market value of $100,000? Of course not. The price you paid 50 years ago is no longer relevant. What matters for the purposes of calculating the apartment's yield, and comparing it with the yield of other apartments, is the property's current market value and annual income potential today. The building's true yield is therefore 10 per cent ($100,000 divided by $1,000,000). A high yield on cost is a nice reminder that your income has grown, but it should never be used as a metric to compare with other investments. So, the next time someone tells you they don't want to sell a stock because it has a high yield on cost, show them this column. E-mail your questions to jheinzl@ I'm not able to respond personally to e-mails, but I choose certain questions to answer in my column.


CTV News
11 minutes ago
- CTV News
Updated unemployment numbers from Statistics Canada
Atlantic Watch Young workers and the private sector bore the brunt of Canadian job losses in July.