'The Night Agent' star gives blunt message to actors who want to be political
"I don't believe that actors should be famous," Basso said while on the "Great Company" podcast on January 31, after being asked if he enjoyed the fame that came from starring in the popular Netflix series.
The actor spoke out against celebrities who use their platform to deliver political messages, saying this went far beyond the scope of their job.
"We're saying words that we're told to say," he began. "We're told how to say them, we're told where to stand. And then we're telling people how to vote?" he mocked.
"Dude, your job is illegitimate in that way… Like you should be quiet, you should do your job. You should be a jester, entertain people. Then shut the f— up," he continued.
"We're court jesters. We're entertaining. We're public servants. We're there to perform, to entertain," he added. "And then all of a sudden, the jester, because he's in the courtroom, starts to be like, 'I might want to go sit on the throne!'"
Read On The Fox News App
"No. You're not supposed to be there. You're doing a very specific job," he said.
'Captain America' Star Anthony Mackie Cautions Fans To Not Make Comparisons Between Trump And 'Red Hulk'
Basso said that also applied to government officials, whom, he said, should speaking for the people, not promoting themselves.
"You should be representing me… like, what are you doing?" he asked.
The actor's comments comes after a recent poll found that Republicans are largely averse to celebrities sharing their political opinions.
Click Here For The Latest Media And Culture News
The AP-NORC poll, released in December, found 61% of Republicans strongly/somewhat disapproved of celebrities speaking out about political issues, while 27% neither approved nor disapproved and 11% strongly/somewhat approved.
For Democrats, just 20% strongly/somewhat disapproved, while 40% neither approved nor disapproved and 39% strongly/somewhat approved.
Fox News' Alexander Hall contributed to this article.Original article source: 'The Night Agent' star gives blunt message to actors who want to be political
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
Jake Paul smashes his brother Logan's lavish wedding cake in bizarre clip
Jake Paul posted a bizarre video of himself smashing his brother's wedding cake this week. His older brother, YouTuber-turned-WWE star Logan Paul, 30, tied the knot with long-term girlfriend, Danish model Nina Agdal, 33, at a lavish Lake Como wedding on Friday. During the ceremony, his younger brother, a pro boxer and content creator, said he was brought to tears, sharing a post saying, 'I've seriously been crying.' But Jake, who starred in the Netflix biopic 'The Problem Child,' is known as a bit of a troublemaker, and it didn't take long for the sentimental mood to turn to chaos. As the guests partied long into the night at the no-expenses-spared reception, Jake bizarrely ended up destroying his brother's extravagant cake. Sharing a clip on his socials, captioned, 'Jake or cake?' the influencer showed himself squaring up and punching the giant, three-tiered dessert, alongside his brother. In the background, Sister Sledge's 'We Are Family' plays as the pair continue to bash the cake together, with sponge pieces flying everywhere and chunks dropping to the floor. The cake became so unsteady at one point that a guest had to come over and help steady the table it was on. 5 Jake Paul wrecked his brother's wedding cake in a wild viral moment. @jakepaul/Instagram 5 The bizarre stunt split viewers right down the middle. @jakepaul/Instagram At the end of the clip, Jake appears satisfied with his efforts and cheers with his hands in the air before sharing a long hug with his brother. Guests gathered around the spectacle, phones in hand, egging them on, but Logan's new wife, Agdal, was nowhere to be seen. From one angle, it looks as if the cake hasn't even been cut yet. The general sentiment online was, 'Why…?' 5 The groom, Logan Paul, pulled his younger brother in for a hug after ruining the cake. @jakepaul/Instagram 'What is this? What am I watching? Someone is marrying this?' someone asked. 'Such a weird party,' another claimed. 'Are they marrying … each other?' a different user wondered. Others called it 'embarrassing,' 'a circus,' and 'a red flag.' Meanwhile, some compared the nuptials to a 'fancy frat party,' and one pointed out, 'Their performance of masculinity is very intriguing, to say the least.' 5 Logan Paul and Danish model Nina Agdal tied the knot last week in a lavish ceremony in Italy. Instagram/Jake Paul 'This is proof that money can never buy class,' chimed in one critic, while someone else said, 'Wasting food while children are starving in Africa …' Many commenters also sympathised with Agdal, with one saying, 'I know she's crying in a room by herself right now.' 'If I were a bride, I would be livid,' someone else claimed. 'Divorce, babe. Divorce,' another urged. 'His wife probably picked out that design, curated the flavours for the wedding, paid well over 5k – and for what? So a man could ruin it all,' read another comment. 5 Logan appeared to back Jake's stunt, sharing a professional shot of the cake-smashing moment on Instagram. @jakepaul/Instagram Others expressed sympathy for the pastry chef who made the cake. It's unknown who that was though, and in an Instagram carousel with photos of the cake, Logan notably didn't tag the cake maker, despite tagging all other vendors from the day. The wedding planner, @lakecomoweddings, also left the cake vendor off their Instagram coverage of the day. The wedding comes two years after WWE star Paul proposed to Agdal in Italy. 'Today is the day I ask the love of my life to marry me,' the YouTube personality said in a video shared in 2023. 'Fourteen months ago, I fell in love with the most beautiful human being I've ever seen in my life, and I have been waiting for this day ever since.' They welcomed their first child, Esme, in September 2024. After the wedding, Logan took to Instagram to gush about Agdal. 'God delivered in every way. This wedding was the perfect way to kick off the rest of our lives @ninaagdal,' he said. 'I love you and our beautiful baby girl Esme so so much. Let's make more babies.'
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
Man convicted of killing woman abducted from insurance office to be executed in Florida's 10th execution of the year
A man convicted of abducting a woman from a Florida Panhandle insurance office and killing her is scheduled to be executed Tuesday evening. Kayle Bates, 67, is set to receive a lethal injection at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison near Starke under a death warrant signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. It would be Florida's 10th death sentence carried out in 2025, further extending the state record for a single year. Two more executions are planned within the next month. Advertisement 3 Kayle Bates, 67, is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison in Starke, under a death warrant signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis. AP Since the US Supreme Court restored the death penalty in 1976, the highest previous annual total of Florida executions was eight in 2014. Florida has executed more people than any other state this year, while Texas and South Carolina are tied for second place with four each. Advertisement Bates was convicted of first-degree murder, kidnapping, armed robbery and attempted sexual battery in the June 14, 1982, killing of Janet White in Bay County in the Florida Panhandle. Bates abducted White from the insurance office where she worked, took her into some woods behind the building, attempted to rape her, stabbed her to death and tore a diamond ring from one of her fingers, according to court documents. Attorneys for Bates have filed appeals with the Florida Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court, as well as a federal lawsuit claiming DeSantis' process for signing death warrants was discriminatory. 3 Bates was found guilty of murdering Janet White in Bay County on June 14, 1982, along with charges of kidnapping, armed robbery, and attempted sexual battery. Family Handout Advertisement The federal lawsuit was dismissed last Tuesday, with the judge finding problems with the lawsuit's statistical analysis. The court ruled that even if the numbers were correct, they wouldn't necessarily prove discrimination. On the same day, the Florida Supreme Court denied Bates' pending claims, including arguments that evidence of organic brain damage had been inadequately considered during his second penalty phase. The court ruled that Bates has had three decades to raise these claims. A US Supreme Court decision is still pending on Bates' final appeal. 3 It would be Florida's 10th death sentence carried out in 2025, further extending the state record for a single year. AP Advertisement A total of 28 men have died by court-ordered execution so far this year in the US, and at least 10 other people are scheduled to be put to death in seven states during the remainder of 2025. Curtis Windom, 59, is set to become the 11th person executed in Florida on Aug. 28. He was convicted of killing three people in the Orlando area in 1992. David Pittman, 63, would be the 12th person executed in Florida if his death sentence is carried out as scheduled Sept. 17. He was found guilty of fatally stabbing his estranged wife's sister and parents at their Polk County home before setting it on fire in 1990. Florida executions are carried out using a three-drug lethal injection: a sedative, a paralytic and a drug that stops the heart, according to the state Department of Corrections.
San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Republicans say they'll sue to block California redistricting plan. Do they have a case?
Gov. Gavin Newsom's plan to ask the voters to redesign California's congressional districts to enable Democrats to add House seats is drawing challenges from Republicans who claim the proposal violates the state Constitution and federal law. But the law doesn't appear to be on their side. As the Democratic-controlled Legislature prepares to vote this week on Newsom's proposed November ballot measure to change districts that were drafted by an independent commission, Assembly Member Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego, asked the nonpartisan Legislative Counsel's Office to declare the measure illegal. He said he was also prepared to go to court. 'By concocting this partisan redistricting scam, Gavin Newsom and Democrat politicians are openly violating the California Constitution and their oath of office,' DeMaio said in a news release. 'Any vote … on this corrupt plan would be unlawful and unconstitutional.' He argued that the state Constitution, under a ballot measure approved by the voters in 2008, allows only a bipartisan commission to draw district lines and does not permit them to be redrafted for political purposes. The National Republican Congressional Committee also said Newsom's plan would be challenged in court as well as the ballot box. Newsom 'is shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters to prop up his Presidential ambitions,' Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., chair of the committee, said on X. But Rick Hasen, a professor of law and political science at UCLA who has written widely on election law issues, said the Legislature can ask California voters to change the state Constitution by placing an amendment on the ballot with two-thirds majority votes in each house. Newsom and legislative Democrats introduced their measure on Monday. 'If it's a constitutional amendment approved by voters, then there is no state law problem with amending the earlier constitutional amendment,' Hasen said. Newsom's November ballot measure, a response to plans by Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas to redraw the state's House districts and allow Republicans to pick up five seats next year, would likewise redesign California's congressional districts for the remainder of the decade to enable Democrats to add five seats to their current 43-9 majority in the state if Texas or any other state redrew its district lines. The proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, dubbed the Election Rigging Response Act, was introduced Monday with 43 coauthors in the Assembly and 20 in the state Senate, all of them Democrats. They plan legislative votes on Thursday. The ballot proposal would temporarily suspend the state constitutional limits on redistricting that DeMaio cited. But he contended the Legislature has no authority even to ask the voters to remove restrictions they had added to the state Constitution, and that such changes could be made only by an initiative from private citizens. DeMaio said he would actually prefer a U.S. constitutional amendment establishing an independent commission to draw nonpartisan House district lines in every state. Until that happens, he told the Chronicle, Newsom and his fellow Democrats should refrain from asking Californians to 'act like a bunch of toddlers because two wrongs make a right.' Another election law professor, Justin Levitt of Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, who was a national policy adviser for democracy and voting rights under President Joe Biden, said DeMaio was correct that the California Constitution currently prohibits legislators from redrawing district lines. 'But that's exactly why the Legislature is proposing a constitutional amendment,' Levitt said. 'And I'm not aware of any limitation on the Legislature to propose such an amendment for the voters to consider.' DeMaio also said federal law allows changing district lines only after each 10-year census and prohibits mid-decade redistricting. But the Supreme Court ruled otherwise in a 2006 case, League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, allowing Republican legislators in Texas to redraw House district lines in their favor. 'The text and structure of the Constitution and our case law indicate there is nothing inherently suspect about a legislature's decision to replace mid-decade a court-ordered plan with one of its own,' Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for a 7-2 court majority. Texas' current Republican majority, and partisans on both sides in other states, have relied on that ruling to propose off-year redistricting for their own advantage. Levitt said he'd prefer to limit the practice to once per decade. 'I wish there were such a law — and Congress could clearly pass one,' the Loyola law professor said, noting that legislation to prohibit mid-decade redistricting of U.S. House seats has been proposed in Congress for more than 20 years. 'But that's not currently where federal law stands.' Hasen of UCLA said Newsom's proposal might be challenged on other legal grounds, such as the rule limiting California ballot measures to a single subject. But he said opponents' strongest argument would probably be a political one — that the voters should reject a plan to suspend the nonpartisan redistricting program they approved 17 years ago. DeMaio appeared to agree on Monday. 'If we stop it in court, fine,' he said at a press conference in the state Capitol. 'But more than likely it will have to be stopped at the ballot box.' Also Monday, DeMaio submitted a proposed initiative for the 2026 state ballot that would ban any legislators from seeking any elected office for 10 years who voted to put Newsom's redistricting measure on the ballot. 'There is no free ride on casting a corrupt vote this week — if a state legislator votes in favor, they better be prepared to get a real job for the next 10 years,' DeMaio said.
