
South Africa: Boost employee morale with financial support during tough times
Employers could offer financial education to help their people manage income and expenses, provide access to confidential advice, tools and resources to help employees learn how to budget or manage debt. They could also choose to offer benefits like earned wage access (EWA).
EWA provides employees with access to a portion of the wages they have already earned, in advance of their next payday. Unlike payday loans, which are a credit product with exorbitant interest rates, EWA is offered and managed by employers as a benefit.
Employees only pay a withdrawal fee made up of a small percentage of the total amount (e.g. 2%) and a flat transaction fee.
Employers incur no credit risk on EWA, as employees have already earned the money. It gives employees flexibility and control over their money and contributes positively to their overall well-being.
The amount employees can withdraw can be set as a portion of their monthly earnings (20% - 25% on average) by their employer, and they can only withdraw once they have already earned wages.
For example, someone who earns R8,000 and wants to withdraw wages halfway through the month, can only access 25% of the R4,000 they have earned so far, giving them up to R1,000 in EWA.
The R1000 is repaid with their next paycheck, which prevents employees from accumulating long-term debt. Employers can also limit how many withdrawals can be made per pay cycle, and block off periods where no EWA is available.
'EWA can save both employers and employees money,' comments Simon Ellis, co-founder and CEO of Jem HR, a WhatsApp-based employee benefits and HR platform for frontline workforces.
'It saves HR and Finance departments time spent evaluating and processing employee loan requests.
'EWA platforms integrate into payroll systems, employees opt in, receive the withdrawn amount, and repayments are deducted from their next salary, making it almost effortless for HR teams to manage,' Ellis adds. 'EWA also stops employees who run short on cash from having to pay 20 - 30% interest to loan sharks.'
Financial duress
According to The Deskless Worker Pulse research report, conducted by Jem in 2024, 44% of deskless workers in South Africa are under financial duress. Almost half run out of money before payday every month. Of those, 97% need the money for essentials like transport, food, medical services, airtime or electricity.
'Offering EWA to employees reduces absenteeism when employees don't have money for transport for example,' states Caroline van der Merwe, chief product officer at Jem. 'It also lowers employee turnover by reducing financial stress, often the reason employees leave jobs.
'Absenteeism and employee turnover cost employers in terms of wages paid, the cost to hire temporary workers or pay existing workers overtime, the cost to hire replacements, reduced productivity, and the administration costs to manage absenteeism,' van der Merwe says.
'Low wage workers are often in debt due to a lack of access to affordable credit. EWA gives them a means to break the pay-cheque-to-pay-cheque cycle and emerge on a steadier financial footing, which is good for employer and employee,' van der Merwe concludes.
All rights reserved. © 2022. Bizcommunity.com Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Filipino Times
4 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Abu Dhabi Court Orders Woman to Repay Dh216,000 Loan After WhatsApp Evidence
The Abu Dhabi Court for Family, Civil, and Administrative Cases has ordered a woman to pay Dh216,000 plus legal interest to a man after finding she borrowed money but failed to settle the full amount. The man said he had lent the woman Dh390,000 in instalments over time, relying on their friendship when she faced financial difficulties after her trading accounts were closed. She repaid Dh102,000, leaving Dh288,000 unpaid despite repeated reminders. Although no written receipts were signed, the man presented WhatsApp messages in which the woman acknowledged owing money. In one exchange, she admitted to a debt of Dh312,000, while he claimed the figure was Dh318,000. The woman insisted she had only borrowed and repaid Dh102,000, but the court ruled the evidence supported the man's claim. Since both parties acknowledged the Dh102,000 repayment, the court concluded that Dh216,000 remained outstanding and ordered her to pay the amount plus interest.


Filipino Times
11 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Al Ain Court Orders Man to Repay Dh160,000 in Fake Investment Scheme
The Al Ain Civil, Commercial, and Administrative Cases Court has ruled against a man for duping another into a fraudulent investment, ordering him to repay Dh160,000 plus interest and legal costs. Court documents show the defendant convinced the plaintiff that he owned private companies and persuaded him to invest. Trusting the claims, the plaintiff handed over Dh150,000 in two instalments, supported by a signed receipt. However, the defendant failed to deliver on the investment, avoided communication, and later claimed the money had been lost. A court-appointed forensic accounting expert confirmed that the defendant acknowledged receiving the funds under an informal investment agreement but did not honour the partnership terms. The court ordered the defendant to repay the Dh150,000 principal, Dh20,000 in damages, and 12 per cent annual interest from the date of filing until full settlement, along with all court fees and expenses.


Filipino Times
12 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Dubai Court Orders Man to Repay Dh118,000 in Failed Currency Exchange Deal
A Dubai civil court has ordered an Arab man to return nearly Dh118,000 to an African trader after failing to deliver on a promised five-minute currency exchange. The defendant was also directed to pay Dh5,000 in compensation for financial and emotional harm. Court documents show that the trader, who needed U.S. dollars to pay Canadian suppliers, entrusted Dh117,913 to the defendant. The man had assured that the funds would be instantly converted through his local bank accounts. Instead of transferring the money, the defendant allegedly stalled and tried to reassure the trader with a photo of himself depositing cash at an ATM. However, the promised transfer never came through, leaving the trader unable to meet supplier deadlines. To maintain his business relationship, the trader paid his supplier again out of his own pocket and later pursued legal action in Dubai. Despite WhatsApp messages, invoices, and other evidence submitted, the defendant failed to appear in court or prove repayment. The court applied the UAE Civil Transactions Law, which requires anyone who unlawfully takes money to return it, ruling in favor of the trader and ordering repayment plus damages. The trader's larger claim of Dh100,000 in psychological and material harm was denied.