Vaughan blames Stokes' absence for England's loss in fifth test against India
Stokes missed the crucial decider, leaving Ollie Pope to captain the side in his absence. Despite starting the final day as favourites, England were left reeling from a dramatic collapse, falling short of their target by 35 runs with four wickets still in hand.
Speaking to the British media, Vaughan stressed the impact Stokes' leadership would have had on the result.
✍️ 'Batsmen should have been more cautious in hunt for last 35 runs and losing to India because of their high-risk approach will really hurt' | Writes Michael Vaughan
Read more 👇https://t.co/4O9dSoNWzP pic.twitter.com/ndr5RCitBC — Telegraph Cricket (@TeleCricket) August 4, 2025
'With Ben Stokes in the team, England would have won this Test match,' Vaughan remarked. He highlighted Stokes' influence not just as a key all-rounder, but also as a leader who instils confidence and composure.
England, known for their aggressive approach, struggled under pressure, a sentiment Vaughan echoed. 'They panicked in the way they play. The aggression that typically works for them backfired this time,' he said.
Stokes, who had been in top form prior to the injury, had bowled 140 overs and claimed 17 wickets at an average of 25.24 across the previous four Tests.
He also contributed significantly with the bat, scoring 304 runs in seven innings at an average of 43.43, reinforcing his critical role in the team.
Without Stokes, England fell short of their expectations, with Vaughan firmly believing that his presence could have turned the tide in the decisive Test.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Chris Eubank Jr vs Conor Benn 2 announced: Boxing clash set for November in London
The eagerly awaited rematch between British boxing rivals Chris Eubank Jr and Conor Benn is scheduled for November 15 at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. The pair initially faced off in April in a thrilling middleweight showdown at the same venue, where Eubank Jr secured a unanimous decision victory, with all three judges scoring it 116-112 in his favour. Despite there being no title on the line, the bout attracted significant attention, with many fans eager to see a sequel to the bitter rivalry that began with their fathers, Chris Eubank Sr and Nigel Benn, who first clashed 35 years ago. Although the two boxers had agreed on a rematch for 20 September, the bout fell through due to concerns over Eubank's readiness. However, organisers from Ring Magazine, led by Turki Alalshikh, have now confirmed the new date in November. Eddie Hearn, promoter for Benn, also posted the news on social media, while Eubank's camp has yet to make a public statement on the rescheduled bout. In a twist to the saga, the proposed rematch had been called off in July after Team Benn expressed concerns over Eubank's reluctance to fight. However, the rematch was resurrected after Alalshikh intervened, setting the stage for the new November date. While the first encounter between Eubank and Benn was filled with drama and intrigue, with both fighters pushing to the limit, it remains to be seen whether the rematch can capture the same magic. Eubank, who had a draining weight cut in their first fight, has since proven his ability to meet the weight demands, but the question remains whether the second bout can replicate the excitement of the first. Boxing enthusiasts will no doubt be watching closely to see if this new chapter in the Eubank-Benn rivalry can live up to the high expectations set by their first meeting.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
Vaughan blames Stokes' absence for England's loss in fifth test against India
Former England captain Michael Vaughan has expressed disappointment over England's defeat in the fifth Test against India, attributing the loss to the absence of Ben Stokes, who was sidelined due to a right shoulder injury. Stokes missed the crucial decider, leaving Ollie Pope to captain the side in his absence. Despite starting the final day as favourites, England were left reeling from a dramatic collapse, falling short of their target by 35 runs with four wickets still in hand. Speaking to the British media, Vaughan stressed the impact Stokes' leadership would have had on the result. ✍️ 'Batsmen should have been more cautious in hunt for last 35 runs and losing to India because of their high-risk approach will really hurt' | Writes Michael Vaughan Read more 👇 — Telegraph Cricket (@TeleCricket) August 4, 2025 'With Ben Stokes in the team, England would have won this Test match,' Vaughan remarked. He highlighted Stokes' influence not just as a key all-rounder, but also as a leader who instils confidence and composure. England, known for their aggressive approach, struggled under pressure, a sentiment Vaughan echoed. 'They panicked in the way they play. The aggression that typically works for them backfired this time,' he said. Stokes, who had been in top form prior to the injury, had bowled 140 overs and claimed 17 wickets at an average of 25.24 across the previous four Tests. He also contributed significantly with the bat, scoring 304 runs in seven innings at an average of 43.43, reinforcing his critical role in the team. Without Stokes, England fell short of their expectations, with Vaughan firmly believing that his presence could have turned the tide in the decisive Test.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Stokes refuses to blame Brook for Eng defeat
Ben Stokes said he was frustrated by England's failure to secure a Test series win against India but refused to blame Harry Brook for his dismissal, which sparked a dramatic collapse. The five-match series finished 2-2 after India sealed a dramatic six-run win on Monday, with paceman Mohammed Siraj taking three of the four wickets to fall on the final morning. England, chasing a daunting 374 runs to win, had been cruising at 301-3 on Sunday, with Brook and Joe Root at the crease. But they buckled under pressure and lost their last seven wickets for 66 runs. "It's been toe-to-toe pretty much for 25 days," said England captain Stokes, who missed the Oval game with a shoulder injury. "You know, two teams, two very good teams who have thrown everything at each other, left nothing out there. "From a cricket fan's point of view 2-2 is probably fair. Obviously, we're disappointed now to have not got the result that we wanted to give us a series win." England appeared home and dry on Sunday with Brook (111) and Root (105) at the crease. But their late stumble started when Brook, who had changed the tone of the match with his aggressive batting, chipped a bizarre catch to mid-off as he launched his bat in the opposite direction. England lost further wickets late on Sunday, including that of Root, as the tension rose before bad light and rain curtailed play with the result on a knife edge. Brook dismissal England returned on Monday needing just 35 runs to win the series 3-1 with four wickets in hand but ultimately fell just short. But Stokes defended the 26-year-old Brook, who scored 481 runs in the series, including two centuries. His ton on Sunday came off just 91 balls with 12 fours and two sixes. "Harry got us into that position by playing a particular way, putting the Indian bowlers under immense pressure to take them away from being able to consistently bowl in the areas that they wanted to bowl," said Stokes. "I'm sure everyone was applauding him when he brought up his hundred in the way that he did. Some of the shots he played were unbelievable." The skipper admitted six dropped catches in India's second innings had ultimately proved costly. "But you can go over so many moments in a five-day Test match and all the time you spend out in the field and say, 'If this had been slightly different, we could have been in a slightly different situation'," he said. "No one means to drop catches, obviously. But I think if we look back on that, you could say that those chances that we did put down did cost us. "Back to Headingley (first Test), when we chased down those runs, India dropped quite a few chances off us, and that probably contributed to us winning." Stokes said his team were in a "strong place" ahead of a bid to regain the Ashes in Australia, with that Test series starting in November. "We have got some lads who are members of this team who have got some other responsibilities to fulfil with the Hundred and one-day international series," he said. "I don't have to concentrate on that. We fly out in November, so we have got a lot of time between now and then to build on all the kind of things we have been speaking about before the series started."
