logo
It's time to ban the Chelsea tractor

It's time to ban the Chelsea tractor

Spectator21-06-2025
City dwellers across Europe will have noticed an ominous and growing presence on our streets, nudging cyclists onto pavements, looming over pedestrians crossing the road, and generally spoiling the view. It is gratifying to learn that we are neither going mad nor shrinking in the wash: cars really are becoming huge.
The bonnets of newly-sold cars across Europe now average 83.8cm in height, up from 76.9cm in 2010 – coincidentally the perfect height for caving in a toddler's head. That's according to a new report from Transport & Environment (T&E), an advocacy group for clean transport and energy that is campaigning against what it calls 'carspreading'.
A resident of Zone 3 has no business owning a car that can trace its lineage to the Jeep
Ironically for a vehicle so closely associated with mums doing the school run, the Chelsea tractor is a clear danger to primary-aged children, making it much likelier that the driver will squish them into the tarmac. A similar fate awaits adults, though the lucky ones will merely absorb the impact in their torso, where they keep their vital organs. This shows there's only one thing for it: it's time to ban four-wheel drives from Britain's cities.
Bluntly put, a resident of Zone 3 has no business owning a car that can trace its lineage to the Jeep, a vehicle literally built to fight Nazis. Whatever the shortcomings of Sadiq Khan, no London street is sufficiently dangerous that you need a light utility vehicle to navigate it – or at least, no street that a man who could afford a Land Rover might live in. The yummy mummies of Clapham, the financial bros of Hampstead, or the international wealth treating Chelsea as their playground – none of them should be allowed a four-wheel drive.
The growing height of car bonnets is partly down to an increasing number of SUVs, to use the American term for a four-wheel drive. T&E reckon they account for a little over half of new cars sold in Europe, with many 4×4 bonnets sitting more than a metre off the ground.
Four-wheel drives are therefore likely to account for a growing proportion of the nearly 30,000 people killed or seriously injured in Great Britain each year in road collisions. While the bulk of the roughly 1,600 deaths are car or motorcycle users, about a quarter are pedestrians.
Such incidents are sufficiently commonplace that we don't normally read about them. One noteworthy exception, however, did catch public attention in July 2023. Driving through Wimbledon, Claire Freemantle lost control of her Land Rover Defender and ploughed through the fence at The Study Prep school, killing eight-year-old Nuria Sajjad and Selena Lau.
Initially arrested for dangerous driving, Freemantle was eventually let off without charge on the grounds she had suffered a seizure. The case has since been reopened.
Unsurprisingly, Europeans have alighted on the old standby to any problem: more regulation. The heads of various worthy causes have written to the European Commission urging them to commit to months of fruitful work to create limits on how big new cars can be. Their suggested implementation date is a decade hence, by which point we will presumably all be driving SUVs.
The response from Brussels has been wholly inadequate, a predictably timid European disappointment. But free from the EU's clutches, the British should act decisively: we should outlaw the Chelsea tractor on our own.
Four-wheel drives are no doubt safer for their passengers. Analysis by The Economist of American road accidents last year concluded that the fatality rate of occupants in a Ford F-350 Super Duty pickup truck was about half that of those travelling in a Honda Civic.
But such safety comes at the expense of everyone else. As cited in the same report, a 2004 paper by Michelle White of the University of California estimated that for every deadly crash a 4×4 avoids, there are 4.3 more among other drivers, pedestrians and cyclists.
The negative externalities pile up from there. Larger vehicles generally pollute more, consuming more fuel to move more weight and emit more CO2. Their tyres leave more particles in the air, water and soil. They also create more potholes in the roads, such damage often being cited as a reason to own a 4×4 in the first place.
That's alongside the sheer intimidation of a small tank driving down streets built for horses and carts, as well as the inconvenience to others when you try to park. When they aren't running you over or polluting your lungs, Chelsea tractors make cities uglier and unpleasant for everybody else.
Yes, there should be exemptions. Any man in possession of an actual tractor may legitimately be in want of a SUV. Just as we allow farmers to shoot vermin, we should allow them to haul equipment in a four-wheel drive. Jeremy Clarkson need not return to the barricades over this policy. But as for the rest of us, there is simply no need. Get the urbanites off their tractors and back in their hatchbacks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I Drove the 2025 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro vs. Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 4xe: Which Hybridized Bruiser is Best?
I Drove the 2025 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro vs. Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 4xe: Which Hybridized Bruiser is Best?

Auto Blog

time44 minutes ago

  • Auto Blog

I Drove the 2025 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro vs. Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 4xe: Which Hybridized Bruiser is Best?

By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Two off-road-ready machines with different personalities The Jeep Wrangler has been around for a very, very long time. Its history is about as American as apple pie, hot dogs, and the fourth of July (since, you know, their inception was born from what the GIs drove during WWII). They were built to be resilient and capable, and boy, were they. The 4Runner's story is similar—it was developed in 1984 to take on the American CJ-7, Ford Bronco, and Chevy Blazer. All off-road-ready SUVs that were affordable, rugged, and highly sought after. Thus, the Wrangler and the 4Runner have been butting heads and locking antlers ever since. Owners of both vehicles tend to be very cult-y in their love for their off-roader, and for good reason. Toyota has been hard at work developing and improving its best-selling off-road SUV, and the Jeep has been handed off to several companies by now, but it still remains the best-selling off-road SUV in America. After it was hybridized as a PHEV in 2021 (that doesn't get that great of gas mileage, but… I digress), it quickly became America's best-selling hybrid that year. The 4Runner is also a hybrid now, and similar to the Jeep, not getting very good mileage. Once again, we find ourselves asking: is one better than the other? Let's dig in and find out. I was not a fan of the i-FORCE MAX hybrid system… At all. But Jeep's wasn't much better Before reviewing the 2025 Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro, I had the opportunity to review a 2025 Toyota Land Cruiser, which debuted Toyota's 2.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine mated to a 1.87 kWh NiMH battery pack, working in tandem with a 48 hp electric motor. Combined, it makes about 278 horsepower. It's not at all comparable to the hybrid setup in the RAV4 or the Highlander. In fact, on Toyota's website, it describes the i-FORCE MAX as such: 'a hybrid system for Toyota trucks and SUVs that's been designed for towing and off-road use without sacrificing fuel efficiency.' Source: Kristen Brown The Land Cruiser disappointed me because the hybrid configuration was incredibly harsh, abrasive, and very difficult to become acquainted with. Mileage driving around town and on the highway wasn't great—I averaged about 17 mpg, which, all things considered, wasn't all that terrible for what's basically an AWD SUV that is only 4WD when you lock the diffs. But shifting was rough, the start-stop function was incredibly harsh starting from a stop, and when the gas engine would kick on, it would lurch so far forward I worried I'd accidentally rear-end someone. The SUV had only 5,000 miles on the clock. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The 4Runner was only slightly better, and my tester had 1,900 miles on the odometer when it arrived from the fleet company. I had the same complaints, but was expecting slightly better mileage since the 4Runner has a part-time 4WD system. So, instead of being AWD until the diffs were locked, it was FWD. And I got around the same, 17.1 mpg. Source: Jeep For the Jeep, mileage wasn't much better, either. I got around 20 mpg, which for a plug-in hybrid was pretty disappointing. It has about 22 miles of range in EV mode, which is on par with most PHEVs on the market, and was great for completing daily tasks without burning gas. The 4Runner doesn't have an EV mode, so that's a serious perk for environmentalists. But it's the gas engine that kills it. The Jeep is fitted with Fiat's 2.0-liter turbocharged inline four, and it makes 375 combined horsepower, thanks to its larger 17.3 kWh battery pack. But, as you've read, a bigger battery pack doesn't necessarily mean better mileage. I guess that's what we get for choosing hybridized off-roaders, right? Especially since neither SUV was known for its MPG figures, even as gas-only cars. Both SUVs truly shone off-road Since the 4Runner's hybrid motor is more for performance than it is mileage, there's a lot of low-end torque to enjoy from that battery when you're off-road. Dropping the TRD Pro into 4Hi was as easy as pushing a button and turning a dial on the center console. Once it was in 4WD, you could choose between Mud & Sand, Rock & Dirt, Mogul, and Snow. Mogul mode is a transmission and engine tune that's designed for bumpy terrain, inclines, and v-ditches, according to Toyota. Trails in Bend are mostly dusty with the occasional washout and rocky section, so we stayed in Rock & Dirt. Source: Kristen Brown The 4Runner comes with a sport-style exhaust that, even though it's a four-banger, sounds very reminiscent of the 4.0-liter V6 of the previous generation. It was a great sound while off-roading, and overall helped complete the 4Runner's rugged feel. It had other handy and easy-to-access features, like a quick sway bar disconnect, a rear locking differential, and of course, a 4Lo and 2Lo setting, as well as a tow/haul mode. The TRD Pro is rated to tow 5,800 pounds, which is respectable for a four-cylinder. I'm a little skeptical of towing that much with a smaller engine, but the EV battery gives the 4Runner a performance boost with instant torque and added horsepower. The 8-speed automatic helps, too. No CVTs here. The Wrangler 4xe isn't as smooth off-road, but it is a Jeep. Both have fixed, off-road-ready suspension setups, so they're bumpy and trucky feeling, but everything you expect them to have is there. It has 4Lo, 4Hi, 2Hi, 2Lo, and like the 4Runner, a crawling cruise control function where you can set a certain speed, the car handles the accelerating and braking. The driver handles the steering. It's a fun feature if you're alone and unsure about maintaining braking while going down a decline. If you go for the Rubicon trim, which is more on par with the TRD Pro's pricing and features, it comes from the factory with 33-inch AT tires, front and rear locking diffs (the Toyota only has a rear locker), and reinforced underbody protection (which the Toyota also has). Source: Jeep I have a 2006 Jeep Wrangler, so off-roading in the 4xe felt very familiar. It was an easy transition from a 20-plus-year-old Jeep to a brand-new one. Like my TJ, it had very minimal cargo space, even with four doors and limited visibility, but like the 4Runner, the Jeep had plenty of cameras to help you navigate steep inclines, reversing, and predicting where your tires were heading. However, Toyota's off-road cameras were incredibly frustrating since they'd automatically turn off if you drove over a certain speed. I feel like the cameras are especially useful if they stay on until the driver deactivates them. In the Jeep, the cameras will stay on when 4Lo is active, regardless of speed. In 4Hi, the cameras will turn off if the car goes over 8 mph. Aside from those discrepancies, both off-roaders left me smiling after a day out. The Jeep, naturally, is a little more off-road-centric Don't get me wrong, the 4Runner TRD Pro is plenty capable, but the Jeep puts up some stiff competition for the Toyota. At the base, both the Toyota and the Jeep have 9.7 inches of ground clearance. The TRD Pro trim comes in at 10.1 inches, and the Rubicon barely wins at 10.8 inches. But it's not just ground clearance. The Wrangler 4xe has better approach and departure angles, with 47.4 and 40.4 degrees. The Toyota's approach angle is 33 degrees, and the departure angle is 24 degrees. So, as you'd expect, the PHEV that comes from a long line of militaristic off-road SUVs is better suited for extreme off-roading. Source: Jeep That's not to say that the 4Runner isn't capable, though. The 4Runner has been around for decades and has had plenty of time to improve since its introduction in 1986. It can rock crawl and keep up with the Wrangler just fine, but maybe not stock. A lift, different rear and front bumpers would be needed to keep up, while the Wrangler Rubicon 4xe is designed to do it all from the factory. Additionally, you can remove the doors and the top on the Wrangler. You can't do that with the 4Runner, but you can still roll the very back window down, which is a great feature–especially for dog owners, or if you're camping. There is one feature, though, that would make me choose the 4Runner over the Jeep, and that's the integrated compressor. In the trunk is a little screen where you can choose to inflate or deflate all four tires (and the spare), and choose the PSI. All you have to do is hook up the air hose, which is under the cargo mat close to the tailgate, plug it into the tire's valve, and let'er rip. It really was that easy. My husband and I didn't even have to read the instructions. The Wrangler comes with an inflator and repair kit, but it's not integrated like the Toyotas. We were able to lower a tire down to 10 psi and then inflate it back to 35 psi in just a few minutes. Since it's integrated, you never have to worry about whether or not you remembered your portable compressor. It's always with you. Interior-wise, both have been beautified over the years, and both carry an obvious off-road look to them. The Jeep felt a little more technologically advanced while the Toyota felt more analog, with more buttons and knobs than screens. Both had their fair share of screens, but I preferred the open, familiar feel of the Toyota over the Jeep. As far as on-road comfort is considered, the Toyota is the winner There's a reason I don't drive my own Wrangler every day, and that's because it's not very comfortable. The lift, large tires, and soft top make it noisy, difficult to keep in a straight line, and not very fast. The Rubicon 4xe comes with a hard top, and it's much more stable, but it's still pretty noisy and uncomfortable as a daily. This would be the car I'd drive strictly to and from the trail, and of course, on the trail and while I'm camping. But I definitely wouldn't choose to drive the Rubicon 4xe daily over my Subaru Forester. Especially since the Subaru gets more mileage (and a better safety rating). Source: Kristen Brown The Toyota was incredibly easy to load my kids into, maybe marginally easier than the Jeep. Since it's more of a traditional SUV that can handle doing Jeep things, it was exceptionally more comfortable driving every day. The suspension was very truck-y, but it was much cozier for my toddlers and my husband than the Jeep. The interior was much quieter, the visibility was better, and my toddlers loved the sunroof and the large, tinted windows in the rear. It also had a larger trunk than the Wrangler, which makes it better suited to daily driving. As I mentioned before, the Toyota barely got better mileage than the Wrangler, but if you were to choose one to drive daily, the Toyota would be the obvious choice. Both are notably expensive, though 'Affordable' is not synonymous with either off-roader. However, compared to what you get for the price, it's not all that unreasonable. The Jeep Rubicon 4xe starts at $63,390 and can go up to $72,340 for the Rubicon X 4xe, which is the 'premium' version with leather and heated seats, a heated steering wheel, color-matched hard top, and 35-inch tires. The Toyota 4Runner TRD Pro, which is the most capable trim level, similar to the Rubicon, starts at $66,900. So, if you go for the more rustic version of the Jeep, it's cheaper than the Toyota by a few grand. This is when I hear people saying, 'But you get what you pay for,' and they'd be absolutely right. Final thoughts Both are incredibly capable, attractive, and proven off-roaders with a long list of achievements and reasons to be proud. I'm going to betray my own Jeeple here and say that for the money, I'd choose the Toyota. I'm a family woman now, and being able to carry my kids, my husband, their belongings, and have the ride be relatively comfortable while knowing exactly what it's capable of makes that price tag fairly reasonable. The Wrangler's PHEV powertrain is attractive due to its EV mode for daily tasks and a boost in low-end torque while off-road, but it's not comfortable enough to drive daily with toddlers. If I'm spending over $60,000 on a rig, I want to be able to drive it every day. Source: Kristen Brown If I didn't have toddlers, the Jeep would be the one I'd choose because comfort or a high safety rating doesn't matter as much to me if I were alone. If you were buying one of them to have as a second vehicle strictly for off-roading, the Jeep is also the obvious answer. But if you're looking for something that can do both daily driving and trails in Moab, Utah, the Toyota is the best choice. It all just depends on what you want out of either vehicle, as they're so similarly priced and have very similar features. But that integrated compressor is *chef's kiss*. About the Author Kristen Brown View Profile

Land Rover's new Defender Octa ‘Black' does exactly what it says on the tin
Land Rover's new Defender Octa ‘Black' does exactly what it says on the tin

Top Gear

timean hour ago

  • Top Gear

Land Rover's new Defender Octa ‘Black' does exactly what it says on the tin

Land Rover's new Defender Octa 'Black' does exactly what it says on the tin Aside from the menacing exterior paint, the interior gets fresh detailing and fancy new upholstery. We like Skip 12 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Turn on Javascript to see all the available pictures. 1 / 12 Fresh off the release of its new Range Rover Sport SV 'Black', Land Rover has now applied the same approach to its wide-arched Defender Octa. Yep, looks like a proper thug. That paint is called 'Narvik Black', and it's apparently the 'truest black in the Defender paint palette'. Customers can also add a protective matte film over it… because caution is precisely what this car is all about. Oh no, that's not right is it... Advertisement - Page continues below As many as 30 exterior elements have also been reskinned in either gloss or satin black for the erm Black, including the quad-exhaust tips, badging and even the underbody armour. Your choice of 20 or 22in alloys will get the same treatment, as do the brake calipers nestled in behind. It's a similar ethos inside, featuring darker detailing across the dashboard, centre console and almost every piece of trim and switchgear. Chopped carbon fibre can also be optioned into certain sections if you're the kind of person that thinks Mansory makes some tasteful SUVs. The final change involves the seats, which gain unique patterns and detailed stitching, and debut a new type of semi-aniline leather and Kvadrat fabric upholstery. Otherwise, it's a familiar 13.1in multimedia screen and a 15-speaker Meridian sound system. No technical upgrades are mentioned either, so the Octa Black retains the 626bhp/553lb ft twin-turbo mild-hybrid V8, good for 0-62mph in four seconds across just about any environment. Explains why Land Rover fancies its chances at the forthcoming Dakar Rally. Advertisement - Page continues below We've yet to hear about a release date or pricing for the Black, but do consider that a standard Octa costs at least £148k. Things do be getting expensive these days. Top Gear Newsletter Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. Success Your Email*

Little-known car brand reveals new motor ‘to rival iconic Land Rover model'… and it's coming to UK in months
Little-known car brand reveals new motor ‘to rival iconic Land Rover model'… and it's coming to UK in months

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Little-known car brand reveals new motor ‘to rival iconic Land Rover model'… and it's coming to UK in months

It comes as the brand looks to establish itself as a major player in the global car market MOTOR RIVAL Little-known car brand reveals new motor 'to rival iconic Land Rover model'… and it's coming to UK in months Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A LITTLE known car brand has revealed a new motor that will rival an iconic Land Rover model and it's coming to the UK in just months. The premium hybrid off-roader will be part of the manufacturers new line-up as it prepares to break into UK markets. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 Denza are going after the Land Rover Defender with their latest model Credit: Denza 4 It's a premium plug-hybrid 4x4 and will hit UK markets in a matter of months Credit: Denza In a direct challenge to the Land Rover Defender, Denza are bringing their new BYD Denza B5 to the UK. With competitive off-road stats and levels of power only seen in supercars, the B5 is a premium plug-in hybrid 4x4. It was launched in China last year as the Bao 5 and is one of three new models from BYD's SUV sub-brand Fangchengbao. But it's likely to be named Denza in the UK and positioned as a sibling to the Z9 GT which will also be hitting UK markets next year. Denza is a joint venture between BYD and Mercedes-Benz and was founded in 2010 but it's wholly owned by the Chinese company. The motor will make its debut at the Goodwood Festival of Speed next week ahead of the 4x4 hitting the market in early 2026. The company's president, Stella Li, told Autocar last year that she predicted the SUVs "will be very popular in the UK". She said: 'In the UK, the roads are narrow but we love these big SUV off-road cars, so Fangchengbao will be here." BYD has so far been absent in the large premium SUVs sector which is highly popular. No specification details have been released for the new B5, but is expected to largely resemble the car in China. It uses a "DMO Super Hybrid Off-Road" ladder-frame platform and its power comes from a plug-in hybrid system centre around a 1.5 litre turbo engine with an electric motor on each axle. It can reach 677bhp, more than any Defender, including the V8 Octa. It's considerable battery can supposedly reach a range of up to 78 miles but that's likely to be around 50 miles in practice. The B5 is part of BYD's effort to increase its hybrid car offering against a backdrop of wavering EV uptake in Europe. Eight new laws hitting drivers from July 1 including 'touch' rule where you can face jail over where you place hands The core BYD line-up is also set to see a new arrival next year with the Seal 06, a plug-in hybrid in the mould of the BMW 3 Series. The B5 announcement comes as The Sun reported in April that Denza was readying its stylish Denza Z9 GT. It will launch in Europe this year, with a UK launch expected for 2026. The luxury estate, which is looking to break into the same market occupied by the Porsche Panamera and Porsche Taycan, was designed by former Audi and Alfa Romeo designer Wolfgang Egger. The Sun also reported in March that BYD is readying a low-cost, pint-sized hatchback called the Dolphin Surf which is to be launched in the UK later this year. BYD is hoping to compete with the likes of Dacia and Fiat with the new release - which will be one of the cheapest available to buy from new. The upcoming release comes as BYD looks to establish itself as a major player in the global car market - with the lofty goal of becoming the world's largest car maker. The UK is seen as a key market for its success, with BYD's brand awareness increasing from 1% at the start of 2024 to 31% by the end of the year. 4 The motor will make its debut at the Goodwood Festival of Speed next week Credit: Denza

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store