
Uncomfortable Conversations: Borrowing money from family can be awkward. Here's advice.
Borrowing money from family is awkward enough. But borrowing money from your parents when you are in your 60s is humiliating, Sherrie Palm told me.
Palm of Mukwonago, Wisconsin founded the nonprofit Association for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Support in 2010. Palm said she funded the nonprofit and its efforts out of her own money – and didn't take a salary.
I am "poor as a church mouse," she said.
Welcome back to Uncomfortable Conversations About Money, a recurring series where we will tackle challenging topics or situations around money that make you uneasy. We'll outline the problem and try to get you some usable solutions.
Is it a good idea to borrow money from family?
The problem: In 2014, Palm needed $3,000 to go to Nepal, which was the only country in the world to have a government campaign about pelvic organ prolapse.
Find the loan that's right for you: Best personal loans
She got up the nerve to ask her parents, the late Phil and Joan Kastner, for the money. Her dad enthusiastically said yes, Palm said. Her mom, who had grown up with financial difficulties and was tighter with money, frowned. But the next day, Palm's mom took her to the bank to get the money.
Palm, now 71, and her parents never outlined when or how she would pay them back.
At the time of the loan, Palm's mom had the early stages of what the family later found out to be Alzheimer's. Her mom wrote a sticky note that said "Sher borrowed $3,000," put the date on it and stuck it to the side of her computer.
Family loan causes drama
No one thought anything of the loan until five years later when a family member found the note among layers of sticky notes on the desk while cleaning. The relative alerted the grandkids. That turned into "soap opera" drama as Palm describes it, among that generation, who'd been hoping to inherit the family farm, but were not in their grandparents' will.
Palm's dad was furious when he heard that the younger generation was creating a problem about the unpaid loan. Palm's two brothers, who understood she struggled financially, were not bothered by it. Her mom, whose Alzheimer's had progressed, didn't react to the family drama, Palm said.
After awhile, things calmed down.
Palm's dad died unexpectedly in 2020.
"It still makes me sick that I was not able to pay the loan back prior to dad dying, but dad was very proud of my work," Palm said.
Palm's mom died in 2022, which then led to Palm and her siblings spending the next 2½ years sorting through belongings and preparing the the farm for sale (The grandchildren who had wanted the farm, in Mauston, Wisconsin, didn't have the means to buy the it).
The farm sold for $300,000 and Palm took the $3,000 she owed out of her portion of the inheritance.
Borrower would have acted differently, in hindsight
Palm said had she known the drama that would have ensued from borrowing the money, she would not have asked. She would have taken that as a sign that she shouldn't go on that trip to Nepal.
In retrospect, Palm wishes she and her parents had come up with a clear payment plan or expectations of when she should pay the money back.
Palm said she thinks if she had on paper an agreement such as "I'll pay back $50 a month," that she would have probably gone out to get an extra job "to make that magic happen."
Having an agreement and something on paper would have made Palm feel responsibility for the loan, "kind of like when you get that charge card bill in the mail or the electric bill comes," she said.
Awkward:A friend or family member owes you money. How do you get it back?
Treat a family loan like it is a formal agreement
The advice: Family members who are borrowing or loaning money need to be as clear as possible, said Oliver Schnusenberg, a financial therapist specializing in neuroscience.
"Set clear terms and preferably in writing," said Schnusenberg, who is also a professor of finance with a specialty in behavioral finance at The University of North Florida. "What exactly is the loan? What is it for? What are the terms?"
"The more you actually treat it like a formal loan, the less awkward it becomes because now there's actual transparency around it," Schnusenberg said. Otherwise, things like a "found" sticky note in Palm's case "can be interpreted in multiple ways," he said.
Being clear about the loan and the repayment means "everyone can feel good about it and everyone knows exactly what it is," he said. "If you can name it, you can tame it."
He also advises that the family members lending the money charge interest. Maybe it's less interest than the family borrower might be charged at a financial institution, but Schnusenberg still advises that some fee be tacked on. That's because the lender is losing out on interest the cash could have earned if it was left in a bank account, he said.
If the money is not a loan, but a gift that is not expected to be paid back, then the family members need to consider whether that money could be considered a taxable gift, Schnusenberg said.
Despite some strings being attached, a loan between family members can still benefit the borrower, especially if the person does not have good credit, since a relative is not going to be running a credit or background check, Schnusenberg said.
Borrowing money from family can affect the relationship
But Schnusenberg said personally, he would avoid borrowing money from a family member because "you are in each other's business."
"You're mixing family with business, which may or may not be a good idea," he said. Then if you can't repay the loan, "that may result in strained relationships...and that can be whipped out in other conflict situations in the family like 'Oh, I knew it. You owed me money. It's just like you.'"
Still, Schnusenberg said there may be times when someone has no other choice than to ask family members for financial help.
"I actually know someone who has a fairly strained relationship with their parents, but had no other option and needed a co-signer because their credit rating was so low," he said. "It's created a situation that really no one wants."
How do you ask for a loan from a family member?
Timing and reading the room is important when asking a family member to borrow money, said Schnusenberg.
"Time it to make it a comfortable gathering where everyone is kind of at ease," he said.
Or hint at it without directly asking, to feel out how the family member may receive the idea, Schnusenberg said.
"If you say 'I'm having trouble right now paying for this, I might need to take out a loan,'" you can see how the family member responds, he said.
"If they say 'Well, good luck with that,' then I'm probably not going to ask," he said.
Should family members tell other family members about a loan?
Whether to tell other family members who are not involved in a loan depends on the situation, said Schnusenberg.
If the parents are of an advanced age and other family members need to know about the loan when it comes to settling the family estate, tell the other siblings, Schnusenberg said.
Parents who give a loan to one adult child may also want their other children to know so there is transparency and no appearance of favoritism, he said.
What should you do if the family member doesn't pay you back?
It can get very awkward when someone doesn't pay you back, causing resentment, said Schnusenberg.
"Are you going to take him to small claims court? Probably not," he said. "The only thing you have then is kind of the power to say 'I'm never going to lend you money again,' which probably you weren't going to do anyway."
The bottom line, Schnusenberg said, when a family member asks to borrow money is "How do I feel about that and can I really afford it?"
There's also a potential upside to family members borrowing money from a relative – and successfully paying it back, said Schnusenberg.
Not only did the borrower get quick access to funds, with potential lower interest, but "if the loan is repaid as agreed, then it could also cement trust and understanding. It could potentially actually fix relationships that may be on shaky grounds," he said.
We want to hear from you
Do you have an Uncomfortable Conversations about Money topic you'd like to suggest? Or would you be willing to be featured in a story about your Uncomfortable Conversation? Email blinfisher@USATODAY.com with "Uncomfortable Conversations" in the subject line.
Here are some upcoming topics. Do you have experience with this and if so, are you willing to be featured in a story? Or do you know someone who would be willing to share their wisdom on how they resolved this issue?
How should you split the bills and expenses when you move in with a significant other and your incomes are vastly different?
What should you do when your spouse or partner's ex asks for money?
Betty Lin-Fisher is a consumer reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at blinfisher@USATODAY.com or follow her on X, Bluesky, Facebook or Instagram @blinfisher. Sign up for our free The Daily Money newsletter, which will include consumer news on Fridays, here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16-05-2025
- Yahoo
Why 3D Systems Stock Was Sliding Hard This Week
The 3D printing specialist, a onetime investor favorite, posted lackluster quarterly results. This generated a downbeat research update from an analyst tracking the stock. 10 stocks we like better than 3D Systems › A disappointing earnings report was the main news item driving down 3D Systems (NYSE: DDD) over the past few trading days, a situation compounded by a significant price target reduction from an analyst. This eroded the company's share price, which had fallen by nearly 30% week to date as of early Friday morning, according to data compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence. In its first quarter, reported on Monday, 3D Systems saw its revenue decrease by 8% year over year to $95 million. Following a similar trajectory, the company's non-GAAP (adjusted) net loss widened to $0.21 per share from the year-ago shortfall of $0.17. The company also withdrew its full-year 2025 guidance. Finally, both headline metrics missed their respective consensus analyst estimates. In its earnings report, 3D Systems wrote that it aims to reduce costs by $50 million to help improve the bottom line. These cost-cuts should be enacted by the middle of next year, but the sharp sell-off following the publication of the results indicates that investors might not feel this effort will be successful. One person who didn't have an enthusiastic reaction to 3D Systems' latest news was Craig-Hallum analyst Greg Palm. On Wednesday the pundit cut his price target on the stock by 20%, reducing it to $2 per share from the previous $2.50. Although he maintained his neutral recommendation on 3D Systems stock, according to reports Palm expressed surprised at the company's significant misses in the quarter. He added that management has to convince investors that it can turn the current situation around, however it needs to execute more effectively. I share this view, only I'm more bearish on the company. To me, it's the story of a still-promising technology that isn't being well promoted or developed by the 3D Systems team. Like Palm, I think it has much to prove in the proximate future. Before you buy stock in 3D Systems, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and 3D Systems wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $635,275!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $826,385!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 967% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 12, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends 3D Systems. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why 3D Systems Stock Was Sliding Hard This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool


Forbes
01-05-2025
- Forbes
The 2025 Stanford AI Index: 5 Takeaways That Are Important For Your Business
Last month the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI - an interdisciplinary institute established in 2019 to advance AI research, education, policy, and practice - published its 2025 AI Index Report, which aims to "develop a more thorough and nuanced understanding of the complex field of AI." The report had a number of important takeaways that impact all of us running businesses. Here are the five biggest takeaways. The report says: In 2022, the smallest model registering a score higher than 60% on the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark was PaLM, with 540 billion parameters. By 2024, Microsoft's Phi-3-mini, with just 3.8 billion parameters, achieved the same threshold. This represents a 142-fold reduction in over two years. Depending on the task, LLM inference prices have fallen anywhere from 9 to 900 times per year since 2022. As I wrote previously here, it's becoming more affordable for businesses of all sizes to build their own AI solutions using company data from many different sources. The biggest obstacle remains the price of a developer or IT person sufficiently versed in these tools to do the work. The report says: The number of Al-related incidents rose to 233 in 2024 reached a record high and registered a 56.4% increase over 2023. Among the incidents reported were deepfake intimate images and chatbots allegedly implicated in a teenager's suicide. While this isn't comprehensive, it does show a staggering increase in issues. AI is being used for bad stuff. As business owners we have to let others worry about those terrifying Terminator-Type risks that could destroy human civilization and instead focus on getting training and tools to combat the growing use of AI to fool our employees into downloading malware, opening up our systems for data breaches or inadvertently transferring money out of our accounts. The report says: Al agents show early promise. In short time-horizon settings (two hours), top Al systems score four times higher than human experts, but when given more time to do a task, humans perform better than Al-outscoring it 2-to-1 at 32 hours. Still, Al agents already match human expertise in select tasks, such as writing specific types of code, while delivering results faster. AI agents are rolling out this year but few are worth using in your business due to their immaturity. That's for now. In the meantime we should still be testing them and getting familiar with their capabilities. Within the next few years agents will be commonplace, performing a great deal of work that our employees are currently doing. Some business owners will (rightly) see this as an opportunity to reduce staff. But smarter leaders understand that their job is to prepare their best people to leverage these tools to be even more productive. The U.S. widened its commanding lead in global Al investment. U.S. private Al investment hit $109 billion in 2024, nearly 12 times higher than China's $9.3 billion and 24 times the UK's $4.5 billion. Businesses are turning to Al. In 2024, the proportion of survey respondents reporting Al use by their organizations jumped to 78% from 55% in 2023. Similarly, the number of respondents who reported using generative Al in at least one business function more than doubled-from 33% in 2023 to 71% last year. AI is real. Right now it's a big corporation game with larger brands sinking hundreds of millions of dollars in agentic and generative AI systems that do everything from writing software code to autonomously handling customer service requests. Ultimately these things will pass down to small and mid-sized companies who opt to wait for their core software vendors to introduce AI features into their business processes. U.S. states are leading the way on Al legislation amid slow progress at the federal level. In 2016, only one state-level Al-related law was passed, increasing to 49 by 2023. In the past year alone, that number more than doubled to 131. While proposed Al bills at the federal level have also increased, the number passed remains low. I'm not expecting significant regulations coming at the federal level in the short term. Most will be at the state level and focused on two things: misusing AI in the hiring process (it can be biased) or duping customers with questionable AI bots. Of course, many of these regulations will be decided on by regulators who may be challenged turning on their own TV sets, let alone understanding the implications of AI. But regardless, it will be important to monitor these rules in your state to make sure you're complaint. The above five trends are important for business owners and managers to keep in mind as they're considering AI and other technology investments. And yet as interesting as they are now, won't it be fascinating to see what their 2030 report has to say?
Yahoo
19-04-2025
- Yahoo
Meta Says It's Okay to Feed Copyrighted Books Into Its AI Model Because They Have No "Economic Value"
Meta has been accused of illegally using copyrighted material to train its AI models — and the tech giant's defense is pretty thin. In the ongoing suit Richard Kadrey et al v. Meta Platforms, led by a group of authors including Pulitzer Prize winner Andrew Sean Greer and National Book Award winner Ta-Nehisi Coates, the Mark Zuckerberg-led company has argued that its alleged scraping over seven million books from the pirated library LibGen constituted "fair use" of the material, and was therefore not illegal. The specious defenses don't end there. As Vanity Fair spotlights in a new writeup, Meta's attorneys are also arguing that the countless books that the company used to train its multibillion-dollar language models and springboard itself into the headspinningly buzzy AI race are actually worthless. Meta cited an expert witness who downplayed the books' individual importance, averring that a single book adjusted its LLM's performance "by less than 0.06 percent on industry standard benchmarks, a meaningless change no different from noise." Thus there's no market in paying authors to use their copyrighted works, Meta says, because "for there to be a market, there must be something of value to exchange," as quoted by Vanity Fair — "but none of [the authors'] works has economic value, individually, as training data." Other communications showed that Meta employees stripped the copyright pages from the downloaded books. This is emblematic of the chicaneries and two-faced logic that Meta, and the AI industry at large, deploys when it's pressed about all the human-created content it devours. Somehow, that stuff is simultaneously not that valuable, and we should all stop pearl-clutching about the sanctity of art, and anyway an AI writes creative prose just as well as a human now — but is also absolutely essential to building our new synthetic gods that will solve climate change, so please don't make us pay for using any of it. That last bit is literally what OpenAI argued to the British Parliament last year — that there isn't enough stuff in the public domain to beef up its AI models, so it must be allowed to plumb the bounties of contemporary copyrighted works without paying a penny. Seemingly, this is an unspoken understanding at the top AI companies. When one Meta researcher inquired if the company's legal team had okayed using LibGen, another responded: "I didn't ask questions but this is what OpenAI does with GPT3, what Google does with PALM, and what Deepmind does with Chinchilla so we will do it to[o]," per Vanity Fair, from internal messages cited in the suit. Tellingly, the unofficial policy seems to be to not speak about it at all. "In no case would we disclose publicly that we had trained on LibGen, however there is practical risk external parties could deduce our use of this dataset," an internal Meta slide deck read. The deck noted that "if there is media coverage suggesting we have used a dataset we know to be pirated, such as LibGen, this may undermine our negotiating position with regulators on these issues." More on AI copyright: OpenAI Says It's "Over" If It Can't Steal All Your Copyrighted Work