logo
Asian shares rally while US dollar weakens

Asian shares rally while US dollar weakens

West Australian4 hours ago

Asian shares have hit their highest level in more than three years as they tracked a Wall Street rally, though the dollar struggled on concerns about the Federal Reserve's independence and expectations for early rate cuts.
Stock indexes worldwide look set to end the week on a positive note, with worries about tensions in the Middle East and uncertainty over tariffs and trade deals on the backburner for now.
MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan touched its strongest level since November 2021 early in the session. It last traded 0.2 per cent higher and is set to clock a 3 per cent gain for the week.
Japan's Nikkei jumped 1.5 per cent and surpassed the 40,000 mark for the first time in five months.
Reasons for the upbeat mood included news that Washington has reached an agreement with Beijing on how to expedite rare earth shipments to the United States.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also said on Thursday that he has asked Republicans in Congress to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from their tax and spending bill after Washington reached an agreement with Group of Seven industrial countries.
"That was something that had been making some investors, especially foreign investors, nervous when that provision was passed by the House. So if that provision gets removed, then that allays one of the concerns from foreign investors," said Khoon Goh, head of Asia research at ANZ.
"The accumulation of these various... positive developments all helped to contribute to the buoyant market mood we're seeing."
European futures also gained, with EUROSTOXX 50 futures and DAX futures both up 0.6per cent, while FTSE futures advanced 0.16per cent.
US stock futures were little changed, though Wall Street had on Thursday closed near record highs, further supported by expectations of imminent Fed rate cuts.
Much of the focus for markets over the past two sessions has been on the prospect of an early change of guard at the Fed, after the Wall Street Journal reported that US President Donald Trump has toyed with the idea of selecting and announcing Fed Chair Jerome Powell's replacement by September or October.
That knocked an already battered dollar even lower as traders fretted about an erosion of Fed independence and as they moved to price in more US rate cuts this year.
The dollar languished near a 3-1/2-year low on Friday and was headed for a 1.4 per cent weekly loss, its largest decline in over a month.
For the year, the greenback is already down more than 10 per cent and if it stays that way in the next few days, that will mark its biggest first half-year fall since the start of the era of free-floating currencies in the early 1970s.
Against a weaker dollar, the euro was perched near its highest in over three years at $1.1688. Sterling rose 0.03per cent to $1.3730.
"Trump's desire to 'shadow' the Fed using a designated replacement for Chair Jay Powell isn't a good way to promote the perceptions of integrity and autonomy in US policymaking and, by extension, that of the reserve currency status of the US dollar," said Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group.
Adding to the Fed cut bets has been a raft of weaker-than-expected US economic data, with attention now shifting to Friday's release of the core PCE price index, the US central bank's preferred measure of inflation.
US Treasury yields were steady in Asia after falling the previous session, with the two-year yield at 3.7418per cent and the benchmark 10-year yield last at 4.2554 per cent.
In commodities, oil prices were set for a weekly decline with the Iran-Israel ceasefire holding and easing concerns over Middle East supply risks.
Brent crude futures were up 0.41per cent at $68.01 a barrel while US crude rose 0.46per cent to $65.53 per barrel on Friday, but both were headed for a fall of more than 10per cent for the week.
Spot gold fell 0.23per cent to $3,320.25 an ounce.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US states redefine gas as green energy
US states redefine gas as green energy

West Australian

time3 hours ago

  • West Australian

US states redefine gas as green energy

Louisiana is the latest US state to redefine natural gas as green energy under a new law - even though it's a fossil fuel that emits planet-warming greenhouse gases. Three other states led by Republicans— Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee— have passed similar legislation. In some Democratic-led states, there have been efforts to phase out natural gas. Cities in New York and California have moved to ban natural gas hook-ups in new buildings, though some of these policies have been successfully challenged in court. President Donald Trump has signed a spate of executive orders promoting oil, gas and coal, which all warm the planet when burned to produce electricity. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, a major booster of the state's petrochemical industry, says the new law "sets the tone for the future" and will help the state "pursue energy independence and dominance." Environmental groups say these new laws are part of a broader push by petrochemical industry-backed groups to rebrand fossil fuel as climate friendly and head off efforts to shift electric grids to renewables, such as solar and wind. It's "pure Orwellian greenwashing," said Tim Donaghy, research director of Greenpeace USA. Globally, the term green energy is used to refer to energy derived from natural sources that do not pollute — solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal energy. Louisiana's law could enable funds slated for state clean energy initiatives to be used to support natural gas. Natural gas has been the top source of electricity generation in the United States for about a decade, since surpassing coal. Apart from coal, everything else is better than gas for the planet, said Rob Jackson, a Stanford University climate scientist. Building new gas plants locks in fossil fuel emissions for decades, he added. The law's author, Republican Jacob Landry, runs an oil and gas industry consulting firm. "I don't think it's anything crippling to wind or solar, but you got to realise the wind don't blow all the time and the sun don't shine every day," Landry said. The legislation "is saying we need to prioritise what keeps the grid energised," he added. According to Dave Anderson, policy and communications manager for the Energy and Policy Institute, these laws are part of a long-running disinformation campaign by the gas industry to cast their product as clean to protect their businesses and prevent a shift to renewable energy sources that will address the climate crisis. "The goal is to elbow out competition from renewables from wind and solar, and in some cases preempt localities' ability to choose to pursue 100 per cent truly clean energy," Anderson said. The European Union has previously designated natural gas and nuclear as sustainable, a move that Greenpeace and the Austrian government are suing over.

US states redefine gas as green energy
US states redefine gas as green energy

Perth Now

time3 hours ago

  • Perth Now

US states redefine gas as green energy

Louisiana is the latest US state to redefine natural gas as green energy under a new law - even though it's a fossil fuel that emits planet-warming greenhouse gases. Three other states led by Republicans— Indiana, Ohio and Tennessee— have passed similar legislation. In some Democratic-led states, there have been efforts to phase out natural gas. Cities in New York and California have moved to ban natural gas hook-ups in new buildings, though some of these policies have been successfully challenged in court. President Donald Trump has signed a spate of executive orders promoting oil, gas and coal, which all warm the planet when burned to produce electricity. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, a major booster of the state's petrochemical industry, says the new law "sets the tone for the future" and will help the state "pursue energy independence and dominance." Environmental groups say these new laws are part of a broader push by petrochemical industry-backed groups to rebrand fossil fuel as climate friendly and head off efforts to shift electric grids to renewables, such as solar and wind. It's "pure Orwellian greenwashing," said Tim Donaghy, research director of Greenpeace USA. Globally, the term green energy is used to refer to energy derived from natural sources that do not pollute — solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal energy. Louisiana's law could enable funds slated for state clean energy initiatives to be used to support natural gas. Natural gas has been the top source of electricity generation in the United States for about a decade, since surpassing coal. Apart from coal, everything else is better than gas for the planet, said Rob Jackson, a Stanford University climate scientist. Building new gas plants locks in fossil fuel emissions for decades, he added. The law's author, Republican Jacob Landry, runs an oil and gas industry consulting firm. "I don't think it's anything crippling to wind or solar, but you got to realise the wind don't blow all the time and the sun don't shine every day," Landry said. The legislation "is saying we need to prioritise what keeps the grid energised," he added. According to Dave Anderson, policy and communications manager for the Energy and Policy Institute, these laws are part of a long-running disinformation campaign by the gas industry to cast their product as clean to protect their businesses and prevent a shift to renewable energy sources that will address the climate crisis. "The goal is to elbow out competition from renewables from wind and solar, and in some cases preempt localities' ability to choose to pursue 100 per cent truly clean energy," Anderson said. The European Union has previously designated natural gas and nuclear as sustainable, a move that Greenpeace and the Austrian government are suing over.

Blows to balancing Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill'
Blows to balancing Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill'

The Advertiser

time3 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Blows to balancing Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill'

Congressional Republicans have removed the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump's big bill after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging "unfair foreign taxes" on US companies. The measure was expected to lead many companies to avoid investing in the US out of concern that they could face steep taxes. But the removal of the provision adds a wrinkle to Republicans' plans to try to offset the cost of the massive said in an X post that he made the request to lawmakers after reaching an agreement with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal. He said that after "months of productive dialogue," they would "announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests." Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, "Congressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation." The removal of the provision will provide "greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond," Bessent said in his post. An analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimated that the provision would have cost the US 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. Republicans are rushing to finish the package this week to meet the president's Fourth of July deadline for passage. Earlier ,the Senate parliamentarian advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to the spending bill does not adhere to the chamber's procedural rules. Guidance from the non-partisan Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is rarely ignored. Republicans were counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks, their top priority. Additionally, the parliamentarian advised against various GOP provisions barring certain immigrants from health care programs. Republicans scrambled Thursday to respond, with some calling for challenging, or ever firing, the parliamentarian, who has been on the job since 2012, though GOP leaders dismissed those views. Instead, they worked to revise the various proposals. "We have contingency plans," said Majority Leader John Thune. Friday's expected votes appeared to be slipping, but Thune insisted that "we're ploughing forward." Democrats, who are unified against the package as a tax giveaway for the wealthy at the expense of American safety net programs, said the procedural decisions would devastate the GOP package. Trump hosted House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP lawmakers at the White House joined by truck drivers, firefighters, tipped workers, ranchers and others that the administration says will benefit from the bill. "We don't want to have grandstanders," Trump said of the GOP holdouts. At its core, the big bill, which has passed the House and is now being revised in the Senate, includes $3.8 trillion in tax breaks that had been approved during Trump's first term, but will expire in December imposing a tax hike if Congress fails to act. Senior Republicans said they would try to revise the provision to make it acceptable, perhaps by extending the start date of any changes. Congressional Republicans have removed the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump's big bill after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging "unfair foreign taxes" on US companies. The measure was expected to lead many companies to avoid investing in the US out of concern that they could face steep taxes. But the removal of the provision adds a wrinkle to Republicans' plans to try to offset the cost of the massive said in an X post that he made the request to lawmakers after reaching an agreement with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal. He said that after "months of productive dialogue," they would "announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests." Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, "Congressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation." The removal of the provision will provide "greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond," Bessent said in his post. An analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimated that the provision would have cost the US 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. Republicans are rushing to finish the package this week to meet the president's Fourth of July deadline for passage. Earlier ,the Senate parliamentarian advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to the spending bill does not adhere to the chamber's procedural rules. Guidance from the non-partisan Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is rarely ignored. Republicans were counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks, their top priority. Additionally, the parliamentarian advised against various GOP provisions barring certain immigrants from health care programs. Republicans scrambled Thursday to respond, with some calling for challenging, or ever firing, the parliamentarian, who has been on the job since 2012, though GOP leaders dismissed those views. Instead, they worked to revise the various proposals. "We have contingency plans," said Majority Leader John Thune. Friday's expected votes appeared to be slipping, but Thune insisted that "we're ploughing forward." Democrats, who are unified against the package as a tax giveaway for the wealthy at the expense of American safety net programs, said the procedural decisions would devastate the GOP package. Trump hosted House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP lawmakers at the White House joined by truck drivers, firefighters, tipped workers, ranchers and others that the administration says will benefit from the bill. "We don't want to have grandstanders," Trump said of the GOP holdouts. At its core, the big bill, which has passed the House and is now being revised in the Senate, includes $3.8 trillion in tax breaks that had been approved during Trump's first term, but will expire in December imposing a tax hike if Congress fails to act. Senior Republicans said they would try to revise the provision to make it acceptable, perhaps by extending the start date of any changes. Congressional Republicans have removed the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump's big bill after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging "unfair foreign taxes" on US companies. The measure was expected to lead many companies to avoid investing in the US out of concern that they could face steep taxes. But the removal of the provision adds a wrinkle to Republicans' plans to try to offset the cost of the massive said in an X post that he made the request to lawmakers after reaching an agreement with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal. He said that after "months of productive dialogue," they would "announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests." Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, "Congressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation." The removal of the provision will provide "greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond," Bessent said in his post. An analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimated that the provision would have cost the US 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. Republicans are rushing to finish the package this week to meet the president's Fourth of July deadline for passage. Earlier ,the Senate parliamentarian advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to the spending bill does not adhere to the chamber's procedural rules. Guidance from the non-partisan Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is rarely ignored. Republicans were counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks, their top priority. Additionally, the parliamentarian advised against various GOP provisions barring certain immigrants from health care programs. Republicans scrambled Thursday to respond, with some calling for challenging, or ever firing, the parliamentarian, who has been on the job since 2012, though GOP leaders dismissed those views. Instead, they worked to revise the various proposals. "We have contingency plans," said Majority Leader John Thune. Friday's expected votes appeared to be slipping, but Thune insisted that "we're ploughing forward." Democrats, who are unified against the package as a tax giveaway for the wealthy at the expense of American safety net programs, said the procedural decisions would devastate the GOP package. Trump hosted House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP lawmakers at the White House joined by truck drivers, firefighters, tipped workers, ranchers and others that the administration says will benefit from the bill. "We don't want to have grandstanders," Trump said of the GOP holdouts. At its core, the big bill, which has passed the House and is now being revised in the Senate, includes $3.8 trillion in tax breaks that had been approved during Trump's first term, but will expire in December imposing a tax hike if Congress fails to act. Senior Republicans said they would try to revise the provision to make it acceptable, perhaps by extending the start date of any changes. Congressional Republicans have removed the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump's big bill after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging "unfair foreign taxes" on US companies. The measure was expected to lead many companies to avoid investing in the US out of concern that they could face steep taxes. But the removal of the provision adds a wrinkle to Republicans' plans to try to offset the cost of the massive said in an X post that he made the request to lawmakers after reaching an agreement with other countries on the OECD Global Tax Deal. He said that after "months of productive dialogue," they would "announce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests." Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, "Congressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation." The removal of the provision will provide "greater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond," Bessent said in his post. An analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestlé, estimated that the provision would have cost the US 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product. Republicans are rushing to finish the package this week to meet the president's Fourth of July deadline for passage. Earlier ,the Senate parliamentarian advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to the spending bill does not adhere to the chamber's procedural rules. Guidance from the non-partisan Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough is rarely ignored. Republicans were counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks, their top priority. Additionally, the parliamentarian advised against various GOP provisions barring certain immigrants from health care programs. Republicans scrambled Thursday to respond, with some calling for challenging, or ever firing, the parliamentarian, who has been on the job since 2012, though GOP leaders dismissed those views. Instead, they worked to revise the various proposals. "We have contingency plans," said Majority Leader John Thune. Friday's expected votes appeared to be slipping, but Thune insisted that "we're ploughing forward." Democrats, who are unified against the package as a tax giveaway for the wealthy at the expense of American safety net programs, said the procedural decisions would devastate the GOP package. Trump hosted House Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP lawmakers at the White House joined by truck drivers, firefighters, tipped workers, ranchers and others that the administration says will benefit from the bill. "We don't want to have grandstanders," Trump said of the GOP holdouts. At its core, the big bill, which has passed the House and is now being revised in the Senate, includes $3.8 trillion in tax breaks that had been approved during Trump's first term, but will expire in December imposing a tax hike if Congress fails to act. Senior Republicans said they would try to revise the provision to make it acceptable, perhaps by extending the start date of any changes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store