logo
Man fails final appeal against 35-year sentence for 2012 murder of cleaner

Man fails final appeal against 35-year sentence for 2012 murder of cleaner

The Star08-07-2025
PUTRAJAYA: A 42-year-old man today failed in his final appeal to overturn his conviction and sentence of 35 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for the 2012 murder of an Indonesian domestic cleaner, whom he had accused of speaking ill of him.
A three-member panel of the Federal Court comprising Justices Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang and Datuk Hanipah Farikullah on Tuesday (July 8), unanimously dismissed the appeal by Khairul Azizi Abdul Jalil, upholding the decisions of both the High Court and Court of Appeal.
Delivering the judgment, Justice Nallini held that the prosecution was lawfully entitled to adduce psychiatric evidence in the course of establishing a prima facie case, and not solely in rebuttal, where such evidence was necessary and relevant to establishing the elements of the offence.
She further ruled that no miscarriage of justice had occurred, particularly as the prosecution had called Dr Ian Lloyd Anthony, a Special Forensic Psychiatrist, whose evidence was properly admitted. She added that the appellant had failed to establish the defence of insanity on a balance of probabilities.
Upon a comprehensive assessment of the evidence, the Court found the conviction to be safe and held that the appellant had been afforded full opportunity to present his defence without any procedural unfairness.
Khairul Azizi, who was managing his father's homestay before his arrest, was convicted and sentenced to death by the Ipoh High Court in December 2022 for the murder of Aidah Tursinawati, 43, at a house in Kampung Tersusun Tasek, Ipoh, Perak, at approximately 3.25 pm on Oct 9, 2017.
High Court Judge Su Tiang Joo held that Khairul Azizi had failed to discharge the burden of proving, on a balance of probabilities, that he was of unsound mind and incapable of understanding the nature of his act at the material time.
In June last year, the Court of Appeal upheld the conviction but allowed the appeal against the sentence, commuting the death penalty to 35 years' imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane. Subsequently, Khairul Azizi appealed to the Federal Court seeking an acquittal.
A central issue in the appeal concerned the admissibility of psychiatric evidence adduced by the prosecution during its case-in-chief. The prosecution had called Dr Ian to testify as to the appellant's mental condition before the defence formally raised insanity.
Khairul Azizi had raised the defence of insanity at an early stage of the investigation and was referred to Hospital Bahagia Ulu Kinta for psychiatric evaluation under a Magistrate's order.
A 2018 medical report by a senior consultant forensic psychiatrist concluded that he was suffering from schizophrenia and was of unsound mind at the time of the offence.
However, pursuant to a subsequent evaluation ordered by the High Court, the prosecution tendered a certificate dated Feb 19, 2019, issued by the Medical Director of Hospital Bahagia, which was accompanied by a report from Dr Ian, who concluded that Khairul Azizi was of sound mind and fit to plead.
Confronted with two conflicting psychiatric assessments regarding the appellant's mental state at the material time, the trial judge accepted Dr Ian's expert opinion and rejected the defence of insanity.
Defence counsel Mohd Fitri Asmuni contended that it was procedurally irregular for the prosecution to adduce psychiatric evidence during its case-in-chief, arguing that the burden of establishing insanity rests with the defence and that rebuttal evidence should only be led after the defence closes its case.
The prosecution, however, countered that there is no legal bar preventing the prosecution from calling a psychiatrist during its case-in-chief where the mental condition of the accused is directly relevant to the elements of the charge.
At Tuesday's hearing, the prosecution was represented by deputy public prosecutors Muhamad Iskandar Ahmad, Tengku Shahrizam Tuan Lah, Ng Siew Wee and Mohd Arif Aizuddin Masrom. – Bernama
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four jailed for aiding RM24.2m fixed deposit fraud gang
Four jailed for aiding RM24.2m fixed deposit fraud gang

Daily Express

time35 minutes ago

  • Daily Express

Four jailed for aiding RM24.2m fixed deposit fraud gang

Published on: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 Published on: Tue, Aug 12, 2025 By: Jo Ann Mool Text Size: Some of the accused being escorted to the court complex- Daily Express Malaysia file pix KOTA KINABALU: Four individuals were each sentenced to three and a half years' imprisonment by the High Court here on Tuesday for assisting an organised criminal group involved in a RM24.2 million fixed deposit fraud. Josepin J. Langkan, 39, Vireonis Jonok, 36, Leong Hin Ping, 64, and Nasir Abdul Rasid, 62, pleaded guilty separately before Judge Datuk Duncan Sikodol. Advertisement The offences were committed at the MBSB branch here between April and July last year. They were convicted under Section 130W of the Penal Code, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment. * Read full report in tomorrow's print paper or log in or sign up for e-paper and premium online news access. * Follow us on Instagram and join our Telegram and/or WhatsApp channel(s) for the latest news you don't want to miss. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

Man on trial for stalking woman blasted by judge for asking scandalous questions in Singapore court
Man on trial for stalking woman blasted by judge for asking scandalous questions in Singapore court

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Man on trial for stalking woman blasted by judge for asking scandalous questions in Singapore court

SINGAPORE: A man who stalked a former co-worker for five years continued harassing her even during his trial, where he represented himself and asked her irrelevant questions over seven days of cross-examination. Lucas Seng Yong Yi, 39, also subjected other prosecution witnesses to similar antics by asking them scandalous questions during the trial, which spanned over 70 days from April 2021 to September 2024. Seng was sentenced to 18 months' jail by a district judge in late 2024 after he was convicted of three charges of stalking under the Protection from Harassment Act. Justice Vincent Hoong blasted Seng's behaviour in court in a written decision on Aug 8 after dismissing the offender's appeal against conviction and sentence on July 30. The High Court judge said Seng's conduct at the trial was 'outrageous'. Justice Hoong agreed with the lower court that Seng's deplorable conduct during the trial was an aggravating factor in the sentencing. He said Seng had engaged in victim-blaming, such as contending that the victim had brought some of the acts of harassment on herself because she uploaded her resume onto LinkedIn. Seng also posed scandalous and irrelevant questions at length to the prosecution's witnesses. For instance, he alleged that a male witness was homosexual and was lying in court about being the woman's boyfriend. Seng asked the man if he knew the victim's 'cup size' and if he liked 'sexy men'. He also asked the victim's cousin whether he could kiss her. Seng also made baseless allegations that the prosecution, the police, and various witnesses were fabricating evidence and conspiring against him. 'His conduct at the trial wasted judicial time and resources, caused annoyance to witnesses (including the victim), and undermined the sanctity of the proceedings. It also evidenced a clear lack of remorse,' said Justice Hoong. While self-represented individuals are given some latitude in presenting their cases, that did not give Seng the right to harass the witnesses with repetitive or irrelevant questions, he said. The judge noted that Seng was told repeatedly by the trial judge that certain lines of questioning were irrelevant to the issues to be determined. Justice Hoong added: 'By frequently raising scandalous allegations without any reasonable grounds, the appellant only harmed his own case by demonstrating that he did not have a cogent defence that cast doubt on the prosecution's evidence and had to resort to accusing the prosecution's witnesses of unfounded conspiracies against him.' He noted that trial judges should not intervene excessively in the questioning of witnesses to avoid giving the impression that they are predisposed towards a particular outcome. However, if the court steps in when the questions are not relevant, intended to insult or annoy, or needlessly repetitive, this would not amount to improper judicial interference or 'descending into the arena', he said. Between 2015 and 2020, Seng repeatedly sent the woman text messages, ordered sample products to be delivered to her home, and mailed her his court papers to pressure her into dropping criminal charges against him. In his defence, Seng argued that he believed he was the woman's boyfriend. He said he formed this impression because of certain text messages she had sent him. Justice Hoong said Seng could not have reasonably believed that he was in a romantic relationship with the victim, as the woman had sent him multiple text messages in which she clearly stated that she was not romantically interested in him. Even if Seng thought that he was the victim's boyfriend, his text messages to her would not be reasonable, given her unequivocal demands for him to stop messaging her, said the judge. Seng also claimed that the woman had set a trap to frame him on in April 2017, by stalking him at his void deck, and that the police reports she filed against him were a 'test of love'. The victim said she saw him on the bus and decided to confront him. Her boyfriend, who later joined them at the void deck, corroborated this. But Seng claimed that the man was not a credible witness because if he was attracted to men, he could not have been the victim's boyfriend, and therefore must have been instigated by the woman to lie in court. - The Straits Times/ANN

Witness denies police beat suspects, forced confessions in Palestinian kidnapping case
Witness denies police beat suspects, forced confessions in Palestinian kidnapping case

Sinar Daily

timean hour ago

  • Sinar Daily

Witness denies police beat suspects, forced confessions in Palestinian kidnapping case

All eight accused are jointly accused of abducting a 31-year-old victim at the same time and place to obtain confidential information on creating and disabling software used to hack mobile phones. 12 Aug 2025 06:06pm A police officer denied in the High Court today that two suspects in a Palestinian man's kidnapping case were severely beaten by police, resulting in serious injuries such as a torn tongue during their arrest at a chalet in Hulu Langat three years ago. KUALA LUMPUR - A police officer denied in the High Court here today that two suspects in a Palestinian man's kidnapping case were severely beaten by police, resulting in serious injuries such as a torn tongue during their arrest at a chalet in Hulu Langat three years ago. ASP Mohamad Jazlan Sharif, 42, currently attached to the Intelligence and Operations Division of the Dang Wangi police headquarters Criminal Investigation Department, testified under cross-examination by defence lawyer Norma Goh Kim Lian. The eight accused in the case are Tengku Arif Bongsu Tengku Hamid, 44; Mohamad Naziree Mustapha, 44; Faizull Hardey Mohd Isa, 45; Muhammad Iqmal Abdul Rahis, 30; Mohd Zaidi Mohd Zain, 59; Nidarahayu Zainal, 39; Raibafie Amdan, 44; and Edy Ko'im Said, 45. Goh: I state to you that during the time in room 110, the fifth and sixth accused, Mohamad Naziree and Faizull Hardey, were severely beaten by your team, sustaining serious injuries, including a torn tongue and bodily injuries. They were beaten and forced to confess involvement in the kidnapping, which they denied. Do you agree? Mohamad Jazlan: I do not agree. Goh: Do you agree that when the fourth (Tengku Arif Bongsu), fifth (Mohamad Naziree), and sixth (Faizull Hardey) accused were arrested in room 110, they did not attempt to flee? Mohamad Jazlan: Yes, that is correct. Mohamad Jazlan, the lead officer in the raid, testified that the arrests were made for investigative purposes. "Further investigation involves a police report filed by a Palestinian man, and to my knowledge, there was no physical assault involved,' the witness told deputy public prosecutor Mohd Sabri Othman. The trial before Judge K. Muniandy will resume on Oct 15. All eight accused are jointly accused of abducting a 31-year-old victim at the same time and place to obtain confidential information on creating and disabling software used to hack mobile phones. They were charged under Section 3 of the Kidnapping Act 1961, read with Section 34 of the Penal Code, which carries between 30 and 40 years' imprisonment and caning upon conviction. Meanwhile, Tengku Arif Bongsu, along with married couple Nidarahayu and Raibafie, face an additional 19 charges involving over RM250,000 under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001. - BERNAMA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store