logo
Ex-chemistry prof who used science to defend herself after husband's murder gets life term: Who is Mamta Pathak?

Ex-chemistry prof who used science to defend herself after husband's murder gets life term: Who is Mamta Pathak?

First Post6 days ago
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has upheld the conviction of Mamta Pathak, 65, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for killing her husband, Dr Neeraj Pathak. The former chemistry professor's video went viral in May, in which she was seen presenting her own arguments before the court and questioning her husband's post-mortem report. But why did she murder him? read more
A former chemistry professor's life sentence for killing her husband has been upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Mamta Pathak, a 65-year-old woman, was convicted in 2022 for the murder of her husband by electrocution.
The division bench of Justices Vivek Agarwal and Devnarayan Mishra dismissed her appeal, ruling that she killed her husband, Neeraj Pathak, a retired government doctor. The case had grabbed attention after a video of Mamta Pathak arguing for herself in the courtroom went viral online.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Let's take a closer look.
What's the case?
On April 29, 2021, Dr Neeraj Pathak was found dead at his Loknathpuram house in Madhya Pradesh's Chhatarpur. The autopsy found that the cause of his demise was electrocution.
Police grew suspicious about Mamta due to her behaviour on the day of Dr Neeraj's death. She had left with her son in the morning for Jhansi for dialysis, without informing anyone about her husband's demise. The woman also told her driver that she had made a 'big mistake', Indian Express reported, citing court documents.
Mamta, a professor at a local government college, was arrested within days for murder and booked under Section 302 (punishment for murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The trial was held at the Chhatarpur district court. Dr Neeraj's relative told the court that the doctor had called him hours before his death, saying: 'Mamta is harassing me… she has locked me in the bathroom and hasn't given me food or water.'
On June 26, 2022, the district court found Mamta guilty of her husband's murder based on witness testimonies and the recovery of a plug-in wire and sleeping pills at her residence, the newspaper reported.
Additional Sessions Judge Rajesh Kumar Devaliya convicted her to life imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000.
Mamta filed an appeal seeking suspension of sentence before the High Court's Jabalpur Bench.
How Mamta Pathak defended herself before HC
On March 12, 2024, Mamta presented her arguments before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The former professor argued that the prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence linking her to her husband's death, pointing out that there was no direct evidence or eyewitnesses.
Seeking suspension of sentence and bail, she furnished medical records to highlight her health issues, including suspected bone cancer. Mamta also told the high court that she was the sole caregiver for her mentally and physically ill son.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The court then temporarily suspended her sentence, granting her bail for six months. Her bail was extended again in August last year.
Her video challenging the post-mortem report during a hearing went viral in May this year. The clip showed Justice Vivek Agrawal asking Mamta at the time, 'The allegations against you are that you murdered your husband through electrocution. The post-mortem doctor has categorically said there were signs of electric shock.'
Mamta told the court that it is 'not possible to differentiate between thermal and electric burn marks during a post-mortem'. She went on to explain that only a proper chemical analysis could determine the source.
'Are you a chemistry professor?' the judge asked. To which, she replied: 'Yes'.
The judge didn't see it coming. pic.twitter.com/9sFtWuoglw — Piyush Rai (@Benarasiyaa) May 27, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Mamta added, 'I don't know how the post-mortem has said this is an electric burn mark.'
ALSO READ: Meghalaya honeymoon case: How Sonam, her boyfriend plotted and planned Raja Raghuvanshi's murder
HC upholds Mamta Pathak's life term
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday (July 29) upheld the former chemistry professor's conviction in the murder case of her husband.
The bench ruled that Mamta was not on good terms with Dr Neeraj. It found she tortured him to death by giving him an antipsychotic drug and then an electric shock, as per a Bar and Bench report.
The court asked her to immediately surrender before the trial court. It also dismissed her submission that her husband died from a cardiovascular disease.
The bench also rejected her claim that she was falsely implicated by her husband's relatives, who were after his property. The court said that the couple's sons are Class-I heirs to Dr Neeraj's property.
The motive for the murder, the court found, was marital discord with Mamta suspecting her husband of having an affair.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chaitanya Baghel's judicial remand extended till Aug 18 in Chhattisgarh Liquor scam case
Chaitanya Baghel's judicial remand extended till Aug 18 in Chhattisgarh Liquor scam case

Economic Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Chaitanya Baghel's judicial remand extended till Aug 18 in Chhattisgarh Liquor scam case

Synopsis Chaitanya Baghel's judicial remand extended by 14 days by PMLA Court in Raipur. The extension relates to the alleged Rs 2,161-crore liquor scam. Advocate Faizal Rizvi confirmed the remand extension. The ED arrested Chaitanya Baghel on July 18, 2025. Supreme Court allowed Bhupesh and Chaitanya Baghel to approach High Court. Bhupesh Baghel sought protection in multiple FIRs. ANI Chaitanya Baghel's judicial remand extended till Aug 18 in Chhattisgarh Liquor scam case Raipur: The Judicial remand of Chaitanya Baghel, son of former Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghel, was extended by another 14 days by the special PMLA Court in Raipur in connection with the alleged Rs 2,161-crore liquor to ANI, Chaitanya Baghel's lawyer, Advocate Faizal Rizvi, said on Monday, "The previous 14-day judicial remand has been completed and a fresh application for another 14-day judicial remand has been filed. The court has given 18/8 (August 18) as the date for the next remand." Chaitanya Baghel was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on July 18, 2025, in connection with the scam. The Central agency is investigating the scam under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).The Supreme Court on Monday allowed former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel and his son Chaitanya Baghel to approach the High Court challenging the probe in various scams, including the alleged Rs 2,161-crore liquor Baghel sought protection from coercive action -- including arrest -- in multiple FIRs filed against him in connection with the state's liquor scam, Mahadev App scam, rice milling scam, District Mineral Foundation (DMF) scam, coal scam and the Uttar Pradesh liquor scam. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi also allowed the Congress leaders' son Chaitanya Baghel to approach the High Court with his plea seeking interim Bhupesh Baghel's plea, the Congress leader has stated that he is facing several criminal proceedings initiated between 2015 and 2025. These include cases filed by ACB/EOW Raipur alleging irregularities in procurement, rice milling, the District Mineral Foundation (DMF), and coal levy stated that investigation agencies -- ED and CBI have been filing incomplete charge sheets in a piecemeal manner, often without concluding investigations, to deny him the right to default bail under Section 187(3) of the BNSS (previously Section 167(2) CrPC).

Man beaten to death over Rs 200 loan in UP's Gonda, family stages protest
Man beaten to death over Rs 200 loan in UP's Gonda, family stages protest

New Indian Express

time14 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Man beaten to death over Rs 200 loan in UP's Gonda, family stages protest

GONDA: A 22-year-old newly married man was allegedly beaten to death over a Rs 200 loan dispute, triggering protests from family members who placed his body on the Gonda–Lucknow highway, police said on Tuesday. The deceased, Hriday Lal, a mason from Laxmanpur Jaat village, had lent Rs 700 to a fellow villager, Ram Anuj. A heated argument broke out between them on August, 1 when Lal demanded Rs 200 back. The altercation turned violent, and he was allegedly attacked with sticks by Anuj, his brother Ram Kishore, son Jagdish, and nephews Pankaj and Chandan. Lal was taken to Lucknow for treatment but succumbed to his injuries on Monday. As the body was being brought back in an ambulance on Monday evening, the family attempted to block the Gonda–Lucknow highway at Balpur by placing the body on the road.

UP: Man convicted for 1976 theft after he confesses to crime in court
UP: Man convicted for 1976 theft after he confesses to crime in court

Hindustan Times

time14 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

UP: Man convicted for 1976 theft after he confesses to crime in court

Jhansi , Nearly 50 years after a theft at a cooperative society here, the last surviving accused, now a frail 68-year-old man, has been found guilty not through a lengthy trial but after his confession in court. UP: Man convicted for 1976 theft after he confesses to crime in court The case, which dates back to March 1976, stretched on for over 49 years with countless hearings, bureaucratic delays and the deaths of two co-accused during the trial. But it was only last Saturday that Kanhaiya Lal, standing in the dock of the chief judicial magistrate's court here, admitted to his role in the crime. According to prosecution officer Akhilesh Kumar Maurya, the case was filed on March 31, 1976, by Bihari Lal Gautam, then secretary of the Large Scale Cooperative Society in Tahrauli. The complainant alleged that on March 27, 1976, Kanhaiya Lal, then a Class IV employee, stole an official receipt book and a wristwatch worth ₹150 from the office. Lal forged signatures in the receipt book and misappropriated over ₹14,000 from society members. Two other men, Laxmi Prasad and Raghunath, were accused of issuing forged receipts in their own names and embezzling funds, Maurya said. He said all three were arrested shortly after but were later granted bail. What followed was an extraordinary judicial delay that stretched nearly five decades. Over the years, the slow wheels of justice saw hearings postponed, files changing hands, and the death of Laxmi Prasad and Raghunath. The case, State vs Kanhaiya Lal, finally saw formal charges framed against the primary accused on December 23, 2022. On Saturday, during one of the routine hearings, Lal, now a resident of Sharmafem Road, Hazira in Gwalior, confessed to the crime before Chief Judicial Magistrate Munna Lal, Maurya said. "Kanhaiya Lal told the court he wished to confess due to his deteriorating health and old age," the lawyer said. He said the court accepted Lal's plea and sentenced him under Indian Penal Code sections 380 , 409 , 467 , 468 , 457 , and 120B . Since Lal already spent two separate terms of three months each in jail during the trial period, the court considered it as sufficient custodial punishment. In addition, he was fined ₹300 under each section and ₹500 under one. In case of failure to pay the fine, he will have to undergo an additional three days of imprisonment, according to the prosecutor. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store