Tim Tszyu takes aim at ‘boring' superstars', towering rival as epic Pacquiao card launched in US
Australia's Tim Tszyu has taken a not-so-subtle dig at some of the biggest names in world boxing – branding their fights 'boring' – at a huge Las Vegas press conference where, alongside the Manny Pacquaio, he also promised to revive the 'crazy' defining some of the legend's most memorable fights.
Currently in the US to promote his upcoming July 20 (AEST) blockbuster against WBC super welterweight champ Sebastian Fundora, Tszsyu also vowed to steal the show in a rematch that 'fans will still remember in 15 years' while also sharing a surprise interaction with the famed US agent he has previously dubbed 'The Weasel'.
Watch the biggest Aussie sports & the best from overseas LIVE on Kayo Sports | New to Kayo? Get your first month for just $1. Limited time offer.
More than a year on from losing his WBO strap to Fundora in world title bloodbath, Tszyu is finally set for the rematch – and on the same card where Pacquaio challenges WBC welterweight champion Mario Barrios. The card will be held at Vegas' MGM Grand.
Early on Sunday morning (Australian time), all four fighters attended a press conference inside the Mandalay Bay casino to announce the upcoming card, which doubles as Tszyu's first time back in the US since being stopped by IBF champ Bakhram Murtazaliev last October.
Apart from praising Fundora for adhering to a rematch clause the two teams had in place, Tszyu also had what appeared to be a pleasant exchange with the champ's agent Sampson Lewkowicz after the face offs on stage.
During the build to their first fight at the T-Mobile Arena last year, Tszyu famously branded Lewkowicz a 'weasel', with the agent soon after hitting back to accuse both Team Tszyu and No Limit of 'disrespecting my fighter'.
However, there were far more amicable scenes at the press conference as Lewkowicz grinned and appeared to shake hands with Tszyu, before also embracing No Limit CEO George Rose on stage.
Yet when it came to how the replay goes down, Tszyu promised to bring a crazy fight that fans will still be talking about in 15 years.
When asked his objectives for the Fundora replay, The Soul Taker replied that he not only wanted to win, but do so in the same sort of style that defined Pacquiao's famed trilogy with Erik Morales.
'My main objective of course is to win,' he said.
'To win in dominant fashion.
'(But) it's also to bring the fight that fans want.
'As a young kid, you dream of watching crazy fights.
'You remember things like Castillo-Corrales, Pacquaia-Morales.
'You remember these fights and that's what I intend to do, bring something that the fans will remember in 10 years, 15 years.
'When kids of kids will be replaying the fight.
'And I think this is the fight, this is the night to do it on.'
Tszyu also didn't hold back when asked by the press conference MC if he missed the world title that was dropped in his initial bloodbath with Fundora, that saw lose only via split decision, despite suffering a nasty head cut late in round two.
'It's not just the belt,' the Australian started.
'It's the opposition and the type of fights that you're in.
'When you fight someone like this guy (Fundora), it's never easy.
'And I'm looking forward to bringing those types of fights.
'Because with those type of fights come accolades like world titles and stuff like that
'Being at the very top of the division.
'And that's my purpose right now.
'To get to the very top of the super welterweight division.
'And right now Fundora is the number one man.'
Yet the best line came when Tszyu was asked what chance he and Fundora were of stealing the show on a card boasting the likes of Pacquiao, Barrios, even Isaac 'Pitbull' Cruz?
'Recently the fights I've come across, they've been boring,' Tszyu replied in an obvious nod to recent bouts involving Devin Haney, Ryan Garcia, even the legendary Canelo Alvarez.
'And this card is definitely not boring.
'From that start with Pitbull, to the end with Pacquiao and Barrios – and in the middle with me and Fundora – this is going to be the card.
'And we are probably going to be the fight.
'We've (also) got Pitbull to compete with in terms of fight on the night but it's one hell of a show and I'm honoured to be on here.'
Elsewhere, Tszyu and Fundora also disagreed when asked on how their rematch would play out.
'This is going to be round 13 with Tim Tszyu,' Fundora stated.
'It was a great fight last time and I'm excited to show the world another great fight.'
Tszyu, however, had a different take.
'First of all I'd like to thank Sebastian Fundora for honouring his rematch,' the Sydneysider said.
'He could've gone down a different path.
'But he honoured it, let go of a belt.
'It will be great to be fighting for the WBC belt …'
Then on the initial question, Tszyu continued: 'It could be round 13.
'I'm hoping it's not because it (the first fight) didn't go my way.
'I'm hoping it's round one in a whole different type of fight that swings my way.'
Tszyu also stated he was happy to be back in the world's fight capital.
'I think it's the light,' he laughed when asked how Sin City was different.
'I think it definitely brings something that Australia doesn't have.
'Australia is one hell of a vibe and I've had one hell of a time fighting in front of my people.
'But I think America is where it's at.
'Seeing all the journos here, all the people that support these events, it's one hell of a show.
'And to be doing it on a Pacquiao card, Pacquiao versus Barrios at the MGM Grand – it's something you dream of as a young kid.
'I'm taking this opportunity with both hands.
'I can't wait.'
Fundora, meanwhile, was also convinced he and Tszyu will steal the show in Las Vegas.
'I think this fight, no doubt, will steal the show, no matter what,' said the fighter dubbed Towering Inferno.
'The first fight was a fight of the year.
'I'm going to say it, that was Fight of the Decade.
'You never see that much blood in boxing.
'And that's what people want to see besides a knockout.
'That's entertaining.
'That's boxing.
'And I think this time around will do the same thing.'
And as for how the champ feels more than a year on from their first bout?
'I feel good,' he continued.
'I've had another year and feel like I'm growing.
'I'm 27 now.
'A full champion as well.
'So these things are just adding on.
'I've watched my sister (Gabriela) win her full title as well last year.
'So we're growing and growing and growing.
'And that's what we plan on doing this year and the year to come.'
Fundora added he had become extremely comfortable with the role of WBC champion saying: 'Definitely.
'I remember in the beginning, not even fighting on pay-per-view cards or anything, the interviews would make me nervous.
'Now, we're getting more comfortable.
'Getting more used to this.
'This is our job.
'I'm happy, very grateful.
'I'm happy to share a ring with Pacquiao, with all these guys.
'I'm at their level.
'I'm proving it every single time.'
And as for what he plans to demonstrate against Tszyu in the rematch?
'Another world class win,' he said.
'I'm world champion and plan on being world champion for a while.
'That's what I'm going to do … Towering Inferno.'
In a media scrum after the press conference was done, Tszyu also spoke about the importance of having the chance for a second shot at Fundora after being so severely compromised in their first fight.
'I've never made excuses and I won't start now,' Tszyu said when quizzed on having effectively fought blinded for some 30 minutes in the first fight as blood oozed into his eyes.
'If you lose, you lose.
'If you win, you win.
'But (that loss) gives you this burning fire.
'A rematch gives you the chance to rewrite your mistakes.
'From round three to maybe round ten, I wasn't in the right mindset.
'I lost my head a bit.
'But I adapted, started figuring him out — just a bit too late.
'Now, I know what needs to be done.'
And as for this time around?
'My plan? Hit him in the face as hard as I can,' Tszyu continued.
'We both like to press. We bring the action. Fighting Fundora can't be technical. You've got to make it a war — and that's what this will be. A war.'
Speaking soon after the press conference with FightHype, Tszyu also suggested the long-awaited showdown between himself and Jermell Charlo has to happen – describing the US superstar's decision to avoid him several times before accepting a Canelo fight as 'like a stab in the back'
'I'm 100 per cent in,' Tszyu said when asked fighting Charlo for a title, should he get past Fundora.
'There's some unfinished business there.
'I waited for him with his injury, I went through Tony Harrison, Carlos Ocampo, Brian Mendoza, was still waiting.
'Then we were in discussions (again) and he takes the fight with Canelo.
'It was like a stab in the back.
'I wanted to … I dunno … I don't know what I wanted to do but there was an anger.
'Right now, that anger isn't there obviously.
'But I would love to beat him in the ring and settle our differences.'
Elsewhere, Tszyu also revealed that, after preparing in the US for his previous two world title fights, he is now taking advice from no less than Australian UFC champ Alexander Volkanovski on the best way to ready this time around in Australia.
Volkanovski has always trained out of his home gym in Windang, south of Sydney, for both his first and now second reign as UFC featherweight king.
'I've spoken a lot with Volk, who has told me about all the little things he does,' Tszyu explained.
'He does all his camps in Australia.
'And there is an art to it.
'We always think how we have to come here to the US for our training camps.
'But when you're comfortable and can bring the right sparring over, you can do it all in Australia.'
Tszyu also suggested that should Pacquaio upset Barrios on their July card, it could see Floyd Mayweather come out of retirement for a replay of their 2015 blockbuster.
The Australian added that while he has little interest in the September showdown between Terence Crawford and Canelo Alvarez, he is tipping Bud to create history via an upset.
'In my opinion, I think Crawford wins,' Tszyu said.
'Just what we've seen from Canelo the past couple of fights, it hasn't been impressive at all.
'Buit in all honesty, I'm not that interested (in the fight).
'When Manny Pacquiao versus Mayweather got announced, I was over the moon.
'Watching everything.
'It was massive.
'Canelo versus GGG, I was fully into that one too.
'But Crawford versus Canelo, doesn't interest me.
'I think maybe past their prime …
'If Canelo fought Benavidez, I'd try to book a ticket.
'I'm a big, big fan of Benavidez.
'He's a beast.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Alan Kohler on making housing a bad investment
Sam Hawley: Interest rates might be coming down, but house prices are, once again, heading in the other direction. Given there is a major problem with housing affordability, and there are so many people who can't even afford to enter the market, why on earth is that? Today, the ABC's finance expert, Alan Kohler, on how conditions are ripe for a housing price surge, just as they were back in the early 2000s. In other words, why history's repeating. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal Land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Sam Hawley: Alan, interest rates are coming down and they could drop even further this year. So that should mean houses are more affordable for borrowers. But it's not that simple and you're going to explain to us why. Now, to do that, let's go back to the turn of the century. In 2001, the Reserve Bank was cutting rates just like it is now, wasn't it? Alan Kohler: Correct. Sam Hawley: What was going on back then? Alan Kohler: In 2001, the Reserve Bank cut interest rates six times that year. News report: Nervous anticipation for one of the Reserve Bank's most expected interest rate cuts, the sixth and last this year. Alan Kohler: And that was in response to the dot-com crash in the United States, which happened on basically in March of 2000. It continued for a while. The Nasdaq halved, more than halved. And there was a recession in the United States. The Reserve Bank was concerned that the Australian dollar would rise too much because of that, because obviously the US Federal Reserve was cutting interest rates in response to the recession. So the Reserve Bank of Australia cut interest rates in precaution, even though there was no recession in Australia. The economy did slow a bit. There was a bit of a fall in the share market, but not anything like what happened in the US. Sam Hawley: And the other thing that was happening back then was there was some pretty major policy changes, including the introduction of the capital gains discount and the return of a first home buyers grant. So just remind me of those policies at that time. Alan Kohler: Yes. So in 1999, the Howard Government appointed a business tax review committee, a panel of three businessmen to report on the business tax system. And what they wanted to do, what Howard and Costello wanted to do then, was to reduce the company tax rate from 36 to 30%. So they asked some businessmen to tell them whether that was a good idea. And well, they told them it was a great idea. Go ahead. But in the course of doing that, they also recommended a change in the capital gains tax regime so that instead of the capital gains tax being adjusted for inflation, they recommended a simple 50% discount, which the Howard Government duly applied. Peter Costello, then-Treasurer: Under the reforms which we announced today, a 50% reduction in the taxable gain, that is 50% of the gain is not taxable. Alan Kohler: And although it's the case that that didn't really change the amount of capital gains tax at the time because inflation was quite high. So actually, the 50% discount was roughly the same as the inflation adjustment for the average time that people were holding assets. What I think happened was that it changed the psychology of investing in property because everyone understands a discount, whereas nobody really gets inflation and certainly can't do it in their heads. Sam Hawley: So even if you don't understand capital gains tax, just understand that if it's 50% discount, that's a good thing. Alan Kohler: Exactly. Sam Hawley: If you're a homeowner, right? Alan Kohler: Precisely. And that added to negative gearing, which had been in place for a long time, to make investing in housing an attractive thing to do. The businessmen who recommended it thought that it would lead to Australia becoming a nation of share owners and buy the shares of their companies and drive the prices higher and lower their cost of capital. But that, in fact, didn't happen because people just want to invest in housing. And that's what happened. And as you say, also the Howard government reintroduced first homebuyer grants in 2000, which had been out of action for a while. The first homebuyer grant was in the 1960s under Menzies, but the Hawke-Keating government didn't do them and Howard reintroduced them. Sam Hawley: Okay, so rates are going down. There's these two major policy changes. And at the time, there was a simply huge rise in immigration. Alan Kohler: Exactly. And what caused that in around about 2005 was a change to the way foreign students were assessed in 2001. On July 1st, 2001, the system was changed. Up to that point, foreign students' visas were issued on the basis of either gazetted countries or non-gazetted countries. China and India were included in the non-gazetted countries and it was very difficult for students from those places to get a visa. After July 1st, 2001, that changed and became the same for everybody, which is the way it ought to be, of course. But that led eventually to a huge increase in students from China and India from the mid-2000s. And that led to a doubling and then tripling of net overseas migration into Australia. At the time. Sam Hawley: Wow. All right. So we get a pot and then we put all these things into it and we stir it around. So there's the capital gains tax, there's the first homeowner's grant, the rates are dropping and there's this massive increase in immigration. And when you stir it all around, you come out, Alan, with house prices rising. Alan Kohler: Yes. Well, so all of those four things that we've discussed added to demand from investors and migrants and so on. So there was a big increase in demand, but there was no response in supply. The government did nothing about increasing supply at the time. And the result was that for 10 years, between 2005 and 2015, there was a dire, big shortage of housing, an undersupply of housing for a decade, which really set the scene for a big increase in house prices. And what happened was that the house price to income ratio rose from between three to four times incomes, this is average incomes in 2000, to eight or nine times incomes at the end of that time. And that was a huge change in the way that housing related to people's incomes and also GDP of the there was a stop to immigration during the pandemic. And then post the pandemic, population growth has gone back to more than 2% per annum, which is what it was in the period after 2005. Sam Hawley: All right. So, Alan, that's the history of the skyrocketing house prices and how we ended up here. Now, today, interesting that we have exactly the same conditions. Alan Kohler: That's right. The Reserve Bank is cutting interest rates, probably not by six times, but by probably four or five times this year, possibly into next year as well. We've got first time buyer grants back on. We've got a big increase in migration. I mean, the Treasury forecast in the budget for this financial year, net overseas migration is 335,000. But in the first nine months of the year, it's already 360,000 and looks like being 400,000 this year. There's no targets on immigration, but there's a Treasury forecast and net overseas migration is going to well exceed the Treasury forecast. And of course, there's been no change in the capital gains tax discount because the Labor Party failed to win in 2016 and 2019, where that is their policy to reduce it 25%. All the conditions are in place for another rise in house prices. Sam Hawley: Exactly. So what are we seeing already and what do we expect to see then when it comes to the cost of housing in Australia? Alan Kohler: Between November last year and January this year, house prices actually fell by close to 1%. This is the national median price, having increased 17% in the previous 12 months or so. And since January, they've risen again by more than the increase in average wages over that period. News report: House prices are continuing to rise across the country, with experts predicting property values to grow between 6 and 10% by the end of the year. All the capitals rose more than 0.4 of a percent in May. That brings the national index 1.7% higher over the first five months of the year. Alan Kohler: House prices are already starting to rise in excess of the rise in incomes. And the thing is, you know, everyone says houses are unaffordable, which is kind of true, which you would think would mean house prices don't rise very much now, because if they're unaffordable already, then people can't afford them. But in fact, falling interest rates makes them more affordable. The determinant of affordability is the amount you can afford in terms of interest repayments or mortgage repayments. Really, a better measure might be time to save a deposit, because the problem is that deposits are becoming unreachable for a lot of people. So housing is becoming inaccessible. It's OK if you've got a deposit, because your parents have given you one, given you the money, but those who don't have access to some sort of provision of a deposit can't get into housing. And that's the problem. Sam Hawley: Yeah. There's just a certain number of people that keep buying properties and pushing the amount or the cost of properties up. I mean, there's enough people that can afford the properties because the property price keeps going upwards and upwards. Alan Kohler: Correct. The truth is that if you don't have a parent who can give you the money for a deposit or some other way of getting ahold of a deposit, as opposed to saving it, you're a renter. You cannot buy a house. That is the reality of the situation, particularly in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, but increasingly in Perth and Adelaide and Hobart as well, and also everywhere in Australia. I don't know what's to be done about it, really. Sam Hawley: All right. Oh, gosh. So, dare I ask you then, if you don't have the bank of mum and dad or any family members that can actually help you in this process of getting this massive deposit to buy a home, is there really no chance ever that you're going to land in the property market at this point? Alan Kohler: Well, there has to be a big shift in the value of housing versus incomes. Prices would need to go back to the sort of relationship to incomes that they were 25 years ago, which is three to four times instead of the current sort of nine or 10 times. And the only way that's going to happen is if house prices stay where they are for a while, like a long time, like 20 years. Now, that will only happen if there's an oversupply of housing for that period. Both the federal government and the state governments are all doing what they can. They're working hard. I know, you know, they're genuinely working hard to increase supply, but there's a problem. The trouble is that the construction industry doesn't have the capacity, partly because productivity is so low. In fact, the Committee for Economic Development in Australia, CEDA, released a report about construction productivity and why is it so low. And they do say in the report that we're building now half as many houses per worker as we did in the 70s. So that's fallen by half. But not only is productivity low, the number of workers is also in decline because the average age of builders tends to be quite high. They're all retiring and there's not enough apprentices coming through. The government is talking about increasing the number of tradies who they bring in as migrants, which is definitely what's needed. They're not talking about anywhere near enough of them coming in. And any way, the regulator of the industry is reluctant to recognise foreign qualifications in the construction industry. So, you know, there's a real kind of blockage of kind of productivity and number of people in the construction industry. I think it's going to be difficult to achieve the kind of oversupply of housing over the next sort of decade or two that is required. Sam Hawley: And Alan, while we're waiting for all these houses to be built, conditions are absolutely ripe for house prices just to keep surging. Alan Kohler: Yeah. And the governments, in addition to doing the work that they're doing on supply, which is good, they're also kind of doing short-term band-aid measures, including helping first homebuyers, either through help to buy schemes or grants and so on. And so that just tends to increase demand and increase prices, because a lot of those grants just end up on the price. So, yeah, look, I don't think it's particularly good news on the subject of housing. I'd like it to be different. And there's no big magic bullet. There's just going to be a lot of sort of small work, grinding work to be done. And, you know, the fact is we have to go through a period where housing is a really bad investment. Sam Hawley: Alan Kohler presents the Finance Report on the ABC's 7pm News. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead. Audio production by Adair Sheppard. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Prince William's cheeky jab about family: ‘They might not want to see you'
IN LONDON Prince William has joked that families do not always want to see each other and can be a 'mixed bag' amid his ongoing rift with his brother, Prince Harry. The Prince of Wales made his first visit as Colonel-in-Chief to the UK's Army Air Corps on Wednesday, dressed in camouflage military uniform, and chatted with soldiers on an airfield about the structure of their work-life balance and how regularly they were able to get home, per the Telegraph. 'Some of them might not want to see you that much,' William remarked. 'It's a mixed bag.' It's understood the brothers' last communication was almost two years ago, when they briefly reunited for the late Queen's funeral in London. During his visit to the base, William watched on as the military personnel trained and also opened up about his own interest in boxing, describing how it can help with frustration: 'It's good to take it out on a punch bag.' His cheeky nod to family drama comes just a month after Harry gave a no-holds-barred interview with the BBC, where he revealed the King no longer takes his calls, that he doesn't know 'how long he has left' amid his cancer battle, and then asked his family for 'reconciliation'. The interview was originally scheduled to last just 10 minutes but ended up running for half an hour as Harry opened up in the wake of a bruising court loss over his UK security provisions. According to Hello 's royal editor, Emily Nash, the royal family was given only a 'very brief' notice that the explosive interview was about to drop – and that it scuppered any hope of an olive branch being extended to the Sussexes. 'There was a very brief awareness-raising at the palace shortly before it broadcast,' she said. 'What was made clear all along is that the King didn't feel he could have these conversations with his son because it would put him in a really difficult, and potentially unconstitutional, situation. He couldn't be seen to intervene on his son's behalf or get involved in government matters, his son is suing His Majesty's government, you know he needed to stay right out of this situation. 'But once that had concluded, there was potentially a path to some kind of rapprochement, some kind of olive branch being offered. And I get the sense that that was the mood music, but that really quickly got switched off once the interview landed.'
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Benny Blanco insists Selena Gomez wedding is still ‘not scheduled' despite Ed Sheeran RSVP
The Shape of You hitmaker confirmed during Vanity Fair's Lie Detector video series last month that he'd been invited to the wedding, leading fans to believe that the nuptials may be happening sooner than expected. However, during an appearance on Australia's Today show on Wednesday, Benny insisted that they haven't set a date, but he has informally invited Ed already. When asked if he was thrilled when Ed revealed the RSVP," the music producer replied, 'I just told him, 'I'm gonna have a wedding and you're gonna come to the wedding..."
