Alan Kohler on making housing a bad investment
Sam Hawley: Alan, interest rates are coming down and they could drop even further this year. So that should mean houses are more affordable for borrowers. But it's not that simple and you're going to explain to us why. Now, to do that, let's go back to the turn of the century. In 2001, the Reserve Bank was cutting rates just like it is now, wasn't it?
Alan Kohler: Correct.
Sam Hawley: What was going on back then?
Alan Kohler: In 2001, the Reserve Bank cut interest rates six times that year.
News report: Nervous anticipation for one of the Reserve Bank's most expected interest rate cuts, the sixth and last this year.
Alan Kohler: And that was in response to the dot-com crash in the United States, which happened on basically in March of 2000. It continued for a while. The Nasdaq halved, more than halved. And there was a recession in the United States. The Reserve Bank was concerned that the Australian dollar would rise too much because of that, because obviously the US Federal Reserve was cutting interest rates in response to the recession. So the Reserve Bank of Australia cut interest rates in precaution, even though there was no recession in Australia. The economy did slow a bit. There was a bit of a fall in the share market, but not anything like what happened in the US.
Sam Hawley: And the other thing that was happening back then was there was some pretty major policy changes, including the introduction of the capital gains discount and the return of a first home buyers grant. So just remind me of those policies at that time.
Alan Kohler: Yes. So in 1999, the Howard Government appointed a business tax review committee, a panel of three businessmen to report on the business tax system. And what they wanted to do, what Howard and Costello wanted to do then, was to reduce the company tax rate from 36 to 30%. So they asked some businessmen to tell them whether that was a good idea. And well, they told them it was a great idea. Go ahead. But in the course of doing that, they also recommended a change in the capital gains tax regime so that instead of the capital gains tax being adjusted for inflation, they recommended a simple 50% discount, which the Howard Government duly applied.
Peter Costello, then-Treasurer: Under the reforms which we announced today, a 50% reduction in the taxable gain, that is 50% of the gain is not taxable.
Alan Kohler: And although it's the case that that didn't really change the amount of capital gains tax at the time because inflation was quite high. So actually, the 50% discount was roughly the same as the inflation adjustment for the average time that people were holding assets. What I think happened was that it changed the psychology of investing in property because everyone understands a discount, whereas nobody really gets inflation and certainly can't do it in their heads.
Sam Hawley: So even if you don't understand capital gains tax, just understand that if it's 50% discount, that's a good thing.
Alan Kohler: Exactly.
Sam Hawley: If you're a homeowner, right?
Alan Kohler: Precisely. And that added to negative gearing, which had been in place for a long time, to make investing in housing an attractive thing to do. The businessmen who recommended it thought that it would lead to Australia becoming a nation of share owners and buy the shares of their companies and drive the prices higher and lower their cost of capital. But that, in fact, didn't happen because people just want to invest in housing. And that's what happened. And as you say, also the Howard government reintroduced first homebuyer grants in 2000, which had been out of action for a while. The first homebuyer grant was in the 1960s under Menzies, but the Hawke-Keating government didn't do them and Howard reintroduced them.
Sam Hawley: Okay, so rates are going down. There's these two major policy changes. And at the time, there was a simply huge rise in immigration.
Alan Kohler: Exactly. And what caused that in around about 2005 was a change to the way foreign students were assessed in 2001. On July 1st, 2001, the system was changed. Up to that point, foreign students' visas were issued on the basis of either gazetted countries or non-gazetted countries. China and India were included in the non-gazetted countries and it was very difficult for students from those places to get a visa. After July 1st, 2001, that changed and became the same for everybody, which is the way it ought to be, of course. But that led eventually to a huge increase in students from China and India from the mid-2000s. And that led to a doubling and then tripling of net overseas migration into Australia. At the time.
Sam Hawley: Wow. All right. So we get a pot and then we put all these things into it and we stir it around. So there's the capital gains tax, there's the first homeowner's grant, the rates are dropping and there's this massive increase in immigration. And when you stir it all around, you come out, Alan, with house prices rising.
Alan Kohler: Yes. Well, so all of those four things that we've discussed added to demand from investors and migrants and so on. So there was a big increase in demand, but there was no response in supply. The government did nothing about increasing supply at the time. And the result was that for 10 years, between 2005 and 2015, there was a dire, big shortage of housing, an undersupply of housing for a decade, which really set the scene for a big increase in house prices. And what happened was that the house price to income ratio rose from between three to four times incomes, this is average incomes in 2000, to eight or nine times incomes at the end of that time. And that was a huge change in the way that housing related to people's incomes and also GDP of the country.Obviously, there was a stop to immigration during the pandemic. And then post the pandemic, population growth has gone back to more than 2% per annum, which is what it was in the period after 2005.
Sam Hawley: All right. So, Alan, that's the history of the skyrocketing house prices and how we ended up here. Now, today, interesting that we have exactly the same conditions.
Alan Kohler: That's right. The Reserve Bank is cutting interest rates, probably not by six times, but by probably four or five times this year, possibly into next year as well. We've got first time buyer grants back on. We've got a big increase in migration. I mean, the Treasury forecast in the budget for this financial year, net overseas migration is 335,000. But in the first nine months of the year, it's already 360,000 and looks like being 400,000 this year. There's no targets on immigration, but there's a Treasury forecast and net overseas migration is going to well exceed the Treasury forecast. And of course, there's been no change in the capital gains tax discount because the Labor Party failed to win in 2016 and 2019, where that is their policy to reduce it 25%. All the conditions are in place for another rise in house prices.
Sam Hawley: Exactly. So what are we seeing already and what do we expect to see then when it comes to the cost of housing in Australia?
Alan Kohler: Between November last year and January this year, house prices actually fell by close to 1%. This is the national median price, having increased 17% in the previous 12 months or so. And since January, they've risen again by more than the increase in average wages over that period.
News report: House prices are continuing to rise across the country, with experts predicting property values to grow between 6 and 10% by the end of the year. All the capitals rose more than 0.4 of a percent in May. That brings the national index 1.7% higher over the first five months of the year.
Alan Kohler: House prices are already starting to rise in excess of the rise in incomes. And the thing is, you know, everyone says houses are unaffordable, which is kind of true, which you would think would mean house prices don't rise very much now, because if they're unaffordable already, then people can't afford them. But in fact, falling interest rates makes them more affordable. The determinant of affordability is the amount you can afford in terms of interest repayments or mortgage repayments. Really, a better measure might be time to save a deposit, because the problem is that deposits are becoming unreachable for a lot of people. So housing is becoming inaccessible. It's OK if you've got a deposit, because your parents have given you one, given you the money, but those who don't have access to some sort of provision of a deposit can't get into housing. And that's the problem.
Sam Hawley: Yeah. There's just a certain number of people that keep buying properties and pushing the amount or the cost of properties up. I mean, there's enough people that can afford the properties because the property price keeps going upwards and upwards.
Alan Kohler: Correct. The truth is that if you don't have a parent who can give you the money for a deposit or some other way of getting ahold of a deposit, as opposed to saving it, you're a renter. You cannot buy a house. That is the reality of the situation, particularly in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne, but increasingly in Perth and Adelaide and Hobart as well, and also everywhere in Australia. I don't know what's to be done about it, really.
Sam Hawley: All right. Oh, gosh. So, dare I ask you then, if you don't have the bank of mum and dad or any family members that can actually help you in this process of getting this massive deposit to buy a home, is there really no chance ever that you're going to land in the property market at this point?
Alan Kohler: Well, there has to be a big shift in the value of housing versus incomes. Prices would need to go back to the sort of relationship to incomes that they were 25 years ago, which is three to four times instead of the current sort of nine or 10 times. And the only way that's going to happen is if house prices stay where they are for a while, like a long time, like 20 years. Now, that will only happen if there's an oversupply of housing for that period. Both the federal government and the state governments are all doing what they can. They're working hard. I know, you know, they're genuinely working hard to increase supply, but there's a problem. The trouble is that the construction industry doesn't have the capacity, partly because productivity is so low. In fact, the Committee for Economic Development in Australia, CEDA, released a report about construction productivity and why is it so low. And they do say in the report that we're building now half as many houses per worker as we did in the 70s. So that's fallen by half. But not only is productivity low, the number of workers is also in decline because the average age of builders tends to be quite high. They're all retiring and there's not enough apprentices coming through. The government is talking about increasing the number of tradies who they bring in as migrants, which is definitely what's needed. They're not talking about anywhere near enough of them coming in. And any way, the regulator of the industry is reluctant to recognise foreign qualifications in the construction industry. So, you know, there's a real kind of blockage of kind of productivity and number of people in the construction industry. I think it's going to be difficult to achieve the kind of oversupply of housing over the next sort of decade or two that is required.
Sam Hawley: And Alan, while we're waiting for all these houses to be built, conditions are absolutely ripe for house prices just to keep surging.
Alan Kohler: Yeah. And the governments, in addition to doing the work that they're doing on supply, which is good, they're also kind of doing short-term band-aid measures, including helping first homebuyers, either through help to buy schemes or grants and so on. And so that just tends to increase demand and increase prices, because a lot of those grants just end up on the price. So, yeah, look, I don't think it's particularly good news on the subject of housing. I'd like it to be different. And there's no big magic bullet. There's just going to be a lot of sort of small work, grinding work to be done. And, you know, the fact is we have to go through a period where housing is a really bad investment.
Sam Hawley: Alan Kohler presents the Finance Report on the ABC's 7pm News. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead. Audio production by Adair Sheppard. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
26 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Donald Trump's tariffs have a large role to play in Australia's interest rates cycle
When the RBA handed down its most interest rate decision last month, it shocked economists and the public by holding the cash rate at 3.85 per cent. The widely held consensus had been strongly in favour of another 0.25 per cent cut to follow the previous one in May. In the weeks since the Reserve Bank's decision, economic data has been mixed, with some elements such as the recent retail sales report providing support for the RBA's message of caution, while on the other hand, the recent substantial rise in unemployment was far more supportive of the cash rate being cut. In several important ways the RBA's uncertainty about the path forward for interest rates is arguably justified. Trump, Trade And Global Uncertainty At a global scale, the implementation of the Trump Administration's various tariffs and threats of even greater trade barriers to nation's not willing to make a swift agreement with the United States remains a source of major questions for central banks around the world. The challenge posed by tariffs to the path of interest rates was recently summed up by JPMorgan Chase (the world's most valuable bank) CEO Jamie Dimon at an event hosted by the Irish government. 'The market is pricing a 20% chance (of rising interest rates). I would price in a 40-50% chance I would put that as a cause for concern,' Dimon said. Dimon went on to cite the Trump administration's tariffs, the restructuring of global trade and the growing U.S government budget deficit as inflationary forces impacting the path forward for interest rates. While U.S interest rates can and do rise and fall independently of those of other nations, they are also the most important global benchmark. Theoretically, the U.S Federal Reserve holding a higher interest rate than the RBA can have two major knock on effects for Australia. It can force a repricing of Australian interest rates to better reflect the global benchmark. Or if the RBA chooses to allow the distance between the RBA cash rate and the U.S federal funds rate to expand, it places downward pressure on the value of the Australian dollar in a vacuum. A Mixed Bag For Australia At a domestic level, there is also a high degree of uncertainty impacting the path forward for interest rates. With government currently the driving force behind broader economic growth and employment growth in generally taxpayer funded sectors of the economy (public administration, education and, healthcare and social assistance) the main driver of the resilience of the labour market, it's challenging for the RBA to know exactly when a rate cut would be appropriate. Meanwhile, the deeply mixed nature of retail sales growth depending on the lens with which it is viewed also complicates matters. For example, looking at the latest headline retail sales showing a 1.2 per cent rise in turnover or June in a vacuum, it would be hard to justify a rate cut. But when the focus is shifted to an inflation adjusted figure that looks at retail sales per working age adult, the data for the June quarter reveals a return to recession in per capita terms. This is due to expansion of the population, the vast majority of which is occurring via migration acting as more or less the only driver of the retail economy in aggregate. History And Market Pricing Based on RBA rate cut cycles seen in the last 35 years, where the cash rate has been cut by at least one percentage point, the average rate cut cycle sees mortgage rates fall by approximately 33.3 per cent. If we remove the rate cut cycles driven by major emergencies such as the Global Financial Crisis and the early 1990s recession, the average reduction in mortgage rates falls to 27.0 per cent. If we were to see a similar reduction in interest rates today, we would see a total fall in the cash rate of approximately 1.75 percentage points. This would leave the average payable rate on a variable mortgage for an owner occupier at 4.58 per cent. In terms of the pricing of the future path of interest rates from financial markets, the next full 0.25 per cent rate cut is priced in for the RBA's August meeting, with the next expected to follow in November. Overall, market pricing has interest rates falling by a total 1.33 percentage points, with the cash rate hitting a low of 3.02 per cent during the middle of next year. The Outlook For Rates While the direction of interest rates is ultimately in the hands of the Reserve Bank, under the current circumstances government is also playing a significantly greater role in influencing the path forward than has been historically normal. With the growth in the domestic consumer economy concentrated in the 65 and over age demographic and otherwise reliant on population growth, the level of migration set by the Albanese government will be vital in determining to what degree aggregate consumer demand is weak enough to warrant further cuts in interest rates. Meanwhile, the level of employment growth stemming from government policy will also be a key consideration. If the current pullback continues without a corresponding increase from the private sector, the urgency and magnitude with which the RBA approaches the ongoing rate cut cycle may intensify significantly. Ultimately, it's entirely possible that events beyond our shores end up playing a significant role in the direction of Australian interest rates, whether that be as a result of President Trump's tariffs or the Chinese economy slowing more swiftly than expected due to the ongoing trade conflict and still simmering domestic economic issues.


SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Police 'scrambling' as pro-Palestinian Sydney Harbour Bridge march gets green light
Police are "scrambling" to alert motorists about a pro-Palestinian march over the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday after the event secured a tick of approval from NSW's highest court. Following the Supreme Court ruling on Saturday morning, NSW Police acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna urged those planning to take part to act safely and peacefully. He said the "whole gamut" of officers would be deployed to monitor the demonstration. "We are there to keep everyone safe ... we will have police right along the route and we'll be making sure this is done as safely and peacefully as possible," he told reporters. "Anyone who thinks they're going to come along and hijack this protest or do the wrong thing, police will take swift action." Disruption 'in the nature of peaceful protests' Justice Belinda Rigg rejected a prohibition order sought by police over the planned protest, organised by the Palestine Action Group, which is expected to draw thousands. The application on behalf of the NSW police commissioner sought to prohibit the march on public safety grounds. However, Rigg said in her judgement that arguments it would cause disruption were not sufficient. "It is in the nature of peaceful protests to cause disruption to others," she said. Rigg noted there was significant support for the march from hundreds of organisations including Amnesty International, various churches, the Jewish Council of Australia, the nurses and midwives association and other trade unions. NSW Police took court action to categorise the march as unlawful and unauthorised, arguing that closing the bridge with less than a week's notice was unreasonable. A prohibition order would not have banned attendance at the protest, but would have meant participants would lack legal protection against offences like blocking roads or traffic. The Supreme Court decision means those attending Sunday's protest will be provided these legal rights. Outside court, Palestine Action Group Sydney spokesperson Josh Lees said: "This will go down, I think, as one of those moments in history when the people of the world and in our case, the people of Sydney and NSW, stood up to be on the right side of history." The group had called for a "march for humanity" over the Sydney Harbour Bridge in response to mounting evidence of "widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease" in Gaza, according to the United Nations. 'There to keep everyone safe' Police on Saturday implored those planning to take part to act peacefully and respectfully, warning them they would be closely monitored. Protesters are expected to march from the CBD to North Sydney, with the bridge closed from 11.30am to about 4pm. Police Minister Yasmine Catley urged people to avoid the city if possible. "Make no mistake there is going to be massive, massive disruption ... there will be significant delays," she said. "But we believe police will be able to handle the protest on the bridge so long as people are peaceful, that they listen to what police ask them to do and that they are sensible." What happened in court? On Friday, NSW Police argued the force would not be able to create a safe environment for the rally and raised the possibility of a crowd crush. Lachlan Gyles SC, who represented NSW Police, told the court: "This is really unprecedented in terms of scale, the level of risk, the lack of time to prepare." He accused Lees of ignoring his duty of care to public safety. Under cross-examination, acting assistant police commissioner Adam Johnson raised the possibility of a crowd crush. "I'm personally concerned about that," he said. LISTEN TO "We (Palestine Action Group) want to work with them to facilitate a march over the bridge that is safe and peaceful," he said. Felicity Graham, the group's barrister, told the court it would be safer for police to authorise the protest, as people would march regardless of the decision. "A prohibition order may well increase the number of people who attend the protest, and exacerbate the potential for unrest and violence," she said. Outside the court, Lees said on Friday the group was open to delaying the rally. "We put forward a whole proposal for 24 August, we would have our march over the Sydney Harbour Bridge that would march identical routes to the World Pride March in 2023," he said. Graham also said that the growing support for the march, which includes members of parliament, organisations, and high-profile figures, should be considered. Rigg reserved her decision under Saturday morning. The bridge has previously been shut, including for a reconciliation rally in 2000, which attracted more than 250,000 people. — With additional reporting from the Australian Associated Press


SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Evening News Bulletin 2 August 2025
Listen to Australian and world news, and follow trending topics with SBS News Podcasts . TRANSCRIPT: A woman stabbed to death in rural Victoria; Donald Trump's name removed from an impeachment exhibit at a museum in the US; Australia's Sarah Gigante keeping pace with the leaders of the Tour de France Femmes. A man is being interviewed by police after the stabbing death of a woman in regional Victoria. Police say the man they arrested was known to the woman. Officers had been called to a home in Coleraine, in regional Victoria, about 340 kilometres west of Melbourne just after 1am this morning following reports a woman had been attacked. A worker has been killed and five others remain trapped underground after a collapse at a copper mine in Chile. The collapse is understood to be the result of an earthquake that trapped the miners as they worked on the Andesita project, a new 25 kilometre tunnel complex extending from the El Teniente mine on the western slopes of the Andes Mountains. The US Geological Survey reported a magnitude 5.0 earthquake in an area of central Chile where the mine is located. But authorities are yet to determine if it was a naturally occurring earthquake or whether it was caused by mining activity. A US museum has removed Donald Trump's name from an impeachment exhibit in Washington DC. The Washington Post says the exhibit at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History now has a label that notes that only three presidents have seriously faced removal: Andrew Johnson in 1868; Bill Clinton in 1998, and Richard Nixon, who would have faced impeachment had he not resigned in 1974. Trump was impeached twice in his first term in office. New South Wales Police say they will respect a court decision to allow a pro Palestinian protest to take place on the Harbour Bridge on Sunday. The Force had previously argued that the rally would cause disruption on the bridge, an argument rejected by Supreme Court Justice Belinda Rigg who ruled those arguments were not sufficient to bar the demonstration. Acting deputy commissioner Peter McKenna says they will be working with the protest organisers to ensure it goes ahead smoothly. "Nothing changes for us in the fact that people who come in to do the right thing and have a safe protest, then we will facilitate that. We will work with them. But if people come in to commit any type of offences, anti-social behaviour or anything else that puts the public safety at risk, then we will have no hesitation to take action. So nothing has changed in that space." A handful of Labor Party members have staged a silent protest at the Victorian party's conference. They've held up images of Palestinian flags on their devices as Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles delivered a speech to the group, which centred largely around thanking Labor members for their efforts to secure the party's thumping federal election win. "This is the largest number of seats that we have ever won at a federal election. (claps) Proportionally, it is the single biggest defeat of Australia's conservative movement ever." While passed motions do not bind governments or the federal party, votes by rank-and-file members are set for this afternoon on the AUKUS defence agreement and Middle East. Labor's official platform backs Palestinian statehood but Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has not set a timeline for implementing the policy and recently declared it not imminent. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has unveiled a new economic partnership between the federal government and Indigenous organisation the Coalition of Peaks at the Garma festival in north-east Arnhem land. The PM has called the Partnership an example of the government's commitment to the Priority Reforms of the National Agreement on Closing the Gap. "We must end the stalemate that arises when native title organisations with little in the way back of us, or legal or commercial expertise, are expected to negotiate with multinational companies. This is why the first priority for our economic partnership will be to reform the funding model for prescribed body corporate. So that it delivers meaningful participation for communities and timely decision making for investors." Data released on Thursday revealed just four of 19 targets are on track to be met. Another four goals are going backwards - namely adult incarceration, children in out-of-home care, suicide rates and child development. Australia's Sarah Gigante has kept pace with the Tour de France Femmes leaders, despite France's Maeva Squiban claiming a solo victory in the seventh stage. Gigante has come home in 16th place for the second day running, 1 minute and 11 seconds behind the winner. The result means the AG Insurance-Soudal rider has slipped a place to eighth in the general classification, 1 min 14 sec behind yellow jersey wearer Kimberley Le Court Pienaar. But she says she has a game plan and is sticking to it. "I know they're going to put me under pressure on purpose. So it's hard but yeah, I know what's coming."