
As CT towns plan their budgets, some anticipate huge tax increases. Here's why
While most Connecticut communities are proposing relatively modest tax increases of 1 to 4% and a few plan no change at all, several are warning of heftier hikes and at least two are looking to cut jobs and reduce services.
Wallingford is by far the most extreme case so far, blaming revaluation and other factors for creating the possibility of a 19% tax increase.
Among the other communities proposing substantial — but far less severe increases — are West Hartford at 7.3%, Cheshire at 12.7%, Bristol at 5.3% and Middletown at just under 9%.
'We're seeing more of the 5.5%, 6, 7 or 8% (increase proposals) than we typically see. Places like New London and Norwich are saying they can't keep raising taxes, so they're looking at cuts,' said Joe Delong, executive director of the Connecticut Conference of Municipalities.
Emphasizing that each community's financial situation is different, Delong still said a few factors are hurting nearly all cities and towns: soaring medical insurance premiums for employees, and state aid that never rose to cover the federal pandemic relief funding that's been going away.
'Health care costs are just killing everyone. And a unifying theme we've seen over the last several years is that with ARPA funding gone, the bottom is falling out,' Delong said.
If state Education Cost Sharing funding had kept pace with inflation since 2017, there would be more than $400 million available to towns and cities for their school budgets.
'There was a $407 million shift from the (state) income tax to the (local) property tax,' he said.
Budget proposals are preliminary so far, with some towns beginning to revise or adopt them this months and others going as late as June. So far, though, there have been signs that this could be a particularly difficult year for numerous communities.
Middletown Mayor Ben Florsheim cited falling revenue from car taxes combined with soaring insurance premiums for the city's workforce as significant factors.
'The vast majority of the overall increase in the budget is due to fixed costs, including a roughly 16% increase in health insurance costs that is unprecedented in recent years where Middletown has enjoyed relatively low rate hikes from our insurance provider,' he wrote in a message accompanying the $240.2 million budget he proposed this week.
Paying for it would require a tax rate of 32.8 mills, up 2.7 mills from the current rate, he said. That would translate to an annual extra cost of $490 on a home assessed at $175,000, or roughly another $40 a month.
'I know, and the council knows, that another $40 per month from residents' pockets isn't trivial. Neither is the prospect, or the reality, of crumbling buildings, soaring utility and healthcare costs, and a mindset of reaction and retrenchment in Hartford and Washington,' wrote Florsheim.
In Wallingford, homeowners face the impact of a revaluation that's reflecting much higher home values as well as a shift in tax burden from commercial to residential owners.
'At the proposed mill rate of 24.84, the average residential property parcel, now assessed at $277,618, would generate $6,896 in taxes, an increase of 19.18% from the current tax bill of $5,786,' Mayor Vincent Cervoni wrote in his budget proposal this week.
In at least two Connecticut communities, the solution appears to be reducing the payroll.
'Norwich has said they're considering cutting 10% of their workforce. New London's mayor has said he just can't raise taxes any more; they cut the New London (Sailfest) festival that's been around for so many decades. But he told me he's trying to help children from low-income families on one end, so he can't tax their families out of their homes,' Delong said.
New London Mayor Michael Passero has pledged not to increase taxes, and has cautioned he might need to reduce as many as 15 municipal jobs to balance the municipal books next year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Johnstown city council informs public of park renovation project
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. (WTAJ) — Members of the Johnstown City Council helped inform the public about the approved renovation project of Central Park. Councilman Taylor Clark set up a stand at the gazebo in the park to lay out the project plans, design and other features for the residents to learn about the upcoming park renovations that cost $8 million. Members of the public came to the stand to hear what the councilman had to say. 'We got a design for the park that's going to be not just something that's going to modernize it, but it's going to be something that will be more inclusive for everyone, especially people with disabilities,' Clark said. 'ADA compliance is a huge deal, and modernization is a huge deal, while remembering the history of the park itself.' Plans included a patio place for people to sit down at, a new pavilion for entertainment and a new water feature. The prominent feature, the water fountain in the center of the park, will move over to Sandyvale Park. 'When we put the park back together, there will be new sidewalks, there'll be new benches,' Clark added. 'There'll be a lot of new features of the park that will be more communal for everyone to be able to use.' However, the session did come with a counter protest across the way from the gazebo. Republican nominee for city mayor John DeBarcola and Republican nominee for city council Joe Tartano set up a table to share their perspective as to why the project should not happen. 'They've tried this before,' Tartano said. 'They told everybody when they reduce Main Street and Central Park, it's going to bring people downtown. It's not. It didn't before. It's history. Look into it. After the flood, they redid everything, and it hasn't.' Residents flocked to the park to hear from both sides of the issue. While some picked at bits and pieces of the design, others took strong stances on one side or the other. 'If you had a home, you'd redo your kitchen,' resident Sandy Grodziski said. 'You don't wait 60 years to remodel your house.' 'The park is a great place to meet people. The plans are just incredibly stupid,' resident Catherine-Anne McCluskey said. A main point for those who are against the park renovations is the amount of money going into it. At a price tag of $8 million, they feel the money could have gone elsewhere. 'The money could go to the public safety building,' DeBarcola said. 'The money can go into blight removal. They had so many options on how they could spend this money, and they failed to do that.' Clark has expressed his displeasure with the invoice for the renovations, also saying that the money granted to them by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) during the COVID-19 pandemic could have been allocated elsewhere. The deadline to move the money elsewhere passed in December 2024, which means that the city has to use it before giving it back to the federal government. 'Not only would that be an embarrassment for the city if we were able to do that, it would be very difficult then to move forward, trying to get targeted federal and state funding,' Clark said. 'They're living in the past, and I'm living in the future, so I keep moving up,' Grodziski added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Business Insider
3 days ago
- Business Insider
4 moves the Trump administration could make if courts strike down its tariffs
President Donald Trump has four more swings at implementing his tariffs — even if courts strike down his use of the IEEPA. Experts in international trade told Business Insider that Trump could take four different routes to imposing trade barriers without Congress. All four are doable, though significantly more complicated, and are unlikely policies he could change at will overnight. "Now we're over a hundred days into the tariffs, andtariffs are a very top-of-the-agenda item," Drew DeLong, lead in geopolitical dynamics practice at Kearney, a global strategy and management consulting firm, told BI. "There are a number of motivations underneath tariffs, and whether his current tariffs stay, he will find ways to continue to amplify pressure on trading partners," DeLong added. After small businesses sued Trump and his various trade officials over tariffs, the US Court of International Trade ruled unanimously on May 28 that he doesn't have the authority to levy sweeping tariffs using the IEEPA — a 1970s law typically used for economic sanctions during national emergencies. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit resumed the tariffs a day later, but their fate remains uncertain. "That decision, if it is favorable to Trump, would still go to the Supreme Court for review," said Kent Jones, Professor Emeritus of international economics at Babson College. "Many conservative judges, even Trump appointees, have tended to view Trump's use of IEEAP as overstepping the limits of delegating tariff-making power from Congress to the President." Here are four things the Trump administration could do next to keep trade barriers up without Congress. Section 122 DeLong said Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, also known as the Balance of Payments Act, could be the White House's first choice if it wants to "continue the pressure immediately" on trading partners. The act's official language allows it to be applied only if there are "large and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits," otherwise known as trade deficits. "Section 122 is probably going to be a top pick," Robert Shapiro, an attorney of international trade at Thompson Coburn LLP, told BI. "That gives Trump some vehicle, but it's a limited 15% for 150 days, and then he has to go to Congress." "That would open the door for Congress to pass a whole bunch of trade actions, but the administration obviously didn't want to go through that first," Shapiro added. Section 232 Section 232 under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the White House to raise duties on imports it deems a threat to national security. A recent probe into critical mineral imports, for example, argued that the US is overly dependent on foreign sources for materials essential to defense, infrastructure, and innovation. DeLong said that at the moment, there are at least eight ongoing Section 232 investigations, including those involving copper, timber, and semiconductors. He said the recent June 3 tariff hike on steel and aluminum from 25% to 50% is also being done under section 232. Jones said, however, that each section 232 tariff requires a formal investigation, and the sectors it could be applied to are limited. "The problem with section 232 is that it requires a separate action for each industrial category of goods against which tariffs can be imposed," said Jones. "The perceived advantage of the IEEPA was that it allowed broad tariff coverage across the board to all industries." Section 301 Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 gives the US Trade Representative — now Jamieson Greer — broad authority to investigate whether other countries are violating existing trade agreements or hurting American businesses. DeLong said that the first Trump administration leaned heavily on the provision to impose tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Chinese goods and aircraft from the European Union. But section 301 would require a formal investigation and even a public comment period. "The problem with sec. 301, however, is that it requires a separate determination of specific foreign unfair or discriminatory trade practices, country by country," said Jones. "The IEEPA, again, seemed to give the President more flexibility in declaring an emergency against all global imports into the US without the need to document specific foreign practices," Jones added. Section 338 DeLong said Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 could theoretically allow any US president to impose up to a 50% tariff on countries that discriminate against the US. However, he said this would be a very uncommon approach that could again bring the tariff argument into uncharted territories. "That has not been used — and I don't think I'm understating this —in decades, or ever," said DeLong of section 338. "That would be relatively new."

Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Fiscal Court approves tornado cleanup oversight, several new hires
At its regular meeting Thursday morning, the Laurel County Fiscal Court approved several items related to tornado recovery and county operations for the upcoming fiscal year. Judge-Executive David Westerfield received approval to bring in DRC Emergency Services to oversee remaining tornado debris cleanup through local subcontractors. He was also authorized to hire a company to handle FEMA documentation related to the cleanup, as well as a monitoring company to meet FEMA requirements for debris removal tracking. As for personnel matters, multiple new hires were approved. Jordan Dalrymple, who will serve as retirement clerk, will enter her role on June 16. Dalrymple will earn $21 per hour for the position. Following the retirement of two road department employees, the department saw two new hires — William Antrim and Billy Goforth. Antrim will earn $15 per hour, whereas Goforth will make $14 an hour due to not having his CDL (commercial driver's license). Further, six temporary employees will be hired to haul debris, each earning $30 an hour. In new business, the court approved bids for materials to be used during the 2025–2026 fiscal year. During the county treasurer's report, several transfers and approvals were made, including: — Approval of May claims with no discussion. — An intra-fund transfer, also approved without discussion. — The adoption of standing orders for the 2025–2026 fiscal year. — The closure of the county's ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) account after funds were fully allocated and spent. The cash transfer report included $500,000 from the occupational tax fund to the road fund, $299,848.67 from the ARPA fund to general fund, and $800,000 from the occupational tax fund to general fund. Judge Westerfield closed Thursday's meeting by thanking those involved with tornado relief efforts. 'I just appreciate everybody in the county for pulling together and trying to help these people,' Westerfield stated. The Laurel County Fiscal Court regularly meets at 8:45 a.m. on the second Monday and 9:30 a.m. on the final Thursday of each month. The fiscal court's next meeting will take place Monday, June 9.