logo
Hungary threatens to expel dual nationals in 'defend sovereignty' push

Hungary threatens to expel dual nationals in 'defend sovereignty' push

Euronews11-03-2025
The proposed amendment of the Hungarian constitution could result in the expulsion of Hungarians who hold nationalities from other countries if the government sees them as a danger to sovereignty.
ADVERTISEMENT
Critics of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and his government who hold dual nationalities could face expulsion from the country, activists and NGO leaders fear, after the governing party announced its intention to amend the constitution as part of its latest political campaign.
The move was revealed by the parliamentary group leader of the ruling party, Fidesz, Máté Kocsis, in a Facebook post on Sunday.
'A Hungarian citizen who also holds the citizenship of another state may be expelled from the territory of Hungary under conditions specified by law if his or her activities endanger the national sovereignty, public order, territorial integrity or security of Hungary,' Kocsis' post said, referring to the text of the proposed legislation.
Kocsis further made it clear that the measure could be used against NGOs and journalists seen by the government as representatives of foreign interests. The politician indirectly also referred to Hungarian-born American investor and philanthropist George Soros.
"In recent years, foreign powers and speculators have increasingly unscrupulously and widely interfered in the internal affairs of our country, even in electoral processes, and have also actively engaged in defamatory activities against Hungary throughout Europe," Kocsis wrote.
"They did this through pseudo-civil organisations, corrupt politicians, and media outlets that call themselves independent," he claimed, without providing evidence.
Other details of the draft law remain unknown, so it's unclear which activities could qualify as endangering the national security or the sovereignty of the central European country. Public backlash and fears of losing citizenship abound
Representatives of the civic opposition to Orbán have already expressed frustration over the plans.
Stefano Bottoni, a historian with dual Hungarian-Italian citizenship and a fierce critic of Orbán's rule, said he was in shock.
"I search for the words, but they don't come. Rather, I feel a mixture of anger and anxiety," Botton said.
"Their nearly 15 years rule have prepared me for many things, but not for the fact that any citizen who thinks differently and is not exclusively Hungarian national, can be targeted," he added.
Bottoni, who authored the 2023 bestseller, "Obsessed with power: The Hungary of Viktor Orbán," recalled historical parallels from the region, where states tried to get rid of their own citizens.
The antisemitic campaigns in Poland in 1968-1969, where around 13,000 citizenships were revoked, resulted in mass deportations, are one clear example, he said.
Bottoni called this development a "massive red line that could be seen even from the Moon" in a social media post.
Another Orbán critic, Csaba Lukács, a journalist at the independent Magyar Hang weekly holding Romanian and Hungarian passports, said on social media he was afraid he might lose his Hungarian citizenship. ADVERTISEMENT
"Well, it looks like our party and government may soon take away my Hungarian citizenship and expel me from Hungary," Lukács said, comparing the plans to the rule of Romanian communist dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu.
Recently, Lukács ended up being summoned together with two other journalists to an interrogation by the country's intelligence service after his paper falsely claimed the plane of the toppled Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad had landed in Budapest.
The paper later apologised for publishing fake news, but the government continued to target the outlet, calling it a danger to national security. Orbán boosted by Trump's victory
The latest campaign against activists of multiple nationalities is a part of a broader initiative to get rid of foreign-funded critics in Hungary. ADVERTISEMENT
In the past, Orbán repeatedly referred to NGOs and independent media critical of him and his government as part of what he called a "Soros network" — a reference to the Hungarian-born liberal investor and philanthropist George Soros, often invoked by right-wing populists as a disruptive influence.
However, after the electoral victory of US President Donald Trump, Orbán opted for decisive actions.
In a radio speech on 7 February, he alleged that some Hungarians received foreign funding from Soros, the US government and Brussels to overthrow his government.
'They need to be swept away. When, if not now," Orbán ADVERTISEMENT
"The entire Soros network needs to be dismantled ... Those who accept this money need to be sanctioned.'
In late February, the Hungarian prime minister appointed a government representative to review the United States Agency for International Development's (USAID) work in Hungary and its funds.
András László, a Fidesz MEP, is now investigating which organisations and media outlets in Hungary received funding from USAID programmes — another commonly invoked source of alleged disruptive actions.
Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó said on Monday that he supported the proposed changes in the constitution and called for a law similar to the US Magnitsky Act to defend national interests. ADVERTISEMENT
The exact text of the new legislation has not yet been made public, and the parliamentary vote is not scheduled at this time.
The Fidesz-KDNP party alliance has an absolute majority in the parliament, and anything the governing party proposes might pass immediately.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In Ukraine peace talks, Donbas question remains crucial and unresolved
In Ukraine peace talks, Donbas question remains crucial and unresolved

LeMonde

time4 hours ago

  • LeMonde

In Ukraine peace talks, Donbas question remains crucial and unresolved

The map set on the easel displayed Ukraine with its 1,300-kilometer frontline and the fifth of its territory under occupation. It was around this document that Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump began their bilateral meeting at the White House on Monday, August 18. Nothing has emerged so far about what the two leaders discussed behind closed doors. However, the previous statements by the American president regarding potential territorial concessions are well known. According to multiple sources cited in US media, Trump came out of his meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15, saying the Russian president would agree to ending the war on the condition that he obtain the entire eastern region of Donbas, comprised of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts, including zones of each still controlled by Kyiv. Trump has made no secret of his view that such a withdrawal would be an unavoidable concession to secure a peace deal. "President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," he wrote on his Truth Social network on Sunday night.

Top officers hold Ukraine talks after Trump rules out US troops
Top officers hold Ukraine talks after Trump rules out US troops

LeMonde

time5 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Top officers hold Ukraine talks after Trump rules out US troops

Top US and European military officers met in Washington on Tuesday, August 19, to discuss the mechanics of a possible Ukraine peace deal, after President Donald Trump ruled out sending American troops to back an agreement but suggested air support instead. In a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ending the war, Trump brought Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders to the White House on Monday, three days after his landmark encounter with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. But while Trump said Putin had agreed to meet Zelensky and accept some Western security guarantees for Ukraine, those promises have been met with extreme caution by Kyiv and Western capitals, and many details remain vague. As Western leaders push for an agreement, top US officer General Dan Caine held talks Tuesday evening with European military chiefs to discuss "best options for a potential Ukraine peace deal," a US defense official told AFP. The in-person talks precede a virtual meeting of military chiefs from NATO's 32 member countries on Wednesday, in which Caine is also scheduled to participate. Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine since Russia invaded in 2022, earlier said that European nations were "willing to put people on the ground" to secure any settlement. "France and Germany, a couple of them, UK, they want to have boots on the ground," Trump said in a Fox News interview. "We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air." Asked what assurances Trump had that US boots would not be on the ground, he replied: "Well, you have my assurance and I'm president." Allies discuss next steps The White House later doubled down on Trump's statements – but gave few new details on either the summit or the security guarantees. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that Trump "has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine" and that the use of US air power was an "option and a possibility." Leavitt insisted that Putin had promised Trump he would meet Zelensky, and said top US officials were "coordinating" with Russia on a summit. Trump had dramatically interrupted his meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans at the White House on Monday to call the Russian leader. Allies have expressed doubts that Putin will go through with the meeting, but the Europeans are seizing on the possibility of a peace deal following the Trump talks. French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought together around 30 of Ukraine's allies known as the "Coalition of the Willing" for virtual consultations. Starmer told them coalition teams and US officials would meet in the coming days to "prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended," a Downing Street spokesperson said. Geneva, Budapest floated for summits Russia has warned that any solution must also protect its own "security interests" and has ruled out Ukraine joining NATO. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov added that any meeting between the leaders "must be prepared very thoroughly." Lavrov's comments, and Putin's offer of Moscow as a summit venue, reinforced European fears that Russia was once again stalling. Macron said he wanted the summit to take place in Geneva, a historic venue for peace talks. Switzerland said it was ready to offer immunity to Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court over the war. Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz have both said the summit could take place in two weeks. The White House declined to comment on a Politico report that it was eying Hungary's capital Budapest as a venue for a follow-up three-way summit including Trump.

'Russia has no reason to scale back its ambitions in Ukraine and beyond'
'Russia has no reason to scale back its ambitions in Ukraine and beyond'

LeMonde

time6 hours ago

  • LeMonde

'Russia has no reason to scale back its ambitions in Ukraine and beyond'

Since Donald Trump was inaugurated in January, a series of intense diplomatic maneuvers – full of announcements, reversals and behind-the-scenes strategies – have unfolded without producing a resolution to the war in Ukraine. The successive diplomatic meetings between Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska [on August 15], followed by a meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington and then talks with European leaders [on August 18], raise the question: Has a breakthrough become possible? The answer remains unclear. Despite all parties praising the quality of the discussions, no specific details of a possible settlement, its terms or its timeline have been revealed to date. Meanwhile, the idea of an unconditional ceasefire has dropped from the agenda, and Russia has continued bombing Ukraine without losing favor with the American president. In Alaska, Putin emerged as the main political beneficiary of the meeting. Welcomed with unprecedented honors by Trump, he scored a symbolic victory: To both his electorate and the international community, he did not appear as a pariah but as an indispensable peacemaker. Beyond the staging, the Russian president largely imposed his approach. Now, Trump no longer supports an immediate ceasefire, as Kyiv and Brussels had demanded, but instead a "comprehensive agreement" with vague terms that would include recognition of Crimea as part of Russia, as well as the four regions in eastern Ukraine; the exclusion of Ukraine from membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); the recognition of Russian as a second official language in certain regions; and the return to favor of the Orthodox Church under the Moscow Patriarchate. In exchange, Putin now appears to grudgingly accept the principle of Western security guarantees for Ukraine. Whether this major shift is genuine, however, remains to be seen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store