logo
2 Signs You're Not Being Yourself In A Relationship, By A Psychologist

2 Signs You're Not Being Yourself In A Relationship, By A Psychologist

Forbesa day ago

Flirting is evolutionary. We often flirt to indicate interest in people we're attracted to. However, in the initial phases of dating, there's usually some uncertainty, where neither person is sure if things will move forward. During this time, people often behave in ambiguous ways by sending mixed signals, holding back or keeping things playful instead of making bold, direct moves.
Being too blunt too soon can feel awkward, unsafe or even disrespectful. So, we use indirect, playful communication to test the waters and protect ourselves emotionally and socially. This stage plays a huge role in how we connect with others.
But sometimes, we get so caught up trying to 'do it right,' we end up following a script and forget to enjoy ourselves. People might say 'Don't be the first person to respond back after a date' or 'Act nonchalant if you want them to like you.' Ironically, this leads us to stop being true to ourselves, as though there's no other way to act around the person you like.
You may think this behavior helps you impress your date and secure their interest, but if you're not being authentic, how will you know if they truly like you? Worse, you might end up shaping your identity around theirs, hiding parts of yourself just to fit into a version you think they'll prefer.
Here are two ways to tell if your feelings are genuine or if you're stuck performing a role.
There are some social norms and expectations that guide how people behave in romantic or flirtatious situations. They act like mental roadmaps or 'scripts' for how one should initiate, progress and maintain romantic relationships. These scripts are shaped by culture, media, gender roles, class, religion and even age, and they often influence how people think dating should happen, whether or not they consciously realize it.
Acting out a script isn't inherently negative. In fact, it often helps ensure we behave respectfully and appropriately, especially in intimate situations. Not only do they guide our behavior in intimate settings, but they also help shape how we see ourselves.
In a classic 1989 study, sociologist Elijah Anderson studied how lower-income inner-city American youth devised certain 'game plans' to try and appeal to the woman by acting like her ideal partner, when in reality, he may only be feigning to establish a sexual relationship with her.
Abiding by these behavioral tactics may be seen as important to those who are still developing their identities and are trying to appeal to their peer groups.
On the other hand, a girl's peer group may support her pursuing the relationship if they perceive her partner's intentions as good.
'While many girls pursue the dream, the boy, for the immediate future, is generally not interested in 'playing house,' as his peer-group derisively refers to domestic life,' Anderson says.
Even today, people may adjust their behavior to meet a potential partner's expectations, without being honest about their own. This mismatch can lead to inauthentic relationships and mental health challenges.
Brian Soller, who conducted a 2014 study on the connection between mental health and adolescent relationships, found that inauthenticity in relationships is associated with poor mental health outcomes, especially for young girls.
This inauthenticity is reflected in red flags in dating spheres, which are hard to notice initially, where everyone plays a role that they deem fit for themselves.
This may show up in the form of self-imposed rules like 'I should text back now so I don't seem too eager,' or 'I should play hard to get,' even when you'd rather be direct. This could even be in the form of feigning interest in a hobby or activity your partner prefers, just so they like you back.
For instance, you might decide to go shopping with them, even though it doesn't interest you and you would much rather watch a new movie instead. This inevitably leads to disappointment when your partner finds out you were not being expressive enough. They might be confused or upset and start thinking that you're losing interest in them or that you don't feel comfortable enough to be honest with them.
Even if it feels like a small thing, not being honest about your preferences can still create distance.
While it is important to show interest in your partner's life, it should not come at the cost of repressing your actual self and interests. That's why you need to stop 'performing' just to impress someone.
When your actions are guided more by the rules of flirting than your true feelings, chances are you're acting out a seduction script rather than building a genuine connection.
We tend to act differently around different people. How we behave with our parents may be different than how we act around our friends. Each connection brings out a different dynamic, which means the 'script' you follow in one relationship won't be the same in another.
Consequently, your 'relational self' — the version of you that shows up in a relationship — can shift from partner to partner. However, we often fall into the trap of using the same romantic script with everyone we date, not accounting for the uniqueness of each dynamic.
In this way, you end up playing the same character over and over, no matter who you're with.
There is a misconception that being your real, everyday self in a relationship is what makes you feel authentic. But a 2017 study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin found something surprising: you actually feel more authentic when your relational self is closer to your ideal self or the version of you that you strive to be.
You cannot be your best self by following a script, but by striving to work on yourself and make yourself better every day. That includes being authentic, taking up space and not letting someone enclose you in a standardized box. That includes your friends, family and your partner.
If your crush takes hours to reply or cancels a date, someone might advise you to 'act chill and ignore them.' But if that's not how you truly want to handle things, there's no need to follow that advice.
If expressing your feelings, like calling them to let them know you felt hurt, helps you communicate honestly, then it's okay to do that. Just remember, being honest doesn't mean compromising your self-respect.
Authentic connection allows room for spontaneity and imperfection. But when you're stuck in a script, deviations can feel threatening, because they disrupt the storyline you've mentally constructed about how seduction and love 'should' unfold.
Our environment shapes how we approach romance and love. But when we cling too tightly to these scripts, we risk missing the opportunity for real emotional intimacy. We end up performing roles like 'the pursuer,' 'the prize,' 'the cool one' or 'the unavailable one,' instead of relating authentically to another human being.
If showing interest comes off as needy and you have to withhold your eagerness and enthusiasm, then that person may not be right for you. You need to address incompatibilities right away, instead of pretending everything is fine when they don't live up to their word or disrespect you.
Try to work on the self you aspire to be by setting specific goals that you can reach in a set timeframe. For instance, you may want to be someone who is emotionally grounded, dependable or assertive. Ask yourself, what is holding you back and once you have the answer, set small achievable goals to reach them. When you work on yourself, you inevitably attract people who add to your life, not those who make you feel small and caged.
Tear up the script, albeit mentally, that is holding you back from having a meaningful connection, all because you're too set on whether a person takes the right steps to 'win' you over or vice versa.
If someone truly wants to build a relationship with you, they'll accept you for who you are and be authentic about who they are in return — and that's the type of love we all deserve.
How true do you stay to yourself when you're in the early stages of love? Take this science-backed test to find out: Authenticity In Relationships Scale

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unplugged & Learning
Unplugged & Learning

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Unplugged & Learning

By the time Jada, an eighth grader at Detroit Achievement Academy, settles into her morning routine with her class, she already knows she won't be pulled into a group chat or sneak a glance at TikTok between classes. Her phone is zipped away in her bookbag, self-secured and self-managed by her, as it is for every student in the building. And she likes it that way. 'I thought I'd hate it at first,' Jada admits. 'But honestly, it's way better. My classmates and I actually talk to each other at school. And I'm not stressing about what's happening on my phone.' Across the country, more schools are coming to the same conclusion: cellphones, for all their utility, are making it harder for kids to learn, focus, and just be kids. At Detroit Achievement, the no-cellphone policy is more than just about reducing screen time. It's about protecting time, and space, for students to grow as people. For Kirstin Stoeckle, Director of Upper School at Detroit Achievement Academy, the decision to ban cellphones wasn't about punishment. It was about presence. 'When people outside our school community meet our middle schoolers, they almost always comment on how engaged they are, with each other and at school, and how they still seem like joyful, happy kids.' That sense of childhood - of the good kind of boredom, the kind that leads to creativity instead of doomscrolling - is something Stoeckle and her team are determined to protect. In her view, phones aren't just distractions; they're accelerants. They speed kids toward social pressures they may not be ready for and pull them away from the small, formative moments that make up a school day. 'We didn't ban phones so that our kids would stay kids for longer,' she explains, 'but that did certainly happen, and it has been beautiful for everyone involved. They laugh a lot at lunch. They play outside more, often silly games that they created themselves. We're seeing relationships deepen - in person, in real time.' A growing body of research supports what schools like Detroit Achievement already see every day. In a study spanning four English cities, researchers at the London School of Economics found that banning phones led to a 6.4% increase in test scores - equivalent to an extra hour of instructional time per week. The gains were even more pronounced for low-achieving students, effectively narrowing the achievement gap without a single change to curriculum or staffing. Further emphasizing the impact on economically disadvantaged students, the study noted that the lowest-achieving students benefited the most, with their test scores increasing by 14.23% of a standard deviation. In Norway, a similar experiment with middle schools showed students not only performed better academically but were also more likely to go on to advanced secondary programs. The policy didn't just help kids learn more, it helped them believe in what they could do next. Here in the U.S., schools are catching on. The Bentonville School District in Arkansas banned phones and in just one year recorded a 57% reduction in verbal or physical aggression offenses and a 51% reduction in drug-related offenses, she said. Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders recently announced a bill to make every school in Arkansas phone-free, an effort to re-invest in the mental wellbeing of the state's kids. In Michigan, new legislation is pushing public schools to adopt similar restrictions, while New York and Florida have already announced bell-to-bell bans in the coming school year. It's tempting to frame phone bans as a nostalgic return to 'how things used to be,' but the implications are much bigger. Constant access to devices doesn't just fragment attention; it rewires expectations. Students come to see every lull as a void to be filled by content, not conversation. Every moment of discomfort - social, intellectual, emotional - gets outsourced to a screen. In that environment, deeper learning suffers. So does resilience. Teachers talk about the difference: students who once rushed to Google an answer now pause to wrestle with a hard question. Others who used to eat lunch in silence, eyes locked on their phones, are laughing in circles of friends. It's not magic—it's policy. But the result feels magical. What makes cellphone bans so compelling is their simplicity. There's no need for massive budget increases or sweeping reform. Just a bookbag or a locked pouch and a clear expectation. Is it a silver bullet? No. But it might be the cleanest, fastest way to reclaim time, attention, and connection in American schools. As for Jada, she's already convinced. 'When we went to visit high schools, kids were just by themselves on their phones, like they were in a different place.' she says. 'But, I'm actually here, like, in reality. Does that make sense?' Yeah. It does make sense, Jada.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store