Operation Elon: The Aussie who made $820m selling her Tesla shares
Who would not want to own shares in a company that – as its return to the trillion-dollar valuation club demonstrates – seems to be protected from any sense of economic logic.
Sales continued to plunge across its biggest European markets last month, despite a long-awaited update of its most popular car.
While leaving Tesla on self-drive mode, Musk found time to support extreme right-wing causes across Europe which triggered a plunge in sales on the Continent, as well as the Trump administration which is waging a global trade war that is also costing Tesla dearly.
And when reports emerged that Tesla's directors were searching for a potential replacement for Musk – a very sensible decision for any board in the circumstances – Denholm made a public statement declaring the report to be 'absolutely false' and made it clear that Tesla and its founder Musk were joined at the hip.
'The CEO of Tesla is Elon Musk and the board is highly confident in his ability to continue executing on the exciting growth plan ahead,' she said in a tweet on his social media platform, X.
It is no wonder this board was slammed by a US court judge over a $US56 billion pay packet for Musk. It was accused of acting as enabler for the company founder, not as an overseer for investors.
But the rules are different at Tesla.
Its trillion-dollar valuation only makes sense if you look at it as a meme stock – a company that suddenly goes viral on social media and its shares skyrocket for no clear reason. And Musk is its meme. Denholm seems to get this.
Any valuation currently subscribed to Tesla left reality a long time ago, and the only tether with valuations on planet Earth is its mercurial founder.
Tesla's valuation was extraordinary enough when it was merely worth more than every other carmaker on the planet combined. That was based on the idea that it had too much of a lead on e-vehicles – the car of the future – for anyone else to catch it.
While US and European sales reflect repugnance for Musk's politics, the fall-off in China reflects a far more sobering reality: Tesla is way behind its multitude of Chinese rivals on every significant feature: price, recharging times and autonomous driving features which are now offered free on some Chinese cars.
Keep in mind that the future earnings which underpin its current $US1.1 trillion valuation are expected to shrink if his Republican buddies successfully gut electric vehicle subsidies to the tune of billions of dollars. And the price investors pay for each dollar of Tesla's profit far exceeds dominant tech rivals like Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft.
Cars clearly don't drive its valuation now, it is the market perception of Musk's ability to morph the company into a dominant force in AI, robotaxis and humanoid robots.
That is a much harder argument to make in the current environment.
Any valuation currently subscribed to Tesla left reality a long time ago, and the only tether with valuations on planet Earth is its mercurial founder.
You don't need to go outside the US borders to see what significant competition Tesla faces on the AI front. And China appears to be streets ahead when it comes to autonomous driving, robotaxis and is already talking about AI-aided robots as its next workforce.
It underlines that Denholm's one job at Tesla is to keep Musk interested enough to ensure he gives the company a decent crack at the impossible task before it.
The issue is not whether Tesla is a valuable company, it is whether it is worth anything remotely close to the current market valuation.
It gives an interesting context to Denholm's massive stock sale which has left her with shares worth around $US27 million.
Her Tesla stake is almost certainly worth less than her trophy homes in Sydney and nearby Whale Beach where she reportedly tried, and failed, to get approval for a lift to be installed that would deliver her to the sun-kissed sand.
If she isn't willing to hold shares she paid almost nothing for, other investors should take heed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Focus turns to security guarantees after Ukraine summit
Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Donald Trump's promise of security guarantees for Kyiv to help end the Ukraine war but face many unanswered questions, including how willing Russia will be to play ball. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy hailed Monday's extraordinary summit at the White House with Trump as a "major step forward" towards ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and towards setting up a trilateral meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin and the US president in the coming weeks. Flanked by the leaders of allies including Germany, France and Britain at the summit, Zelenskiy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous meeting at the Oval Office in February. But beyond the optics, the path to a lasting peace remains deeply uncertain and Zelenskiy may be forced to make painful compromises to end a war that analysts say has killed or wounded more than 1 million people. And despite the temporary sense of relief in Kyiv, there was no let-up in the fighting. Russia launched 270 drones and 10 missiles in an overnight attack on Ukraine, the Ukrainian air force said, the largest in August. The energy ministry said Russia had targeted energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery, causing big fires. Zelenskiy said on Tuesday his officials were working on the content of the security guarantees. Russia has made no explicit commitment to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday Moscow did not reject any formats for discussing the peace process in Ukraine but that any meeting of national leaders "must be prepared with utmost thoroughness". Putin has warned that Russia will not tolerate troops from the NATO alliance on Ukrainian soil. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his own summit talks with Trump last Friday in Alaska. Trump has not specified what form US security guarantees could take, and backed away from insisting that Russia agree to a ceasefire before any peace negotiations kick off in earnest. The US president has also told Ukraine to forget about regaining control of Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, or joining NATO. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Zelenskiy and his allies had "failed to outplay" Trump, posting on X that "Europe thanked & sucked up to him". The last direct talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Turkey in July while Putin also declined Zelenskiy's public invitation to meet him face-to-face in May. "President Trump has now opened the door to the negotiating room for him, and Putin must now enter it," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told the Deutschlandfunk radio broadcaster, and if not, sanctions must be intensified. On what security guarantees could be offered to Ukraine: "We are working flat out to specify this." Ukraine's allies will hold talks in the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" format on Tuesday to discuss the way forward. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who also attended Monday's talks, said NATO membership for Ukraine was not under discussion but that there was a discussion on "Article 5"-type security guarantees for the country. Article 5 of NATO's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defence, in which an attack on any of its 32 members is considered an attack on all. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Donald Trump's promise of security guarantees for Kyiv to help end the Ukraine war but face many unanswered questions, including how willing Russia will be to play ball. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy hailed Monday's extraordinary summit at the White House with Trump as a "major step forward" towards ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and towards setting up a trilateral meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin and the US president in the coming weeks. Flanked by the leaders of allies including Germany, France and Britain at the summit, Zelenskiy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous meeting at the Oval Office in February. But beyond the optics, the path to a lasting peace remains deeply uncertain and Zelenskiy may be forced to make painful compromises to end a war that analysts say has killed or wounded more than 1 million people. And despite the temporary sense of relief in Kyiv, there was no let-up in the fighting. Russia launched 270 drones and 10 missiles in an overnight attack on Ukraine, the Ukrainian air force said, the largest in August. The energy ministry said Russia had targeted energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery, causing big fires. Zelenskiy said on Tuesday his officials were working on the content of the security guarantees. Russia has made no explicit commitment to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday Moscow did not reject any formats for discussing the peace process in Ukraine but that any meeting of national leaders "must be prepared with utmost thoroughness". Putin has warned that Russia will not tolerate troops from the NATO alliance on Ukrainian soil. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his own summit talks with Trump last Friday in Alaska. Trump has not specified what form US security guarantees could take, and backed away from insisting that Russia agree to a ceasefire before any peace negotiations kick off in earnest. The US president has also told Ukraine to forget about regaining control of Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, or joining NATO. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Zelenskiy and his allies had "failed to outplay" Trump, posting on X that "Europe thanked & sucked up to him". The last direct talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Turkey in July while Putin also declined Zelenskiy's public invitation to meet him face-to-face in May. "President Trump has now opened the door to the negotiating room for him, and Putin must now enter it," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told the Deutschlandfunk radio broadcaster, and if not, sanctions must be intensified. On what security guarantees could be offered to Ukraine: "We are working flat out to specify this." Ukraine's allies will hold talks in the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" format on Tuesday to discuss the way forward. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who also attended Monday's talks, said NATO membership for Ukraine was not under discussion but that there was a discussion on "Article 5"-type security guarantees for the country. Article 5 of NATO's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defence, in which an attack on any of its 32 members is considered an attack on all. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Donald Trump's promise of security guarantees for Kyiv to help end the Ukraine war but face many unanswered questions, including how willing Russia will be to play ball. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy hailed Monday's extraordinary summit at the White House with Trump as a "major step forward" towards ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and towards setting up a trilateral meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin and the US president in the coming weeks. Flanked by the leaders of allies including Germany, France and Britain at the summit, Zelenskiy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous meeting at the Oval Office in February. But beyond the optics, the path to a lasting peace remains deeply uncertain and Zelenskiy may be forced to make painful compromises to end a war that analysts say has killed or wounded more than 1 million people. And despite the temporary sense of relief in Kyiv, there was no let-up in the fighting. Russia launched 270 drones and 10 missiles in an overnight attack on Ukraine, the Ukrainian air force said, the largest in August. The energy ministry said Russia had targeted energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery, causing big fires. Zelenskiy said on Tuesday his officials were working on the content of the security guarantees. Russia has made no explicit commitment to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday Moscow did not reject any formats for discussing the peace process in Ukraine but that any meeting of national leaders "must be prepared with utmost thoroughness". Putin has warned that Russia will not tolerate troops from the NATO alliance on Ukrainian soil. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his own summit talks with Trump last Friday in Alaska. Trump has not specified what form US security guarantees could take, and backed away from insisting that Russia agree to a ceasefire before any peace negotiations kick off in earnest. The US president has also told Ukraine to forget about regaining control of Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, or joining NATO. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Zelenskiy and his allies had "failed to outplay" Trump, posting on X that "Europe thanked & sucked up to him". The last direct talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Turkey in July while Putin also declined Zelenskiy's public invitation to meet him face-to-face in May. "President Trump has now opened the door to the negotiating room for him, and Putin must now enter it," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told the Deutschlandfunk radio broadcaster, and if not, sanctions must be intensified. On what security guarantees could be offered to Ukraine: "We are working flat out to specify this." Ukraine's allies will hold talks in the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" format on Tuesday to discuss the way forward. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who also attended Monday's talks, said NATO membership for Ukraine was not under discussion but that there was a discussion on "Article 5"-type security guarantees for the country. Article 5 of NATO's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defence, in which an attack on any of its 32 members is considered an attack on all. Ukraine and its European allies have been buoyed by Donald Trump's promise of security guarantees for Kyiv to help end the Ukraine war but face many unanswered questions, including how willing Russia will be to play ball. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy hailed Monday's extraordinary summit at the White House with Trump as a "major step forward" towards ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and towards setting up a trilateral meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin and the US president in the coming weeks. Flanked by the leaders of allies including Germany, France and Britain at the summit, Zelenskiy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous meeting at the Oval Office in February. But beyond the optics, the path to a lasting peace remains deeply uncertain and Zelenskiy may be forced to make painful compromises to end a war that analysts say has killed or wounded more than 1 million people. And despite the temporary sense of relief in Kyiv, there was no let-up in the fighting. Russia launched 270 drones and 10 missiles in an overnight attack on Ukraine, the Ukrainian air force said, the largest in August. The energy ministry said Russia had targeted energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery, causing big fires. Zelenskiy said on Tuesday his officials were working on the content of the security guarantees. Russia has made no explicit commitment to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday Moscow did not reject any formats for discussing the peace process in Ukraine but that any meeting of national leaders "must be prepared with utmost thoroughness". Putin has warned that Russia will not tolerate troops from the NATO alliance on Ukrainian soil. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his own summit talks with Trump last Friday in Alaska. Trump has not specified what form US security guarantees could take, and backed away from insisting that Russia agree to a ceasefire before any peace negotiations kick off in earnest. The US president has also told Ukraine to forget about regaining control of Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, or joining NATO. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Zelenskiy and his allies had "failed to outplay" Trump, posting on X that "Europe thanked & sucked up to him". The last direct talks between Russia and Ukraine took place in Turkey in July while Putin also declined Zelenskiy's public invitation to meet him face-to-face in May. "President Trump has now opened the door to the negotiating room for him, and Putin must now enter it," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told the Deutschlandfunk radio broadcaster, and if not, sanctions must be intensified. On what security guarantees could be offered to Ukraine: "We are working flat out to specify this." Ukraine's allies will hold talks in the so-called "Coalition of the Willing" format on Tuesday to discuss the way forward. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who also attended Monday's talks, said NATO membership for Ukraine was not under discussion but that there was a discussion on "Article 5"-type security guarantees for the country. Article 5 of NATO's founding treaty enshrines the principle of collective defence, in which an attack on any of its 32 members is considered an attack on all.
7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Swatch apologies for ad showing gesture seen as racist
Swiss watchmaker Swatch has apologised for an ad campaign that upset consumers in China and elsewhere and says it has 'immediately removed all related materials worldwide'. In an image for the Swatch Essentials collection, an Asian male model is shown pulling the edges of his eyelids upward and backward with his fingers — a gesture seen as derogatory and racist, Swiss public broadcaster SRF reports. The image triggered criticism on social media in China, with major influencers weighing in. Swatch wrote on Instagram that 'we sincerely apologise for any distress or misunderstanding this may have caused'. It said it would 'treat this matter with the utmost importance'. SRF reported that the apology was also posted on the Chinese social network Weibo in Chinese and English. China is a major market for luxury brands and watchmakers. The founders of Dolce&Gabbana apologised on video in 2018 after a Chinese boycott of its products over what were seen as culturally insensitive videos promoting a runway show in Shanghai. Swiss watch exporters are facing new tariffs in the US and a prolonged slowdown, with significant declines in the United States, Japan and Hong Kong, according to industry association figures.
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Should be very careful': Caution urged for Ukrainian security guarantees amid US-EU talks
Filmmaker Ami Horowitz discusses talks between European leaders and US President Donald Trump. 'A lot has changed, President Trump has done more in 200 days than Joe Biden did in four years,' Mr Horowitz told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'We should be very careful about security guarantees and what they are.'
