logo
Operation Elon: The Aussie who made $820m selling her Tesla shares

Operation Elon: The Aussie who made $820m selling her Tesla shares

The Age16-05-2025

Let's start with a different question: why is this respected Silicon Valley veteran selling?
Who would not want to own shares in a company that – as its return to the trillion-dollar valuation club demonstrates – seems to be protected from any sense of economic logic.
Sales continued to plunge across its biggest European markets last month, despite a long-awaited update of its most popular car.
While leaving Tesla on self-drive mode, Musk found time to support extreme right-wing causes across Europe which triggered a plunge in sales on the Continent, as well as the Trump administration which is waging a global trade war that is also costing Tesla dearly.
And when reports emerged that Tesla's directors were searching for a potential replacement for Musk – a very sensible decision for any board in the circumstances – Denholm made a public statement declaring the report to be 'absolutely false' and made it clear that Tesla and its founder Musk were joined at the hip.
'The CEO of Tesla is Elon Musk and the board is highly confident in his ability to continue executing on the exciting growth plan ahead,' she said in a tweet on his social media platform, X.
It is no wonder this board was slammed by a US court judge over a $US56 billion pay packet for Musk. It was accused of acting as enabler for the company founder, not as an overseer for investors.
But the rules are different at Tesla.
Its trillion-dollar valuation only makes sense if you look at it as a meme stock – a company that suddenly goes viral on social media and its shares skyrocket for no clear reason. And Musk is its meme. Denholm seems to get this.
Any valuation currently subscribed to Tesla left reality a long time ago, and the only tether with valuations on planet Earth is its mercurial founder.
Tesla's valuation was extraordinary enough when it was merely worth more than every other carmaker on the planet combined. That was based on the idea that it had too much of a lead on e-vehicles – the car of the future – for anyone else to catch it.
While US and European sales reflect repugnance for Musk's politics, the fall-off in China reflects a far more sobering reality: Tesla is way behind its multitude of Chinese rivals on every significant feature: price, recharging times and autonomous driving features which are now offered free on some Chinese cars.
Keep in mind that the future earnings which underpin its current $US1.1 trillion valuation are expected to shrink if his Republican buddies successfully gut electric vehicle subsidies to the tune of billions of dollars. And the price investors pay for each dollar of Tesla's profit far exceeds dominant tech rivals like Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft.
Cars clearly don't drive its valuation now, it is the market perception of Musk's ability to morph the company into a dominant force in AI, robotaxis and humanoid robots.
That is a much harder argument to make in the current environment.
Any valuation currently subscribed to Tesla left reality a long time ago, and the only tether with valuations on planet Earth is its mercurial founder.
You don't need to go outside the US borders to see what significant competition Tesla faces on the AI front. And China appears to be streets ahead when it comes to autonomous driving, robotaxis and is already talking about AI-aided robots as its next workforce.
It underlines that Denholm's one job at Tesla is to keep Musk interested enough to ensure he gives the company a decent crack at the impossible task before it.
The issue is not whether Tesla is a valuable company, it is whether it is worth anything remotely close to the current market valuation.
It gives an interesting context to Denholm's massive stock sale which has left her with shares worth around $US27 million.
Her Tesla stake is almost certainly worth less than her trophy homes in Sydney and nearby Whale Beach where she reportedly tried, and failed, to get approval for a lift to be installed that would deliver her to the sun-kissed sand.
If she isn't willing to hold shares she paid almost nothing for, other investors should take heed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HK activist charged under China-imposed security law
HK activist charged under China-imposed security law

West Australian

time41 minutes ago

  • West Australian

HK activist charged under China-imposed security law

Hong Kong authorities have once again arrested pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong and charged him with conspiracy to collude with a foreign country under a Beijing-imposed national security law. Wong, 28, was originally set to be released in January 2027 from a 56-month jail sentence he is serving under the same law for conspiracy to commit subversion after he participated in an unofficial primary election. Taken to the West Kowloon magistrates' courts, Wong faced a new charge of conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security. The former student pro-democracy activist, who wore a blue shirt and appeared noticeably thinner than before, replied, "Understand," when the clerk read out the charge and details of the offence. Wong did not apply for bail, and the case was adjourned to August 8. Before returning to custody, he waved, shrugged, and shook his head in the direction of the public gallery. In a statement, Hong Kong's national security police said they had arrested a 28-year-old man on suspicion of the offence, as well as for "dealing with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence". A charge sheet seen by Reuters accuses Wong of having conspired with exiled activist Nathan Law and others to ask foreign countries, institutions, organisations, or individuals outside China to impose sanctions or blockades. Such actions against Hong Kong or China, along with other hostile activities targeting them, took place in 2020, between July 1 and November 23, it added. The National Security Law, which punishes offences such as acts of subversion, collusion with foreign forces, and terrorism, with terms of up to life in jail, was imposed by Beijing on the former British colony in 2020. The Chinese and Hong Kong governments say the law is necessary to restore stability following anti-government protests in 2019. But some Western governments have criticised it as being used to suppress free speech and dissent.

HK activist charged under China-imposed security law
HK activist charged under China-imposed security law

Perth Now

time42 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

HK activist charged under China-imposed security law

Hong Kong authorities have once again arrested pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong and charged him with conspiracy to collude with a foreign country under a Beijing-imposed national security law. Wong, 28, was originally set to be released in January 2027 from a 56-month jail sentence he is serving under the same law for conspiracy to commit subversion after he participated in an unofficial primary election. Taken to the West Kowloon magistrates' courts, Wong faced a new charge of conspiracy to collude with a foreign country or with external elements to endanger national security. The former student pro-democracy activist, who wore a blue shirt and appeared noticeably thinner than before, replied, "Understand," when the clerk read out the charge and details of the offence. Wong did not apply for bail, and the case was adjourned to August 8. Before returning to custody, he waved, shrugged, and shook his head in the direction of the public gallery. In a statement, Hong Kong's national security police said they had arrested a 28-year-old man on suspicion of the offence, as well as for "dealing with property known or believed to represent proceeds of an indictable offence". A charge sheet seen by Reuters accuses Wong of having conspired with exiled activist Nathan Law and others to ask foreign countries, institutions, organisations, or individuals outside China to impose sanctions or blockades. Such actions against Hong Kong or China, along with other hostile activities targeting them, took place in 2020, between July 1 and November 23, it added. The National Security Law, which punishes offences such as acts of subversion, collusion with foreign forces, and terrorism, with terms of up to life in jail, was imposed by Beijing on the former British colony in 2020. The Chinese and Hong Kong governments say the law is necessary to restore stability following anti-government protests in 2019. But some Western governments have criticised it as being used to suppress free speech and dissent.

Trump-Musk feud escalates
Trump-Musk feud escalates

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Trump-Musk feud escalates

Nick Grimm: The rift is widening between US President Donald Trump and his former close ally, tech billionaire Elon Musk, with the pair trading bitter accusations on social media. The escalating feud comes as the Trump administration attempts to get a mammoth spending bill through the Senate, which is facing fierce opposition from Democrats, some Republicans and Elon Musk himself. Gavin Coote reports. Gavin Coote: A political bromance that has devolved into an acrimonious divorce. After days of growing criticism from Elon Musk about Donald Trump's signature spending bill, the US president is now hitting back. Donald Trump: I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars. Gavin Coote: The CEO of electric vehicle company Tesla was until recently President Trump's most powerful ally. But the relationship fractured when Elon Musk began attacking the Trump administration's efforts to get a spending bill through Congress that would cut taxes and ramp up spending for border security. The men are now trading insults and accusations with Mr. Musk claiming on social media without evidence that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That's in reference to a large tranche of material relating to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender who was accused of abusing underage girls before taking his own life in prison. For many observers, the fallout wasn't a matter of if, but when. Prof Todd Belt: This was inevitable, but seeing it blow up like this so quickly is actually surprising. Gavin Coote: Professor Todd Belt is a political analyst with George Washington University. While Mr. Musk only recently left his post as a top advisor in the Trump administration, Professor Belt suspects tensions between the pair have been building for some time. Prof Todd Belt: There's a very famous photo from behind a door of Trump pointing at Musk, and we never really got the story behind that. I suspect we might now. Elon Musk was walking the halls of power. He was in the Oval Office and now he says he's sleeping in his server farms and conference rooms. So politically, he's really gone from the pinnacle to the pit. And you have to think that this is because he's really concerned about his businesses. He's said as much. The stock prices are down. The sales are down. Gavin Coote: Tesla's share price plunged by 14 percent on Thursday. While the feud continues to play out on social media, it's unclear where it could go next. Donald Trump has already threatened to cancel billions of dollars in government contracts involving Mr. Musk's companies. Bruce Wolpe is a senior fellow at the U.S. Study Center and a former Democratic staffer. Bruce Wolpe: It's getting ugly. And the question is, how ugly can it really get? I mean, Musk says that Trump would have lost the election without him. Musk has supported a tweet calling for Trump's impeachment and J.D. Vance become president. Musk has said, I'm dropping the bomb and Trump is in the Epstein tapes. These are the notorious records of Jeffrey Epstein. He's also, Musk is also disconnecting, decommissioning a rocket that's essential to resupplying the International Space Station. And so can it go any worse? Gavin Coote: The spending bill that sparked Mr. Musk's fury is yet to pass the Senate. And while he's vowed to continue mobilising opposition to it, Bruce Wolpe suspects it will have limited impact. Bruce Wolpe: When Musk first said this bill does not control the deficit, that is something that a lot of Republicans on the Hill wanted to get some information on and want to support. But when it gets this personal, I think the Republicans on the Hill, they're choosing between Trump and Musk. There's no choice here. And the Republicans are with Trump and everything rides on Trump's being able to pass this big, beautiful mega bill. If he can pass that, then his legacy, at least for the first term, will be sealed. Gavin Coote: So where does that leave Elon Musk? Do you think he will end up becoming this sort of angry voice out in the wilderness? Bruce Wolpe: Musk said that Trump has three and a half years left. He says, I'm going to be around for 40 years and he has all the money in the world. And so wherever he applies his brain and his money and his power, he can make a difference. So we will see as to where it goes. But this will go on for a while. And that does not do anything to improve the political culture in the United States. It's ugly. It's going to get worse. Nick Grimm: Bruce Wolpe there from the US Studies Center, ending Gavin Coote's report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store