Everything Kim Saeron's Family Exposed About Kim Soohyun In Latest Press Conference
On 7th May 2025, the legal representative of Kim Saeron's family, Bu Jiseok, and YouTuber Kim Seui of Garo Sero Institute held a press conference to reveal new information about Kim Soohyun and his relationship with the late Kim Saeron. Here's what was shared:
(Warning: The following content contains mentions of sexual harassment and abuse and may be triggering)
Kim Soohyun Sent Photos Of Him Sleeping With A Female Idol To Kim Saeron
In the audio recording dated 10th January 2025, Kim Saeron claimed to an acquaintance that Kim Soohyun once sent her photos of him with a female idol after having sex with the individual. She also alleged that the actor saved the idol's name as 'Seaweed' on his contact list because he said the idol smelled like seaweed.
Kim Saeron Admitted To Having Sex With Kim Soohyun When She Was In Middle School
To the same acquaintance, Kim Saeron admitted to having sexual relations with Kim Soohyun. She mentioned that she dated the actor from middle school until she entered University. The late star then alleged that their first time sleeping together happened when she was in the 2nd year of middle school, making her 13 or 14 during the incident.
Kim Soohyun Subjected Kim Saeron To Sexual Harassment And Abuse
Kim Saeron's family also said they've filed a complaint against Kim Soohyun, alleging that he violated the Child Welfare Act. In addition to forcing the actress to engage in sexually inappropriate acts, the family claimed Kim Soohyun subjected Kim Saeron to sexual harassment and abuse during their relationship.
The Informant Who Leaked Kim Saeron's Recording Was Brutally Attacked
During the press conference, Bu Jiseok and Kim Seui revealed that the informant who shared the recording was attacked by two assailants from Korea and China on 30th April. The victim was allegedly stabbed nine times in the neck and sustained other injuries. The two said the attack was premeditated, likely to prevent the recording from going public.
Kim Saeron's family has requested police protection for themselves and Kim Seui, who have been publicly supporting the family. Kim Soohyun and his agency have addressed these new allegations, claiming the recordings were fabricated. The agency also said they would take legal action against Kim Saeron's family and Kim Seui. What are your thoughts on this?
Watch the press conference below:
Sources: Soompi (1)(2)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
South Korea's top court clears Baby Shark of plagiarism claims
SEOUL: South Korea's Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the global children's hit 'Baby Shark' does not constitute plagiarism. The decision dismissed a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by US-based composer Johnny Only against South Korean education firm SmartStudy. The viral 'Baby Shark Dance' video remains YouTube's most-viewed content with over 16 billion views, surpassing Luis Fonsi's 'Despacito'. Johnny Only, legally named Jonathan Wright, had claimed SmartStudy's 2015 release copied his 2011 composition's bassline and rhythm. He sought 30 million won ($21,700) in compensation through his 2019 Seoul lawsuit against the Korean company. SmartStudy, now rebranded as The Pinkfong Company, maintained their version adapted a traditional children's tune in the public domain. A Seoul district court originally cleared Pinkfong of copyright violations in 2021 due to insufficient evidence. The appellate court upheld this verdict in 2023 before Thursday's Supreme Court confirmation. Court documents stated 'All appeals were dismissed and the lower court's rulings were upheld' in the final judgment. Pinkfong celebrated the ruling, stating it validated their creative adaptation of a traditional chant into a pop phenomenon. The company credited their success to adding 'an upbeat rhythm and catchy melody' to the public domain material. Only previously told CBC he had rewritten the original shark attack song into a child-friendly version in 2011. He claimed Pinkfong's version followed his creative approach during the 2019 interview. The composer had not responded to AFP's request for comment following Thursday's verdict. - AFP
Barnama
9 hours ago
- Barnama
South Korean Supreme Court Approves Rulings Against US Composer In Suit Over 'Baby Shark'
SEOUL, Aug 14 (Bernama-Yonhap) -- The Supreme Court on Thursday confirmed lower courts' rulings against an American composer in a plagiarism suit he brought against the producer of the popular South Korean children's song "Baby Shark" six years ago, Yonhap News Agency reported. New York-based composer Johnny Only, whose legal name is Jonathan Wright, filed the lawsuit in Seoul in March 2019, claiming that "Baby Shark," the world-famous song released by South Korean education startup SmartStudy in 2015, copied his 2011 song. SmartStudy, now renamed The Pinkfong Company, has said its song was a recreation of a traditional North American children's song that has no valid copyrights.
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
South Korean top court rules 'Baby Shark' not plagiarised
SEOUL: South Korea's top court ruled Thursday that the globally popular South Korean children's song "Baby Shark" was not plagiarised, rejecting a copyright claim filed by a US-based composer. With its catchy lyrics, the "Baby Shark Dance" video is the most viewed on YouTube, with more than 16 billion views, roughly double those of the runner-up, "Despacito", and third-place "Wheels on the Bus". In 2019, New York composer Johnny Only, whose legal name is Jonathan Wright, filed a lawsuit in Seoul, alleging that the 2015 hit "Baby Shark" by South Korean education startup SmartStudy copied a song he had released in 2011. Only demanded 30 million won (US$21,700) in compensation, accusing the firm of copying elements of his work, including its bassline and rhythm. SmartStudy, now known as The Pinkfong Company, argued that its version was an adaptation of a classic North American children's tune that is not protected by copyright. A South Korean lower court initially cleared the company of the charges at a trial in 2021, finding that there was insufficient evidence of copyright infringement. That ruling was upheld by an appeal court in 2023. Only then challenged the 2023 decision, but South Korea's Supreme Court affirmed the lower court rulings on Thursday. "All appeals were dismissed and the lower court's rulings were upheld," according to court documents seen by AFP. The Pinkfong Company said in a statement Thursday that the Supreme Court's decision confirmed "Baby Shark" was "based on a traditional singalong chant that has entered the public domain". The company said it had given "a fresh twist to the chant by adding an upbeat rhythm and catchy melody, turning it into the pop culture icon it is today". Only did not immediately reply to an AFP request for comment. He told Canadian public broadcaster CBC in 2019 that he had created a toddler-friendly version of "Baby Shark" in 2011, revising the original song, which was about a gory shark attack.
