Rs431bn owed to Chinese power projects: PD and SBP at odds over repatriation?
This issue came to light during a meeting of the Sub-Committee on Reforms, chaired by Minister for Petroleum and Natural Resources Ali Pervaiz Malik. The meeting was also attended by Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Industries and Production, Haroon Akhtar.
Chinese coal-fired power projects, such as Port Qasim and Sahiwal, have been persistently writing to the Ministry of Finance, seeking clearance of these outstanding payments.
Chinese IPPs face Rs500bn in unpaid dues
The matter surfaced during discussions on proposed measures to mitigate currency risks for foreign investors in Pakistan.
The SBP stated that no loan repayments—whether principal or interest—nor profit repatriation payments are pending with the SBP or any commercial bank. The central bank acknowledged that only a profit payment of $26.5 million is pending with one commercial bank, which it expects will be cleared soon. SBP further clarified that no verbal or written directives had been issued to commercial banks to delay LC payments or other financial transactions.
However, the Power Division reported that while the power payment cycle typically spans 90 days, Rs 431 billion in payments remain stuck with commercial banks—primarily for non-energy components.
A detailed ageing report presented during the meeting indicated that while no energy payments have been overdue for more than three months, non-energy payments have been pending for years. The depreciation of the rupee has further reduced the dollar value of these payments.
No representatives from NEPRA attended the meeting, and no information was shared regarding eight pending cases.
The SBP reiterated that no Chinese company payments are currently pending for profit repatriation or debt servicing, and it has issued no instructions—verbal or written—to banks in this context. However, the SBP was asked to provide a written report detailing all payments to Chinese companies pending with commercial banks, including ageing data.
The Power Division maintained its stance that Rs 431 billion in payments are pending with various banks and remain un-repatriated by the concerned Chinese companies.
NEPRA was directed to provide an update on the potential claw back of the eight cases under adjudication. No conclusive way forward was proposed during the session.
The committee noted a divergence in views between the SBP and the Power Division, making it difficult to issue a clear recommendation due to the lack of clarity. The chair emphasized several core principles as essential for attracting investment: (i) adherence to due process of law ;(ii) sanctity and enforceability of contracts;(iii) provision of adequate security measures ;(iv) a competitive and transparent process, and (v) policy consistency and predictability in the medium term.
Regarding the development of physical infrastructure and utility services at Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and Export Processing Zones (EPZs), the Board of Investment (BoI) informed the sub-committee that six SEZs will be marketed to Chinese investors. BoI said that 40 companies have been identified to showcase as success stories, which will be narrowed down to 5–10 for targeted promotion.
The committee supported promoting six SEZs—AIIC, BQIP, KIP, Rashakai, Dhabeji, and PSM—to Chinese investors. Of these, 3,000 acres are available for development at PSM and 700 acres at AIIC, with additional land parcels available at other developed SEZs, all equipped with basic amenities.
The committee recommended establishing Service Level Agreements (SLAs) to define timelines.
On easing regulatory hurdles and creating a one-stop-shop mechanism integrating federal and provincial authorities, the BoI presented updates on its Business Facilitation Center (BFC) initiative. BoI highlighted the 'regulatory guillotine' efforts and modernization of the Companies Act. The Cabinet Committee on Regulatory Reforms (CCoRR) has been notified, and BoI claims that two reform packages will reduce the cost of doing business by Rs 250 billion. Three additional reform packages are in the pipeline for CCoRR approval.
BoI also shared its role in integrating 20 departments with SECP, harmonizing food standards across federal and provincial jurisdictions, and reducing DRAP's medical device registration timeline from two years to 45 days.
The committee recommended that BoI implement a hub-and-spoke model for BFCs linked to regional offices in the six priority SEZs. SLAs will also be developed for these centers to provide transparency and predictability for investors.
On reducing port clearance times and enhancing cold chain logistics, the Secretary of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs (MoMA), along with the Chairman of Port Qasim Authority (PQA) and the General Manager (Operations) of Karachi Port Trust (KPT), briefed the committee.
They reported that recent reforms have reduced consignment clearance time by 24–48 hours. However, no precise data was available on reefer (refrigerated container) occupancy or costs.
It was also noted that 35–40% of consignments are routed through yellow or red channels, and various departments at ports impact both import and export processes.
The chair inquired whether consignments of vetted and established investors could be moved to the green channel.
The committee recommended developing a comprehensive port governance model that ensures one-window operations and standard procedures for cold chain storage, aligned with international best practices. SLAs should also be signed with investors to guarantee faster clearance of their consignments. Pre-clearance mechanisms and a grievance redressal help desk for reputable importers were also advised.
Lastly, the chair took serious notice of the long-vacant post of Chairman KPT and directed the Secretary of MoMA to resolve the matter urgently. A 'look-after' charge must also be assigned without delay.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
US-China truce for stable global trade
A trade deal between the world's two largest economies is in sight as a 90-day truce between China and the United States is set to expire on Tuesday. 'Last month's negotiations in Stockholm have advanced our talks with China, and I believe that we have the makings of a deal that will benefit both of our great nations,' US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent wrote on microblogging platform 'X' days after the third round of negotiations between the two countries in the Swedish capital on July 29. Bessent's tweet came on the heels of an announcement by President Donald Trump of trade deals with several countries which yielded to his pressure tactics, including Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Pakistan – as well as the one with the 27-nation European Union. The Stockholm negotiations – the first major engagement between Washington and Beijing following Geneva and London sessions – were described by both sides as 'productive and fulsome', despite yielding no tangible outcome. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng led the Chinese delegation, accompanied by Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and WTO trade negotiator Li Chenggang. On the American side, the negotiators included Treasury Secretary Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The main objective was to negotiate a 90-day extension of truce agreed in mid-May, under which triple-digit tariffs were scaled back: the US from 145% to 30%, and Beijing from 125% to 10%. The truce has thus far held but faces the August 12 deadline for renewal, or rejection. Indications are that the two sides would preserve the truce as Bessent sought to downplay the risk of escalation, saying 'the meetings were very constructive. We just haven't given the sign off.' A trade war between the two top economies triggered by Trump's sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs had created dangerous volatility in global markets and threatened to unravel the international trade system the US has protected vehemently post-World War II. However, Trump backed down, announcing a 90-day 'pause' following the first trade meeting between the two sides in Geneva. Beyond tariffs, the two global giants are also at loggerheads on a range of issues, including US demands that China's ByteDance sell popular video-sharing platform TikTok to an American company and that Beijing speed up its export of critical minerals. Analysts, however, argue that these tensions are driven more by geopolitics than economics as the United States views China's rapid rise as a geostrategic threat to its global dominance – and is therefore seeking to contain it. Trade Representative Greer also soft-pedaled the absence of a tangible outcome from the Stockholm meeting, saying that they didn't yield a breakthrough but provided opportunities to monitor implementation of earlier commitments, including rare earth exports and semiconductor trade measures, and set the stage for deeper future engagement. Rare earth minerals, technology export controls, market access and industrial overcapacity, and fentanyl-related tariffs were some of the key issues discussed in Stockholm. China has partially resumed rare earth exports to the US following an agreement reached between Presidents Trump and Xi Jinping in early June. But the US side seeks clearer commitments around the volume and timing of these exports. China has chokehold over rare earth magnets, which are critical for EVs and high-tech technology export controls, the US has eased restrictions on Nvidia H20 AI chip exports to China. Trump had stopped Nvidia from exporting to China its most powerful chipsets critical for developing cost-efficient AI models. The administration later reversed the ban on the condition that the chips will be equipped with tracking and positioning functions. The Cyberspace Administration of China, the country's internet regulator, however, voiced concerns over potential 'backdoor' security risks, fearing that Chinese user data and privacy rights could be affected. Nvidia denied its chips have any hidden method of bypassing normal authentication or security controls. On market access and industrial overcapacity, Chinese negotiators pressed concerns over US tariffs, dual-use exports, and the electoral impact of Chinese state-backed overcapacity flooding global markets. The American side demanded better access for US firms and tighter control on industrial subsidies. On fentanyl-related tariffs, the Trump administration continues to levy higher tariffs on China over its alleged role in fentanyl trade. China has sought clarification on what constitutes sufficient action for a tariff rollback during the Stockholm discussions. Treasury Secretary Bessent said that they touched on US concerns over China's purchase of Iranian oil, supplying Russia with dual-use tech that could be used on the battlefield, and manufacturing goods at a pace beyond what is sustained by global demand. On August 2, President Trump signed an executive order that further modified tariff rates with 69 trading partners, imposing 'additional ad valorem duties on goods of certain trading partners,' including long-term allies like Canada and the European Union, with rates ranging from 10% to 40%. The move has drawn widespread criticism with detractors accusing Trump of reversing decades of globalisation that made America's massive services economy the envy of the world but contributed to its long decline in manufacturing. Trump expressed cautious optimism about the Stockholm talks. However, senior US officials stressed that the final decision on preserving the truce remains his alone. Observers are watching for a potential Trump-Xi summit later this year, possibly during the APEC meeting in South Korea in late October or early November – an encounter analysts say could solidify any truce and pave the way for broader structural reforms in trade relations. At Stockholm, China's Vice Premier He Lifeng said the two nations share extensive common interests and a broad space for cooperation in the economy and trade areas. 'Cooperation between them benefits both sides, while confrontation harms both sides,' he added. 'A stable, healthy and sustainable China-US economic and trade relationship serves not only the two countries' respective development goals but also contributes to global economic growth and stability.' The Chinese vice premier's assessment aligns with the views of international financial institutions. The IMF has warned that escalation of tariffs poses serious risks to global economic growth and inflation. While the Geneva truce prompted a modest upgrade to the IMF's 2025 global GDP outlook to 3%, analysts caution that uncertainty in trade policy would continue weighing on business confidence unless the two top economies reach a durable trade deal. The onus now lies with President Trump who has been accused of weaponising tariffs even at the expense of America's global leadership role. The writer is a student and freelance contributor with special interest in geopolitics and geo-economics
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenues to US, official says
Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from sales to China of advanced computer chips like Nvidia's H20 that are used for artificial intelligence applications, a U.S. official told Reuters on Sunday. US President Donald Trump's administration halted sales of H20 chips to China in April, but Nvidia last month announced the U.S. said that it would allow the company to resume sales and it hoped to start deliveries soon. Another U.S. official said on Friday that the Commerce Department had begun issuing licenses for the sale of H20 chips to China. When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15% of revenues to the U.S., a Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement, 'We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets.' The spokesperson added: 'While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide.' AMD did not respond to a request for comment on the news, which was first reported by the Financial Times earlier on Sunday. The U.S. Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China represents a significant market for both companies. Nvidia generated $17 billion in revenue from China in the fiscal year ending January 26, representing 13% of total sales. AMD reported $6.2 billion in China revenue for 2024, accounting for 24% of total revenue. The Financial Times said the chipmakers agreed to the arrangement as a condition for obtaining the export licences for their semiconductors, including AMD's MI308 chips. The report said the Trump administration had yet to determine how to use the money. 'It's wild,' said Geoff Gertz, a senior fellow at Center for New American Security, an independent think tank in Washington, D.C. 'Either selling H20 chips to China is a national security risk, in which case we shouldn't be doing it to begin with, or it's not a national security risk, in which case, why are we putting this extra penalty on the sale?' U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month the planned resumption of sales of the AI chips was part of U.S. negotiations with China to get rare earths and described the H20 as Nvidia's 'fourth-best chip' in an interview with CNBC. Lutnick said it was in U.S. interests to have Chinese companies using American technology, even if the most advanced was prohibited from export, so they continued to use an American 'tech stack.' The U.S. official said the Trump administration did not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips was compromising U.S. national security. The official did not know when the agreement would be implemented or exactly how, but said the administration would be in compliance with the law. Alasdair Phillips-Robins, who served as an adviser at the Commerce Department during former President Joe Biden's administration, criticized the move. 'If this reporting is accurate, it suggests the administration is trading away national security protections for revenue for the Treasury,' Phillips-Robins said.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Federal govt and provinces: Senate body seeks ‘out of box' fix for NHP dispute
ISLAMABAD: The Senate Standing Committee on Power headed by Senator Mohsin Aziz is scheduled to meet on Monday (today) to find out an 'out of box' solution on the dispute on Net Hydel Profit (NHP) between Federal Government and provinces, particularly Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) has reportedly distanced itself from the proposal of out of box solution of current controversy on NHP. Minister for Planning, Development and Special Initiative, Ahsan Iqbal is also heading a committee on this issue. Ministry of Energy (Power Division) is represented by the CEO of CPPA-G and the MD of PPMC The Committee has convened five meetings attended by the representatives of all four Provinces, the Ministry of Energy (Power Division), the Finance Division. Further update on the finalisation may be shared by the Ministry of IPC. KP formulates strategy aimed at recovering NHP dues According to WAPDA, the Council of Common Interests (CCI) based on Article 161(2) of the Constitution determines the sale rate at Bus Bar of hydel power stations. However, calculating NHP has been tricky due to conflicting claims and interpretations of the Kazi Committee Methodology. Various attempts have been made to resolve this, including ad-hoc payments and arbitration, but a long-term solution remains unresolved. After power sector restructuring and becoming NEPRA licencee, WAPDA paid Rs. 6 billion annually to the Govt, of KP as NHP until FY 2014-15, which was later uncapped at Rs 1.10 per kWh by NEPRA in FY 2015-16, following GoKP's request for settlement of all previous NHP arrears by making payments of Rs.70 billion in four installment and notification of uncapped NHP rate of Rs 1.10/kWh-an MoU was signed between Govt of Pakistan and Govt. of KP on February 25, 2016. The MoU was also approved by CCI on February 29, 2016 and later the settlement of Govt of Punjab's claims of Rs.82.71 billion and payment of regular NHP at uncapped rate was also agreed and approved by CCI on December 16, 2016. Despite paying NHP at the uncapped rate that was further enhanced by NEPRA from Rs.1.10/kWh to Rs.1.155/kWh in FY 2017-18 and CCI's overriding of its earlier decision of Jan 1991 regarding KCM through approving the said MoU, the GoKP again raised the issue in CCI and asked for payment of NHP as per KCM. WAPDA argues that considering Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission's report (suggesting WAPDA's replacement with CPPA-G for NHP obligations), ECC's decision of January 24, 2019 (Power Division to lead efforts to secure financing for NHP payments to provinces) and Finance Minister's remarks during 49th CCI meeting (Finance Division is working on clearing NHP outstanding dues of KPK and Punjab, and in future CPPA-G will directly pay NHP to provinces), the Power Division and CPPA-G are in better position to propose an out of box solution for NHP payment . WAPDA doesn't profit from selling power at hydel stations, as NHP is a pass through item and makes the NHP payment to provinces as per government guidelines and regulations. WAPDA's outstanding recovery from CPPA-G against power sales invoices has sharply increased due to delayed payments, hindering WAPDA's ability to make timely NHP payments to provinces, despite regular billing at NEPRA-determined rates. Currently, WAPDA has to pay NHP of Rs.49.565 billion to GoKP and Rs. 114.584 billion (including Rs. 13.617 billion as NHP arrears) to GoPb. WAPDA maintains that Power Division and CPPA-G are in better position to propose an out of box solution for NHP payment. Power Division (Power Planning & Monitoring Company): PPMC has offered the following comments: (i) Article 161(2) of Pakistan's 1973 Constitution requires that net profits from hydroelectric power generation be paid to the province where the power station is located, calculated by deducting operating expenses from bus bar revenue, and explicitly excludes Net Hydel Profit (NHP) as a pass-through cost to electricity consumers ;(ii) KCM calculates NHP by aggregating power generation income, but this approach, formulated in 1985-86 was based on a unified and unbundled WAPDA being the sole power producer and distributor. Now, Pakistan's energy landscape has changed significantly including WAPDA's unbundling, emergence of IPPS, and shifts in the power mix wherein hydro power contributes 27% (approx.) ;(iii) NHP payments should be made through the federal budget or covered by WAPDA's profits from hydropower sales, rather than consumers; (iv) commenting on GoKP's proposal, PPMC is of the view that the transfer of hydropower plants to provinces is governed by the Power Generation policies of 1995 and 2015 that is applicable to BOOT-based IPP projects developed within a province by private sponsors. The WAPDA Act lacks provisions for transferring hydropower plants constructed under its mandate to the provinces, and its projects are primarily financed through PSDP, donor loans, and internal funds, after accounting for NHP; (v) NHP payment through ESCROW account, does not align with the legal and regulatory framework and the constitutional scheme. Regarding wheeling of power from PEDO and wheeling charges determination, B2B electricity supply through wheeling arrangements will be integrated into IGCEP and TSEP under the CTBCM Directive No. 7. NEPRA's periodical regime, determined water usage charges should be reviewed based on the mechanism applied in various countries. Government of Sindh: The Provincial Government submitted proposal regarding transferring Hydro Electric Stations to the respective provinces in lieu of NHP requires clarification as presently no hydro power station is managed in IPPs mode. It further stated that the hydro-electric power generation is a bi-product of 'Water Reservoir Projects (Dams)'. While framing any such proposal, the basic purpose of construction of these reservoirs be considered and IRSA be included in the committee. Govt of Sindh further contended that transfer of Hydro Electric Stations to provinces requires careful consideration of the primary purpose of water reservoir projects. To ensure a comprehensive approach, it is suggested to include representatives from IRSA, Finance Division, and Economic Affairs Division in the committee to provide technical, financial, and economic expertise. Govt of Sindh has reiterated its earlier stance on NHP, reflected in the minutes of 49th CCI meeting which is as follows; 'Chief Minister, Punjab endorsed views of DCPC and asked for early payment of Rs. 58 billion dues of NHP owned to Punjab. The Chief Minister, Sindh, endorsed the NHP claim of Chief Ministers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab being constitutional. He, however, did not support increase in tariff and its passing on to consumers. He said that since profit was utilized by WAPDA it should now be accounted for'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
