
Auckland woman Rangimaria Sellars jailed for stabbing taxi driver in Christchurch
'This is an example of extreme violence.'
Court documents state the attack, which resulted in six stab wounds and necessitated emergency surgery, took place inside a Toyota Prius about 10.15pm on October 10 last year in Christchurch.
'The victim ... had picked [up] the defendant from somewhere in the city,' the agreed summary of facts for the case states.
'Whilst en route, the defendant disclosed she did not have the money to pay for her fare.'
The driver was nearly at the airport already but pulled into the Spitfire Square carpark, across the street from the airport, to discontinue the ride. Sellars then asked to be taken to the police station.
'Using a knife she had concealed in her clothing, the defendant stabbed the victim several times,' court documents state - causing two wounds to his abdomen, two to his forearm and single wounds to his thigh and right hand.
The victim, who went to a nearby McDonald's restaurant for help, had to undergo surgery almost immediately after arriving at Christchurch Hospital.
He was 'covered in blood' as emergency responders carried him out of the restaurant on a stretcher, a witness previously told the Herald.
Sellars was arrested about 15 minutes after the incident at a nearby hotel. She later told police she had stabbed the stranger because he touched her leg.
But CCTV footage from inside the car makes it clear that's not true, Christchurch-based Crown prosecutor Gail Barrett pointed out while attending the hearing via an audio-video feed.
'It does show that this was an unprovoked assault on a taxi driver as a vulnerable person,' she said.
The driver, 36, did not attend today's hearing in person and so did not read his written victim impact statement, although the judge referred to it extensively before announcing the sentence.
He told the court the victim thought he was going to die that night. He ended up spending five days in hospital with significant injuries, and could no longer do simple things for himself like cook and shower.
His abdominal wounds meant he could no longer sit for long stretches, making his job impossible.
'He says he was told he was lucky to survive this attack,' Judge Patel noted.
'By day, he thinks of someone attacking him and by night ... he dreams about somebody attacking him again.'
The victim was fortunate to have family who came to New Zealand and helped him.
'Before this incident he thought the people of Christchurch were good people, but now he has a different view,' the judge also noted.
'He says he needs to be more careful and aware of his environment.'
Sellars faced up to 14 years' imprisonment after pleading guilty in Christchurch District Court in November to wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm. She entered the plea via audio-video feed from Auckland.
Today's sentencing was then transferred to Auckland so she could attend in person.
Defence lawyer Hannah Kim acknowledged the victim hadn't touched her client, who was sitting in the front passenger seat.
But her aggression that night was still motivated by fear due to Sellars' traumatic past as a victim of abuse, she argued.
She pointed to a psychological report that outlines how Sellars established poor coping mechanisms in her youth that led to trouble with the law. She suffers depression, is hyper-vigilant of threats and hears voices, although she's currently on medication to suppress the voices, the lawyer said.
She asked the judge for a starting point of between three and three-and-a-half years before allowing reductions for her guilty plea, background and remorse. She acknowledged, however, that a sentence of imprisonment was inevitable.
The judge, however, agreed to the Crown's suggestion of a four-and-a-half year starting point. He then allowed a 25% reduction for her very early guilty plea a 5% for her background - noting that the reduction had to be tempered by her long history of violence.
Her criminal history included common assault charges dating back to 1995, followed by assault with a stabbing instrument in 2001 and wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm in 2003.
Sellars had been serving a 13-year sentence when she was released on parole in 2022, but she was recalled to prison after committing new crimes and had only been released again weeks earlier. Her lawyer noted that, other than the stabbing, her more recent crimes had involved burglary and dishonesty but not violence.
Judge Patel increased her sentence by two months to reflect her criminal history, resulting in an end sentence of three years and four months' imprisonment.
He noted that, upon her most recent release from prison, Sellars reported feeling she hadn't 'received the professional support that you needed.'
The judge ordered that the psychological report that had been prepared for the sentencing be provided to the Parole Board with the hope that measures can be taken to support her better next time.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Murderer to testify at trial of another murder-accused man
Police at the scene of the couple's death in Ellerslie, November 2023.. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi A man who admitted murdering an Auckland couple in their Ellerslie home in 2023 will testify at the trial of another man also accused of the murder. Lok Fung Lorrence Li has pleaded not guilty to murdering husband and wife Fuk-Fu Joseph Kwok and Mei Han Chong, and conspiring to kill a third person, his former landlord. His trial in May was aborted on the first day after co-defendant Shu Man Poon pleaded guilty to killing the couple. Justice Matthew Downs confirmed in the High Court at Auckland this morning that Poon would testify on behalf of the Crown. The new trial date for Li is yet to be set. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

1News
5 hours ago
- 1News
Supreme Court judges grill Crown in David Tamihere appeal
Supreme Court judges have grilled the Crown case in double convicted murderer David Tamihere's appeal in the High Court at Auckland. Tamihere was convicted in December 1990 of murdering Swedish tourists Urban Höglin and Heidi Paakkonen. His lawyers are appealing an earlier Court of Appeal ruling that found a miscarriage of justice but upheld his convictions. Crown lawyers began there submissions today, with lawyer Fergus Sinclair giving the panel of judges background about Tamihere's movements through the bush around the Coromandel Peninsula, and the discovery of Höglin's body. The Crown case at the original trial was that Tamihere was living in the bush when he murdered the couple near Crosbies Clearing north of Thames. ADVERTISEMENT "We know Mr Tamihere's last two trips involved spending time in the Wentworth Valley, and on trip one, spending days on that Eastern side," Sinclair said. "Multiple witnesses established that." Watch the story on TVNZ+ Evidence had been presented at trial that two trampers identified Tamihere as a man they encountered at Crosbies Clearing with a young woman. Sinclair said Tamihere partly acknowledged and partly fictionalised trips he had taken around the area at trial, to conceal that he had been near to where Höglin's body was found. "Trip one, he said, North from Thames, has spent a long time around the Coromandel area, but he didn't," he said. "He went South, then East into the Wentworth, back the same way after more than a week." ADVERTISEMENT The second trip, Sinclair said, Tamihere claimed to have again gone North from Thames to the 309 Rd, then down the main road almost to Thames, but swerved up Tararu Creek Road to where the couple's car was to steal it, but this too was wrong, instead claiming Tamihere had gone South and back to the Wentworth Valley. "It's not possible to forget that your last two journeys were to an entirely different part of the region," Sinclair said. "So much time spent in a completely different place, in the opposite direction." Sinclair referenced the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeal. "Mr Tamihere lied to conceal his presence in the Wentworth Valley, and did so because he knew police might find evidence there," he said. "The only evidence is the body, the only reasonable conclusion is that Mr Tamihere knew about the body." Sinclair faced scrutiny from the judges regarding whether claims Tamihere had lied had been put to him at trial. ADVERTISEMENT "It's a fundamental issue with the Crown's case," Chief Justice dame Helen Winkelmann said. "You're taking us and saying 'Mr Tamihere lied'. Statements are made contextually, lies, as juries are instructed, must be assessed contextually, if it's said to be a lie it must be put to the witness that it's a lie, it must be part of the case that it's a lie... "What are we to make of the fact that these things that you are now saying are lies, were to a greater or lesser extent not pursued at trial?" she asked. Five Supreme Court judges hearing arguments on whether the Court of Appeal in an earlier ruling was right to not quash his convictions. (Source: 1News) Sinclair said this was the fresh evidence exercise. "The issue is, does it disclose a miscarriage, and it is the Crown responding to a defence theory," he said. "The body is found, we now see more things, does it give rise to a miscarriage that is the issue." ADVERTISEMENT More scrutiny was put on the Crown's case by Justice Sir Joe Williams, who said their case came down to whether or not Tamihere had lied. "His lie, you say, is the thing that binds all of this together, Crown stands or falls on that lie," he said. "Without it you lose." Earlier today, Tamihere's lawyer James Carruthers asked the question if his trial would have turned out differently if a fundamental error had not occurred. He quoted a case which said questions needed to be asked on what course a trial would have taken, if errors had not been made. "It's interesting to ask here what the course of the trial might have been like had it not started off in completely the wrong direction," Carruthers said. "And as we can see from the Crown's amended case, it would have taken on an entirely different complexion." ADVERTISEMENT Part of the Crown evidence in the original 1990 trial was false, coming from a prison informant later convicted of perjury. Crown lawyer Rebecca Thomson discussed the importance of the evidence in the trial. "This was one of the very rare murder trials at which there was no body available, no narrative about how, and where, and why these victims had been killed," she said. "The Crown's case is entirely circumstantial leading towards the only possible explanation being Mr Tamihere's guilt. "That the Crown put some weight on the fact that Mr Tamihere had confessed himself to that crime, even if to witnesses who today we would perhaps not put so much stock in, is simply the fair trial process at work." That evidence was admissible and the Crown relied upon it, Thomson said. "The place that it had at the trial is what this court must focus on when looking at the unfairness question." ADVERTISEMENT Thomson said they accepted that it could have made a difference to the trial, but said whether it reached the level of being unfair was a higher threshold. Tamihere served more than 20 years of a life sentence in prison before being released on parole in 2010. He has always denied even meeting the pair and there have been lingering questions around the convictions. In 2020 the then Governor General, on advice from former Justice Minister Andrew Little, granted Tamihere a rare Royal Prerogative of Mercy. The case was referred back to the Court of Appeal to rule on whether there may have been a miscarriage of justice. That court, in July last year, found there was – but upheld Tamihere's murder convictions because there was evidence beyond reasonable doubt he murdered the tourists. This, in turn, was appealed to the Supreme Court which is hearing the case now. The hearing continues tomorrow.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
More young people being detained in police cells for longer - children's commissioner
Children's Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly The Children's Commissioner is calling for an end to holding children in police cells, saying it puts them at risk of self-harm. A Christchurch mother is furious her 15-year-old son spent a sixth night being held in a police cell after he was arrested last Thursday. The boy, who had an extensive criminal history, was charged with burglary after allegedly damaging a property with a group of older teenagers. RNZ cannot name the teenager or his mother for legal reasons. He had been remanded in police custody by a judge until his next appearance in the Youth Court later this month, or until there was a suitable secure facility available. His mother said he was being transferred to an Oranga Tamariki youth justice residence on Wednesday, as a place had become free, but she was furious he had been held in a police cell for so long. She said he had ADHD and mental health problems and tried to take his life on the first night in custody. "He's not sleeping, he's not eating, he's just not coping very well in there. His mental health is going down," she said. "I don't think it should be allowed - that's just not humane for children." The mother said she was frustrated she was not informed at the time about his self-harm attempt, and she said there had been no urgent referral to mental health services. She said he had been trying to turn his life around. "That's not normally him on the outside. Yes, he has gotten himself into trouble but he's been working on getting himself back on the straight and narrow. He's been going to his course, doing all his community work for the previous charges," she said. "He just decided he wanted to go and hang out with the wrong people, and it had to be the wrong time." Children's Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad said New Zealand should end the practice of holding minors in police cells. "Police cells are inherently adult environments so they put children at a greater risk of harm," she said. "They are often distressing spaces, they are not age-appropriate for children to be in. And time in a police cell, especially a period of days, can lead to children experiencing mental and emotional and physical harm, potentially including a risk of self-harm." Achmad said over the last few years she had seen a significant increase in the numbers of children being detained in police cells and being held for longer. "I really want to see government systems investing in more iwi and community-based remand options so children can be in the community while they are awaiting their next Youth Court hearing," she said Oranga Tamariki deputy chief executive youth justice services and residential care Iain Chapman said when a young person was in police custody, the agency aimed to move them into a suitable alternative as soon as possible. "Occasionally there are challenges with how quickly an alternative placement is available, or with arrangements to move the child or young person. On these occasions, they may remain in police custody for more than 24 hours," he said. "This is not what we want to happen, and we monitor these situations closely. Our teams assess, review, and prioritise placements every day, or more frequently when needed." Young people were visited and supported by Oranga Tamariki social workers while in custody, and the 15-year-old had been visited every day, in addition to safeguarding measures by police, Chapman said. "There are currently 188 beds available in secure residences across both youth justice and care and protection facilities, and 97 beds available in community homes," he said "Youth justice residences each have a 'safe operating capacity' ... We have been operating at maximum safe operating capacity from time to time recently." The boy's mother said this was the second time her son had spent multiple days in police cells - in June he was held for seven days before being transferred to Oranga Tamariki (OT) care. "Speaking from our experience I don't think it should be allowed. If there are no spaces in OT care he should be released home. I get some youth don't have that privilege," she said. "We really do not want it to happen to other families that have young people that are struggling." Canterbury police operations manager Inspector Bryan Buck said police worked closely with Oranga Tamariki in relation to the 15-year-old. "Under section 238(1)(e) of the Children's and Young People's Well-being Act 1989, where a child or young person appears before the Youth Court, the court shall (if satisfied that suitable facilities for the detention in safe custody of that young person are not available) order the young person be detained in Police custody," he said. "We work in close partnership with Oranga Tamariki, specialist mental health services, medical professionals, the Courts, legal representatives, as well as other sector agencies, to provide a supportive and safe environment that prioritises the well-being of young people during their time in police custody." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.



