logo
Man accused of killing grandparents said ‘God told him to,' affidavit says

Man accused of killing grandparents said ‘God told him to,' affidavit says

CTV News2 days ago
Jeremyah Campbell, 22, was arrested and charged with the murder of his grandparents — the Rev. George White, 83, and Mary White, 81. (WESH via CNN Newsource)
WEST MELBOURNE, Florida (WESH) -- A recently filed arrest affidavit provides more details about a triple shooting in West Melbourne, Fla. that left an elderly couple dead.
Jeremyah Campbell, 22, was arrested and charged with the murder of his grandparents — the Rev. George White, 83, and Mary White, 81. He is also accused of shooting and injuring a neighbour.
When deputies found Campbell after the shooting, he was 'sobbing uncontrollably and shouting a stream of incoherent words,' according to the affidavit. Campbell was detained and later told a deputy that 'God told him to send his grandparents to him,' the report said.
A search warrant obtained by WESH 2 said deputies observed Campbell 'to be sweating, to have dilated pupils and [to be] making incoherent statements such as claiming to see cyclops and claiming Satan was in his head.'
The report said a family member told investigators that Campbell had argued with the victims earlier in the evening. She said the fight stemmed from a belief that Campbell was under the influence of an unknown drug.
Campbell is being held at the Brevard County Jail without bond.
By Meghan Moriarty, WESH
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How does the WNBA deal with sex-toy throwers? What to know about arrests and security
How does the WNBA deal with sex-toy throwers? What to know about arrests and security

CTV News

time26 minutes ago

  • CTV News

How does the WNBA deal with sex-toy throwers? What to know about arrests and security

The WNBA logo is seen near a hoop before an WNBA basketball game at Mohegan Sun Arena, Tuesday, May 14, 2019, in Uncasville, Conn. (AP Photo/Jessica Hill) The WNBA is still struggling with a string of sex-toy disturbances. In the past week and a half, sex toys have been thrown on court during games in Atlanta on July 29, Chicago on Aug. 1, Los Angeles on Aug. 5 and Chicago again on Thursday night, with the most recent object hitting the court in the closing seconds of the Atlanta Dream's victory over the Sky. The sex toy that landed on the court in Los Angeles nearly hit Fever guard Sophie Cunningham during Indiana's game against the Sparks. Sex toys were also thrown at games in New York and Phoenix last Tuesday but didn't reach the court. Police say another toy was thrown at a game in Atlanta on Aug. 1, although it's unclear if that one reached the court. The distractions have created unexpected challenges for the league, the teams and the players, but also for arena security. Here's what to know. Are arrests being made? A man was arrested Saturday in College Park, Georgia, after he was accused of throwing a sex toy onto the court during the Atlanta Dream's July 29 matchup with the Golden State Valkyries, according to a police report. The report said he threw another sex toy during the Dream's Aug. 1 game against the Phoenix Mercury, but that instance did not seem to result in a delay of play. He is charged with disorderly conduct, criminal trespassing, public indecency and indecent exposure. All four charges are misdemeanors in the state of Georgia, meaning that if he is convicted, the punishment for each can be a fine of up to US$1,000 or jail time of up to 12 months. A misdemeanor for public indecency and indecent exposure may also require registration on the state's sex offender list. The report said the man told police 'this was supposed to be a joke and the joke (was) supposed to go viral.'` Another man in Phoenix was arrested after police say he threw a sex toy in the crowd at a Mercury game on Tuesday. Police say the 18-year-old pulled the sex toy from his sweater pocket and threw it toward seats in front of him, striking a spectator in the back. The man later told police it was a prank that had been trending on social media and that he bought the toy a day earlier to take to the game. He was later tackled by a volunteer at the arena who had witnessed the incident and began following him as the man tried to leave the arena. Police say the man was arrested on suspicion of assault, disorderly conduct and publicly displaying explicit sexual material. The New York Liberty told The Associated Press on Thursday night that there is an ongoing investigation into the throwing in New York and the team is cooperating with law enforcement. What difficulties do arena security face in stopping this? The types of sex toys being thrown onto the court generally do not include metal elements, meaning that arena metal detectors are not able to sense them. When carried on a spectator's body, they become even more difficult to detect. Arena security teams face challenges in catching these items, according to Ty Richmond, the president of the event services division at Allied Universal Security, a company that provides security services to certain NBA, WNBA, NFL, MLB and MLS arenas across the country. 'Not all stadiums are using a screening process that's consistent and can detect (the sex toys) because of what it would require — pat down searches, opening the bags, prohibiting bags,' he said. 'The conflict of expediency, of getting fans into the arena and into the venue, which is an important issue, and security and safety.' The limits of arena security make legal action one of the strongest deterrents for this kind of behaviour, Richmond said. 'The decision to prosecute and show examples of how people are being handled is very important,' he said. 'Without a doubt, I think it will make a difference. The application of it is important, and publicizing that is important.' There have not been any arrests made yet for the in Los Angeles and Chicago. In a statement to the AP, the Sparks said they are 'working with arena personnel to identify the individual responsible and ensure appropriate action is taken.' The WNBA has said that any spectators throwing objects onto the court will face a minimum one-year ban and prosecution from law enforcement. How is it affecting players? As the disturbances pile up, those on the court have become increasingly frustrated. 'Everyone is trying to make sure the W is not a joke and it's taken seriously, and then that happens,' Cunningham said on her podcast after nearly being hit by one of the sex toys on Tuesday. 'I'm like, 'How are we ever going to get taken seriously?'' No other professional sports leagues have faced sex toy disturbances like this. It has started a conversation online about the perpetrators' choices to throw them during games in a women's league and a league with a high-profile amount of lesbian and queer players. 'This has been going on for centuries, the sexualization of women. This is the latest version of that. It's not funny. It should not be the butt of jokes,' said Minnesota Lynx coach Cheryl Reeve Thursday. 'The sexualization of women is what's used to hold women down, and this is no different.' Despite the criminal behaviour leading to arrests, at least one crypto-based predictions market is offering trades essentially allowing users to wager on whether sex toys will be thrown at future WNBA games. Players have also been sounding off on social media, echoing concerns about arena security protocols. Liberty forward Isabelle Harrison posted on X last week, saying 'ARENA SECURITY?! Hello??! Please do better. It's not funny. Never was funny. Throwing ANYTHING on the court is so dangerous.' ___ Alyce Brown, The Associated Press

Husband suspected wife of poisoning him before she killed 3 relatives with toxic mushrooms
Husband suspected wife of poisoning him before she killed 3 relatives with toxic mushrooms

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Husband suspected wife of poisoning him before she killed 3 relatives with toxic mushrooms

MELBOURNE, Australia — The husband of a woman convicted of killing three people with a meal laced with deadly mushrooms suspected his wife had been poisoning him more than a year before the fatal meal, an Australian court has heard. A judge on Friday lifted a gag order on pretrial evidence that triple murderer Erin Patterson, 50, had wanted kept secret while she attempts to overturn her convictions. The evidence included the suspicions of Patterson's estranged husband Simon Patterson that she had previously attempted to kill him. Husband says he feared estranged wife would poison him Simon Patterson testified at a pretrial hearing that he had declined the lunch invitation out of fear. 'I thought there'd be a risk that she'd poison me if I attended,' the husband told the court months before the trial in testimony that was not presented to jurors. Simon said while he had stopped eating food prepared by his wife, from whom he had been estranged since 2015, he never thought others would be at risk. Erin Patterson was convicted by the Victoria state Supreme Court last month of murdering her parents-in-law Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson at her home in Leongatha with a lunch of beef Wellington pastries containing toxic death cap mushrooms. She was also found guilty of attempting to murder Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband, who survived the meal but spent weeks in hospital. Erin Patterson was initially charged with attempting to murder her husband by inviting him to the lunch in July 2023. He had accepted the invitation then cancelled. She was also initially charged with three counts of attempting to murder him on three occasions around Victoria between November 2021 and September 2022. She had denied all charges. Prosecutors dropped all charges relating to the husband before her trial began in April. Simon Patterson testified before the trial that he suspected his wife had deliberately made him seriously ill with dishes including penne bolognese pasta, chicken korma curry and a vegetable curry wrap. No poisons were ever found. The three alleged poisonings occurred during family camping trips. Simon shared his poisoning suspicions with his doctor, who encouraged him to create a spreadsheet listing what he had eaten around the time he became sick. The court on Friday also released video of Erin Patterson's police interview, recorded a week after the fatal lunch. In the interview, Detective Stephen Eppingstall told her that both her female victims were dead and their husbands were critically ill. Eppingstall asked her why she had invited them to lunch. Erin Patterson replied that she wanted to maintain her relationship with the estranged husband's parents because her own parents had died. Don and Gail Patterson had remained supportive and had been the only grandparents to her two children, she said. 'I love them a lot. They've always been really good to me and they always said to me that they would support me with love and emotional support, even though Simon and I were separated, and I really appreciated that,' Erin Patterson said. Disclosures come as Patterson plans to appeal Justice Christopher Beale ruled for lawyers representing media who sought to overturn the gag order, ordering that the evidence that jurors had not seen would be made public. Erin Patterson's lawyers wanted all the evidence that was not deemed admissible at her trial kept secret until an appeals court decided whether to overturn her convictions. Their reasons included that media interest in the case was unprecedented. Defence lawyer Colin Mandy argued that reporting of the suppressed evidence as well as references to it in books, podcasts and a planned television mini-series would 'leave an indelible impression on the minds of potential jurors in the event that there is a retrial.' A hearing will begin on Aug. 25 to determine what sentence she will get. She faces a potential life sentence for each of the murders and 25 years for attempted murder. Prosecutor Jane Warren told Beale on Friday 'a lot' of victim impact statements would be presented at that two-day sentencing hearing. Once Erin Patterson is sentenced, she will have 28 days to lodge an appeal against the sentence, the convictions, or both. Her lawyers say they will appeal against her convictions. Rod Mcguirk, The Associated Press

All Hail Louisiana, where left-lane hogs can now go to jail
All Hail Louisiana, where left-lane hogs can now go to jail

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

All Hail Louisiana, where left-lane hogs can now go to jail

Not all heroes wear capes. Some are Louisiana Democratic state senators. Senator Wendell Jay Luneau, who has represented District 29 since 2016, is my hero. A small-business owner and the senior partner at the personal injury law firm Luneau & Beck, LLC, he epitomizes everything that is right and just in the American political system. What has Louisiana Senator Luneau done to earn my boundless adulation? He made it possible to jail left-lane hogs who drive slowly and clog the passing lane (which Louisianans call 'left-lane camping'). If a motorist in the left lane of a four-lane highway (two lanes going each direction) drives even one single mile an hour below the speed limit, they can be fined. All thanks to Louisiana Senate Bill 11, which Luneau sponsored and championed. It was signed by the Governor and became Louisiana state law on Aug. 1. 'I saw first-hand a lot of people driving in the left lane and blocking traffic,' Luneau told the Louisiana media. 'It is dangerous because when you get up there people get aggravated, they get mad, they try to switch lanes.' This, he says, can lead to deadly crashes. Bill 11 is a beautiful piece of legislation, poetic in its simplicity. It states, 'Any vehicle proceeding on a multilane highway at a speed slower than the posted maximum speed limit shall be driven in the right hand lane then available for traffic, or as close as practicable to the right hand curb or edge of the roadway, except when overtaking and passing a vehicle proceeding in the same direction or when preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway. Persons in violation of this Paragraph shall be punished as follows: (a) A fine of $150 for the first offense. (b) A fine of $250 for a second subsequent offense within a 12-month period of the first offense. (c) A fine of $350 for a third subsequent offense within a 12-month period of the first offense or imprisonment for not more than 30 days, or both.' Shift over Shakespeare. Take a seat Emily Dickinson. Stand down Sappho. Cut it out Catullus. Put a sock in it Mister Keats. Senator Luneau's law, with passages such as 'imprisonment for not more than 30 days' is the most exquisite verse ever set to paper in the last three millennia. It was already illegal to left-lane camp in Louisiana; drivers who travelled less than 10 miles an hour below the speed limit in the left lane of a four-lane highway could be fined. The 10-mph leeway made it hard for police to enforce. 'So,' Luneau explained, 'What I did is just made this bill where it's a little easier for them to write the tickets, gave them some more discretion and increased the fines, so we can try to get some of those folks that insist on driving in the left lane side by side to stop doing that.' The fines are steep but what really sets this law apart is the fact that repeat offender left-lane hogs can be jailed. Jailed! Jailed! This is a dream come true. It is the Holy Grail. It is winning the Super Bowl, Wimbledon, the World Series and two World Cups combined. Oh, to hear the bars of the prison door clank shut on a left-lane hog who habitually crawled along in the passing lane. What sweet music they would make. Some people consider driving slow in the passing lane 'a pet peeve.' Regular readers know that, to me, it is a deep and abiding loathing. In past columns, I have suggested firing missiles at the offenders. It should therefore come as no surprise that I am already looking into applying for American citizenship and moving to the great state of Louisiana. The Louisiana Radio Network reports that Luneau's law already has a theme song. It was suggested by Senator Royce Duplessis on the senate floor. Duplessis: 'Have you heard of the artist, Ludacris?' Luneau: 'I have.' Duplessis: 'Okay.' Luneau: 'Met him, in fact.' Duplessis: 'Okay. Have you ever heard a song by Ludacris called 'Move, get out the way?'' Luneau: 'I have.' Duplessis: 'Okay.' Luneau: 'I think that would be a great song, man.' A great song for the world's greatest law.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store