Trump envoy to visit Moscow this week before deadline for ending Ukraine war
's special envoy is expected in Moscow days before the US president's deadline on Friday for
Russia
to make progress on ending the
war in
Ukraine
or face increased US sanctions.
Mr Trump said Steve Witkoff would visit Moscow on Wednesday or Thursday. When asked what message Mr Witkoff would take to Russia and what
Vladimir Putin
could do to avoid new sanctions, the US president answered: 'Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed.'
In Kyiv, there is little expectation Mr Witkoff will make a breakthrough with Mr Putin, but a hope that Mr Trump's changed rhetoric and tougher stance on Moscow may lead to a real change in US support for Ukraine. Sources in Kyiv said they expected Keith Kellogg, Mr Trump's Ukraine envoy, to visit the country towards the end of the week, possibly to coincide with Mr Witkoff's visit to Moscow.
Mr Trump came into office convinced he could do a deal with Mr Putin, but in recent weeks appears to have become increasingly frustrated with Russia's actions. On Thursday he described its continued attacks on civilian areas in Ukraine as 'disgusting' and on Sunday said that two nuclear submarines that he
ordered to be deployed
after online threats from the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev were now 'in the region', without giving further details.
READ MORE
Mr Trump had initially announced in July a
50-day deadline
for Russia and Ukraine to end the war, but said last week he no longer believed Russia was serious about ending the war and shortened it to '10 or 12' days, later clarified as this Friday, August 8th.
Mr Trump has previously said the new measures he has in mind if the deadline is not met could involve 'secondary tariffs' targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India.
[
Russia urges caution over nuclear rhetoric in response to Trump's submarine order
Opens in new window
]
Mykhailo Podolyak, an aide to
Volodymyr Zelenskiy
, said if Russia did not change its course by Friday, Kyiv would expect the 'irreversible logistics' of secondary sanctions on Russian oil exports to be set in motion.
'After that he'll look whether this is helping to bring about the end of the war or not, and if not then he will move to the next step,' said Mr Podolyak, in an interview in Kyiv.
The next move, he said, could be further sanctions, and the increased militarisation of Ukraine. 'Trump has already said he's ready to sell Europe as much weapons as they want [to pass to Ukraine]. Before he didn't say that … This is already a different conception of the world,' he said.
Before that, though, all eyes will be on Mr Witkoff's visit to Moscow. On previous trips, he has held long one-on-one meetings with Mr Putin and has spoken of his warm feelings for the Russian leader.
The camaraderie has left both Kyiv and other US allies wondering whether Mr Witkoff is capable of delivering harsh messages to Moscow, although his visit this week will be the first since Mr Trump's rhetoric on Ukraine became noticeably harsher.
The Kremlin said on Monday it was 'always happy to see Mr Witkoff in Moscow' and a meeting with Mr Putin was possible, the spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters. He described talks with Mr Witkoff as 'important, substantive and very useful'.
Mr Putin said on Friday he was in favour of 'a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries'.
Despite periodically making such statements, Mr Putin has also made clear that Russia's maximalist war goals remain essentially unchanged, demanding as a minimum control over four Ukrainian regions to which Moscow has laid claim, and a commitment that Ukraine will never join Nato.
Russia continues to target Ukraine with almost nightly drone and missile attacks. Last week was one of the deadliest for some time in terms of civilian casualties, with one set of attacks on Kyiv killing 31 people, including five children.
[
The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop
Opens in new window
]
Both sides continue to target infrastructure in the opposing country with drones. Russia's ministry of defence said on Monday its air defences had intercepted 61 Ukrainian drones overnight.
Meanwhile, the Netherlands will contribute €500 million ($579 million) to Ukraine's defence as part of a US initiative, making it the first Nato country to donate funds through the new programme.
The Dutch package includes missiles for Patriot surface-to-air interceptor units, Mr Zelenskiy said in a post on X. 'I am sincerely grateful to the Netherlands for their substantial contribution to strengthening Ukraine's air shield,' he said. – Guardian, Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
22 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Russia issues missile warning to West ahead of US deadline for Ukraine ceasefire
The Kremlin has said it is no longer bound by any constraints on deploying short- and intermediate-range missiles near European Union and Nato states, as nuclear sabre-rattling escalated before a US deadline for Moscow to halt fighting with Ukraine . US president Donald Trump has threatened to impose 'severe' tariffs on imports from Russia and from countries – including China and India – that buy Moscow's oil, unless the Kremlin agrees to a ceasefire by Friday. Envoys for Mr Trump are expected in Moscow and Kyiv this week – Russian state media say Steve Witkoff will arrive on Wednesday, and Keith Kellogg is set to visit Ukraine – amid sharpening rhetoric between the White House and the Kremlin. After former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev warned that Mr Trump's 'ultimatum game' was stoking the risk of war between their countries, the US leader said last Friday that he was moving two nuclear-powered submarines to 'appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that'. READ MORE On the same day, Russia said it had started regular production of a new nuclear-capable, intermediate-range ballistic missile called Oreshnik, and would deploy it this year in neighbouring Belarus, which borders Ukraine and EU and Nato members Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed on Tuesday that Moscow now felt free to deploy short- and mid-range missiles wherever it liked, in response to what it claims are US plans to deploy such missiles in areas of Europe and Asia that would threaten Russia. [ Opinion: Trump's threats against Russia are a charade meant to buy Putin time Opens in new window ] 'Russia no longer has any constraints in this regard. Russia no longer considers itself to be limited in any way. Russia considers itself to have the right, if necessary, to take appropriate measures,' he said. During Mr Trump's first term as president in 2019, the US withdrew from the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF), which banned missiles with a range of 500-5,500km. Russia denied US claims at the time that it was secretly developing such weapons, but said it would not deploy anything that had been banned under the INF for as long as the US and its allies did the same. 'Our repeated warnings on this account have been ignored, and US-made ground-based INF systems are being deployed in Europe and the Asia-Pacific,' the Russian foreign ministry said on Monday. 'In this regard, [Russia] states that the conditions for maintaining a unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar systems have ceased to exist. We are authorised to declare that the Russian Federation no longer considers itself bound by the previously adopted self-imposed restrictions.' Moscow claimed that some versions of the US-made Himars rocket system – which Ukraine uses to powerful effect against Russia's invasion force – could fire further than 500km and so fall 'into the category of ground-launched INF-range missile systems'. Mr Trump reiterated on Tuesday that he would raise tariffs on India 'very substantially' due to what he considers to be New Delhi's unfair trade rules and because it is 'fuelling the war machine' by buying Russian oil. [ The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop Opens in new window ] He also claimed that lower world energy prices would force Russian president Vladimir Putin to end his invasion of Ukraine. 'If energy goes down enough, Putin is going to stop killing people,' Mr Trump told US television. 'If you get energy down, another $10 a barrel, he's going to have no choice because his economy stinks.' Mr Peskov said US threats to impose financial penalties on Russia's trading partners were 'illegal'. Sweden, Norway and Denmark announced that they would contribute about $500 million (€433 million) to a new plan for Nato members in Europe to buy US arms for Ukraine. The Netherlands said on Monday it would put €500 million into the scheme.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Lobby other EU countries to allow Irish Central Bank to drop Israeli war bonds, TDs recommend
An Oireachtas committee has recommended the Government lobby other EU states to change rules that stop the Irish Central Bank from refusing to act as a competent authority in Europe for Israeli war bonds. Third-country issuers, such as Israel, can choose any EU state as their home member state and competent authority. That authority reviews its bond prospectus and, in this case, authorises Israel to sell bonds in the EU market. Before 2021, the UK was the EU home member state under the regulation for the state of Israel. Ireland was chosen as the new home member state following the UK's departure from the EU after Brexit in 2016. Politicians from all parties have expressed concern that Ireland is the competent authority that gives authority to Israel to sell bonds in the EU market, including what Israel markets as 'war bonds'. However, the committee has been told by the Central Bank that it is powerless to refuse to act as the competent authority under current rules. The rules and criteria that determine approval of the prospectus do not cover Israel's continuing military activities in Gaza , but rather include risk rules based on financial and fiscal criteria. The governor of the Central Bank, Gabriel Makhlouf, told the Oireachtas Committee on Finance in June that Ireland had no power to unilaterally remove itself from being the competent authority. Any decision to change that situation, he said, would be made by the third country, in this case Israel, and by that third country alone. The committee, chaired by Sinn Féin TD Mairéad Farrell , published a report on Tuesday, the main recommendation of which was that the Government engage at EU level with a 'view to amending the EU Prospectus regulations to permit each individual European Central Bank to refuse to act as a Competent Authority'. It has also recommended that the Central Bank conduct an immediate internal review in advance of any renewal in September of the Israeli bond prospectus. It said that review should determine whether it is in compliance with the levels of disclosure, accuracy and transparency required by the EU Prospectus. At the meeting in June, committee members expressed concern that the continuing destruction and deaths in Gaza were not being taken into consideration in determining the right of Israel to sell bonds, which several committee members pointed out were being openly marketed as 'war bonds'. The report states: 'In response to questions around whether enhanced scrutiny is applied to sovereign bond issuers involved in armed conflict or under international investigation, representatives of the Central Bank told the Committee that a judgement is made as to whether a prospectus is particularly complex and if there are issues that are challenging to articulate. 'Ultimately, however, the judgement rests on whether the disclosure is appropriate to the financial risk.' At the meeting, members expressed concern with regard to both the exposure of the EU financially to Israel and the current situation in Israel. 'Members further described the prospectus regulatory regime as 'narrow and arguably amoral ... Jesuitical in the way that it is interpreted and applied, which is mindful of only its basic, legalistic obligations in satisfying the regulatory framework in place', the report stated. Amid cross-party opposition to the Central Bank continuing in that role, the committee has also recommended that any future review of its role as the competent authority by the regulator should take into account the nature of the case taken by South Africa against Israel under the Genocide Convention and the interim findings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in that regard. It also said the illegal situation created by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories should also be taken into account.
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
US House committee issues subpoenas for Epstein files and Clinton depositions
The US House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department on Tuesday for files in the sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, part of a congressional probe that politicians believe may show links to President Donald Trump and other former top officials. The Republican-controlled committee also issued subpoenas for depositions with former president Bill Clinton, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and eight former top law enforcement officials. The committee's actions showed how even with members away from Washington on a monthlong break, interest in the Epstein files is still running high. Mr Trump has repeatedly tried to move past the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation, but politicians from both major political parties, as well as many in the Republican president's political base, have refused to let it go. US President Donald Trump speaking to reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport in Pennsylvania on Sunday (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) Since Epstein's 2019 death in a New York jail cell as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges, conservative conspiracists have stoked theories about what information investigators gathered on Epstein – and who else could have been involved. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee nodded to that line of questioning last month by initiating the subpoenas for the Clintons, both Democrats, as well as demanding all communications between former president Joe Biden's Democratic administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein. The committee is also demanding interviews under oath from former attorneys general spanning the last three presidential administrations: Merrick Garland, William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder and Alberto Gonzales. Also subpoenaed were former FBI directors James Comey and Robert Mueller. However, it was Democrats who sparked the move to subpoena the Justice Department for its files on Epstein. They were joined by some Republicans to initiate successfully the subpoena through a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee. 'Democrats are focused on transparency and are pushing back against the corruption of Donald Trump,' Robert Garcia, who is the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, told reporters last month. 'What is Donald Trump hiding that he won't release the Epstein files?' The committee had previously issued a subpoena for an interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, who had been serving a prison sentence in Florida for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by the wealthy financier but was recently transferred to a Texas facility. However, the committee's Republican chairman, James Comer, has indicated he is willing to delay that deposition until after the Supreme Court decides whether to hear an appeal to her conviction. She argues she was wrongfully prosecuted.
