Nilambur By-Election 2025: Voting Tomorrow; Full Schedule, Key Candidates, And Political Dynamics
Why the By-Election?
The bypoll was necessitated following the resignation of PV Anvar, who vacated the Nilambur seat on January 13, 2025, after a fallout with the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF). Anvar had won the seat in the 2021 Assembly election as an LDF candidate, defeating VV Prakash of the United Democratic Front (UDF).
Initially elected as an independent in 2016, Anvar later aligned with the LDF but has now parted ways. Reports suggest he has been attempting to join the UDF and is currently serving as the State Convener of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC). However, his nomination under the TMC banner was rejected, and he is now contesting the bypoll as an independent candidate.
Key Candidates for Nilambur Bypoll 2025
The Nilambur by-election has attracted significant political interest, with candidates representing all major fronts:
M. Swaraj – Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)], representing the LDF
Aryadan Shoukath – Indian National Congress, representing the UDF
Adv. Mohan George – Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
Adv. Sadik Naduthodi – Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI)
PV Anvar – Contesting as an Independent, after being denied candidature by the TMC
Constituency Profile
The Nilambur Assembly constituency comprises the Nilambur municipality and panchayats such as Edakkara, Pothukal, Chungathara, Vazhikkadavu, Moothedam, Karulai, and Amarambalam. Historically, the seat has been a Congress-UDF stronghold, barring two notable exceptions:
In 2016, PV Anvar won as an Independent
In 2021, he secured the seat on an LDF ticket
With Anvar now running independently, the main contest is expected between the LDF and the UDF, although the presence of multiple parties and independents could influence vote dynamics.
Full Election Schedule for Nilambur By-Election 2025
As per the ECI, the notification for the by-election was issued on May 26, 2025, with the last date for filing nominations being June 2. The date of scrutiny was June 3, and the last date for withdrawal of candidatures was June 5.
Polling Date: June 19, 2025
Counting of Votes: June 23, 2025
Completion of Election Process: June 25, 2025
Electoral Roll Updates
The Election Commission carried out a Special Summary Revision of the electoral roll with April 1, 2025, as the qualifying date. Applications were invited from eligible citizens for inclusion in the updated roll. The final electoral roll was published on May 5, 2025, following a time-bound revision process.
However, the ECI has clarified that the process of continuous updation of the electoral roll will remain active until 10 days before the last date for filing nominations, allowing for the inclusion of eligible applicants with respect to the qualifying date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Supreme Court's order on Bihar SIR is not a ‘rebuke' to Election Commission
'History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes,' Mark Twain once famously said. The Supreme Court's order in Association for Democratic Reforms vs Election Commission of India (2025), in the context of the 'Special Intensive Revision' (SIR) exercise in Bihar, 'rhymes' very much with its landmark judgment in Lal Babu Hussain vs Electoral Registration Officer (1995). On Thursday, the SC directed the ECI to make the draft electoral roll more accessible and searchable, giving excluded voters reasons for their exclusion so that they may challenge it. In Lal Babu Hussain, the Court put paid to the ECI's attempt to declare certain voters 'non-citizens' and directed them to follow a fresh, transparent and fair process with regard to voters it had genuine reasons to believe were not citizens. The parallels between these two cases, nearly 30 years apart, speak of a certain official distrust of India's poorest citizens. Something similar happened in 1994 in Delhi and Mumbai. The ECI instructed Electoral Registration Officers to identify 'non-citizens' and remove them from the electoral list, in coordination with the local police. Notices were issued to nearly three lakh people demanding that they prove their citizenship — only with documentary proof — limiting its possibility to only four documents. Ration cards, perhaps the most widely held proof of identity, were not accepted by the ECI until it was pushed to do so by the Bombay High Court. Those affected in Delhi approached the SC directly. In its 1995 judgment, a three-judge bench of the SC set aside the instructions of the ECI and directed that no one should be required to prove their citizenship unless the ECI had credible material to show that they were not citizens. When such material was found, the ERO was required to conduct a full-scale inquiry, allowing the person in question to provide all possible evidence to show that they were citizens of India. Then, as now, the ECI's move triggered strong political backlash against the ruling party (Congress). The SC's latest order has also pushed the ECI to accept more documents as proof of identity and to also declare why certain voters have been left out of the draft electoral list. The ECI has claimed (without substantiating) that, by and large, voters have been removed from the draft electoral roll as they have either died or migrated. The SC's order will test the truth of the ECI's claims, but the key point is that it took the SC to push the ECI to follow the most basic principles of natural justice. Between the Lal Babu Hussain judgment and the latest order in the SIR case, the relationship between the ECI and the SC has been one of institutional bonhomie. The SC, in its judicial orders, has helped push forward some key ECI proposals for changes in the electoral process relating to the declaration of assets and criminal cases, the disqualification of convicted politicians, and the 'None of the Above' option. The ECI's indifferent stance on electoral bonds, which the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional, was one of the rare instances of relative disagreement between the two institutions. The SC's order in the SIR case is, therefore, no 'rebuke' to the ECI; rather, it is far from it. The SC judges hearing the case, through their oral observations, do not seem convinced that the ECI is acting either unlawfully or in bad faith. Rather, they have tried to nudge the ECI along, pointing to its own commitment to transparency and fairness in the process. Coming along with the earlier order of the SC, which pushed the ECI to accept the Aadhaar card and the EPIC card as valid documents, has meant that the focus of SIR has shifted, subtly, from questions of citizenship to questions of correctness of the rolls. The very first electoral rolls in India were prepared in such a way that even the homeless and the nameless (mostly women who were referred to only as someone's mother or wife) found themselves on the voter rolls. This was done at a time when the Constitution was not even final, and no one knew who was going to be a citizen in the new India. Had that exercise been done with the callousness and cruelty of the SIR, India would never have been the world's largest electoral democracy. The writer is a co-founder of the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy and an advocate
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
In Bihar Village Where Ranveer Sena Was Founded, Muslims, Dalits Declared ‘Traceless' After SIR
Khopira (Bihar): In Bihar's Khopira village – where Dalits and people from Other Backward Classes (OBC) won the right to vote denied them by Upper Caste landlords after long and bloody struggles – the Election Commission of India's (ECI's) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise may end up disenfranchising the poor. Eight Muslims from three separate families in Khopira were declared 'traceless' under the SIR and their names deleted from the draft electoral roll published on August 1. All three families have filed complaints with Bhojpur district election officials regarding the deletions, asking for the names to be added to the voter list. The Wire visited two of the three families in Khopira to assess how SIR is resulting in deletions of genuine voters in Bihar. Five members of one family deleted from electoral roll One of the complaints was filed by Intaf Ansari. Ansari states in the complaint that his name, along with four of his family members has been deleted from the electoral roll. The other four are Shabnam Khatoon (wife of Intaf), Imtiyaz Ansari (brother of Intaf) and his wife Nasima Begum and Nasima's sister Afsana Begum. All five have their votes registered at their address in Khopira village, which falls under Agiaon assembly constituency. When The Wire visited their one-storey home in the Muslim tola of Khopira Minhaz Ansari, Intaf's nephew, answered the door. He said that the four of the five members had migrated to Pune for employment, although they visit Bihar to vote and had done so in the 2024 general election. The fifth, Afsana Begum, lives in Bihar at another location. Minhaz filled their SIR forms, but failed to submit it to the BLO, as a result of which their names were cut from the rolls. However, Minhaz claims that the BLO didn't verify their status with a house visit before declaring them traceless. The BLO has told Minhaz to fill and submit the Election Commission's Form 6 to add the five members. Form 6 is for new voter registrations. The second family The Wire visited is also called Ansari, who live in the same tola. Brothers Nasim and Sikandar's names have been deleted as they were found to be 'traceless', despite their forms being submitted to the BLO along with their Aadhar and voter ID cards before July 26. When The Wire visited their home Nasim Ansari was present. There are eight voting members in the family and the other six found their names in the draft list. Sikandar submitted his form and went back to West Bengal, where he works. The BLO told the family that the deletions may be due to a technical mistake and asked them to submit form 6s. Nasim Ansari said that he would submit Aadhaar cards as proof. When told that Aadhaar is not included in the list of 11 documentary proofs he looked confused. Later, after The Wire's visit to Ansari's house, the Supreme Court directed the ECI on August 14 to include Aadhaar in list of accepted documents The patriarch of the family – Shamsuddin Ansari – is a mason and the other men in the family have migrated to West Bengal and Dubai in search of employment. The Wire was unable to visit the third person – also called Nasim Ansari – who had filed a complaint, but confirmed that his name had been deleted by checking his EPIC number in the Election Commission of India's 'Voter Helpline' app. The complaint he has written states that he too was found to be 'traceless'. The complaints were written and filed with the help of the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation. Dalit family finds names of members struck off Similarly, in the Dalit tola, two members of Punit Kumar's family have had their names struck off. His wife Lakshmi Kumari and aunt Khushboo Kumari found their names missing from the draft list. Both women are 23 years old and got their voter ID cards made in March 2025. They applied for it in January 2025 and submitted their Aadhar cards as proof. Four months later they were told to submit documents afresh under SIR with the caveat that Aadhar was not valid. The BLO told Punit that their names were cut because they are newly registered voters. They have been asked to submit residence certificates along with Form 6s. Naval Kishore Singh, the BLO for booth number 197, one of the three booths in Khopira, said that all deletions had been because of non submission of forms. When asked about people being declared 'traceless' he maintained that proper procedure had been followed. Khopira is nestled among rice paddies and water canals. However, the placid countryside hides a disturbing past. The village is the birthplace of Brahmeshwar Singh, the founder of the Ranveer Sena, a dreaded Bhumihar militia that carried out horrific caste massacres. He was the Mukhiya [hence the sobriquet Bhramheshwar mukhiya] of Khopira in the 1980s, a period where landless tillers – Dften dalits and OBCs – were not only denied fair wages, but were subjected to humiliating diktats like not being allowed to sit on a cot when an Upper Caste person walked by, prevented from voting or riding a horse at weddings. With the help of Marxist-Leninist groups like Liberation and Peoples' War, the subaltern castes organised and fought for their rights. The Ranveer Sena was formed in 1994 in Khopira and the nearby village of Belaur and soon embarked on a bloody rampage. Their ghastly acts include the Bathani tola massacre of 22 people in 1996 and the Lakshmanpur-bathe massacre of 68 dalits the year after. They were banned by the Bihar government. However, the legacy of that violent period is fresh in the memory of many people. 'My father joined the Liberation party in the 1980s to fight for the rights of Dalits and I am a second generation party worker,' Dinesh said. 'It was through a long and bloody struggle that we won our rights, including the right to exercise our franchise,' he added. The SIR exercise being conducted by the Election Commission is likely to roll back those hard won gains. Dinesh estimates that of the approximately 2,400 voters in Khopira village there have been 334 deletions, amounting to 14% of the electorate. Two decades of bloody strife Azad Ram, the acting mukhiya of Khopira village was at his home when The Wire visited him. His wife is the actual mukhiya. He said that Khopira used to be a village dominated by upper caste Bhumihars. Bhrameshwar, his predecessor, owned 100 bighas of land and enforced caste hierarchy ruthlessly. In the early 1990s the Dalits fought back under the organisation of Liberation and other communist groupings. The stir turned violent and there were recriminations on both sides. Azad Ram and Dinesh maintain that killings of upper castes by Dalits were retaliatory in nature to violence instigated by Bhumihars. The Bhumihars responded by amalgamating smaller militias into the Ranveer Sena. What followed was two decades of bloody strife that ended with Brahmeshwar Singh's assassination in 2012. Agiaon's electoral history may shed some light on what the SIR is meant to achieve. It is one of seven assembly segments that fall under the Arrah lok sabha constituency and is a reserved seat. Dalits comprise 18.3% of the population. In 2010 the BJP's Shivesh Ram won Agiaon and lost it to the Janata Dal (United)'s Prabhunath Prasad in 2015. In the 2020 Bihar elections the CPI (ML) Liberation's Manoj Manzil won the seat with 86,327 votes, representing a solid 61.39% of the turnout. Manoj was born in a family of landless dalit brick kiln workers who were party cadre, and he himself organised a movement of school students protesting for better education facilities. However, an alleged 2015 murder rap caught up with him and he was sentenced to life imprisonment. In the 2024 by election Liberation candidate Shiv Prakash Ranjan's vote share dropped to 53% as the party retained the seat. The decade and a half since the creation of Agiaon assembly constituency has seen a shift from the Right to the Left. The SIR may result in the deletion of Dalit, Muslim and Yadav voters who favour the Mahagathbandhan and tilt the seat back to the Right.
Hans India
6 hours ago
- Hans India
ECI reports zero complaints by political parties; 28,370 voter claims filed
New Delhi: Despite sustained criticism from Opposition parties over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has reported that it has not received a single formal complaint from any political party regarding claims and objections to the draft rolls. In contrast, the ECI said, individual voters have submitted 28,370 applications for inclusion or exclusion. According to the ECI's daily bulletin on August 15 -- covering the period from August 1 (3 p.m.) to August 15 (9 a.m.) -- political parties have appointed 1,60,813 Booth Level Agents (BLAs). This includes 53,338 from the Bharatiya Janata Party, 47,506 from the Rashtriya Janata Dal, 36,550 from the Janata Dal (United), and 17,549 from the Indian National Congress, among others. While no political party, including those in Opposition, has submitted claims or objections, individual electors have filed 28,370 such requests. Of these, 857 have already been disposed of following the mandatory verification period. The Commission also received 1,03,703 applications from first-time voters aged 18 and above, including six routed through BLAs. The ECI reiterated that claims and objections are adjudicated by the respective Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) or Assistant Electoral Registration Officers (AEROs) only after a seven-day verification process. Crucially, no name can be deleted from the draft rolls published on August 1 without a formal 'speaking order' issued after due inquiry and providing the concerned individual an opportunity to be heard. The absence of formal party complaints stands in sharp contrast to the repeated public accusations by Opposition leaders alleging bias and procedural lapses in voter roll management. The data indicate that while parties are actively engaging in the revision process through their BLAs, they have not formally contested the fairness of the exercise before the ECI.
