Censor Board Reverses Stance On 'Janaki Vs State Of Kerala'
The movie, starring actor-politician Suresh Gopi alongside Anupama Parameswaran, had faced severe censorship challenges primarily due to its protagonist's name 'Janaki', which references the Hindu goddess Sita. The board initially expressed concerns about depicting a character bearing this sacred name in a narrative involving sexual abuse, fearing potential religious sensitivities and communal tensions.
Under the revised certification conditions, the censor board now permits retention of the title with a minor modification, suggesting either 'Janaki V Vs State of Kerala' or 'V Janaki Vs State of Kerala' to reflect the protagonist's complete name, Janaki Vidhyadharan. This compromise allows filmmakers to maintain the essential character identity while addressing the board's religious concerns through a simple naming convention adjustment.
The second required modification involves muting the protagonist's name during a specific cross-examination scene within the film. According to the board's affidavit, this particular sequence depicts the character being assisted by an individual from one religious community while facing questioning from someone belonging to another religious group. The board argued that this religious dichotomy in treating a character named after Goddess Sita could potentially inflame communal tensions and create divisive narratives between different religious communities.
The censor board's affidavit further warned that approving such scenes without modifications might encourage similar portrayals in future films, potentially establishing problematic precedents for religious representation in cinema. This reasoning reflects ongoing concerns about maintaining communal harmony while allowing artistic expression in Indian filmmaking.
Justice N Nagaresh has scheduled a follow-up hearing for later today, requesting filmmakers to present their response to these certification suggestions. The court had previously screened the complete film on July 5 to better understand the contentious elements before making informed decisions about the censorship requirements.
The case highlights significant regional disparities within India's film certification system, as the Mumbai division of the CBFC had raised the initial objections while the Kerala division had already approved the film without concerns. This discrepancy underscores the complex challenges filmmakers face when navigating varying censorship standards across different regional boards within the same national system.
Originally scheduled for release on June 20, the film experienced considerable delays due to this certification conflict. The producers had previously criticized the board's extensive editing demands as "arbitrary" and "unwarranted", expressing frustration with what they perceived as excessive interference in their creative work.
This development represents a significant victory for the filmmakers, who can now proceed with minimal modifications rather than the extensive restructuring initially demanded. The case may establish important precedents for future films dealing with similar themes involving religious references and sensitive social issues.
The resolution demonstrates how judicial intervention can facilitate dialogue between censorship authorities and creative professionals, potentially leading to more balanced approaches that respect both artistic freedom and cultural sensitivities. The outcome awaits final confirmation following today's scheduled hearing where producers will respond to the board's revised certification conditions.RetryClaude can make mistakes. Please double-check responses. Sonnet 4
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
30 minutes ago
- Hans India
Additional US tariffs to impact $48 billion of India's exports, govt to safeguard trade: Minister
If America imposes additional 25 per cent on India, around $48.2 billion of India's merchandise export to the US is likely to be subject to those tariffs, the Parliament was informed on Tuesday. Reciprocal tariff at the rate of 25 per cent has been imposed on certain goods exported from India to the US, starting from August 7. Further, additional rate of duty of 25 per cent with effect from August 27 has been imposed on certain goods exported from India. 'The government has taken note of tariff imposition by the US. It is estimated that around $48.2 billion of India's merchandise export (based on 2024 trade value) to the US will be subject to the above additional tariffs,' Minister of State for Commerce and Industry Jitin Prasada said in a written reply to a question in Lok Sabha. He further said that the government is committed to secure and advance country's national interest and protect the welfare of our farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs and all sections of industry and 'take all necessary steps to help mitigate impact on trade including through appropriate export promotion and trade diversification measures'. It is estimated that around 55 per cent of the total value of India's merchandise exports to the US is subject to the 25 per cent first line of US reciprocal tariffs. No additional tariffs have been imposed on Indian exports to the US in sectors like pharmaceuticals and electronics as yet. According to the minister, a combination of different factors, such as product differentiation, demand, quality, and contractual arrangements, would determine the impact of reciprocal tariffs on India's exports, including in the textiles sector. New Delhi has reiterated that the latest tariff actions by US President Donald Trump are "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". "We have already made clear our position on these issues, including the fact that our imports are based on market factors and done with the overall objective of ensuring the energy security of 1.4 billion people of India," the government had said in a statement.
Hans India
30 minutes ago
- Hans India
China's Foreign Minister 'heartened' by stability in borders, says Beijing attaches 'great importance' to PM Modi's visit
New Delhi: Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on Tuesday said he is "heartened" to see the stabilisation of India-China ties and peace along the borders, stressing that Beijing attaches "great importance" to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's upcoming visit to China for the SCO Summit. Speaking at Hyderabad House in New Delhi during the latest round of Special Representatives (SR) dialogue on the boundary question with NSA Ajit Doval, Wang Yi said the setbacks in India-China ties in recent years were "not in the interest of the people of both countries". "I am very pleased to meet you again in New Delhi for this round of talks between the special representatives of China and India on the boundary question. The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interests of the people of our two countries. And then in October last year, President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Modi had an important meeting in Kazan. That meeting pointed the direction for the development of our bilateral relations and provided impetus for the proper settlement of the boundary question," Wang Yi said in his opening remarks, delivered in Mandarin and translated into English. Recalling the last round of SR-level talks, Wang Yi said China was encouraged by the progress. "We had a very good 23rd round at the end of last year. We reached a new and important consensus on managing disagreements, stabilising the borders, and moving toward a settlement. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored," he noted. Appreciating NSA Doval's role as India's Special Representative, the Chinese Foreign Minister said the relationship now faces "an important opportunity of improvement and growth". He also emphasised that PM Modi's visit next month would contribute to the success of the SCO Summit in Tianjin. "The Chinese side attaches great importance to the Prime Minister's visit to China to attend the SCO summit at our invitation. We believe that the Indian side will also make a contribution to a successful summit in Tianjin. History and reality prove once again that a healthy and stable China-India relationship serves the fundamental and long-term interests of both of our countries. It is also what developing countries all want to see," Wang Yi said. Calling for stronger bilateral engagement, the Chinese Foreign Minister urged both sides to "follow the strategic guidance of our leaders, increase mutual trust through communication, expand common interests through cooperation, and properly settle border issues." He added that China is ready to work with India to "build more consensus and identify the direction, the specific goals of the next round of boundary consultations going forward, and create more conditions for the improvement and further growth of our bilateral relations."
Economic Times
30 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India has taught a lesson to Pakistan, China & Turkey in Operation Sindoor: RSS leader Indresh Kumar
Senior Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh leader Indresh Kumar said Congress is responsible not for the independence but partition of the country. Kumar, who is also patron of Muslim Rashtriya Manch, during his visit to Kashmir said that Supreme Court has commented on the character of Congress and Rahul Gandhi, who they said is not a true Indian. "Congress didn't give us freedom, they gave us partition. On 14th of August, Pakistan was formed and what was left was called India and this is what they call freedom. They (Congress) are responsible for partition," said RSS leader was on a two day visit to Kashmir along with selected members of MRM and their families across the country. They visited Pahalgam to pay tributes to victims of April 22 attack at Baisaran. They also took out a Tiranga rally in Pahalgam, which they said is aimed at sending message of peace across the country. "Supreme Court has commented on Congress and it's leaders. SC has stated that Rahul is not true Indian. They have also said that demeaning nation and army has become his habit and he should change it. So, SC has put before us the characteristics of Congress and it's leaders. A hint is enough for the wise," said Kumar adding, "Those who participated in freedom struggle doesn't mean they were all Congress people, they were freedom lovers of the country." The RSS leader said that the government, army and people should work together to give befitting response to people spreading violence, be it the internal element here in J&K, elements from Pakistan or those from China. "After Pahalgam attack Operation Sindoor was against Pakistan and not against anyone in India or Kashmir. We targeted their air bases because we had to teach a lesson to China and we flew drones to teach Turkey a lesson. We had to tell the world that India is an independent new power of the world," said Kumar, adding, "He (Chinese foreign minister) coming here is diplomacy. We will shake hands and if need arises we can twist the hand as well."The RSS leader said that good relations are important for within a family as well as with the neighbours. "But both sides have to play a role in improving repeated defeats in wars Pakistan resorted to terrorism and people of Kashmir were both victims and perpetrators of violence. This place bore the brunt of this violence," said Kumar. Kumar said that India doesn't acknowledge anyone as "intervenor in Kashmir issue." The RSS leader reiterated that Pakistan Occupied Kashmir belongs to India and rejected the two Nation Theory as well. "Muslims and Hindus are not two nations, we inclduing all minorities are one nation called Hindustani. We are one nation, citizens of one country with one flag... May be some day all us here will be in Lahore and do this interaction here," said Kumar. The RSS leader said that "terror and terrorism" has no religion. "So, no one will organize or participate in the funeral prayers of any terrorist and he won't be provided with the land for the last rites. Like the people of Mumbai decided for Kasab," said Kumar. He further said that there was a time when Kashmiri policeman would be killed and other than his family and relatives, nobody would participate in their funerals. "Instead thousands of people, in some cases even 50,000 people would participate in the funeral of now Kashmir has changed this message and this new message we have to take forward. So walk on the path of peace and development and we will suport you all," said Kumar adding, "We will also spread the message that Kashmir which was once known as paradise on earth is once again on the same path."
