EU, UAE launch free trade talks amid US tariff pressure
This initiative also aims to expand further the EU's global trade network, which currently comprises 44 agreements with 76 countries, said the Commission.
According to a press release of the Commission, Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic and UAE Minister of State for Foreign Trade Thani bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi met in Dubai to reaffirm their shared vision for the agreement and agree on a roadmap, with substantive work expected to begin as early as June.
The first meetings of negotiating teams will focus on reducing tariffs on goods and facilitating services, digital trade and investment flows. Talks will also explore ways to boost trade in strategic sectors, such as renewable energy, green hydrogen and critical raw materials.
Sefcovic emphasized that a bilateral FTA would unlock "tremendous business opportunities" for both European and Emirati enterprises, while also bolstering the EU's regional engagement with Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the launch of the talks as a "significant milestone," noting that the agreement would deepen EU-Gulf ties, create new opportunities for European businesses, and strengthen cooperation in key areas such as renewable energy and digital technologies.
To address the uncertainty of US trade policy, the EU is strengthening cooperation with other economies to promote trade diversification and reduce its reliance on the United States.
Last Friday, US President Donald Trump announced that he is "recommending a straight 50 percent Tariff on the EU, starting on June 1, 2025." But after a phone call with von der Leyen on Sunday, he agreed to postpone the planned tariff increase until July 9.
On Tuesday, Trump welcomed the EU's decision to proceed with negotiations, calling it a positive step, but he again warned that he would enforce trade measures if a deal is not reached.
UNI XINHUA AKT BM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
UP Holds High-Level Review Meeting on Backwards Class Welfare
Lucknow: A high-level state meeting was convened on Wednesday under the chairmanship of Hansraj Gangaram Ahir, Chairman of the National Commission for Backwards Classes (NCBC). The session aimed to evaluate existing welfare schemes for backwards classes and shape strategic future directions in coordination with the Uttar Pradesh government. The meeting was attended by NCBC Member Bhuvan Bhushan Kamal and Secretary Meeta Rajeev Lochan. Representing the state government, Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Backwards Class Welfare and Empowerment of Disabled People, Narendra Kashyap, joined alongside Chairman of Uttar Pradesh Backwards Class Commission Rajesh Verma, Principal Secretary Subhash Chandra Sharma, Director Vandana Verma, and other departmental officers. Opening the meeting, officials presented a brief history and functional overview of the Uttar Pradesh Backwards Class Commission, outlining its constitutional responsibilities and current initiatives. The Commission emphasised its dual mandate: grievance redressal and delivery of social justice through research and policy advice. A technical assessment of its organisational structure—including staffing levels, approved posts, and administrative workload—was shared, along with a review of financial provisions and the budgetary needs for future expansion. Among the key points discussed was the Commission's ongoing effort to identify backwards castes, update caste schedules, and conduct region-wise socio-economic assessments. Officials highlighted that several castes, sub-castes, and surnames listed by the Uttar Pradesh Commission have not yet been included in the Government of India's Central List. Recommendations for their inclusion are underway, pending inputs from the state administration. Minister Kashyap reaffirmed the government's dedication to empowering the backwards class community. Continuous efforts are being made to bring equity and development to all marginalised sections. We urge the Commission to expedite its recommendations regarding deprived castes,' he stated. Chairman Rajesh Verma also spotlighted the Commission's work through extensive public hearings, surveys, and outreach initiatives across the state. He called for closer synergy between state and central authorities to streamline implementation. Concluding the session, Chairman Ahir commended Uttar Pradesh's proactive measures, noting that its approach could serve as a template for other states. 'We are fully prepared to cooperate with the Uttar Pradesh government. All collected data will be compiled and submitted to the Centre, ensuring timely policy action,' he affirmed. The meeting marked a significant step in strengthening institutional coordination and shaping inclusive strategies for the upliftment of backwards classes in the region.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trumpland: What if the world turned US trade war back on America?
AI image Tariff' Trump has announced a 25% levy on Indian goods entering US starting tomorrow, coupled with a penalty for India's continued oil and defence purchases from Russia. Prefixing his announcement on Truth Social with 'while India is a friend', the US president has sought to punish India for asserting sovereign choices in trade and foreign policy. With friends like this, who needs friends? The irony is poetic: the self-declared custodian of free trade is now its most protectionist offender. Economics is built around the principle of movement: of goods, capital, labour and data. This isn't just ideology, it's the physics of prosperity. Yet, the US, once the world's most vocal advocate for free markets, is, in the form of Trumpland, its most disruptive force. From semiconductor export bans and weaponised sanctions to unilateral tariffs and extraterritorial dictates, Trumpland has turned the global economy into a minefield of exceptions, exclusions and coercion. So, here's the question that can now be asked aloud: what if the rest of the world sanctioned the US? What if countries collectively paused the flow of rare earths, APIs, industrial machinery, telecom infrastructure, even data? Could the US survive the very conditions it imposes on others? In 2024, US goods imports hit a record $3.3 tn, while exports reached $2.1 tn, pushing goods trade deficit to $1.2 tn, a 14% increase from the previous year. Even after including services like finance and travel, total trade deficit stood at $918 bn, up 17%, the second highest on record. Trade gap with China grew to $295 bn, a clear sign of ongoing reliance. Beyond China, the US remains critically dependent on imports for over 221 essential goods, including microchips and battery components, with foreign sourcing levels between 90% and 100%. China supplies 70% of rare earths, and dominates the global graphite supply chain. Other key materials like lithium and cobalt are also heavily imported from countries like Chile, Canada and Argentina. In total, just four trading partners — China, the EU, Mexico and Canada — each account for more than 10% of US import value. These are not discretionary purchases, but foundational components of American industry. The US is not merely part of global supply chains, but also structurally dependent on them, never mind all that talk of decoupling and University's Budget Lab assessed that the US' 2025 tariff surge has raised its average effective tariff rate to 22.5%, the highest since 1909. This policy shift has led to a 2.3% rise in consumer prices, costing the average household $3,800 annually. Lower-income families are hit hardest, with those in the second income decile losing $1,700 a GDP growth is expected to drop by 0.9 percentage points in 2025. Long-term output is projected to remain 0.6% smaller, a permanent loss of around $180 bn a year. Exports have declined by 18.1%. Prices for essentials have spiked, with apparel up 17%, food nearly 3% higher, and new cars costing an extra $4,000 on from protecting the economy, Trump tariffs are eroding household income, slowing growth and adversely affecting America's economic Walter Scheidel explains in his 2017 book, The Great Leveler, entrenched systems rarely reform themselves through negotiation alone. Meaningful redistribution often follows rupture rather than consensus. So, what might rupture look like today? Imagine the world's major exporters including Europe, China, India, Asean and Latin America agreeing to a coordinated pause in shipments to the US. No semiconductors, no APIs, no telecom equipment. In a matter of weeks, American production lines would slow, inflation would surge, and financial markets would be rattled. It would serve as a powerful reminder that the US economy is not insulated by exceptionalism. It operates on the consent and cooperation of the rest of the world. This isn't about restoring balance. It's a call to deliberately hit the US economy where it hurts, to expose the double standards that define today's global order. In any functioning market, domestic or global, rules matter not only because they enable exchange but also because they constrain abuse. Participation in global trade is characterised by the principle of mutualism and benefits will flow only as long as responsibilities are this fundamental point, the US' economic bullying undermines not just the trust but the very ethos of the current global economic system. The world, India included, now faces a pivotal question. Should it continue to accommodate this exception, or begin to act as a collective? A coordinated stand by global exporters, in defence of systemic integrity, would affirm that globalisation is not the privilege of a single actor but the shared project of many. If the international order is to survive, it must demonstrate that no participant is above its rules. Trumpland may yet learn that the system the US helped create can continue to evolve without its dominance. And that the invisible hand, if constrained long enough, may simply withdraw its reach from the United States. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Regulators promote exchanges; can they stifle one? Watch IEX Jane St: How an options trader smelt a rat when others raised a toast TCS job cuts may not stop at 12,000; its bench policy threatens more From near bankruptcy to blockbuster drug: How Khorakiwala turned around Wockhardt Stock Radar: SBI Life rebounds after testing 50-DEMA; could hit fresh record highs above Rs 2,000 – check target & stop loss These 10 banking stocks can give more than 25% returns in 1 year, according to analysts Two Trades for Today: A metals stock for an over 6% gain, a large-cap chemicals maker for about 7% upmove F&O Radar| Deploy Broken Wing in LIC Housing Finance to benefit from bearish outlook
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Trump announces 25% tariff on India and unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil
The United States will impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India's purchasing of Russian oil, President Donald Trump said Wednesday. India 'is our friend,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform, but its tariffs on U.S. products 'are far too high. 'The Republican president added India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, enabling Moscow's war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional 'penalty' starting on Friday as part of the launch of his administration's revised tariffs on multiple told reporters on Wednesday the two countries were still in the middle of negotiations on trade despite the tariffs slated to begin in a few days.'We're talking to India now,' the president said. 'We'll see what happens.'The Indian government said Wednesday it's studying the implications of Trump's tariffs announcement. India and the U.S. have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' bilateral trade agreement over the last few months, and New Delhi remains committed to that objective, India's Trade Ministry said in a statement. Trump's announcement comes after a slew of negotiated trade frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia — all of which he said would open markets for American goods while enabling the U.S. to raise tax rates on imports. The president views tariff revenues as a way to help offset the budget deficit increases tied to his recent income tax cuts and generate more domestic factory jobs. While Trump has effectively wielded tariffs as a cudgel to reset the terms of trade, the economic impact is uncertain as most economists expect a slowdown in U.S. growth and greater inflationary pressures as some of the costs of the taxes are passed along to domestic businesses and consumers. There's also the possibility of more tariffs coming on trade partners with Russia as well as on pharmaceutical drugs and computer chips. Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, said Trump and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would announce the Russia-related tariff rates on India at a later date. Trump's approach of putting a 15% tariff on America's long-standing allies in the EU is also generating pushback, possibly causing European partners as well as Canada to seek alternatives to U.S. leadership on the world stage. French President Emmanuel Macron said Wednesday in the aftermath of the trade framework that Europe 'does not see itself sufficiently' as a global power, saying in a cabinet meeting that negotiations with the U.S. will continue as the agreement gets formalized.'To be free, you have to be feared,' Macron said. 'We have not been feared enough. There is a greater urgency than ever to accelerate the European agenda for sovereignty and competitiveness.'Seeking a deeper partnership with India Washington has long sought to develop a deeper partnership with New Delhi, which is seen as a bulwark against Prime Minister Narendra Modi has established a good working relationship with Trump, and the two leaders are likely to further boost cooperation between their countries. When Trump in February met with Modi, the U.S. president said that India would start buying American oil and natural new tariffs on India could complicate its goal of doubling bilateral trade with the U.S. to $500 billion by 2030. The two countries have had five rounds of negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement. While U.S. has been seeking greater market access and zero tariff on almost all its exports, India has expressed reservations on throwing open sectors such as agriculture and dairy, which employ a bulk of the country's population for livelihood, Indian officials Census Bureau reported that the U.S. ran a $45.8 billion trade imbalance in goods with India last year, meaning it imported more than it a population exceeding 1.4 billion people, India is the world's largest country and a possible geopolitical counterbalance to China. India and Russia have close relations, and New Delhi has not supported Western sanctions on Moscow over its war in Ukraine. The new tariffs could put India at a disadvantage in the U.S. market relative to Vietnam, Bangladesh and, possibly, China, said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations.'We are back to square one as Trump hasn't spelled out what the penalties would be in addition to the tariff,' Sahai said. 'The demand for Indian goods is bound to be hit.'
